A Simple Way to End This Recession ... Forever
by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: United States Marine Corps Official Page, D Sharon Pruitt)
I found myself walking all over downtown Boston on Thursday to take care of some personal business. It was a beautiful day to walk the city. The sun was shining, everything was in full bloom, the air was warm with a cooling breeze, thousands of people were out and about, and the city was filled with unbelievably powerful and dangerous weapons of war.
Wait, what?
You heard me. I first got hip to what was going on a couple of days earlier. There were full-dress Marines all over the place, which at first made me think there was some kind of Fleet Week thing going on. On Tuesday, I was walking down Massachusetts Avenue to run an errand when the sky was suddenly filled with roaring thunder. I looked up, and what goes bellowing by at rooftop-level overhead but three gigantic gray Osprey helicopters flying in formation toward the center of the city. The pigeons at the corner of Huntington Avenue fell into paroxysms of terror and went wheeling into the air away from the noise, while people on the sidewalks stopped and pointed and stared.
I did some Google searching when I got home and found out that it is Marine Week here in Boston - the absence of sailors walking around should probably have given me a clue that it wasn't Fleet Week - and they shipped in the Ospreys to show them off. Walking through Boston Common on Thursday, I saw one of the Ospreys parked on the green next to an Apache attack helicopter and what looked like a big. fat-bodied, MH-53 Pave Low SAR helicopter. On Thursday, after I walked out of City Hall, I looked down the Fanueil steps to see a big troop transport truck parked next to a massive Howitzer right in front of the old meeting hall. I didn't get around to any other parts of the city, but smart money says there were other war weapons on display elsewhere as well.
The Boston Globe reported it this way:
The war bird flew in low, following easy-to-spot landmarks. It hovered for a moment before landing in a clearing in the middle of the heavily populated city. And then the Marines stepped out.
This was no assault, but rather the kickoff of a week-long show-and-tell on Boston Common by the Marines, armed with smiles and handshakes.
The Marines deplaned from a MV-22 Osprey, a unique tilt-rotor aircraft that can take off and land as either a conventional fixed-wing aircraft or a helicopter.
OK, the selfish part first: I hate the Osprey, and have ever since they were introduced by Bell-Boeing and started killing Marines, who, by the way, call the thing "the widowmaker." Local reporters who were allowed to take a flight in the things had to sign all manner of releases before they took off, just in case one of them crashed again. An Osprey crash in Afghanistan killed four people just last month, in fact. The things don't work, and watching them skim the roofs in my neighborhood made me want to run and hide. I half expected one of them to go sideways and crash into the Hancock building. It really wouldn't have surprised me.
But the larger issue represented by the Ospreys, and by the other war weapons parked all over town, has to do with money that has been poorly spent. One Osprey costs $70 million, and Bell-Boeing has sold some 450 of the things to the Marines, the Navy and the Air Force. If you don't have a calculator close at hand, that comes to $31,500,000,000.00. Spelled out, that's thirty one billion five hundred million dollars of your money.
Now, let's see.
The residents of Tennessee and surrounding states had the heavens open up on them last week, causing floods of catastrophic proportions that killed dozens of people and wiped out an as-yet undetermined number of homes. Dealing with this calamity is going to cost hundreds of millions of dollars, if not more.
A massive and ongoing oil disaster is threatening the entire Gulf Coast, as well as much of the Eastern seaboard and the ocean beyond if the oil gets into the Gulf's loop current. While British Petroleum is expected to shoulder the financial burden of the clean-up, the damage to fishing and tourism will again run into the hundreds of millions, if not more. For the record, the first of the oil officially made landfall in Louisiana on Thursday, and more is sure to come.
We are still fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both conflicts cost the American taxpayers millions of dollars a minute, and have cost hundreds of billions of dollars already, and that's leaving out the burdens placed on tens of thousands of families whose son or daughter or father or mother or brother or sister was killed or maimed since the invasions were undertaken a decade ago.
Wall Street bandits have raped the futures of millions of people, annihilated their savings and retirement and cost them their homes. Millions more remain unemployed, and require hundreds of millions in unemployment and other hardship benefits, if not more. The Bush administration TARP bailout alone cost $89 billion, and that's before we get into the cost of President Obama's "American Recovery and Investment Act." Thanks to the evil dealings of the aforementioned bandits, and their facilitators in Washington, DC, it's difficult to argue against the necessity of those expenditures ... but, damn.
