Doctors Raise Phosphorus Concerns After US Strikes in Afghanistan

by: Jon Boone  |  The Guardian UK

Doctors Raise Phosphorus Concerns After US Strikes in Afghanistan
An eight-year old Afghan girl after a US bombing. Afghanistan's leading human rights organization is investigating allegations that the US used white phosphorus in a battle last week that may have killed many civilians. (Photo: AFP)

    Kabul - Afghanistan's leading human rights organisation is investigating claims that white phosphorus was used during a deadly battle between US forces and the Taliban last week in which scores of civilians may have died.

    Nader Nadery, a senior officer at the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, said the organisation was concerned that the chemical, which can cause severe burns, might have been used in the firefight in Bala Baluk, a district in the western province of Farah.

    Dr Mohammad Aref Jalali, the head of an internationally funded burns hospital in Herat, said villagers taken to hospital after the incident had "highly unusual burns" on their hands and feet that he had not seen before. "We cannot be 100% sure what type of chemical it was and we do not have the equipment here to find out. One of the women who came here told us that 22 members of her family were totally burned. She said a bomb distributed white power that caught fire and then set people's clothes alight."

    US forces in Afghanistan denied they had used the chemical, and have also said claims that up to 147 civilians were killed were grossly exaggerated.

    As with previous such tragedies, both sides have made wildly different claims, with Taliban spokesmen seeking to exploit popular fury and US officials attempting to limit the damage and pin the blame on the Taliban for allegedly using civilians as human shields.

    But members of the human rights department at the UN mission in Afghanistan have been appalled by witness testimony from people in the village, according to one official in Kabul who talked anonymously to the Guardian.

    He said bombs were dropped after militants had quit the battlefield, which appeared to be backed up by the US air force's own daily report, which is published online.

    "The stories that are emerging are quite frankly horrifying," the official said. "It is quite apparent that the large bulk of civilian casualties were called in after the initial fighting had subsided and both the troops and the Taliban had withdrawn.

    "Local villagers went to the mosque to pray for peace. Shortly after evening prayers the air strikes were called in, and they continued for a couple of hours whilst the villagers were frantically calling the local governor to get him to call off the air strikes."

    He said that women and children hid inside their homes while their men went on to the roofs with guns. US forces say these men were militants, but the UN official said they were simply villagers and "it is totally normal for them to have guns". Also contested is an incident immediately after the battle when people from the village took piles of corpses to the governor's compound in the provincial capital.

    The UN official says their willingness to ignore the Islamic custom of organising burial within 24 hours of death showed the level of anger.

    A statement by US forces said insurgents forced tribal elders to parade the corpses through neighbouring villages to "incite outrage among villagers".

    It said that a joint US-Afghan investigation team confirmed that "a number of civilians were killed in the course of the fighting but is unable to determine with certainty which of those causalities were Taliban fighters and which were non-combatants".

    Last week Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai, called for all air strikes in villages to be stopped, a view privately backed by many in the UN.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



I suspect this is one more

I suspect this is one more lie told by our government and after all the white phosphorus settles, we're going to find out that someone did authorize this travesty. But no one in Congress has the courage to do anything about it. No wonder the world hates American's, we're represented by greedy, heartless, lying thugs.


One way to think of the

One way to think of the appropriateness of these airstrikes is to consider an analogous case. Assume a group of bank robbers hole up in an apartment block, and many inhabitants remain in the building. The police and robbers shoot at each other for some time, until the police withdraw to avoid casualties among their number (or perhaps to have a rest). Some appartment residents may even return home, now that the danger seems to be over. It isn't. The police call in air strikes, blowing up the building killing or injuring all within it. If we would not accept this policing tactic at home, why should we accept it abroad? Or is it just that we value Afghan civilian lives less American ones?


This is pretty disgusting.

This is pretty disgusting. When I was in the Marine Corps 45 years ago, we used white phosphorus ("willy peter") rounds to illuminate an enemy position at night, firing them high into the sky with a howitzer or 106mm rifle; it was like the sun had come out, you could see clearly for a couple of miles, so intense was the burn. WP is a particularly nasty weapon, visualize a containerload of matches being struck at once. I believe the use of such rounds in ground combat, particularly in areas where there are known to be civilians, as the IDF and now US troops have done, should be treated as a war crime, along with use of depleted uranium and cluster bombs. I mourn our loss of humanity, that we can thoughtlessly inflict so much pain on innocent people. It's all summed up in the term, "collateral damage."


Is it surprising that there

Is it surprising that there have been events and incidents such as 9/11, USS Cole, US Embassies abroad, etc. etc., it is this sort of action and the unequivocal support which has been given to Israel which has caused hatred for US foreign policy leading to "terrorist" acts but who are the terrorists?


I never believe such

I never believe such accusations until the government officially denies them. Remember Pat Tillman? White phosphorus in Falluja, fire bombs on Dresden & Tokyo, atomic bombs on Hiroshima & Nagasaki..all lies put out by our enemies to make us look like the bad guys. I heard President Carter say that America would not be the first to use atomic weapons. Breznev said the same thing the same year. Who do you believe? History made Carter a liar. He could have said we will not be the second one to use them or we won't use them again but not that we will never be the first. Jeez, we were not only the first but the ONLY nation to use them. When asked "How many a-bombs did the U.S. drop in WWII?", most people say two. My answer is that we used all we had at that time. In a Democracy there are no innocent civilians. In a democracy the people are responsible for the actions of their government. Tough luck, guys. Sow beans, get beans. Sow corn, get corn.