Health Care Reform Is Needed Now More Than Ever

by: Mark Weisbrot, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Health Care Reform Is Needed Now More Than Ever
(Photo: Chris Jones/CORBIS)

    With the US economy's downward spiral still accelerating and the federal government looking at its largest budget deficits since World War II, some are saying that this is not the time to expand health care coverage to all Americans.

    But this is exactly the time for the Obama administration to move boldly on its campaign promise to implement a universal health care system.

    Obama wants spending that stimulates the economy in the short term, but he also wants to reduce the long-term deficit problem after the economy recovers. This is exactly what health care reform will do.

    In the short run, health care spending, like other government spending on goods and services, creates jobs and generates income. This will help arrest the economy's downward spiral.

    With the collapse of private spending, the federal government must act as the consumer of last resort - hence, the vital importance of the $787 billion stimulus package that Congress passed last week. Fortunately, this package did contain at least some health care stimulus. In included $87 billion for Medicaid payments to the state governments, $25 billion towards helping unemployed workers extend their employment-based health insurance after being laid off, and $19 billion for health information technology.

    But health care reform would do vastly more. President Obama has proposed a reform that would, while keeping the employer-based health insurance that covers most Americans, create a public health insurance system for the 46 million who do not have insurance. Large employers would be required to either pay into this system or provide their employees with insurance that is at least as good as the federal system. Individuals without insurance could buy into the public system, and the federal government would subsidize these payments so that they would be affordable for low-income households and those without ties to the labor force.

    The White House estimates that its plan would cost $50 billion to $65 billion annually, but it would be better to spend much more than this, with more federal subsidies to employers to cover uninsured workers and improve existing coverage. As big as it may seem, the $787 billion stimulus bill passed by Congress amounts to less than 2.7 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). This is not nearly enough to counteract our deep recession: the Congressional Budget Office estimates the output gap (i.e., how much output is below the economy's potential) at $2.9 trillion over the next three years.

    Besides saving thousands of lives by providing health care to the uninsured and supplementing the fiscal stimulus, health care reform has another huge advantage: it can drastically reduce future federal budget deficits. The vast majority of our government's long-term shortfall is due to exploding health care costs in the private sector. These spill over to the public sector, which currently finances about half of the nation's health care costs. The United States spends about twice as much per person on health care as other high-income countries, and yet has worse health outcomes, including life expectancy and infant mortality.

    The main economic reason for this colossal failure is that our system of private insurance and powerful monopolies is vastly more wasteful and inefficient than the health care systems of other developed countries. Insurance companies spend tens of billions trying to insure the healthy, avoid the sick, and deny payment for claims. Pharmaceutical companies take $350 billion of our health care dollars for drugs that cost a small fraction of that sum to produce.

    The Obama health care plan won't eliminate most of these perverse incentives and waste - eventually we will need a truly national, single-payer system like Medicare to accomplish that. But it would be a big step in that direction, creating a nearly universal insurance system and laying the foundation for a sustainable system that can contain costs.

    --------

    This op-ed has been previously published by McClatchy Tribune Information Services, The San Diego (California) Union-Tribune and other newspapers.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, DC. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of "Social Security: The Phony Crisis," and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Unless and until all members

Unless and until all members of the Administration and all members of Congress must pay the kinds of health insurance fees that the rest of us must pay - and get exactly the same kinds and quality of health care that we get, there will be little real incentive to overhaul health care. How could they possibly be expected to be really committed to reform unless it and its alternative - nothing - touched them and their loved ones the way it touches the rest of the population?!


I do not need nor do I wish

I do not need nor do I wish to have any sort of Government dealings in my health care. Good God! Look at what they have screwed up already. Get a grip. Get some accident insurance and take responsibility for your own health. I'm 60 years old, have accident insurance which has taken care of trauma injuries. The rest.....get a yearly physical, respond appropriately to the results. Learn about those results and take care of your selves. That worked well a hundred years ago and will work well now. Lets not create more medical Nazis.


Our votes or lack thereof

Our votes or lack thereof will affect them and theirs. Let's plan to make it known that this is a vital issue.


Unless and until there is a

Unless and until there is a system whereby a doctor is given a flat annual fee per patient as opposed to a fee for service there will be abuse of any health insurance system you can name. By using a flat annual fee, the incentive is to keep the patient healthy so as to minimize the number of visits per year. The other two steps to reducing health insurance costs are the promotion of healthy diets and physical activity. The final step is to look at a pollution tax payable by the creator of the pollution be it the automobile driver, the trucker, or the plant spewing the pollution into the air or water. The tax thus collected should be used to offset health care costs.


