A Lesson in US Job Creation: The Civilian Conservation Corps

by: Frank Ackerman  |  TripleCrisis | Op-Ed

How could the Obama Administration have spent two years in office and forgotten to create any visible new jobs for the millions of unemployed Americans? Nothing contributed as much to the Democrats’ midterm electoral losses as the high rate of unemployment; the party in power routinely gets clobbered when lots of people are out of work on Election Day.

Once upon a time, there was a much smarter response to unemployment. In fact, I recently spent a week enjoying the results of the wisdom of the past. In a vacation trip to Grand Canyon and Bryce Canyon National Parks, I walked on trails, protected by retaining walls and guardrails, built by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) in the 1930s. The CCC, part of the Roosevelt Administration’s response to the Great Depression, created vast numbers of jobs – 600,000 at its peak – in repairing, protecting, and improving parks, forests, and other natural resources.

The CCC recruited unemployed young men (gender equality was not yet on the horizon) for six- month assignments. Living in camps run by the Army, the recruits received $30 a month ($480 in today’s dollars) – plus food, housing, and medical and dental care. They were required to send $25 home to their families, who were quite often destitute, keeping $5 a month for their own spending. At a time when the likely alternative was long-term unemployment, the CCC attracted more applicants than the agency could hire.

To address the loudest contemporary objection to government job creation: Yes, the CCC increased the federal deficit – but not by much. The total cost over its nine years of operation was $3 billion, equivalent to an average of less than $6 billion a year in today’s dollars. Priced at today’s minimum wage or a bit above, with corresponding increases in other costs, my guess is that the CCC could still be recreated for around $20 billion a year, a small fraction of the Obama stimulus package.

The forces against independent journalism are growing. Help Truthout keep up the fight against ignorance and regression! Support us here.

But the important question is not, did it cost money, but rather, did the nation get its money’s worth? The CCC planted 4 billion trees. It built 63,000 buildings, 125,000 miles of roads, 47,000 bridges, and 28,000 miles of park trails. It installed 89,000 miles of telephone lines and 5,000 miles of water lines. And it did many other projects as well. There is no other time, before or since, when the National Park Service had the resources to undertake so many park improvements and repairs. If you’ve visited the Grand Canyon or other national parks, you’ve walked on the results of the CCC’s labors. Would we be better off today with a fractionally smaller deficit, and inaccessible parks?

The much more expensive Obama stimulus package left no such tangible legacy. If you look carefully, you can see the occasional signs on highway projects advertising “your stimulus dollars at work.” But the funds are so diffuse, channeled through so many existing agencies and businesses, that there is no public sense of overall accomplishment. In the know-nothing climate of this year’s campaigns, it was easy for Republicans to make the absurd claim that the stimulus was a complete failure which didn’t create any jobs.

Why was so much spent, with so little to show for it? Perhaps, as Paul Krugman has suggested, Obama’s economic advisers were committed to the fantasy that the recession would be minor and short-lived, so that nothing new or long-lasting was needed to address unemployment. Or perhaps the Obama Administration couldn’t have gotten anything better adopted, due to intransigent Congressional opposition. But it would have been nice to see them try.

The CCC wasn’t a perfect model; in some ways, it was a prisoner of the prejudices of its times. Hiring women was never considered. Black and Native American men were often (not always) sent to segregated CCC camps, and faced hostility from nearby white communities. But it had important accomplishments for its recruits, as well as for the nation. Beyond the work day, CCC camps offered a rich cultural life, with sports teams, music and theater groups, and extensive educational opportunities. Most of the recruits had not finished high school; the CCC hired 30,000 teachers to provide academic, vocational, and business classes, which launched many young men into promising new careers.

I had a great time on vacation in the national parks, but I came back with selective amnesia: I can’t remember what’s wrong with repeating the CCC program that made all this possible.

Facts about the CCC are from “With Picks, Shovels, and Hope: The CCC and its Legacy on the Colorado Plateau,” by Wayne K. Hinton with Elizabeth A. Green (Mountain Press Publishing Company, Missoula, MT, 2008). 

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Among the accomplishments of

Among the accomplishments of the CCC not mentioned above was to provide the US with well-disciplined, healthy, fit young men to fight in WWII, as the camps were run by the Army. A recent documentary about the CCC shown on PBS explained this and all the other benefits derived from the program.

A modern day CCC could have vastly improved US infrastructure as a reasonable cost while providing employment, education, proper nutrition and education to those who, today, do without these things while also benefiting America. Obama missed his FDR moment, but it may be that he never wanted it in the first place. He seems to be in thrall to supply side economic theory.



The most obvious answer to

The most obvious answer to the unemployment problem has always been a CCC type program. But that would have required a government that didn't regard the unemployed with contempt. Obama and the rest of the filth that rule us simply have no need of working people. Working people don't provide the contributions necessary to fund the slick marketing programs that front for congressional and presidential candidacies. After all, government is there for those who can pay for it, eh? Just ask Abe Foxman.