The Federal government, as well as all 50 states, have been undertaking a series of extreme austerity measures in order to make up for the financial shortfall the nation has been experiencing during this supply-side, trickle-down, right-wing recession. Taxes on soda drinks, taxes on everything that moves, school budgets pillaged, libraries closed and as many budgetary holes as possible filled with federal money the federal government can't afford to spend.
We are a nation in bankruptcy dealing with a series of disasters and calamities, and we are going to be deep in the hole for generations to come.
But wait, what about those Ospreys? What about the $31 billion spent on spiffy, dysfunctional helicopters we absolutely do not need, even if they did work? What about the billions stolen by US "defense" contractors in an orgy of fraud in Iraq? What about the $1 trillion allocated this year alone for the "national defense" budget?
Just dumping the Osprey program would have given us enough money to pay for the disasters in Tennessee and the Gulf, with a whole lot left over to help those affected by the recession and the Wall Street thievery. Shaving the tiniest percent off the 2010 "defense" budget would feed, clothe and educate every person of woman born in the United States, and we'd still have the most awesomely formidable military arsenal in the history of the galaxy.
But we don't talk about that stuff. We close libraries, cut education budgets, tax everything, and borrow from our children's future instead of tapping into the awesome reservoir of taxpayer cash shoveled into the Pentagon each and every year.
And, oh yeah, we get weaponry scattered across my city that taxpayers can oooh and aaaah at as a booby prize for the trillions they've had stolen from them to pay for a bunch of crap that looks good flying overhead, but doesn't do anything to keep them safe.
Psssst, Mr. Obama: tap the defense budget. We can be out of this recession in the morning.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Obama? The last person to
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 09:07 — Anonymous (not verified)Obama?
The last person to alert. Hypnotized by the power elite from youth, he'll never reduce military spending.
and it isn't that simple.
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 10:53 — Anonymous (not verified)and it isn't that simple. What would be interesting is an accurate count of articles (over the past 40 years) pumped out by the alternative wing of corporate media - that have said the same thing over and over again, simplistically and without any thought about how the Pentagon, for better or worse, is the economy.
It's not enough to just tap a budget.
If we had followed what was
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 11:26 — Curtis (not verified)If we had followed what was proposed over the last 40 years, we wouldn't be in the pickle we are now.
It Would Be A Start to
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 11:28 — Bill O'Rights (not verified)It Would Be A Start to drastically reduce military expenditures and to close down most of the 700 military installations the US has around the world, as Ron Paul has called for for so many years to the ignoring majority of the Democratic and Republican parties, both. The rest of "ending the Recession" which will become a full blown Depression in short order, would be to allow it to happen without trying to engineer out of it through 'stimulus' packages that simply create impossibly greater debt and obviously haven't worked any better than they did for FDR - who's Depression was prolonged to the suffering of US and world citizens until WWII ended it and we entered a different theater of suffering. The entire bank bailout was never intended to help any of us - it was a gigantic heist to cover the gambling debts of a handful of extraordinarily powerful and wealthy people who own our government. Note that Bernie Sanders has just sold out and gutted the audit the Fed bill - if you want to end the Recession, expose the wildly criminal behavior that has taken over the governance of this country, the control of our Military and the minds of the population, who - like a typical family of sexual abuse - bury their heads in the sand while Daddy continues to have his way with little sister who is now starting to behave badly and get into trouble.
“Every gun that is made,
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 11:29 — Anonymous (not verified)“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists and the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.”
~ Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890-1969) 34th President of the United States
My God our leaders are
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 11:57 — Anonymous (not verified)My God our leaders are stupid!
Psssst, Mr Obama. There's
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 12:04 — Anonymous (not verified)Psssst, Mr Obama. There's no such thing as guns AND butter. It's in fact guns OR butter.
It's MomsDay, Mr Obama. My kids cannot digest guns. Can yours?
Nothing is going to change
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 12:07 — Jack E Lohman (not verified)Nothing is going to change until we have public funding of campaigns. As it is, the rich fund the elections and the politicians write the laws (or deregulate) to benefit the rich. What is it about money do we not understand?
