A Movement Rises in Arizona

by: Jordan Flaherty, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

A Movement Rises in Arizona
(Photo: Arasmus Photo / Flickr)

Three months ago, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed into law the notorious SB 1070, a bill that put her state at the forefront of a movement to intensify the criminalization of undocumented immigrants.

Since then, activists have responded through legal challenges, political lobbying, grassroots organizing and mass mobilizations. More than a hundred thousand people from across Arizona marched on the state capitol on May 29. Hundreds more have pledged to risk arrest through nonviolent direct action. These are the public manifestations of an inspiring and widespread struggle happening in this state. The organizations leading this fight offer a vision for people around the US concerned with human rights.

A Rogue State

On July 28th, Federal District Court Judge Susan Bolton issued a preliminary injunction against sections of Arizona law SB 1070, which is scheduled to go into effect immediately. The judge put a hold on some of the most outrageous parts of the bill, such as language that mandates racial profiling by officers. However, Judge Bolton left much of the rest of the law intact, including sections that specifically target day laborers.

For Arizona activists, the legal ruling represents - at best - a small respite. "It's not a victory, it's a relief," says Pablo Alvarado of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON). "We're putting a Band-Aid on a wound."

Alvarado and the organizers with NDLON are part of a broad network of national organizations and volunteers who have joined with local organizers to fight not just against this unjust law, but also against a general climate of anti-immigrant hatred. "Arizona is a rogue state," says Alvarado. "We're going to use every single means that we have at our disposal to fight back."

Puente Arizona, a Phoenix-based organization that describes itself as a human rights movement working to "resurrect our humanity," has formed Barrio Defense Committees in neighborhoods across the city. Emulating the structure of groups founded by popular movements in El Salvador, the community-based structure works to both serve basic needs, and also to build consciousness and help bring people together. According to Puente activist Diana Perez Ramirez, the committees host regular "know your rights" training and ESL classes, and are organizing "Copwatch" projects. "We ask the community to unite and organize themselves," says Ramirez. "And we are just there to support that." More than one thousand people have joined these neighborhood organizations so far, with more joining every day.

Puente has made use of volunteers from across the US, utilizing national support to help with local organizing, and initiating direct action with the support of out of town allies like the Ruckus Society, Catalyst Project, and various chapters of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). They have issued calls to action, including a Human Rights Summer (modeled after the civil rights movements' Freedom Summer) and "30 Days for Human Rights," a month of actions culminating on the day SB 1070 became law.

Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.

Just after midnight, as the law took effect, the first protest of the day began, as nearly 80 people blocked the intersection at the entrance to the town of Guadelupe, a small (one square mile) Native American and Hispanic community just outside of Phoenix. The town has a long history of struggle against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has been one of the main public faces of SB 1070, and most of the protesters (and all of the organizers) were from the community. Holding signs declaring their opposition to the new law and leading chants against police brutality, activists declared that Arpaio's officers are not welcome in their town. The standoff against police lasted more than an hour, before protest leaders in consultation with the town's mayor decided to open the intersection. Several more actions are planned.

Working Proactively

The Repeal Coalition, a Flagstaff- and Phoenix-based grassroots immigrants-rights organization, was formed in 2007. The group came together because they saw a vacuum in the immigrants' rights movement in Arizona. "Some of the left here were not being very audacious," explains Luis Fernandez of the Repeal Coalition. "The positions in the public debate ranged from 'kick them all out,' to 'get their labor and then kick them out.'" The Repeal Coalition has staked out a position of calling for the elimination of all anti immigration laws, declaring, "We fight for the right for people to live, love, and work wherever they please." With this call, says Fernandez, "Now we have a real debate."

When the coalition was founded, organizers brought in labor activists to advise them on how to build an organization along similar models to those that have built strong unions, utilizing house calls, neighborhood mapping, and group meetings. Although they are an all-volunteer group with little to no funding, they have developed a structure that has initiated large protests and provided direct service, and they are now strategizing more ways to take direct action in the post SB 1070 era.

