The Ugly New McCain

by: Richard Cohen  |  The Washington Post

The Ugly New McCain
Presidential candidate John McCain. (Photo: Darren Abate / Wireimage.com)

    Following his loss to George W. Bush in the 2000 South Carolina primary, John McCain did something extraordinary: He confessed to lying about how he felt about the Confederate battle flag, which he actually abhorred. "I broke my promise to always tell the truth," McCain said. Now he has broken that promise so completely that the John McCain of old is unrecognizable. He has become the sort of politician he once despised.

    The precise moment of McCain's abasement came, would you believe, not at some news conference or on one of the Sunday shows but on "The View," the daytime TV show created by Barbara Walters. Last week, one of the co-hosts, Joy Behar, took McCain to task for some of the ads his campaign has been running. One deliberately mischaracterized what Barack Obama had said about putting lipstick on a pig - an Americanism that McCain himself has used. The other asserted that Obama supported teaching sex education to kindergarteners.

    "We know that those two ads are untrue," Behar said. "They are lies."

    Freeze. Close in on McCain. This was the moment. He has largely been avoiding the press. The Straight Talk Express is now just a brand, an ad slogan like "Home Cooking" or "We Will Not Be Undersold." Until then, it was possible for McCain to say that he had not really known about the ads, that the formulation "I approve this message" was just boilerplate. But he didn't.

    "Actually, they are not lies," he said.

    Actually, they are.

    McCain has turned ugly. His dishonesty would be unacceptable in any politician, but McCain has always set his own bar higher than most. He has contempt for most of his colleagues for that very reason: They lie. He tells the truth. He internalizes the code of the McCains - his grandfather, his father: both admirals of the shining sea. He serves his country differently, that's all - but just as honorably. No more, though.

    I am one of the journalists accused over the years of being in the tank for McCain. Guilty. Those doing the accusing usually attributed my feelings to McCain being accessible. This is the journalist-as-puppy school of thought: Give us a treat, and we will leap into a politician's lap.

    Not so. What impressed me most about McCain was the effect he had on his audiences, particularly young people. When he talked about service to a cause greater than oneself, he struck a chord. He expressed his message in words, but he packaged it in the McCain story - that man, beaten to a pulp, who chose honor over freedom. This had nothing to do with access. It had to do with integrity.

    McCain has soiled all that. His opportunistic and irresponsible choice of Sarah Palin as his political heir - the person in whose hands he would leave the country - is a form of personal treason, a betrayal of all he once stood for. Palin, no matter what her other attributes, is shockingly unprepared to become president. McCain knows that. He means to win, which is all right; he means to win at all costs, which is not.

    At a forum last week at Columbia University, McCain said, "But right now we have to restore trust and confidence in government." This was always the promise of John McCain, the single best reason to vote for him. America has been cheated on too many times - the lies of Vietnam and Watergate and Iraq. So many lies. Who believes that in Afghanistan last month, only five civilians were killed by the American military in an airstrike, instead of the approximately 90 claimed by the Afghan government? Not me. I first gave up on the military during Vietnam and then again when it covered up the death of Pat Tillman, the Army Ranger and former NFL player who was killed in 2004 by friendly fire.

    McCain was going to fix all that. He was going to look the American people in the eyes and say, not me. I will not lie to you. I am John McCain, son and grandson of admirals. I tell the truth.

    But Joy Behar knew better. And so McCain lied about his lying and maybe thinks that if he wins the election, he can - as he did in South Carolina - renounce who he was and what he did and resume his old persona. It won't work. Karl Marx got one thing right - what he said about history repeating itself. Once is tragedy, a second time is farce. John McCain is both.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Lies begetting lies on the

Lies begetting lies on the campaign trail can only beget more lies in the White House. We've had enough of lies in Washington. Sow your lies on the desert of desperation, Mr. McCain. This is not change, it is the same old, same old lies.


When you have supported 2

When you have supported 2 senseless endless wars that cost over 10 billion a month and have killed over 1 million innocents and have caused the US image to become an image of torturers and high tech killers, when the financial policies you have have been supporting have caused the economy to fail, when your chief financial advisor sneaks a bill through congress to completely deregulate financial institutions, when you are against health care as a right even for returning soldiers, when you support tax cuts for the super wealthy like yourself and for huge corporations, but nothing for the middle class, when you have consistantly fought for the Bush administration, there is only one thing left to do. Lie your way out of it. More and more people are not buying it.


Good for Richard Cohen. It

Good for Richard Cohen. It is about time the Press woke up and smelled the coffee. We see in John McCain version 2008 every bad thing about Republican administrations going back to Nixon. It is government by PR and the Press has been complicit in promoting McCain's myth of himself. No we have Pallin as his second in command. She has lied in every speech she has given since she was introduced. She has done her best to create her own myth of herself, with the help of GOP operatives, most of which is made up of lies. Now we see the attempt to suppress the facts about his, with all information going through the GOP. This is Bush-Cheyney business as usual. Vote for McCain/Pallin and you will just get 4 more years of lies and coverup.