If politicians are going to be beholden to their funders, those funders should be the taxpayers. And at $5 per taxpayer per year it would be a bargain. Even at 100 times that. We MUST lobby our senators and representative to co-sponsor the bill at:
http://www.fairelectionsnow.org/more/summary
Jack Lohman …
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
This is about priorities.
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 12:18 — Carl Forsberg (not verified)This is about priorities. Where your money is spent speaks volumes about what one regards as what is REALLY important – in their beliefs, in what they regard as important not just in their own lives but what they believe is important in the lives of others.
Regardless of what politician say, where they allocate a nations wealth and resources says volumes about what they are really about. Do the American people count in this game? From the way the money is being spent it appears they do not. That will become the legacy of this administration. The people have the power to change that if they so choose. IT IS YOUR CHOICE.
This is Mother's Day. It's
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 12:18 — Anyse (not verified)This is Mother's Day. It's original intent was to decry the use of our sons and daughters as fodder in war as this is not want our mothers taught us to do. They taught us to love and to care for others, not to kill them for the sake of the state. Some say that leaders are stupid. I ask "What is the role of a citzenry that allows this kind of behavior to persist?" Breaks my heart!
It took Eisenhower a while
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 12:33 — Jade Queen (not verified)It took Eisenhower a while to get it, but when he did, he really did. He funded a People to People program which sends geeks abroad to connect with other geeks over things like refractory depression and what to do about it. I know because I went on one of these trips to China in 2001 with 50-some other Oregonians (with a few Californians snuck in somehow). Sandwiched between my own family members with major challenges and working in what is called mental health, I was looking for every tool ever tried against depression. I was richly rewarded The ordinary Beijingian expert had already fielded tourists from everywhere and knew what everybody was doing. They were trying it all out in practice. It was fascinating. I have a trip journal I marvel over every once in a while. If anyone reading this gets an Obama ear now and then, whisper this in it. And I want a beer with Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Met him on the street in Boston. He was very nice to a star-struck Oregonian.
As much as i admire America,
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 12:46 — Eau Contraire (not verified)As much as i admire America, i doubt the reforms needed to address its glaring inequities are still in the capacity of the American citizenry to initiate. harsh words, i know, but they also express a deep disappointment, because the founding ideas of the original revolution are without peer; it's just disheartening to see they've been delayed once again by the tried and true vices of greed and power. i just thought we'd be further along by 2010 then this. woe is me. but better me than a weapons manufacturer or banker, i guess, is the point to which we're being driven rather quickly, yes? weapons manufacturers whose products can't win a war, and bankers who know nothing about stable investments.
It is that simple. Cutting
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 12:56 — Steve (not verified)It is that simple. Cutting Defense is merely one of three steps.
Cut Defense by 50%.
Tax wealthy multinational corporations at the same percentage rate that folks like you and I pay.
Tariff goods made overseas.
I understand corporate/GOP/Walmart apologists can't fathom taking steps to strengthen America and fortify US jobs, but the majority of us are ready to make these changes.
O President Obama. You
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 13:00 — Phil Arthur Numen (not verified)O President Obama. You promised.
Steve, I would add: Extend
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 13:18 — Anonymous (not verified)Steve, I would add: Extend the social security tax to include all levels of income, instead of simply the bottom tiers. :) Otherwise, great!
Check out Chalmers Johnson
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 13:22 — Anonymous (not verified)Check out Chalmers Johnson on
The Downslope of Empire:
http://www.counterpunch.org/kreisler05062010.html
A few years ago in Spokane's
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 13:48 — David Brookbank (not verified)A few years ago in Spokane's Riverfront Park, a friend (Marianne) and I, observed US death (military) recruiters in the packed summertime park. Among other things, they were painting camouflage on the faces of pre-school children. At one point a recruiter handed a rifle to a boy who looked about 17 and allowed the boy to raise it and sight it across the top of the crowd, down the meadow towards the clock tower and the river. Marianne and I were distributing flyers against the genocidal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. We were approached by one of the propagandists (recruiters) who after a brief exchange went back to his recruiting site and got on his cell phone. Within a few minutes, we were approached by Spokane Police who attempted to intimidate us out of our constitutional rights to free speech and assembly.
