Financial Regulation Bill Passed Despite Financial Lobbying

by: Yana Kunichoff, t r u t h o u t | Report

Financial Regulation Bill Passed Despite Financial Lobbying
Rep. Barney Frank, chair of the Financial Services Committee. (Photo: paul w / flickr)

    The Obama administration achieved one small step Thursday, successfully passing legislation that would guarantee oversight of the financial derivatives market. This bill, passed by the House Financial Services Committee on a 43-26 vote, would be the first time the market would be forced to rein in this multi-trillion-dollar industry.

    This bill is the first in a series of steps toward the mammoth task of remaking America's financial system following the financial crisis last year. Financial derivatives, the most notorious of which are credit default swaps, have been pegged as the main reason for the failure of the much-maligned insurance company American International Group.

    The regulation has seen strong opposition from those it will most affect - the financial industry and parts of the business industry, which have fought the bill from the outside while Republicans headed the campaign from within the House. Only one Republican, Rep. Walter Jones (North Carolina), sided with the Democrats in voting for the Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets Act of 2009.

    Lawmakers are now considering changes to the bill to reassure centrist Democrats uncomfortable with what many see as overly strong oversight of the market. Only in draft form now, this amendment would keep the majority of oversight responsibility for community banks and credit union lobbies on the shoulders of the existing regulators. Sponsored by Reps. Dennis Moore (D-Kansas) and Brad Miller (D-North Carolina), it may minimize opposition from powerful financial industry lobbies, who have heavily opposed the bill thus far.

    Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), chairman of the Financial Services Committee, called the amendment a "legitimate response" to the concerns of the community banks and credit unions.

    He also denied the influence of the different but equally powerful lobbies on the resulting legislation passed Thursday. "Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley have no influence," he said.

    Heather Booth, director of Americans for Financial Reform, a consumer advocacy group, does not see the bill as sufficiently comprehensive. "It does not do enough to protect taxpayers and our economy," she said.

    The key components of the legislation set out a regulatory framework for the regulation of swap markets, dealers and major swap participants. All standardized swap transactions between dealers and large market participants, referred to as "major swap participants," would have to be cleared and must be traded on an exchange or electronic platform - an unprecedented decision.

    Rulemaking authority would be held jointly by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Additionally, the Treasury Department has been given the authority to issue final rules if the CFTC and SEC cannot decide on a joint approach within 180 days. Subsequent interpretations of rules must be agreed to jointly by the commissions.

    The Democrats also hope to reach agreement on the ever-delicate balance between the powers of federal and state officials in market regulation. The Obama administration and liberal Democrats hope to allow state officials more leeway in pursuing stronger regulations that those strictly mandated by federal standards. More conservative Democrats and those in the financial industry favor pre-empting state action.

    The House leaders are expected to conclude voting on the bill in November, while the Senate is anticipated to take longer.

    The next legislative effort aimed toward systemic change is the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), spearheaded by Frank, which he hopes to have reviewed by Wednesday. The battle over the CFPA may prove to be yet more contentious.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Yana Kunichoff is an assistant editor at Truthout.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



What I've read is that the

What I've read is that the bill has loopholes big enough to drive 3 Brinks trucks loaded w/cash through. I have no confidence in the current Congress' & administration's ability to push through effective and very much needed regulatory reform of the financial industry. This is pretty much the same Congress that refused to put in the TARP legislation requirements ensuring that the banks HAD to state where the TARP $$ went, as a result, Elizabeth Warren, member of the Congressional Oversight Panel (for the various bailouts) stated in an interview that it was unlikely that we, the people whose money it was that the banks received, would ever know where it went or how it was used by the banks. Because, as Ms. Warren stated, that wasn't made an upfront (before you get the money) requirement. The money was intended to get the TBTF banks lending again--to "small" businesses or to unfreeze the commercial paper markets, etc. Hasn't happened. But the TBTF banks are now even larger (more concentration of capital, just as Marx predicted) and they are once again handing out huge bonuses, etc. So I see no reason to think this bill does anything much different from TARP. Without the complete ban of lobbyists, true campaign reform, and, to be blunt, increasing the number of Supreme court justices so Obama can (if he chooses) add enough justices who aren't incredibly pro-big business to get change the current incredibly pro big business majority, I don't see how much is going to change in terms of getting rid of the TBTF banks and essentially repassing the Glass-Steagall Act. Setting up an official, public & mandatory official exchange for derivatives, etc.


For all its poffered and

For all its poffered and phoney "concern" for the financial health of future generations, the Repugnican Party stands morally bankrupt on this and so many other issues. The GOP's continued fealty to the multi-national banks at the expense of the average American is disgusting and dangerous. Credit default swaps should be called insurance and regulated like insurance, if the are allowed to exist at all. Anything else is a straight shot down the highway to hell. It's time for those of good conscience to simply steamroll the Roadblock Republicans on this and every other issue that puts national financial health at stake.


Wasn't Barney Frank in

Wasn't Barney Frank in office when all hell broke loose and then Wall Street was infused with trillions to "shore 'em up"? What regulation are the major players going to worry about? None really, they just have a camotose press, a guy who's a Democrat, and then "small baby steps" are massive achievements, in which all is ok again.


Goldman Sachs runs the

Goldman Sachs runs the country. Bye, bye democracy! We have our very own oligarchy. The Russians are not ahead of us on that.


Barney Frank and C. Schumer

Barney Frank and C. Schumer (D-NY) have been (and are as I write) so well supported financially by the banking and securities corporations, there is no hope these two will ever re-regulate or re-instate the most simple, direct and effective of reforms. Like Geithner and Summers, they have drunk the deregulation=legal fraud=hands off kool aid and are standing in line for more. This bill is their cynical cover for the continuation of the the massive financial crimes and the bailout fraud they and the Phil Gramm Club enabled.


prada outlet

must look at this prada outlet usa for more GNvSDHgT http://www.prada--outlet.org/