We need universal health

We need universal health care, but talking about health care and how much the economy is going to grow makes little sense, as we may be at the end of economic growth due to the collapse of ecosystems (part of what is driving the need for health care) So yes, fix the health care system, but keep it away from the economic growth system, which is doomed to fail.


Single Payer National Health

Single Payer National Health care sooner not later! Google PNHP or SPANOHIO.org


Single payer Universal

Single payer Universal health care could be implemented as easily as Obama's plan, and would save the vast majority huge amounts of money and stress. Conyer's HR 676 is the way to go...Watch Sicko, again if you've already seen it...


As in Canada and everywhere

As in Canada and everywhere else every user should pay his/her own health care. Premiums are just few percents of the persons income. Those not able to pay into, because of their low income or being unemployed government should take care of. It is affordable and it is there when we need it. Those who say that government will mess it up, all they have to look back what happened after public transport was privatized. GM and I forgot the name of the tire company, formed the corporation which purchased public transit end in few years bankrupted it.I have been self employed for more than 40 years, and I have paid all my insurances.The fees were gone up every year by 25-40%, and all to "Serve me better". Because I had to have it, I had to pay their exorbitant fees.Enough is enough!


We need a real health care

We need a real health care system instead of the disorganized, useless mess we have now. The aim of our for-profit health insurance industry is not to provide people with adequate health care; it is, primarily, above all else, to make a profit. So far, the government has been subsidizing these profits through the Advantage plans and Medicare part D, to the great detriment of the Medicare fund. To provide serious help to persons and the nation's economy, we need to enact H.R. 676 - publicly funded, privately delivered health care. It's high time our legislators collected the courage to stand up to the vast AHIP and PHARMA lobbies.


One hundred years ago, life

One hundred years ago, life expectancy at birth was 50 years for white males, now it is 75. Life expectancy at 60 was 14 years, now it is 21 years. Maybe we could maintain or improve these statistics with a century old system of finance. Maybe if physicians didn't view having a million dollar mansion (here in the heartland, probably 2 mil on the coasts) as a birthright, we could do okay also.


We need universal health

We need universal health care NOW. To continue to allow the insurance companies to control everything to do with medical care is absurd. As others have pointed out, they do their level best to avoid actually paying for things when the care is needed most. If they do have to pay, they raise rates to the point that peole have to drop their coverage. We may be in horrible shape economically but so were the British after WW II and that is when they decided that Universal Health Care was needed and when they started it there. Come on let's push harder for real change we can believe in, eh?!


"787 billion stimulus

"787 billion stimulus package amounts to less than 2.7% of GDP." Wrong. That implies GDP of greater than $29 trillion. US GDP officially was $13.84 trillion in 2007. Officially, it dropped 6.2% over the last quarter of 2008, so it's 13 trillion and dropping. This article loses most of its credibility with such mathematical propaganda . The actual figure is 6%, minimum, which is a lot.


Don't want the government

Don't want the government involved in your health care? Don't get old. So you'd trust the for-profit insurance companies more - yep, they care a lot about your interests. So far all we've heard from Obama and Kennedy are calls for 'quality, affordable, health insurance for all'. These are code words for what MA, ME, MN, OR, TN, VT,WA have tried, all without success because they protect huge profits for ins. companies, big pharma and mega-healthcare providers. Take a look at a local, grassroots initiative: http://capecare.info/


This patchwork of a system

This patchwork of a system is a nightmare. Unless we have a single-payer plan, we will simply be putting more patches on top of more patches. The system will be so complicated that people in need will not know how to access it. When I lived in the UK, I knew if I was sick, I'd be cared for. I didn't wait until I was so sick I had to go to hospital. All of us need to have equal access.


Nationalized health care

Nationalized health care will come like it or not. those that don't want it may opt out just like in UK. They will have to pay the cost of their care however.. I really want to stop subsidizing the drug companies and everytning else that guzzles from our present wasteful trough of financing everything for everyone..


HR 676. This is the

HR 676. This is the prescription for an economic stimulus and for curing the health care situation in the United States. The many reasons are too long to reproduce here, but if you haven't seen the econometric study done by the California Nurses Association (CNA), go to calnurses.org and scroll down the page until you find the link. Along with PDA, Health Care Now (not the phony Health Care for America Now, better known as HCAN), and the Physicians for a National Health Program, CNA has formed the Leadership Council for Guaranteed Health Care, another group to google. The econometric study empahtically shows that 2.6 million jobs would be created by passage of HR 676, and hundreds of billions would be saved, along with an influx of new taxes by the new workers. Obama knows about single-payer. We have to claw and fight to get public exposure and if you want to work for real health care reform, please join and begin working for one of the organizations today to bring real change to fruition.


