Honduran Violence, US Aid Tests Obama's Global Image

by: Roberto Lovato  |   New America Media

Honduran Violence, US Aid Tests Obama's Global Image
Outside Toncontin Airport in Tegucigalpa, Honduran soldiers try to evacuate Zelaya supporters. (Photo: Getty Images)

    While English language television in the United States mined the minutiae of Michael Jackson's upcoming funeral, millions watching Spanish, Portuguese and French language media in the rest of the Americas were transfixed by live broadcasts of the Honduran military shooting and killing a 10 year-old boy and other protesters.

    From the U.S.-Mexico border to the southern tip of Argentina and Chile, Latin Americans were besotted by television and internet images of the tens of thousands of Hondurans who risked their lives while staging a peaceful march to the airport where a plane carrying ousted the President of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, and United Nations President Miguel d'Escoto was trying to land.

    In the course of Sunday's mass mobilization by Hondurans, many throughout the continent watched the drama of the police stepping out of the way of the marchers when their chief declared that he "holds the military responsible" for any bloodshed. Shortly after blood was, in fact, spilled as at least 2 people were killed by the military and several others were injured, according to Telesur, which broadcast live from the Tegucigalpa airport.

    Public and official outrage in response to the killings and shootings are sure to intensify pressure on the military coup leaders who already face worldwide denunciation and pressure. The Organization of American States (OAS) suspended Honduras' membership Saturday; The European Union and most countries in Latin America with embassies in Honduras have withdrawn their ambassadors; the World Bank and some governments have either suspended or frozen loans to Honduras.

    But the military coup leaders are still recipients of U.S. economic and military aid.

    As a result, the whole Latin American world is watching Honduras and President Obama, who still has not heeded calls to suspend U.S. military aid to Honduras. In fact, Latin America may well be where the decline and fall of Obama's global rock star status begins.

    The Obama Administration has chosen to respond to the crisis in a manner that will signify little to millions watching the bloodshed taking place in Honduras; While nobody in the hemisphere wants the return of the actions of the Bush era, many already believe that the Obama Administration's inactions mean that the "new" or fundamental "change" Obama promised during his also widely-viewed Summit of the Americas speech last April adds up to little more than this: more militarismo, but with a smile.

    For example, rather than officially declare and denounce the Honduras putsch as a "coup", which would, among other things, trigger a cutoff of military and other aid, the Obama Administration has instead chosen the symbolic act of suspending joint military operations.

    In a region where U.S. military aid, U.S. military training and U.S. political support for dictatorships responsible for killing, torturing and disappearing millions are at the heart of why Obama needed urgently to signal a "new" U.S. policy, Obama's continued "Si Se Puede" (Yes We Can) to continued military aid for such human rights violation-plagued governments as those of Colombia, Mexico and Honduras will only tarnish his and the U.S.' image in the region.

    The President's inability or unwillingness to call for an immediate
suspension of U.S. military aid is already raising questions about the motives and role of Obama Administration operatives like Hugo Llorens, the current U.S. Ambassador to Honduras.

    From 2002-2003 - the year many in Latin America condemned the attempted military coup in Venezuela - Llorens was the Director of Andean Affairs at the National Security Council (NSC).

    Llorens was charged with advising then President Bush and his National Security Advisor on issues pertaining to Venezuela, Bolivia, Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador. Although Llorens and the Obama Administration do not recognize the current government, they did, apparently, know that the coup was going to take place.

    That the Obama Administration knew of the coup and did not cut off aid immediately after it took place, makes its claims that it tried to "stop" the coup seem naive, at best.

    That the Administration may not cut off aid even after coup-appointed Honduran Foreign Minister Enrique Ortez described President Obama as "ese negrito que no sabe nada de nada" (that little black boy who knows nothing about nothing) is to add political insult to tragic injury before a hemispheric audience; That Obama may not cut off military aid even after Sunday's increased bloodshed adds even graver injury to that insult.

    And in Latin America, a region where the word "Honduras" now means "defend democracy", a region where many know that Democrat-led U.S. regimes have propped up military dictatorships, assassinated leaders and covertly destabilized left-leaning governments with the same zeal and effectiveness as Republican regimes, President Obama and the United States, no longer have the luxury of being on the wrong side of history made on the streets. This hemispheric sensibility was articulated forcefully by Argentinian President Cristina Fernandez, who traveled with the Presidents of Ecuador and Paraguay to El Salvador on Sunday in order support Zelaya. During their late night press conference, Fernandez seemed to speak to and for millions when she stated, "We're not just defending Honduras. We're defending ourselves." The question President Obama must answer as unequivocally and rapidly as possible is, "Who are Latin Americans defending themselves from?"

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



"But the military coup

"But the military coup leaders are still recipients of U.S. economic and military aid." - When Americans feign non-partisanship regarding Honduras and pretend to stay out of the mess, THEY ARE TAKING SIDES. We have control over our elected servants and this is what they are doing to stamp out democracy in our name.


The military takeover in

The military takeover in Honduras has taken on a new critical point in the Obama Administration. If the current Ambassador to Honduras, Hugo Lloren (appointed by GW Bush as Ambassador to Honduras) knew of the coup and kept his mouth shut then he is guilty of betraying his own country of the misdeed. A deed that has world wide condemnation. And if it comes to past that President Obama knew what Lloren did, than his Administration is nothing more than a repeat of the GW Bush Administration. He is finished in Latin America and consequently throughout the world. What comes to mind is, is Obama afraid of his own military? Does he fear a military takeover in the USA? Or is just plain dumb on a critical matter that now puts the US on the same line as the military regime in Honduras? After all, the US still supports the Honduras military with arms and ammunition to kill it's own citizen and to take over the country militarily in the wee hours of the morning. School of the Americas. You have done your job well! You perhaps are the real cause of the turmoil in Honduras!


At this point I have become

At this point I have become so cynical about the US that the only questions I wonder about in this case are: "What Honduran resource are we trying to steal?" And, "Which US corporation has bought which politicians to promote this takeover via their hired thugs, the CIA?"

But I have much more faith in the people of South America than those of the United States, my own country. A place where my fellow "citizens" have proven that they can watch their neighbor murdered from the safety of their darkened bedroom window (Kitty Genovese) and do nothing at all to help (except Trust in God, of course). The people of South America appear to actually help and support each other and to have a real society. So, I wish them well in their efforts to rid themselves of all influences from a once great nation turned scourge of the world. That nation those of us who live here call the United States of America, and others more justifiably call "The Great Satan."

It must be wonderful to be a part of South American society. A place that everyone can be proud of and can feel good working together with neighbors to improve. With real justice and equality for all. I remember having that same feeling of pride in country here, not all that many years ago. But not any more. My own country has long since degenerated to the point that it has displaced all pride to fill me with shame and disgust.



I don't understand why Obama

I don't understand why Obama is vascillating on this one. If he declares it a coup and takes action (threatens a Panama-stye invasion), he loses nothing in terms of controlling influence in the country, and greater prestige in Latin America, when Zelaya returns. The only explanation is that it was the US's idea in the first place, and if they back out now, then the Honduran military will give the game up and that will be oh so messier. Naw, but that kind of twisted intrigue can't happen with O's complicity, can it? He's too pure.


Dear Henry (07-06 at 21:59)

Dear Henry (07-06 at 21:59) - Obama knows well he can't control the thugs from School of the Assassins, er, I mean, School of the Americas. They have had the run of Latin America for almost 100 years. If enough Americans realize what a blight they are upon this nation (and on every other they have touched), we might get Congress to haul their asses outa here . . . but not soon; too much money to be made by same old/same old war profiteers.