Honor the WikiLeakers

by: Alexander Cockburn, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

When it comes to journalistic achievements in 2010, the elephant in the room is WikiLeaks. I've seen many put-downs of the materials as containing "no smoking guns", or as being essentially trivial communications to the State Department from U.S. diplomats and kindred government agents around the world.

Now, it's true that the cables were legally available to well over 1.5 million Americans, who had adequate security clearance. But trivial? Don't believe it. The cables show the daily business of a mighty empire acting in manners diametrically opposite to public pretensions. The cables form one of the most extraordinary lessons in the cold realities of international diplomacy ever made public. Normally, scholars have to wait for 10, 20, even 50 years to gain access to such papers.

The WikiLeaks documents show that the picture of the international business of the United States offered by the major U.S. media to the public is an infantile misrepresentation of reality. The efforts being made by Attorney General Eric Holder to bolster secrecy and espionage laws show that the U.S. government, led currently by a man who pledged "transparency," wants the American people to remain in blissful ignorance of what its government is actually doing.

The alleged leaker of the WikiLeaks files, Army Private Bradley Manning, currently being held in solitary confinement in sadistic conditions, should be vigorously applauded and defended for exposing such crimes as the murder of civilians in Baghdad by U.S. Apache helicopters. The WikiLeaks Afghan-related files are a damning, vivid series of snapshots of a disastrous and criminal enterprise.

In these same files, there is a compelling series of secret documents about the death squad operated by the U.S. military known as Task Force 373, an undisclosed "black" unit of special forces, which has been hunting down targets for death or detention without trial. From WikiLeaks we learn that more than 2,000 senior figures from the Taliban and al-Qaida are held on a "kill or capture" list, known as Jpel, the joint prioritized effects list.

Julian Assange and his colleagues should similarly be honored and defended. They have acted in the best traditions of the journalistic vocation.

The U.S. began the destruction of Afghanistan in 1979, when President Jimmy Carter and his National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, started financing the mullahs and warlords in the largest and most expensive operation in the CIA's history until that time. Here we are, more than three decades later, half-buried under a mountain of horrifying news stories about a destroyed land of desolate savagery, and what did one hear on many news commentaries earlier this week? Indignant bleats often by liberals, about WikiLeaks' "irresponsibility" in releasing the documents, twitchy questions such as that asked by The Nation's Chris Hayes on the "Rachel Maddow Show": "I wonder ultimately to whom WikiLeaks ends up being accountable."

The answer to that last question was given definitively in 1851 by Robert Lowe, editorial writer for the London Times. He had been instructed by his editor to refute the claim of a government minister that if the press hoped to share the influence of statesmen, it "must also share in the responsibilities of statesmen."

"The first duty of the press," Lowe wrote, "is to obtain the earliest and most correct intelligence of the events of the time, and instantly, by disclosing them, to make them the common property of the nation ... The Press lives by disclosures ... For us, with whom publicity and truth are the air and light of existence, there can be no greater disgrace than to recoil from the frank and accurate disclosure of facts as they are. We are bound to tell the truth as we find it, without fear of consequences -- to lend no convenient shelter to acts of injustice and oppression, but to consign them at once to the judgment of the world."

Alexander Cockburn is co-editor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. He is also co-author of the new book "Dime's Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils," available through www.counterpunch.com.

Copyright 2010 Creators.com 

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Hear, hear! So few

Hear, hear! So few "Americans" truly and/or correctly understand freedom of the press, and the First Amendment in relation not only to the press but to all of us, and those right's importance to freedom and liberty, as well as the grave threat that government secrecy and lawlessness, and/or extra-judicial government activities, pose for all of us, and are doing so more and more.

Thus, most "Americans" cluelessly allow their sacred human rights as written down in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution, and reiterated in the state constitutions, to be very rapidly whittled away to nothing, threatening the safety of the entire country and everyone in it. They don't even understand what "Supreme Law of the Land", which the Constitution is, means.

Title of another article on the topic: "MSNBC Analyst: Constitution Has 'No Binding Power On Anything'" (which a grave and extremely treasonous lie!)

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
December 31, 2010

infowars.com/msnbc-analyst-constitution-has-“no-bidding-power-on-anything”/

We've all got to wake up and take back the realization of the exceeding seriousness of the Constitution(s), both state and federal; and completely stand up for them and their principles of human and civil duties and rights, especially from those domestic enemies and traitors to this country who falsely claim that the Constitutions are supposedly not binding.

Because, if we don't stand up for and defend and protect the Constitutions from the rampant traitors in the U.S. today, which may now very well include most "Americans", we are all doomed to a "life" of slavery and destitution at the hands of a government that can do anything to us. This must be stopped! And it is the DUTY of ALL Americans to stop it:

"...(W)hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce (The People) under absolute Despotism (as IS happening right now), it is their right, IT IS THEIR DUTY, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security (and liberty, freedom and happiness)..."! --Declaration of Independence, 1776. [Emphasis and/or clarification(s) added by me.]

Since the Declaration of Independence is joined to the U.S. Constitution under the Supremacy Clause of the latter, it is part and parcel of the Constitution, and is part of the Supreme LAW of the Land just like the rest of the Constitution; therefore, it is also the DUTY of every single American including government officers to OBEY it, just as it is their DUTY to obey ALL of the Constitution.

All those who do not rise up en masse against ALL of this destruction of the Supreme Law of the United States, make themselves complicit traitors along with all of those who are part of destroying it outright; so, unless people are not True Americans, and don't want to be traitors to the U.S., they better get off their duffs and defend and protect the Constitution(s)!



Correction [in capital

Correction [in capital letters]: ...All those who do not rise up en masse against ALL of this destruction of the Supreme Law of the United States, make themselves complicit traitors along with all of those who are part of destroying it outright; so, unless people are not True Americans, OR don't want to be traitors to the U.S., they better get off their duffs and defend and protect the Constitution(s)!



Find a uniform & kill

Find a uniform & kill whatever is inside of it.



"Find a uniform & kill

"Find a uniform & kill whatever is inside of it."

You would kill the laker girls? STRING HIM UP!



There is a difference

There is a difference between a uniform, which is the public extension of authority, and a costume. A marching band does not wear uniforms in the sense to which I refer, but merely costumes.

A Russian general, whose name I can't remember said, "The army with the fanciest uniforms invariably loses."



We had fancier uniforms than

We had fancier uniforms than the North Vietbamese.



Insanity Asylum

http://www.zhgutov.com/index.php/component/k2/item/41-отец-антоний-бадура-меня-не-хотели-отправлять-в-сибирь/41-отец-антоний-бадура-меня-не-хотели-отправлять-в-сибирь?start=90