Why the Faithful Approve of Torture
Friday 01 May 2009
by: Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite | The Washington Post

Prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. A recent poll shows the more often you go to church,
the more you approve of torture. (Photo: Catholic News Agency)
The more often you go to church, the more you approve of torture. This is a troubling finding of a new survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Shouldn't it be the opposite? After all, who would Jesus torture? Since Jesus wouldn't even let Peter use a sword and defend him from arrest, it would seem that those who follow Jesus would strenuously oppose the violence of torture. But, not so in America today.
Instead, more than half of people who attend worship at least once a week, or 54%, said that using torture on suspected terrorists was "often" or "sometimes" justified. White evangelical Protestants were the church-going group most likely to approve of torture. By contrast, those who are unaffiliated with a religious organization and didn't attend worship were most opposed to torture - only 42% of those people approved of using torture.
One possible way to interpret this extraordinary Pew data is cultural. White evangelical Protestants tend to be culturally conservative and they make up a large percentage of the so-called Republican "base". Does the approval of torture by this group demonstrate their continuing support for the previous administration? That may be.
But I think it is possible, even likely, that this finding has a theological root. The UN Convention Against Torture defines torture as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person..." White Evangelical theology bases its view of Christian salvation on the severe pain and suffering undergone by Jesus in his flogging and crucifixion by the Romans. This is called the "penal theory of the atonement" - that is, the way Jesus paid for our sins is by this extreme torture inflicted on him.
For Christian conservatives, severe pain and suffering are central to their theology. This is very clear in the 2002 Mel Gibson movie, The Passion of the Christ. Evangelical Christians flocked to this movie, promoted it and still show it in their churches, despite the fact that it is R-rated for the extraordinary amount of violence in the film. It is, in fact, the highest grossing R-rated movie in the history of film. The flogging of Jesus by the Romans goes on for fully 40 minutes. It is truly the most violent film I have ever seen.
The message of the movie, and a message of a lot of conservative Christian theology, is that severe pain and suffering are not foreign to Christian faith, but central.
Of course, this is an interpretation of Jesus life, death and resurrection that I reject. It is also an interpretation that I believe has done a lot of harm through the centuries. I think it is impossible, yes, impossible, if you read the Gospels, to make the case that God wanted Jesus tortured for the sins of humanity. But that is an interpretation that has sometimes been made in the history of Christianity and the social and political fallout has been, and is today, that torture is OK, maybe even more than OK. This Pew finding may just be another in a long line of horrible historical examples of that.
--------
Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite is the former president of the Chicago Theological Seminary (1998-2008), Thistlethwaite is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
How sad to read these
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 08:41 — Lane Baldwin (not verified)How can you be Pro-Life AND
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 09:01 — Doris (not verified)Thanks for this
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 09:20 — David Spaetheica (not verified)Many of us in
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 09:22 — dipconsult (not verified)this is a very interesting
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 10:01 — Anonymous (not verified)David S. is closest to the
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 10:18 — Jeff C (not verified)The history of Christianity
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 10:57 — Anonymous (not verified)Gracious sakes! They didn't
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 10:57 — Valerie (not verified)There is no conflict between
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 11:12 — to Doris (not verified)Totally consistent with
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 11:19 — Anonymous (not verified)Ummm..... I think that the
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 11:21 — Anonymous (not verified)As said by a previous
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 11:43 — Larry Milton (not verified)The greatest tyrants the
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 11:57 — Social Democrat? NOT (not verified)Maddave interjects: In
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 12:29 — David Timm (maddave) (not verified)What percent of non
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 12:36 — Chas (not verified)What else can you expect
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 12:45 — Anonymous (not verified)I really think this article
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 13:09 — John B. Hodges (not verified)I am not a bit surprised.
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 13:28 — Anonymous (not verified)Within the first week of
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 13:40 — Anonymous (not verified)I think I know why these
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 13:46 — Anonymous (not verified)Mel Gibson's "bloodfest"-
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 14:15 — herbert browne (not verified)I believe the logic is
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 14:22 — Chas (not verified)If one read Eric Hoffer's
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 14:29 — Anonymous (not verified)Not only the Roman Church
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 15:41 — Cuyler Brooks (not verified)We need only to look to the
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 15:46 — de_Genova (not verified)It seems that few
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 16:34 — Andrew Doubleday, Christchurch, New Zealand (not verified)This would be obvious to
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 16:50 — Michael (not verified)Jesus warned us about false
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 17:03 — Anonymous (not verified)When I was a kid, the big
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 17:42 — Sally (not verified)I've read so many differing
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 19:52 — Anonymous (not verified)Why do the followers of
Mon, 05/04/2009 - 21:08 — Raymond Bradley (not verified)Jesus' entire ministry on
Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:14 — DavidInRichmond (not verified)Some will abuse religion for
Wed, 05/06/2009 - 21:15 — Holly Berkowitz (not verified)Not surprising when one
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 05:42 — Warren Tarrer (not verified)Jesus would not have
Tue, 05/12/2009 - 13:56 — Frances in California (not verified)gucci online uk
Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:40 — enzyhodo (not verified)you must read gucci handbags uk and get big save jYvEHzWM http://www.blogvan.nl/gucciuk/
louis vuitton online store us
Wed, 10/24/2012 - 14:52 — lobesefe (not verified)click loui vuitton outlet online to take huge discount CUvOjKHG http://louisvuittononlineshop.metroblog.com/
outlet hermes
Fri, 10/26/2012 - 18:58 — Premzesk (not verified)must check hermes outlet online shopping QgnqffMX http://www.hermes--outlet.net/
gucci replica handbags
Sun, 10/28/2012 - 23:15 — Inepefum (not verified)you love this? gucci replica bag for promotion code PeTmfypF http://www.replica--gucci.org/
uggs outlet
Thu, 11/01/2012 - 15:15 — VexHeisy (not verified)you definitely love uggs outlet camarillo , for special offer RMxuAhUh http://www.uggs--outlet.net/
chanel bags outlet
Wed, 11/14/2012 - 00:46 — WoowlCes (not verified)must check chanel outlet for promotion code WrNQkLdR http://www.chaneloutlet-handbags.com/
uhryjj
Sun, 01/27/2013 - 08:54 — uhryjj (not verified)vrwkqu