Fernandez says that this struggle is ultimately about overcoming fear and moving from reaction to proactive action. "We've been in a crisis in Arizona for a long time," he explains. "Even if SB 1070 wasn't implemented, it wouldn't matter. The political crisis would continue." To address this crisis, Fernandez believes organizations must build unity across race and class. "Traditionally in America, when the working class starts suffering, instead of connecting together and looking upwards at the cause of the problem, they look sideways or downwards for who to blame." Most importantly, he believes activists must take action to seize the initiative.

In this vision, he has been inspired by young organizers working on the federal DREAM ACT, a federal law that creates a path to citizenship for undocumented youth. "They came to Arizona and said, 'We're undocumented and we're going to commit acts of civil disobedience.'" At first, Repeal Coalition members tried to talk them out of this action, but the youth explained, "We are going to lose our fear because it is the fear of being arrested or the fear of being deported that fuels the inability of political action." The bravery and vision of these youth has inspired Fernandez to continue to search for new and bold ways to take action, rather than just continually respond to right wing attacks. "We need to set the agenda," explains Fernandez. "We have to say, 'No, you're going to react to us.'"

Despite a range of tactics and philosophies, one thing organizers here have in common is a dedication to exporting the lessons of their struggle. While Arizona's law is the first and most draconian, similar laws are pending across the country. And during this current national economic crisis, more and more politicians have found that they can score political points by demonizing immigrants. "The last two months we've had a lot of people calling us asking what they can do to help Arizona," says Fernandez. "We say, organize in your own town. You don't have to come to Arizona, because Arizona is coming to you." 

-----

Organizations Mentioned in this Article:

Puente Arizona - http://www.puenteaz.org

Repeal Coalition - http://www.repealcoalition.org

National Day Laborer Organizing Network - http://www.ndlon.org

Catalyst Project - http://collectiveliberation.org

Students for a Democratic Society - http://www.studentsforademocraticsociety.org

The Ruckus Society - http://www.ruckus.org

Other Resources:

Louisiana Justice Institute: http://www.louisianajusticeinstitute.org

Justice Roars: http://louisianajusticeinstitute.blogspot.com 

Project Transparency: http://www.nolapublicrecords.org

Left Turn Magazine: http://www.leftturn.org

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Jordan Flaherty is a journalist, an editor of Left Turn Magazine and a staffer with the Louisiana Justice Institute. He was the first writer to bring the story of the Jena Six to a national audience and audiences around the world have seen the television reports he's produced for Al-Jazeera, TeleSur, GritTV and Democracy Now. His post-Katrina reporting for ColorLines shared an award from New America Media for best Katrina-related reporting in ethnic press. Haymarket Press will release his new book, "Floodlines: Stories of Community and Resistance from Katrina to the Jena Six," in 2010. He can be reached at neworleans@leftturn.org.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



I still don't understand why

I still don't understand why it's wrong or racist to want people to immigrate legally. This idea that this is a justice movement to be allowed to break the law is surreal to me.



This sounds like a very good

This sounds like a very good model for all progressive issues. It should be clear to everyone that we are in a battle for this country and we will lose this battle if we continue to simply react to the conservative agenda. We need to place our ideals and moral values in their face and keep pushing until they are off balance and having to react to us. We can all live in harmony, but not while we are under fire from a relentless right wing attack machine. We must find a way to neuter the radical right.



I'm from Arizona.. I think

I'm from Arizona..

I think that anyone in any member NAFTA state should have the right to live and work in any other NAFTA state.. so Mexicans can come here and live and work as well as Canada, but also we can live and work there as well... much as the EU allows it member state citizens..