Just a question to the human

Just a question to the human being: Sun, 03/01/2009 - 03:35 — Texan (not verified) How can he explain why the pharmaceutical company shares (Aventis for instance) slumps when President Obama announces a public health plan? If public health plans subsidize pharmaceuticals industries, the shares would go up. It is an American illusion to think individuals can compete efficiently with huge financial groups like Pfizer, Merck &Co, GSK… Individuals need their drugs and they pay the price they decide to sell! The invisible hand of the free market of Adam Smith is another illusion… Jacques Bureau, France (EU)


I was in an HMO which I paid

I was in an HMO which I paid for as part of group through my work. Now I am in Medicare. Medicare plus supplemental insurance is no more expensive than my previous group plan and it is WAY BETTER than the HMO. I can imagine ways to tweak Medicare to make it better, but it is already good and it works. I have WAY more choices of providers than I did when I was in an HMO. This freedom of choice enabled me to travel out of area to an outstanding diagnostician who caught my cancer in the early stage, saving a whole lot of money and trouble.


Is there a listing of

Is there a listing of persons who think health care is only for themselves?


The greatest need Health

The greatest need Health Care has is prevention. Prevention is something that every person must do by making sure that they eat a proper diet, get the exercise they need for there body, and quit eating a junk food diet that is only leading to over weight and heart decease. This means of proper health care is completely dependent on making the right decisions in your life. It does not cost a penny to enact, in fact because you start eating real food it will actually put more money in your own pocket. So it is not about escalating cost, it is about making proper judgments about how you live your life, about how you spend your hard earned money. Let the junk food rot on the shelves, don't let it destroy your health. Take charge of your life and in doing so you will take charge of your own health care as well. I have done that. I am 72 years old and I do not use any medications for any illnesses. In fact I am in the best health of my entire life, and I did this myself by taking change of my life and my health concerns. If I can do that so can you. It is your choice!


Find yourself one Howard

Find yourself one Howard Dean. He's done it in VT.


Even companies like Blue

Even companies like Blue Cross pay their flunky operatives more to keep from paying on legitimate claims than they would pay for most of the claims. Private insurance companies are FOR PROFIT, and Big PHARMA is for PROFIT, not for people , not for the taxpayer or the premium payer. Take a look at SICKO, the movie, again if you have any doubts. EVERY CIVILIZED COUNTRY HAS SUBSIDIZED NATIONAL HEALTH CARE .... we don't.


So a lot of the "patriotic"

So a lot of the "patriotic" comments here say that privatized health care is BAD. Well, I watched Michael Moore's movie on health care and was especially interested in that in France (yeah, the 'evil' country that didn't bow down to Bush when he wanted to invade Iraq - "Freedom Fries", etc.), but I know a friend who lives there. So I asked him about his taxes and what he gets for it. His reply follows: Yes, I was just explaining that to a friend of mine yesterday. My income tax was 7.5% last year on a household income of $110,000. I live in a “socialist” country, but compared to where I was 3 years ago in Laramie, I am filthy rich. We make roughly the same salary (taking cost of living into account), but we have zero debt, exceptional health care, free college, public transportation, a superb public infrastructure, six weeks of vacation per year, and I drive a brand new Audi. Honestly, after three years here I don’t get all this noise about the evil “socialist” model. Whatever. So, I pay more than 7.5% in the USA and get to pay a premium extra for any health care, both in insurance and in co-pays. So I would like to ask a Right Winger, why should I pay some "Middle Man" for what taxes take care of in a country with First Rate health care just so that this Private Individual can GET RICH on MY SICKNESS and I get health care that is equal to that in Slovenia???


Comment to Jaques Bureau.

Comment to Jaques Bureau. The answer to the question of why drug company's shares should fall (Aventis may have other issues in addition) when Obama announces a public health plan is that, unlike Bush, a plan by Obama is likely to allow the government to bargain on the price so any company that sells to the government is likely to have to take only a small markup, not the obscene amounts they have been doing.


Cher Monsieur Bureau I

Cher Monsieur Bureau I believe there is a slight misunderstanding here between you and "Sun, 03/01/2009 - 03:35 — Texan (not verified)": you agree. By "subventioning", our texan friend did not mean government subvention, but rather private, unwelcome subvention of each and everyone. Best regards to all - I love truthout. Patrick_


I do work in healthcare. If

I do work in healthcare. If you want more availability, then demand in healthcare providers increases. Thus, demanding more doctors!!! How about analyzing the most basic of economic law and simply increase the availably of providers/doctors (ie education), thus lowering the cost of service or product. So how about trusting the people and spend those billions toward opportunity, rather than increased government, regulating bodies and those who will oversee the overseers. Supply and demand!!!! Also, healthcare is free already in America... I promise.