A couple years later on 7/4/07, in the same park, a joint terrorism task force composed of Spokane Police, FBI, and other law enforcement--acting on the pretext of a complaint from organizers of a Clear Channel Communications event, assaulted and arrested 17 young people who had and were expressing an agenda. (Turns out at a trial 10 months later, the police had withheld video evidence of their wrong doing and the case was dismissed and a lawsuit appears to be pending against them).
As long as we are spectators at the empires display of its shock troops and murderers of civilians in far away lands, we are lost. What is going to be interesting is to watch the same US "left", which is unwilling and incapable of getting behind a Nader or McKinney or other left candidate, as it is confronted by a right which has no qualms whatsoever about organizing, voting, and electing extreme right wingers. And what a laugh they must get out of watching the "left" rally to elect establishment figures like Obama, who may yet adopt as his own John McCain's "Bomb, Bomb Iran" slogan.
Sorry charlie, if Obama taps
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 14:10 — Anonymous (not verified)Sorry charlie, if Obama taps the defense budget to pay for the current natural and man made disasters here at home, he'll likely wind up the way two of the Kennedy clan and Abe Lincoln did. When you go up against the Military industrial complex, you lose either politically, or possibly literally-your life. I think Obama is too much of a team player to go against them. He was allowed to come to power because he would continue along with the status quo..don't expect miracles to happen here. They won't.
Obama has become, in effect,
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 14:25 — Sallyport (not verified)Obama has become, in effect, the mouthpiece of the Pentagon. Remember when we used to claim that our military was under civilian command? Now it is clear that Obama is taking orders from the Pentagon. And, as becomes clearer with each passing week, the Pentagon is deep into planning for perpetual war, the only way of insuring the survival of our empire.
Thanks for the
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 14:37 — Bob S. (not verified)Thanks for the article...glad to know I'm not the only one who felt that way last week watching those flying coffins buzz around the city.
Fox 25 news while interviewing a local Marine at the beginning " propaganda week"..told the marine he sounds like John Wayne when he speaks...I kid you not.
http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/morning/marine-week-boston-new-england-salutes-20100503
Two simple things the world
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 14:47 — Susan J. (not verified)Two simple things the world must do to end this madness:
1. A global 2010 Jubilee forgiving all debts of individuals, corporations, countries, etc., and a 'gift' of $1 million (dollars, any country's, or even a global, currency) to all of earth's inhabitants. Money is just numbers on a piece of paper, we will all have the same amount to start... All public works (utilities, food, water, health, energy, prisons, etc.) will become permanently de-privatized and non-profit. The next Jubilee will be 2050. We are 10 years late, it should have been 2000.
2. A requirement for corporations to hire their own security forces (Xe, etc.) when they wish to plunder & pillage other countries, kill their citizens, and steal the income from their resources. Our own troops can come home and protect us (and our public 'works') from the corporations.
All for the defense budget
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 15:03 — Diane Nilan (not verified)All for the defense budget being tapped, end the Osprey fiasco, and one more suggestion that will be just as popular...
Ban all paid lobbyists from DC for a year. (Might want to extend that to state capitols.) The Lobbyists have enough to live on without becoming homeless, at least for the year, and we'll see how government can function without them. Might like it.
How about requiring all
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 15:33 — Anonymous (not verified)How about requiring all elected federal officials to subsist on only their own salary and savings for the duration oftheir time in office and a period of two years thereafter? We might see how government functions without the influence of big money. We might like that, too.
I just want to plant a small
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 15:38 — Bobo (not verified)I just want to plant a small bug in peoples' ear at this point. After the 2nd American Revolution takes place and a new constitution is being debated and such, instead of electing officials and creating a career field of politician. How bout this? When a citizen of any ethnicity, economic group, or gender becomes 40 years of age. That person must register themselves for selective service. But not for compulsory military service, but for optional Congressional service. Now if a person is chosen to serve for a 2 year term. They will not be paid $40 a day like jury duty. Serving your country will not cause any families economic woes. No job will be lost because a person chose to serve and therefore must take a 2 year leave. If gov't should represent the people then the people need to be the gov't not just business men and lawyers who attended only Harvard or Yale. When I need my best interests represented, who do you think I've found who can do that for me? Yup, me. Hard to corrupt people very deeply when they never need run for elections. Just a thought.