JC, you would have to study

JC, you would have to study the history of immigration in the US to understand the huge flaws in our present system. Legal immigration is a practical impossibility for poor people. You really must be relatively wealthy to legally immigrate to the US. People with that kind of money are not about to be exploited as farm workers. I believe that Europeans still have the most favorable immigration requirements, so it may be that the whole system is racist and biased against they very kinds of people who come here in desperation to pick our fruits and vegetables. I personally am grateful to every farm worker of any immigration status because their willingness to work for sub-human wages let's me afford fresh foods on a less than lavish income. I honor and appreciate their efforts, and wish the government would subsidize farm worker wages instead of them many other stupid things they do with my outsized contribution to their wasteful idiocy. So if you are bothered about illegal immigration, you might want to consider working to address the real source of the problem, which actually has little to do with immigration and more to do with NAFTA and other globalization initiatives that increase poverty while improving the bottom line of multinational corporations. We have common cause with our Mexican and Latino sisters and brothers, but the neo-liberals don't want us to realize that so they are now cast as "the enemy" by both impoverishing their home country and then denying them abundant opportunities to achieve legal status. These beloved workers subsidize our lifestyle, but because they are low income they also make a very convenient scapegoat for people who do not have a big picture perspective on our common misery.



I'm so pleased to see

I'm so pleased to see rational and thoughtful responses here. JC, Uppity Woman is right. It's relatively simple for a well-educated, relevantly employed European or Asian to enter the U.S. for the purpose of working and living here. Our system is designed to fit that model perfectly. The problem is that there's no "sliding scale" cost for application for legal status that allows a person working at or below minimum wage to make that application. So they come here as a tourist, assimilate to the best of their ability and fail to leave when their visa runs out.

I agree with Anonymous - we should allow people of North America to move freely across borders for the purpose of living and working where there are desirable jobs and/or lifestyles. We'd have to set some guidelines because Canada can't support additions to their healthcare system without heavy compensation or they'll find themselves facing the same problems as the U.K. But NAFTA should have opened the door to more than corporate trade.



JC, I can understand how you

JC, I can understand how you might question this, but any law that says you must hassle someone based on how they look is inherently racist and laws that require people to report "suspicious" people are wrong on many levels. If there was some balanced approach that could regularize aliens and regulate the people who persist in illegally hiring them, it might be okay, but denying basic human rights is never a good answer.



Personally, I believe in

Personally, I believe in states rights. Living in NJ I don't think I can comprehend the problems Arizona is having with illegal immigration. If people from south of the border want to come here legally that's fine with me. If they sneak across the border and take advantage of our economically stressed safety nets they should be sent back home. That is common sense.



How would JC feel if the SS,

How would JC feel if the SS, Stazi or the KGB
stopped him and demanded his papers?
If no one makes a stand against facism some
day the embryonic police state we now inhabit
will reach maturity and he will be detained if
he doesn't have proof of citizenship.



RACISM STICKS TO

RACISM STICKS TO EVERTONE...ITSANOTHER WORD FOR ARROGANCE...HELL I HAVE SEEN PLENTY OF ILLEGALS ACTING ARROGANT(RACIST)...SOME ONE SAID THAT ARROGANCE IS THE BACKSIDE OF IGNORANCE...SO BY BECOMING LESS IGNORANT..WE BECOME LESS ARROGANT AND THEN LESS RACIST..SO NOW ALL IS WELL



States rights should never

States rights should never trample civil rights. And studies confirm that at least 70% of all undocumented aliens actually ENTERED the country legally. They just chose to stay after their visas expired.



Where are the employers

Where are the employers hiring at below market rates in all of this? The citizens' complaints are that they are not being hired, that " illegals" are. As "I'm from Arizona" rightly points out, (quote) "anyone in any member NAFTA state should have the right to live and work in any other NAFTA state". Should and could are very different things, but even if we were to put the lie of NAFTA aside, it is the employers, those sacred cows, who are somehow invisible in all of this. But then they are well-funded, and it's their story that gets argued, isn't it?
This is what fascism and corporate tyranny looks like. Does it need to speak German for us to see it?

Damned excellent comment, Uppity Woman. Much Respect!



