Musharraf Quits as President to Avoid Impeachment

by: Naween A. Mangi and Khalid Qayum  |  Bloomberg

Musharraf Announces His Resignation, Avoids Impeachment
A partially torn poster of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who announced today that he will resign. (Photo: Emilio Morenatti / AP)

    Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf, the dictator who reinvented himself as a US ally against terrorism, resigned to avoid facing impeachment charges for illegally seizing power and mishandling the economy.

    "This is not time for individual bravado. I lose or win in impeachment proceedings, the Pakistani nation will be the loser," Musharraf, 65, said in a one-hour address to the nation. "After taking advice from my supporters and friends, I have decided to resign in the best interests of the nation."

    Musharraf's departure after a six-month standoff frees up the coalition government to tackle an economy growing at the slowest pace since 2003, leaving half the population short of food. It will also test the durability of a fragile coalition that has been criticized by the U.S. for not doing enough to fight militants on the border with Afghanistan.

    "This is the opportune moment for the government now," said Alok Bansal, an analyst at the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses in New Delhi. "Unless they show tenacity now, the coalition may splinter."

    The president said he will tender his resignation to the speaker of the house today. He'll be replaced by Mohammedmian Soomro, chairman of the Senate and a Musharraf loyalist, pending a parliamentary vote to choose a new president within 30 days. Pakistan's benchmark stock index rose the most in seven weeks and the rupee gained after the announcement.

    Army Commander

    Musharraf was the army commander in 1999 when he overthrew Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who has led calls to remove the president since returning from exile late last year. Pakistanis were frustrated with a decade of corrupt and ineffective governments under Sharif and Benazir Bhutto, and opinion polls showed 70 percent of people supported the coup.

    A former special services commando, Musharraf put Sharif on trial for alleged corruption and in a deal brokered by the Saudi royal family, the two-time former prime minister was sent into exile in Saudi Arabia. Musharraf's government also pursued corruption charges against Bhutto, leading her to remain in Dubai and London until she returned last year, only to be assassinated 10 weeks later. Musharraf didn't say today whether he plans to remain in Pakistan or go into exile.

    Under Pressure

    The former general has been under pressure to quit since he fired 60 judges, including Supreme Court Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammed Chaudhry last year, leading to nationwide street protests. The government led by the Pakistan Peoples Party, which came to power in March after defeating pro-Musharraf parties in the Feb. 18 elections, vowed to reinstate the senior judiciary but has been unable to agree on how to do so.

    "When he saw impeachment coming, he decided to resign because he couldn't sack the government," Sharif's spokesman Siddiq-ul-Farooq said in a telephone interview from Islamabad. "We hope the judiciary will be reinstated very soon now."

    Pakistan's coalition partners including Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari, co-chairman of the Peoples Party, will meet today to discuss the reinstatement of judges, spokesman Farhatullah Babar said by telephone.

    "After a long struggle, democratic forces have won and uncertainty has ended," Information Minister Sherry Rehman, a member of the Peoples Party, said. "Its difficult to give a deadline for the reinstatement of judges."

    Handed Control

    Musharraf assumed the presidency in 2001 and was re-elected by parliament in October. Opposition parties claimed the law barred Musharraf from standing while he still headed the military. Musharraf handed over control of the army to Ashfaq Parvez Kayani in November.

    After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Musharraf abandoned the Pakistani army's long sponsorship of the Taliban regime in neighboring Afghanistan and allied with the U.S. His government was the largest recipient of U.S. aid in Asia after Afghanistan, amounting to more than $10 billion in six years.

    Musharraf was credited for steering Pakistan's economy out of trouble in 1999 when the government had less than $1 billion in foreign exchange reserves. He brought in former Citigroup Inc. executive Shaukat Aziz to run the finance ministry and the nation's economy expanded at an average annual 7.5 percent in the four years ending June 30, 2007.