McCain, by his own

McCain, by his own admission, under torture, signed a confession of war crimes in VietNam. I have much sympathy for those that underwent such experiences and do not think such things should be held against them. What I do have trouble with is his subsequent insistence that he has never "sold out" the U.S. Every time he lies it is a sell-out. I have no idea the national heritage of "Palin," but in Greek the word means "again" or "back" and ironically with Palin, here we seem to be going "back around again" with the lies and half-truths. In contrast, "truth" in Greek literally means "unforgetfulness." Now that's a difference. Its origin in Greek mythology had to do with reincarnated spirits who were forced to drink from the river Lethe (river of forgetfulness) before being reincarnated so that they could not take unfair advantage of others who did not have the same experiences from previous incarnations. Ironic that some politicians can't even remember their actions and experiences in this life?


MCCCAIN CLAMPS DOWN ON

MCCCAIN CLAMPS DOWN ON QUESTIONS IN ALASKA:republican efforts include dispatching a former top US terrorism prosecutor from NewYork, EdO'Callaghan to assist Palin's personal lawyer working to derail or delay a pending ethic investigation in Alaska...'troopergate' Palin's abuse of power...by anne sutton, yahoo news 9-16-2008---what change????


ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: from

ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: from the name of Samuel A. Maverick (1803–70), a Texas engineer and rancher who did not brand his cattle. maverick: noun individualist, nonconformist, free spirit, unorthodox person, original, eccentric; rebel, dissenter, dissident, enfant terrible; informal cowboy, loose cannon. antonym conformist.


FOR EVERYONE WHO HAS HAD

FOR EVERYONE WHO HAS HAD ENOUGH__Please go to www.blackboxvoting.org and order a free "tool kit" that will outline what YOU CAN DO to insure that the 2008 election is NOT a replay of the 2000/2004 "elections". It doesn't matter what kind of bullshit your candidate demonstrates if you have the voting rigged, you know you'll "win". We can't stop them from lying, cheating, etc, but we CAN STOP THEM FROM STEALING ANOTHER ELECTION. GO TODAY>>>WWW.BLACKBOXVOTING.ORG


Sadly I completely agree

Sadly I completely agree with Mr. Cohen. I also am stunned with McCain's continuous telling of his POW experience rather than answering questions that he prefers not to. What is that about? Seems like he is unstable. It is sad and the McCain/Palin ticket is not the remedy for our ills. God help us, I don't know who is.... But I am sure it is not them. AM, Lincoln City, OR


We've seen this again and

We've seen this again and again: A previously admirable Pol abandons everything he's always stood for when the gold ring of the presidency is almost in his grasp and appears to be slipping away. The modern archetype is Hubert Humphrey in 1972. Luckily, that scene was captured by the late Hunter S. Thompson in one of the great passages from political journalism: "There is no way to grasp what a shallow, contemptible and hopelessly dishonest old hack Hubert Humphrey really is until you've followed him around for a while on the Campaign Trail." (Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72) I used to admire McCain, but today Dr. Thompson's description would fit him perfectly.


There was a time, near the

There was a time, near the end of the Clinton administration, that I considered supporting McCain for his 2000 run, even though I'm a Democrat. This summer, his morphing into a caricature of a crooked politician, courtesy of Karl Rove, Inc., has me baffled. I understood in 2000 that he wasn't a saint but I liked his persona if not his politics. I thought he might bring an end to the rampant partisanship in Washington. I was dead wrong. I just wonder how he can live with himself, knowing that if his lies deceive enough of the electorate, he will be putting Sarah Palin one soul away from the Presidency. And all the while he knows that somewhere along the line he's lost that soul.


It is like Gollum & his lust

It is like Gollum & his lust for 'the ring'... Losing all sight of right & wrong. It is sad to see the weakness of man on display so grand & obscene.


Apparently some of our

Apparently some of our "conservatives" agree with Lenin: "A lie told often enough becomes the truth."


"I'm sorry is McCain's M.O."

"I'm sorry is McCain's M.O." He was sorry for the being one of the Keating Five -- no one even mentions that one! He's sorry for lying about the Confederate flag. "I'm sorry, my friends" has gotten him a long way. It's up to us to keep him from getting to the White House.


What is truly sad is the

What is truly sad is the author's belief in McCain's integrity as though his involvement with Keating, including joint family vacations over a period of years, acceptance of free use of the Keating jet for himself and his family, and the acceptance of campaign contributions in return for McCains help in keeping the federal regulators off of Lincoln savings during those years, was not completely corrupt. Anyone who accepts bribes over a period of years does not deserve my respect even if they managed to avoid doing jail time (much like Oliver North and Scooter Libby). Although I cannot imagine a more corrupt regime than the present one, a McCain-Palin one would certainly give it serious competition for that dubious honor.


Has anyone noticed how much

Has anyone noticed how much slower and erratic Senator McCain's speech is? He makes many more errors than he used to, the favorite line from his campaign headquarters these days is "He meant to say..." Many of the letters above question his judgment, there are questions about his memory, and other aspects of his health-malignant melanoma is not your run of the mill skin cancer. No doubt he underwent a hellish experience that many of us would not have survived, perhaps it has taken a larger toll in the long run than one might hope for. Anyone think he is beginning to act a little demented? He sure seems to be in the very early stages of that condition to me. He is a different guy than the one who ran in 2000.