Jack E. Lohman writes:
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 16:00 — Austin Loomis (not verified)Jack E. Lohman writes: "Nothing is going to change until we have public funding of campaigns." Sad but true. In particular, until we have public funding of campaigns... we won't have the kind of politicians who would support public funding of campaigns. To quote a great American author: "That's some catch, that Catch-22."
Dear Mr. Pitt, Did it ever
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 16:02 — Anonymous (not verified)Dear Mr. Pitt,
Did it ever occur to you that Obama doesn't want to cut the military budget? That when he got elected (or sooner), he realized that the office of the president is a puppet show and that the military owns this country? That if he dared try to cut the military he'd lose his office, lose his life, be criticized and defamed as non-patriotic, have all his other proposals destroyed or all of the above?
JFK, RFK, MLK: it's not
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 17:38 — Jade Queen (not verified)JFK, RFK, MLK: it's not just the military, it's also bankers, big ag, and big pharma who use war to continue living in the manner and manors to which they have become accustomed. If Obama were to buck them thoroughly, they might kill him, but eventually it would get figured out. The thing is, if you entertain bullies while you are taunting them, sometimes they let you live because they are bored with sycophants. Macho can admire the macho of sticking it macho's figurative eye. Why do you think Colbert and Stewart are still in business? Obama could talk trash if he wanted. You gotta die some time anyway. Why not go out in a blaze of glory?
Cut the military by 50% and
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 18:06 — Anonymous (not verified)Cut the military by 50% and do what with the returning men? Create public works programs that would cost just as much? That would show a more tangible good for the country than a pile of dead bodies. Don't you think? I'm all for it.
Hello Mr Pitt. So, now you
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 18:30 — WCH (not verified)Hello Mr Pitt.
So, now you tell us? Lots of perceptive people from both sides of the political spectrum have been telling us this for years and years. But it seems the Power Elite, as mentioned so well in earlier comments to your post, has the bit so firmly in its teeth and the 90% of the populace who haven't got a clue, can't process well enough to find the clues are kept that way by the same Power Elite who run the DOD, banks, Fed, and nearly every other agency of the federal government. That same Power Elite is not about to tolerate some smart aleckey 10% of the population upsetting their apple cart. If it ever gets better it is likely to be very messy in the process. We have been warned and warned, from Jefferson, Madison, Eisenhower and many others. Good luck to us all. We are going to need it. History does not come down in our favor.
How do you restrain a
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 19:33 — Anonymous (not verified)How do you restrain a monster? The answer is: carefully. It take cooperation.
These things cannot land
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 20:39 — Captain Chris (not verified)These things cannot land "conventionally" because the rotors would strike the ground. I was in Beaufort NC while they were undergoing x- flight testing. The best they can do is to place the rotors at about a 45 cant relative to the runway.
Just thought you might like to know.
cc
Susan J. RE: 2. A
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 21:17 — DJM (not verified)Susan J. RE: 2. A requirement for corporations to hire their own security forces (Xe, etc.) when they wish to plunder & pillage other countries, kill their citizens, and steal the income from their resources. Our own troops can come home and protect us (and our public 'works') from the corporations.
Oddly enough if this were enacted I believe the average person might finally begin to recognize the potential blowback , but it would be too late. (it is already of course, because our military is mainly the enforcement arm of corporations as it has been for a very long time. Read the book; War is a Racket)
The V-22 is a great example
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 21:54 — Dick Spivey (not verified)The V-22 is a great example of our corrupt military complex. It costs over $120 million each, is unsafe, and can only lift a quarter the payload of similar size helos. The facts are here:
http://www.g2mil.com/scandal.htm
''JFK, RFK, MLK: it's
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 21:57 — Anonymous (not verified)''JFK, RFK, MLK: it's not
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 22:38 — Jade Queen (not verified)..''
I beg to differ...
Corporations own the military simply as the default position any gang or cabal of Global Corporate CEOs would find themselves in with the parts of any 'Company' they take over...
Remember, CONservatives have been telling Americans two BIG things for 30 years now..., That ''LESS GOVERNMENT'' through less and ''LESS REGULATION'' is Good and running OUR GOVERNMENT like a Business is even Better...