    The benchmark Karachi Stock Exchange gained 10-fold since 2001 and investment from overseas corporations including China Mobile, Standard Chartered Plc and Emirates Telecommunications Co, reached a record $8.4 billion last year.

    The main stock index, which has fallen 24 percent this year, rose 4.5 percent to 10,719.62. The rupee rose 1.1 percent to 75.60 against the U.S. dollar, paring its 22 percent decline this year.

    Faced Criticism

    Since January, Musharraf has faced criticism for a slowdown in economic growth, a widening budget deficit and an inability to reign in inflation running at a 30-year high.

    In the speech, Musharraf denied charges his policies had stunted economic growth, calling allegations against him "baseless."

    The coalition government "may succeed in removing me but it can damage the country," Musharraf said in the speech. "I deny the charges that economic crisis is caused by policies of my government in the past nine years."

    At an electronics store less than a mile from Musharraf's office, a dozen men applauded when he announced his resignation.

    "We are very conscious that problems will remain with us," said Khurram Mughal, a lawyer from Rawalpindi, who stopped in the store to watch the speech.

    Peace Process

    As president, Musharraf started the India-Pakistan peace process by initiating a cease-fire across the border in October 2003 and pushing several so-called confidence-building measures including bus services and cultural exchanges.

    "I don't think any other leader would have had that kind of commitment," said Suba Chandran, deputy director of Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies in New Delhi. "He is the person behind the peace process and he was the first Pakistani leader to reorient Pakistan's policy toward Kashmir and ensure intra-Kashmiri interaction. His leaving would create a void."

    Musharraf considers himself a religious moderate who enjoys playing bridge and listening to classical music. He preached "enlightened moderation" as a way forward for Pakistan, the world's second most populous Muslim nation after Indonesia.

    During his tenure, Musharraf survived at least four assassination attempts by Islamic extremists since he ended support for the Taliban regime.

    Emigrated to Pakistan

    The former army chief was born on Aug. 11, 1943, in Delhi, emigrating to Pakistan after the partition of the subcontinent in 1947 at the age of five. He lived in Turkey from 1949 to 1956 where his father was a diplomat. He attended St. Patrick's school in Karachi and then joined the army, graduating from the Pakistan Military Academy.

    Musharraf was commissioned in the artillery regiment of the army in 1964 and later joined the Special Services Group as a commando, according to his profile released by the army. After serving in two wars with India - in 1965 and 1971 - he became a general in 1991 and chief of the army in October 1998.

    He has been frequently criticized by the U.S. for "not doing enough" to fight terrorists hiding along the Pakistan- Afghanistan border. As many as 2,000 people were killed in suicide attacks and other bombings in Pakistan last year.

    "Pakistan's economy is in a poor condition, politics is in complete chaos and there's a rise in militancy and violence," said Jawaharlal Nehru University's former professor Bahadur. "He was personally tolerant and liberal but his positive contributions are not enough to overshadow his negative ones."

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



"...resigned to avoid facing

"...resigned to avoid facing impeachment charges for illegally seizing power and mishandling the economy." Yes! About time! Woo-hoo.... What? President of *Pakistan*? Crap. Got my hopes up there for a second....


