Voter Repression

by:   |  Winston-Salem Journal

Voter Repression
The US Supreme Court has effectively reinstated the poll tax that once kept minorities and the poor from voting.
(Photo: smaceesl.com)

    The U.S. Supreme Court has effectively reinstated the poll tax that once kept minorities and the poor from voting, and it did so for no justifiable reason.

    The high court upheld an Indiana state law that requires a form of government-issued photo identification card for anyone to vote. Indiana lawmakers approved the bill on the grounds of fighting voter fraud.

    But even in upholding the law on Monday, the court said there is no evidence of voter fraud. The court traded away the ability of many poor Americans to vote out of deference to conservative fears that someone might cheat.

    This is fractured logic. The state is now permitted to deny access to the polls to hundreds of voters - documented cases of such were entered into evidence - to prevent some potential, as yet undefined, bad guy from slipping into the booth and voting twice. So much for the concept of voting as the most sacred right in a democracy.

    The photo-identification ruse is nothing short of voter suppression, enacted by Indiana's Republican legislature to keep down the vote of traditionally Democratic-leaning minorities and senior citizens. It is those people who will have the most trouble getting state-approved photo-identification cards and who will likely miss the vote.

    The poll tax long had its supporters in the Old South. It cost only a couple of dollars to vote, its apologists said. That wasn't much of a sacrifice for the sacred right.

    But the poll tax wasn't charged to most whites. That's because people whose ancestors had voted before minorities won the right to vote after the Civil War were grandfathered in. The whole idea of a poll tax, as with the identification card, is to suppress the vote of the poor.

    The 24th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution banned poll taxes in 1964, but six justices effectively reinstated it this week with this decision.

    How difficult can it be for someone to get a photo-identification card? A lot harder than many of us think.

    Testimony before the court centered on the poor who do not own vehicles and who, therefore, do not have driver's licenses. They can file for other forms of identification, but those cards require personal trips to government offices, which can be expensive, difficult or impossible for the infirm. Many citizens also don't have access to their birth certificates, a key document needed in getting the proper identification in Indiana.

    Just as those who supported the poll tax denied that it was an impediment to voting, those who support this identification requirement say it is not a big deal. But it is a big deal for the poor, and that's why the Indiana legislature enacted this law. They know they implemented a new tactic in our nation's sorry history of denying the vote to our poor and minority populations.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     



Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



The Supreme Court has given

The Supreme Court has given us the civil war and corporate control. Isn't it time to replace it with a Supreme rotating jury?


I teach high school to

I teach high school to homeless students in Denver, CO. Obtaining official identification is no simple process. Parents with whom they have feuded or are estranged are often uncooperative in providing social security and birth information. Getting copies of these documents can take months and, without any transportation and little in the way of cash, getting on a bus or walking can take a lot of time and effort. This crowd will almost universally be discouraged from voting - perhaps the very intention of our Supreme Neocon Court.


Requiring a Photo Voter

Requiring a Photo Voter Identification is the first step to suppression of the vote. There are other dubious reasons, I am sure, as it will also make it easier to locate and classify everyone. The poor are also the most likely to vote Democratic than Republican...and I am sure that is the main reason. Also, the so-called Stimulus check is just another way to bring any persons that have not filed an Income Tax Return to do so.. using lure of a 'stimulus' check as bait. This may be a form of seining for more tax revenue in the future to pay for all the wars that are planned. I guess I was raised to believe that you never get something for nothing ! With this Bush Administration, what you see is not what you get.


scalia says he only does

scalia says he only does what is specifically written in the 18th Century English Constitution without interpretation. I guess the founding fathers must have so visionary more than 200 years ago that they previsioned the year 2000 and they wrote the Bush presidency into it. In any case, the rules governing comments don't allow the words necessary to express what this court is. And I don't want to insult the world's oldest profession by comparison. But even the out of wedlock children of wild female dogs have more honor and integrity and decency though than these men in black...


Civil War? Where were these

Civil War? Where were these warriors when the House of Representatives, the Senate and the President illegally "repealed" the writ of habeaus corpus? Where were these warriors whentheir fellow citizen, Jose Padilla was held for years without charges? Where were these warriors when the House of Representatives, the Senate and the President actually had to have a "discussion" about wheather or not this country tortures people? Where were these warriors when the Supreme Court ruled that it was constitutional for city governments to use eminant domain to sease private property for the purpose of economic development?


Clearly the intent of the

Clearly the intent of the Indiana legislature, and the right-wing extremist on the Supreme Court, is the suppression of voting by the poor and by minorities. The best way to counter this right-wing effort is to raise money to help these people get their identification so that they can vote the Republicans out and get a legislature who will represent what is good for all of the people. The Democrats should also shout from every rooftop “The Republicans don’t want you to vote! They have taken away your rights and liberties. They have lied to you at every turn. Are these the people you want in charge?”