Soaring Gas Prices Changing Lifestyles
     By Daisy Nguyen
     The Washington Post | Associated Press

     Monday 10 March 2003

     With gasoline prices climbing to near-record levels, some Americans are cutting back sharply back on nonessential driving or trading in their gas guzzlers.

     Michael Giles said he stopped volunteering at the Salvation Army to avoid driving his 1990 Chrysler Imperial, which gets 22 miles per gallon.

     "I'm retired and live on a pension, so I'm always pinching pennies," said Giles, 61, as he filled his tank in Los Angeles. "I can't volunteer anymore, and so somebody is suffering from that. I suffer because that used to give me something to do."

     The average price for gas, including all grades and taxes, reached about $1.75 a gallon Friday, the Lundberg Survey of 8,000 stations nationwide reported. The survey's record is $1.77, recorded in May 2001.

     Giles and other Californians are paying the nation's highest prices, with the average reaching nearly $2.06 a gallon on Friday, according to the Automobile Club of Southern California. The nation's highest price for self-serve regular was in San Francisco, at $2.10, the Lundberg survey found.

     Charles Robinson, 59, of Kansas City, Mo., began cutting back his driving two weeks ago and now uses his car only for essential trips to the grocery store or the doctor or to pay bills. Unleaded gas averaged $1.63 a gallon Thursday in Kansas and $1.59 in Missouri, according to the AAA.

     "Everything came to a halt," Robinson said. "It's too much money for too little gas."
The effects of the high prices extend beyond the car owners, said Jack Kyser, chief economist at the Los Angeles Economic Development Corp.

     For poorer people, "it probably means fewer trips to the mall, fewer trips out for the family to eat," Kyser said. "So this is going to ripple out through the economy."
Diesel fuel also is more expensive.

     Fresno trucker Ricky Dunn, 46, said he is struggling to make ends meet at home because he is spending around $700 more each month for diesel for his truck, and that eats into his profits.

     "I stay home more now," he said. "Last time, I filled just enough to get home from the barber shop. I was watching the (gas gauge) hand all the way home."

     Roger Monay estimated he spent up to $300 in the past month to fuel his van for the 70-mile commute from his Lancaster home to work in Los Angeles.

     "I couldn't take it anymore, so just yesterday I bought a used, four-cylinder car - a Ford Mustang," he said.

    

---

     Go to Original

     Interest Rates May Be Cut to 1958 Low
     By Martin Crutsinger
     Associated Press

     Monday 10 March 2003
 
     The Federal Reserve may soon be forced to cut interest rates again, driving them to the lowest level since Dwight Eisenhower was president, amid fears that the shaky economy is about to fall back into recession.

     Concerns about the anemic recovery from the 2001 downturn were heightened with last week's report that unemployment had risen to 5.8 percent in February, with a big loss of 308,000 jobs.

     "Prior to the unemployment report, we thought the Fed would stay on hold for some months to come and the next move would be a rate hike, not a rate cut," Louis Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP, a bond market research firm, said Monday.

     Now, Crandall said, he is forecasting a quarter-point rate cut at the March 18 Fed meeting.

     Worries about an Iraq war continued to batter Wall Street on Monday with the Dow Jones industrial falling by 171.85 points to close at 7,568.18.

     The Fed last cut interest rates on Nov. 6, when it slashed its target for the federal funds rate, the interest that banks charge each other on overnight loans, to 1.25 percent, the lowest average since 1.17 percent in July 1961.

     The funds rate has not been lower than 1 percent since it averaged 0.68 percent in July 1958, when Dwight Eisenhower was president.

     Some economists believe the Fed might cut rates by a half-point, the same move it made in November, when it cited the drag on the economy from "geopolitical risks" such as worries about a possible war in Iraq.

     Before the dismal unemployment report, most economists believed that the Fed stand pat in March, as it did in December and January, believing that it had already done enough to guarantee the economy would rebound more strongly once the uncertainty of the war was removed.

     Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan even told Congress in mid-February that President Bush's economic stimulus package of new tax cuts would probably not be needed because the economy would begin growing at healthier rates once businesses grew more confident and began increasing their investment spending.

     But the job losses in February were so dramatic that analysts quickly lowered their growth estimates. Analysts at J.P. Morgan slashed their forecast for growth in the first six months of this year from 3 percent to 1.5 percent.

     Financial markets were also quick to respond to the jobless report, with federal funds contracts ~W bets on future Fed rate moves ~W putting the possibility of a March rate cut above 40 percent, up from 22 percent before the jobless report was released.

     Stan Shipley, economist at Merrill Lynch, called the jobless report "frighteningly weak," but he said the Fed still may decide not to cut rates at next week's meeting. He said the Fed may prefer to signal that the possibility of a rate cut has increased by changing the portion of its statement designed to foreshadow future moves.

     Many economists said that even if the Fed doesn't cut rates at the March meeting, policy-makers could use an emergency telephone conference call to change rates between meetings. The next discussion on interest rates after March will not occur until May 6.

     If the United States does go to war with Iraq and achieves a quick victory which jump-starts U.S. economic growth, then the Fed may see no need to cut rates further.

     However, if the war goes badly, with significant disruption to oil supplies leading to soaring oil prices, analysts said the central bank will not hesitate to use all its remaining interest rate ammunition.

     "In a messy war scenario, the central bank would cut short-term interest rates toward zero," predicted Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo in Minneapolis. He said that given how weak the economy is, the Fed is not worried that higher oil prices will trigger inflation troubles.

     "Today, the central bank is more worried about deflation than inflation," Sohn said.

     (In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.