Fort Hood Soldier Refused Deployment to Afghanistan

by: Angela K. Brown  |  The Associated Press

Fort Hood Soldier Refused Deployment to Afghanistan
US Army Spc. Victor Agosto. (Photo: Victor Agosto / AP)

    Fort Hood, Texas - A Fort Hood soldier was sentenced Wednesday to a month in jail for refusing to deploy to Afghanistan over his beliefs that the war violates international law.

    Spc. Victor Agosto, 24, of Miami, pleaded guilty to disobeying lawful orders and was sentenced at the central Texas Army post. The judge also reduced his rank to the Army's lowest level, a private, which also was part of the maximum penalty he faced in his plea agreement with the military.

    Also, Agosto cannot be discharged at a level lower than other-than-honorable conditions, an administrative discharge. A discharge was not mentioned in the hearing, but Agosto is expected to be released from the Army after completing his jail term.

    Before he was sentenced during the hourlong military hearing, he told the judge he should not be jailed because he posed no threat to anyone.

    He said he had remained on post and went to work every day since refusing to deploy after learning a few months ago that the Army was keeping him beyond his enlistment date. He said he did not use drugs or go absent without leave, as other soldiers have done to avoid deployment.

    He said he did not apply for conscientious objector status because that requires opposition to all wars, and he does not believe that all war is wrong.

    "I really had no Army way of being consistent with my conscience," Agosto said. "The courts haven't recognized soldiers' rights to refuse an order they believe to be illegal.... I believe future courts will find that the Afghanistan war is illegal because it violates international law."

    His attorney, James M. Branum, said he plans to appeal for a lesser sentence on the grounds of legal errors. Agosto gave an unsworn statement, which means cross-examination is not allowed.

    But after Agosto spoke, Capt. Theresa Santos, acting as the judge in the hearing, asked him several questions, including his opinions about the war before he joined the military.

    Agosto said that when he enlisted in 2005, he felt invading Iraq was wrong but that troops had a mission to complete. He said he began to oppose the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after he served a 13-month tour in Iraq, which ended in late 2007.

    Wednesday's proceeding was a summary court martial, in which a soldier's guilty finding will not show up as a felony conviction if an attorney does not represent him during the hearing. Branum said he was there to advise Agosto and did not speak on the record or object to anything.

    Earlier, Agosto called one witness to testify on his behalf. Cynthia Thomas, who said she's been an Army wife for 17 years, said Agosto made a hard decision to follow his conscience although he would lose his military benefits and be ostracized by his peers.

    "I have not met a soldier with more integrity than Victor Agosto," she said. "He has served this country in a time of war with honor."

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Victor Agosto is right, the

Victor Agosto is right, the Army is wrong.


Our country needs more

Our country needs more people like Victor Agosto.


While Victor Agosto is under

While Victor Agosto is under contract to the Federal Government to perform a specific set of duties, there are considerations that representatives of these contracts are finding harder and harder to enforce, and that is "Educated men making informed decision". There is a growing trend and cassum between blindly following orders and making informed decision. It is necessary to blindly following orders in time of crisis, as well during times when preparing for crisis. And refusing an order to deploy into an illegal situation is an appropriate and reasonable act. There are many instances where men are being prosecuted for failing to refuse such orders. Which brings me to the next point, educated men know that they have other options. Convictions and Beliefs play a strong role here as well. What would happen if our President declared war on another country and the military choose not to act. Instead simply stating that attaching said country was unnecessary and that other alternatives need to be taken prior. Or while in the course of attacking another country the military learned that the attack was illegal and decided to withdraw. Where would the leave the President? While Victor's decision is a hard on, on a mass scale his decision leaves the military with a very perplexing question it needs to address. How do they win the hearts and minds of the soldiers serving them? How does the President insure that the decision's he's making concerning everyone's fate - yours, mine, and those protecting us both on domestic and foreign soil are appropriate, legitimate, and in the best interest of everyone? For most of us, since we are not in a position to know all the factors involved in making the decision, we need to follow along blindly until we learn otherwise, and then at that point - as Victor did - reevaluate our position and take a stance for what we now believe in.


Didn't ENetArch read the

Didn't ENetArch read the entire article??? HIS CONTRACT WAS UP!!!! The army had no right to keep him. MY COUNTRY RIGHT OR WRONG. You and Nixon, Bush, and the other war criminals need to be sent to GITMO!!!!!!!!!!!!


He got what he deserved. If

He got what he deserved. If he joined for the benefits, he has to complete his side of the bargain. I wouldn't want to have to depend on a fraud like him in a life-or-death situation.