When Bill Clinton jumped in

When Bill Clinton jumped in bed with the neo-cons and went against his on party by pushing in NAFTA, I began noticing his, and his pseudo liberal wife's actions.

That helped me train myself in spotting OWO and Bilderburg desires being fulfilled by other Whores of the various "Estates"that yield to greed and the Ultimate Power of Biggest Kids of the Block.

This present Arizona ruckus is a part of that great plan of a GLOBAL NATION.

If the Federal Government of the United States had enforced the existing federal laws, Arizona would not have the horrendous problem that it must deal with.

If any nation desires its on sovereignty, its borders must be respected. That goes for any of its border States as well... and it has little to do with 'profiling'. It does, however, have a great deal to with its sovereignty.

The MSM, or forth estate, has been directed by The Biggest Kids to hammer into the heads of the masses the bigotry of Arizona citizens 24/7.

I expect many hostile rebuttals, so fire away.
Then, when you're though with that one, you can tear me up for saying "9/11 was an inside job".



When Bill Clinton jumped in

When Bill Clinton jumped in bed with the neo-cons and went against his on party by pushing in NAFTA, I began noticing his, and his pseudo liberal wife's actions.

That helped me train myself in spotting OWO and Bilderburg desires being fulfilled by other Whores of the various "Estates"that yield to greed and the Ultimate Power of Biggest Kids of the Block.

This present Arizona ruckus is a part of that great plan of a GLOBAL NATION.

If the Federal Government of the United States had enforced the existing federal laws, Arizona would not have the horrendous problem that it must deal with.

If any nation desires its on sovereignty, its borders must be respected. That goes for any of its border States as well... and it has little to do with 'profiling'. It does, however, have a great deal to with its sovereignty.

The MSM, or forth estate, has been directed by The Biggest Kids to hammer into the heads of the masses the bigotry of Arizona citizens 24/7.

I expect many hostile rebuttals, so fire away.
Then, when you're though with that one, you can tear me up for saying "9/11 was an inside job".



When Bill Clinton jumped in

When Bill Clinton jumped in bed with the neo-cons and went against his on party by pushing in NAFTA, I began noticing his, and his pseudo liberal wife's actions.

That helped me train myself in spotting OWO and Bilderburg desires being fulfilled by other Whores of the various "Estates"that yield to greed and the Ultimate Power of Biggest Kids of the Block.

This present Arizona ruckus is a part of that great plan of a GLOBAL NATION.

If the Federal Government of the United States had enforced the existing federal laws, Arizona would not have the horrendous problem that it must deal with.

If any nation desires its on sovereignty, its borders must be respected. That goes for any of its border States as well... and it has little to do with 'profiling'. It does, however, have a great deal to with its sovereignty.

The MSM, or forth estate, has been directed by The Biggest Kids to hammer into the heads of the masses the bigotry of Arizona citizens 24/7.

I expect many hostile rebuttals, so fire away.
Then, when you're though with that one, you can tear me up for saying "9/11 was an inside job".



9.11 was clearly an

9.11 was clearly an insider's job, clearly done by the U.S. government.



Dear Liced-Christ (someday

Dear Liced-Christ (someday I'll penetrate the puzzle that is your username . . .): 9-11 was not a US Gov't "inside" job PER SE. It was a CIA working with lots and lots of layers and layers of Back Door Guys, a-a-a-allll the way out to the Pakistani ISI, which is their proudest clone. CIA's not the Gov't. CIA is outa control rogue-agency . . . but, yes, they do run the country. Not content to run just the country, they're trying to rule the world. . . . which brings me to Dear crowbar: No, not a rebuttal so much as a different term for the exact same structure you outline: not Global Nation, GLOBAL CORPORATION (think Matrix; oh, and spit out that blue pill!).



OK, cheyennebode: It's time

OK, cheyennebode: It's time someone blew your cover. Who's paying you to lie like this? Which drug cartel has you infiltrating ICE? Why don't you go get an honest job cooking meals for the homeless or something less poisonous than polluting T/O comments?