And, much to my surprise and sorrow, MILLIONS of intelligent and hardworking VOTERS listened and agreed after 24 hours a day of nonstop, still ongoing Global Corporate owned Media Talking Head efforts to convince them...
And now, thanks to a whole LOT Less Regulatory Control of Ourselves over Our Country and a whole Lot Less Government to interfere with Global Corporations operating in America, The Business of America is now truly BUSINESS... and Only Business...
So, as for ''OUR'' Military..., Its pretty much a Business-Government's 'Business' which prefers to contract out a LOT of its 'Business' to For-Profit Enterprises because, after all, even if it costs more, what's the Cost to Them..?
The rank and file in the
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 22:20 — Randal Marlin (not verified)The rank and file in the military are expected to be willing to give up their lives in service of their country.
Why shouldn't the manufacturers of weapons be expected to forgo profit-making in time of war?
That would remove a major incentive for war. The military-industrial complex is far too powerful. There's a moral responsibility on the people and their representatives to regain control over this monster.
Not to interject
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 22:25 — Captain Chris (not verified)Not to interject unnecessarily, but I have a greater concern- I wish people would start to think about the wasted cash keeping the largest per capita population of any "society" in the history of human kind behind bars. What about private prisons for profit? Reminds me of Blackwater... Corrections Corporation of America, Whackenhut...
WTF!!
The "free media" controlled and embedded.
Targeting Al Jazeera, (and firing upon them.)
Legalized slavery in the "home of the free."
What a pile of crap. Who do they think we are?
SHEEP!!!!!
Legalized slavery in the "Home of the Free."
So brave, in our name, we kill people by flying robot. How brave...
Where are you Obama? WHO ARE YOU OBAMA? I VOTED FOR YOU AND YOU HAVE NOT MADE MENTION OF THE PRISON/ MILITARY/ INDUSTRIAL/ WALL STREET RAIDER/ Mercenary COMPLEX...
Mr. Obama, I hate to have to say this, but- I am ashamed of you.
How free we are!
It is all lies.
Wendell Berry's poem
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 22:31 — Anonymous (not verified)Wendell Berry's poem Questionnaire is easy to find on line. It's related, check it out.
Q: reporter "What do you
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 22:42 — Captain Chris (not verified)Q: reporter
"What do you think of Western Society?"
A: Mahatma Ghandi
"It might be a good idea."
"Psssst, Mr. Obama: tap the
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 23:16 — jahf (not verified)"Psssst, Mr. Obama: tap the defense budget. We can be out of this recession in the morning."
But, that would defeat the purpose of buying people in office, which is, of course, to make sure that the wrong people don't get the money.
Our problem isn't so much that we don't have money. Our problem is that we insist on giving responsibility of allocating what money we have to precisely those people who will do so in a fashion that is contrary to the good of the country.
"My God our leaders are stupid!"
Um ... ask yourself who keeps getting the money, and then tell me again which people are the stupid ones.
According to Gore Vidal,
Sun, 05/09/2010 - 23:57 — JRS (not verified)According to Gore Vidal, President Kennedy, who Vidal knew, told him: "It's so hard to hold the military down." I assume Kennedy meant the military-industrial complex as well. Did Kennedy get assassinated because he tried to hold the military down? Maybe he did, although I can't tell you for sure whether he did or not. I'm sure Obama knows how powerful the "military" is. A lot of you have some very good ideas on how we the people can have a better government, from public financed campaigns to reducing the military budget, to an ancient Greek style of government where all citizens have to serve at one time or another like jury duty, to getting rid of lobbyists for a year or two to see how things go from there. I wish I knew the answer to a better government. It would be nice to have another Constitutional Convention. But what do you do about the military?
Within 2 weeks of RFK
Mon, 05/10/2010 - 00:36 — Captain Chris (not verified)Within 2 weeks of RFK introducing an executive order that "U.S. Notes" were to be valued as currency, (thereby circumventing the Federal Reserve System, (a private, for profit institution)) he was shot dead.
You decide- fools.
cc
Which self serving,
Mon, 05/10/2010 - 00:45 — Captain Chris (not verified)Which self serving, narcissistic, sociopathic Jackasses would we have to bring about and "debate" another constitution?