Jobs that don't produce more

Jobs that don't produce more than they consume, which is what these jobs are, will hurt the economy further. Most of these jobs will produce nothing of economic value, yet have an economic cost. For example, the CCC paid groups of people to spread trash in parks, then paid other groups to pick the trash up. Economic value: $0. That's one of the reasons that the Great Depression lasted 15 years.



Erich... "...produce nothing

Erich... "...produce nothing of economic value, " is a sadly and brutally blindsided denial of what the CCC actually DID do... make a lasting (dare I say century at this point?) powerful tangible infrastructure build and MOREOVER a massive change in millions of men coupled with a respect and admiration for HELPING them at that time. My father's entire life hinged on what happened to him in rural Pennsylvania with this program that resulted in his career through WW2 and into the Atomic Energy Commission. His is hardly a singular story. Criticizing the CCC for what it did NOT do and wasn;t INTENDED to do, while ignoring where it's pointed SUCCESS was seems ridiculous at best and more likely angrily biased and vindictive.



"Jobs that don't produce

"Jobs that don't produce more than they consume, which is what these jobs are, will hurt the economy further. Most of these jobs will produce nothing of economic value, yet have an economic cost."

And here we have the quintessential and wholly repellant utilitarian thrust that is so typical of a certain strain of modern thinking. And, sadly, it permeates much of so-called progressive "thought", showing its amoral head in Frankenstinian stem-cell advocacy and in the reduction of language to clinicity, i.e. the common use of the dehumanising terms "fetus" and "reproductive rights" when "baby" and "human rights" would be the obvious choices in any minimally civilized community. Progressivism will need to rid itself of such self-serving contrivances if it ever is to reacquire mass movement status. As will Erich, above, if he is ever to grasp that government and work are for people, not people for work and government.



Andrei: You'll get a better

Andrei:
You'll get a better hearing if you drop the pretentious language.



A bit too far out in front

A bit too far out in front for you, are we, Anonymous? Don't be embarrassed, most of us are deficient in one way or other. If you're having trouble with the vocabulary, just speak up and we'll see that you're pointed in the right direction. :-)



Sat, 11/20/2010 - 17:05 —

Sat, 11/20/2010 - 17:05 — Andrei Vyshinsky (not verified)
 
"And here we have the quintessential and wholly repellant utilitarian thrust that is so typical of a certain strain of modern thinking."
 
This strain of thinking or that strain of thinking isn't the issue. What, exactly, do you find repellent... that I mention the FACT that these jobs aren't helping the economy recover, or that I'm against government actions that cause recessions/depressions to last longer than they would last naturally? Because that's what make-work jobs do; it's not a matter of opinion or any particular strain of thinking. It's simple math: it's a net economic loss if a person gets paid to do a job that produces nothing of economic value (how much would you be WILLING to pay a guy to spend his morning digging a hole and spend the afternoon filling the hole back in? What would the net effect on the economy be?). And, in the case of rebuilding infrastructure, the economic payback is so far in the future that, as far as the short-term effect of lifting the country out of depression, those jobs also fail; these things should be done during times of prosperity. There's a reason that people decrease spending during recessions. For the government to negate that by spending more money, which has to ultimately be born by the taxpayer, is reprehensible and counter-productive.
 
"...if he is ever to grasp that government and work are for people, not people for work and government."
 
The only purpose of work is to produce goods and services that add more value to the economy than they cost.
 
PS. I'm not a Progressive. Their philosophy is way to regressive for me.
 
PPS. While not even remotely on topic, I agree with your position regarding the rights of those yet to be born.
 
 
 



I run a Youth Conservation

I run a Youth Conservation Corps program, and the economic stimulus package allowed me to add at least 12 youth positions this summer and about the same last summer. Much like the CCC these young people were put to work on conservation projects on National Wildlife Refuges throughout he New England region. The administration may not have done a good job highlighting there Youth Conservation Corps accomplishments but I am sure nationwide the affect of ARRA funding has been the creation of a very large number of Youth Conservation Corps jobs.



burberry coats

baby burberry , just clicks away HHrTVTde http://www.burberryoutlet--online.com/



cheap designer purses

[URL=http://www.cheap--designer-handbags.com/ - cheap designer purses[/URL - to take huge discount RMtUUwzS http://www.cheap--designer-handbags.com/



cheap ugg boots uk sale

ugg wholesale uk , just clicks away feHjNTZm http://www.uggboots--uk.net/



louis vuitton online store usa

check louis vuitton online shop to your friends lcIZmmXm http://www.louisvuitton--onlineshop.com/



gucci uk

buy best gucci bags uk with confident aCIgHcBs http://www.gucciuk.us/



christian louboutin outlet store

buy a christian louboutin outlet shop for more lFNRXqMt http://www.christianlouboutin-outletstore.org/



steven jackson jersey

eqiiz roddy white jersey
oaznr mario williams jersey
reqen brett keisel jersey
fdqgf jake ballard jersey
nzxws fred jackson jersey



coach outlet

click coach handbags online online oLcbtHzI http://www.coach--outlet-online.net/



iyxunn

izoqahc