If Pakistani voters can have

If Pakistani voters can have accountability for their leader we American Voters can have impeachment here. The House Democrats have the votes to hold full Impeachment Hearings. A simple majority vote is all it takes to start Impeachment Hearings, but Speaker Pelosi is blocking it. Use Your Power To Force Impeach Hearings Now or lose it forever "As John Dean points out, Bush/Cheney have broken the same laws Nixon did, only Nixon's actions did not cost the lives of over 4000 brave American men and women" (and over 30,000 GIs wounded, one Million Iraqis Killed). Bush and Cheney are the most impeachable US executives in American history. If the Incumbent House Democrats do not hold impeachment hearings soon it will be plain to all that they are Traitors to their Oath Of Office and to Our Constitution. The failure of the House Democrats to hold Bush and Cheney accountable for the WMD Lies is unforgiveable. The Democrats lied to us about Stopping The Iraq War in 2006 and then proceeded to fund it thru 2009. Even the Democratic Base will not support them in the November election. No matter what Bush/Cheney Crimes evidence comes out the Incumbent House Democrats will try to ignore it. How can we make Impeachment Hearings Happen? Arrayed against impeachment literally, is nearly the entire Democratic Party establishment as well as most Republican Congressmen. But the Democrats control Congress and can start Impeachment Hearings with a simple majority vote. We just have to make them do it. Most rank and file Democratic voters want Impeachment but are being ignored by the Democratic Congress. Many of the so called progressive organizations are also in cahoots with the House Democrats and Pelosi (such as: MoveOn, ACLU & UFPJ ) and are against impeachment. MoveOn could cause Impeachment Hearings all by itself but refuses. UFPJ once said it was for impeachment but refuses to take its 1,400 local activist groups to the street to support impeachment hearings. Is it lying? ACLU (don't get me going) was the primary leader in causing impeachment hearings for President Nixon, but today refuses to do so. If the hundreds of violations of Our Constitution by Bush and Cheney are so much worse than Nixon... Why in Hell isn't ACLU supporting it? What underhanded deal have they made with the Incumbent House Democrats and Pelosi? In Colorado we have actually been doing negative campaigning against all incumbent Democratic Congressmen who reject impeachment. We have a Congressman Udall who is running to be a Senator from Colorado. He supposedly has a liberal background but is moving right as fast as he can. He avoids all protesters who want to stop the Iraq War funding and who support impeachment. The difficult aspect is that the Colorado Democratic Party, the Denver Media, and most Colorado Progressive organizations are helping him avoid us, However, we have had contacts from strong Udall supporters and bloggers asking us to back off. We know we are having an effect on Udall's Campaign. The race for the US Senate from Colorado is statistically "too close to call", so we have a real chance to make a difference here. We believe that since the race is "so close" that we actually can stop Udall from winning and going to the Senate. The way we are doing this is by doing "Negative Protesting" at our weekly impeachment events, at all of Udalls public events. We only have to sway the vote of a very small percentage of voters to keep Udall out of the Senate. This is doable. Given that impeachment advocates have worked hard to lobby Congress to hold hearings and have done so for many years with no results, we think it is time for all impeachment advocates to try a different tactic, to get tough with Incumbent House Democrats. The House Democrats have ignored us for years. Unless we threaten to un-elect them with negative campaigning they will continue to ignore us. The only thing they care about is getting re-elected. Unless Angry Liberal Democrats, Independents, Republicans, Greens and the rest of you get off the couch and carry signs in front of all Incumbent House Democratic Congressmen's offices with harsh language such as "UDALL is a Traitor to Our Constitution because he Refuses to honor his oath to protect it". There Will Be No Impeachment and No Accountability. It is up to you. John H Kennedy, Denver CO, 43 yr Democratic voter, Obama delegate to the Denver County Democratic Convention, organizer of the IMPEACH COLORADO COALITION http://ImpeachCO.com


I am sorry to see Musharaff

I am sorry to see Musharaff go as he did a lot for Pakistan. Pakistan was nearly bankrpt when he took power and removed the corrupt govt of Shariff.It is rather unfortunate that both Benazir and shariff govet so very corrupt had robbed Pakistn and did not allow Democracy to flourish. What we need is a benevolent dictator as we need to educate the populous before we bring in democracy.


I totally agree. The

I totally agree. The democratic leadership needs to be removed so that progressives can have a real voice . Pelosi et al have proven to be totally corrupt - loyal to their corporate overlords rather than the people .


It's always encouraging

It's always encouraging anytime after the failure of Congress in Iran-Contra (1985-87) to hear a call for impeachment of a lawbreaking executive. It's even more encouraging when such a call succeeds. On this score Pakistan is a republic. Are we?