Mr. Smith? I somehow doubt it...
1) Since corporations are
Mon, 05/10/2010 - 01:20 — Anonymous (not verified)1) Since corporations are now people too, make them pay taxes the same way people have to pay taxes - on their entire worldwide income.
2) Bring back the Eisenhower tax rates.
3) End the wars and don't start new ones.
That'll be a start.
Lots of folks throwing
Mon, 05/10/2010 - 01:40 — mgmyers79 (not verified)Lots of folks throwing around great ideas. But. None of them are workable without a sizable minority of Americans throwing monkeywrenches into the profiteering plans. Picketing, marching, protests are not going to cut it. Once we begin blocking commerce and acting seriously (trying to not get caught), instead of symbolically(getting caught for doing nothing), the elites will begin making concessions. The one thing they can't stand is to lose profit. Cut into the bottom line and they'll either scream uncle or hire Blackwater to wage urban warfare for them.
"it's difficult to argue
Mon, 05/10/2010 - 05:18 — MonkeyMuffins (not verified)"it's difficult to argue against the necessity of those expenditures"
--
It's only difficult if you're a regressive-gliberal-phlegmocrat (RGP).
If you're a reasonably sane, human primate, not so much.
Thank you Mr. Pitt, for reminding me a) why I didn't vote for Status Quobama, and b) why I'm a repentant RGP.
That having been said, recalling the empire's troops and imposing austerity on the imperial war machine would no doubt prove beneficial.
But that's as likely as Hope, Change and Yes We Can.
These days, sites like The Automatic Earth are infinitely more relevant, informative and reality based than these Left-in-name-only store fronts.
--
We live at the end of empire, during the century of contraction, in a culture of make believe.
We are not going to grow, consume and indebt our way out of the problems of growth, consumption and debt.
We got everything we wanted and lost everything we needed.
Come on, folks, face the
Mon, 05/10/2010 - 07:15 — Igor (not verified)Come on, folks, face the truth: None of this is going to change without the use of physical force by the American people. Tiocfaidh ár lá...
I made a living doing the
Mon, 05/10/2010 - 14:08 — Dan (not verified)I made a living doing the dismal science, and so I hardly agree that Mr. Pitt's prescription will "end this recession forever"... even though I absolutely do agree with all his suggestions. The dismal fact is that our economy is addicted to military spending, and has been ever since WWII. Millions of jobs and are directly related to it, and millions more indirectly. So, giving the military/industrial complex the axe will probably double our unemployment rate. If we want to end the recession forever we'll need a sweeping economic makeover -- an endeavour that's totally impossible under Wall Street style capitalism, with "race to the bottom" globalized oursourcing going on. To get on the right track we might start by going to european style capitalism and then doing a sweeping reform of the WTO so it focuses on fair and environmentally sustainable trade instead of just free trade. And while we're in the throes of the readjustment this would entail, we might want to dump the M/I complex, as Mr. Pitt suggests.
Don't count on Obama - the
Tue, 05/11/2010 - 00:24 — Anonymous (not verified)Don't count on Obama - the moment he actually does something close to what is right, he will be gunned down like Kenndey and replaced by a more pliant puppet. They will blame it on a lone white supremacist.
Kansas. Once I was hired to
Tue, 05/11/2010 - 10:00 — Anonymous (not verified)Kansas. Once I was hired to write a series of articles about towns in Kansas. As I looked over their statistics and poured over You Tube videos it became clear that the war machine was pumping money into the small towns via military bases and aircraft manufacturing. The war machine is a form of socialism. People have jobs making these useless weapons. The other employer is our gross and unhealthy agriculture system.
Wars keep crooks in office
Tue, 05/11/2010 - 14:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Wars keep crooks in office silly people...look around the world and understand that wars are fun and profit for politicians. Not once has anyone said, If we stop the wars, we would have enough money for health care, if we stop the wars, we could use our military to protect our country and our borders. Wars keep Presidents in power that is all you need to know. Now do something about that. And ask the war profiteers in Congress why they keep funding the killing and the murder of innocents when the reason for going into the wars was full of lies? The reason for staying in the wars is also full of lies.