Groups to Monitor DC Vehicle Checkpoints

by: Brian Westley  |  The Associated Press

Groups to Monitor DC Vehicle Checkpoints
Police stop a vehicle at a checkpoint in the Trinidad neighborhood of Washington, DC. Recent violence in the neighborhood prompted police to create a Neighborhood Safety Zone to make sure people have legitimate reasons to be there. Civil libertarians are closely observing the police checkpoint and considering legal action. (Photo: AP / Jose Luis Magana)

    Police in the nation's capital set up controversial vehicle checkpoints Saturday in a neighborhood reeling from gun violence, with civil liberties groups considering legal action and closely observing officers.

    Police in neon yellow vests stopped motorists traveling through the main thoroughfare of Trinidad - a neighborhood near the National Arboretum in the city's northeast section. Police checked drivers' identification and turned away those who didn't have a "legitimate purpose" in the area, such as a church visit or doctor's appointment.

    The checkpoints were announced after eight people were killed in the city last weekend. Most of the killings occurred in the police district that includes Trinidad. Already this year, the district has had 22 killings - one more than in all of last year.

    The checkpoints have drawn harsh criticism from civil rights groups.

    "Trinidad should not be treated like Baghdad," said Mark Thompson, the leader of the NAACP's local police task force.

    Thompson was joined Saturday morning by about a dozen activists representing myriad groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, at the intersection where the checkpoints began in the evening. They warned of legal action if residents' constitutional rights were violated.

    "It seems interesting that police are willing to easily cast aside fundamental freedoms for quick-fix, lazy law enforcement tactics," said Johnny Barnes, executive director of the ACLU for the National Capital Area. "We're going to do everything to make sure that the rights of citizens are protected."

    Barnes said about two dozen lawyers, law students and other citizens were monitoring the checkpoints Saturday night and interviewing those who were turned away by police to determine if people's rights were violated.

    Interim D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles and Mayor Adrian M. Fenty have insisted that the checkpoints are a legal and necessary step to stop a spike in violence.

    "It would be unconscionable, maybe even a dereliction of our duty, for the police chief and I to not do something different, to not turn up the heat," Fenty said.

    The checkpoints will be enforced at random hours for at least five days, though it could be extended to 10 days, police said. Officers will search cars only if they observe guns or drugs. Pedestrians will not be affected.

    Some residents said they felt the checkpoints were unfair to law-abiding citizens.

    "You are bothering innocent people," said Diane Kemp, who has lived in the Trinidad neighborhood for 16 years. "I know I live here, so why should I have to show my ID?"

    But others applauded the initiative. George Saxton of Capitol Hill was pulled over in his black Ford Focus after dropping off his niece near the checkpoint. He said those who are complaining about the initiative probably have something to hide.

    "I hope this will help," Saxton said.

    D.C. Council member Phil Mendelson, chairman of the Committee on Public Safety and the Judiciary, said the checkpoints are the latest example of recent police initiatives that he believes threaten residents' civil rights.

    He cited an amnesty program, later scaled back, in which officers planned to go door-to-door asking for permission to search homes for guns. He also pointed to a plan for a large surveillance camera network that he claims lacks adequate privacy rules.

    "One has to ask 'What is going on? What is the thinking?'" he said.

    

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Welcome to the Police State.

Welcome to the Police State. War is Peace...


is one to understand that

is one to understand that the people who died were not law abiding citizens of good repute and there fore it was okay for them to die. Instead of thinking of lawsuits maybe these same groups should be instituting programs within each and every block that would convince those dwellers that the removal of bad dudes is a good idea. That people can start at one end of the street and sweep each and every piece of unlawful trash out the other end. Or does the ACLU prefer to make headlines in the safety of the courtroom?


This is un-acceptable in

This is un-acceptable in America or anywhere else, this policy should be challenged on every front until overcome and prohibited . Maybe civic involvement can cure the problems that inspired the checkpoints in the first place. Reach out and listen to the real needs of the people affected. Jobs, Housing, healthcare, education and JUSTICE. Cure that.... yer on yer way WHYnotnews.org


First we got NOW with their

First we got NOW with their campaign against drunk drivers, who rather than making drunk drivers accountable for their actions decided to take out their anger on the rest of us. The result? Random road blocks that make everyone that goes through them prove they are not breaking a law. Once the Supreme Court found it constitutional the road blocks were expanded to lesser holidays, then weekends. Even Supreme Court nominee Robert Bourque called this law "blatantly unconstitutional". Once that floated, seat belt laws were used to expand the road block policy another level. Then they moved on to "cruisers". Now its bad neighborhoods. The next step will be requiring every citizen to carry identification. Once that happens get used to the phrase: "May I see your papers please?" And that is how we lose our constitutional rights. Are your children any safer?


Now we know what the Bush

Now we know what the Bush administration REALLY means when it says that if the terrorists are not stopped in Iraq, they will bring their terrorism to the US. We were not outraged enough by what they did in Iraq when they started kicking down doors and harassing civilians, ultimately culminating in Fallujah and Abu Ghraib, so they are now gearing up to bring their act to the good ol' US of A. I wonder how far they will get with this and what, if anything, will ultimately stop it?