"Backlash: Right-Wing Radicals, High-Def Hucksters, and Paranoid Politics in the Age of Obama"
Monday 13 September 2010
by: Thom Hartmann, t r u t h o u t | Book Review

A woman attends a Tea Party rally on tax day 2009. (Photo: bvcphoto)
"Backlash: Right-Wing Radicals, High-Def Hucksters, and Paranoid Politics in the Age of Obama"
by Will Bunch
Will Bunch, the author of the brilliant Reagan biography "Tear Down This Myth," has done it again. His latest book, "Backlash: Right-Wing Radicals, High-Def Hucksters, and Paranoid Politics in the Age of Obama," is an extraordinarily readable, vividly real-to-life and broad-in-scope view of the Tea Party movement - this book could have been a movie. Bunch's writing style is so evocative that he brings every sense - sight, smell, sound etc. - to Tea Party movements and activities all across the United States, bringing to life in all its insane glory this bizarre, right-wing phenomenon sweeping our nation.
This is not, of course, a new phenomenon. In a current issue of Mother Jones magazine, an article titled "Recycled" by Kevin Drum quotes a journalist's description of the American Liberty League, which emerged in 1934 in opposition to FDR's New Deal. The article that is quoted, written by historian Frederick Rudolph, observes:
"It supports with worshipful intensity the Constitution of the United States; it places itself on the side of the individual and of liberty in opposition to an encroaching government bureaucracy; it respects the judgment of the founding fathers who had so wisely incorporated the separation of federal powers and the rights of states into the great national document; it defends the American right to enjoy the sweat of one's own labor and the rewards of one's own ability."
Also see: "Backlash in the Age of Obama"
The New Deal produced the Liberty League, the Clinton presidency produced the Arkansas Project and the Obama administration is now confronted by the Tea Party. While Republican presidencies tend to produce not much more than fawning coverage from a corporate and monopolistic media, Democratic presidencies draw out of the woodwork billionaires and their institutions to fund groups dedicated to the destruction of any Democrat in the White House.
"Backlash" is a brilliant overview of this most recent incarnation of the phony grassroots movements that arise or are funded - like the John Birch Society against Jack Kennedy and LBJ - to destroy Democratic presidents. From Tea Party to Tea Party, from Fox News to the reactive corporate media, Will Bunch has done a brilliant job of taking us inside this newest movement to preserve the rights, powers and wealth of the very, very rich.
What's perhaps most brilliant about Bunch's book is how he gives us the view from both 30,000 feet and on the ground. You get to know individual and truly dedicated, genuine believers, the mostly baby boomer followers of hucksters like Dick Armey, and you get to know the hucksters, hustlers and puppet masters themselves, too.
In addition to buying a copy for yourself, be sure to get an extra book for your Tea Party friends, coworkers or relatives.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
'Phenomenon' is the singular
Mon, 09/13/2010 - 10:33 — Anonymous (not verified)'Phenomenon' is the singular and 'phenomena' is the plural. Likewise criterion (singular) and criteria (plural). This is basic literacy. Your review is most uninformative to boot.
I would wager almost anything that you would also write :'he spoke to John and I' and argue vehemently that his Mom told him never to say 'John and me' which is correct in this instance, because it's wrong to say 'John and me' as in the sentence John and me went swimming. Total confusion between accusative and nominative cases. 'Huh?'
Anyway, I'm a journalist. Enough of this garbage about correct usage.
Hartman: How 'bout some
Mon, 09/13/2010 - 11:00 — Vic Anderson (not verified)Hartman: How 'bout some attention to US progressive Eternal FLAMERS?
I'm in the middle of The
Mon, 09/13/2010 - 11:09 — The Glenn Beck Review (not verified)I'm in the middle of The Backlash now, and I can confirm what Hartmann wrote here. Bunch's book is an up close examination of Glenn Beck's 9-12 hypocrites, Tea Party activists and exposes the astroturf nature of much of these groups.
I write about Beck nearly every day on The Glenn Beck Review to expose his lies and reveal the ignorance of his supporters.
Perhaps his next book should
Mon, 09/13/2010 - 11:19 — Anonymous (not verified)Perhaps his next book should include that ADMIRAL MULLEN ADMITTED THE PENTAGON IS THE NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT because it is funded by the Treasury bond proceeds that funds the Federal deficit, for the national debt. This was declared by Admiral Mullen just within the last 2 weeks when, acting like the military dictator,told the American taxpayers that their purpose was to work to fund the Pentagon, first. As for my grammar,I received a C------------------- for English 1A and my teacher told me she was being generous.
to "journalist" Anonymous @
Mon, 09/13/2010 - 14:37 — goobagooba (not verified)to "journalist" Anonymous @ 15:35, the sentence reads: "This is not, of course, a new phenomenon." And in the previous sentence uses the same word in terms of a series of events attributed to a singular cause, which makes the noun a collective one used correctly in each sentence. Had these groups not been placed under the same causative umbrella, it would have been correctly used in the plural.
Observe those in here who
Mon, 09/13/2010 - 22:38 — Anonymous (not verified)Observe those in here who are trying to shoot the messenger, then take heed and avoid kicking your own ass in the future! Read the book ASAP, then thank Hartmann, Will Bunch and yourself for doing it!
I agree with 19:37, I think
Mon, 09/13/2010 - 22:48 — Ken Hall (not verified)I agree with 19:37, I think the usage was correct. Conjecture as to what an author might have written is quite silly. As to the article being useful, one has to read the book to form a valid opinion. As to conservatives posting here, get a brain.
My apologies to all
Tue, 09/14/2010 - 16:49 — Anonymous (not verified)My apologies to all concerning the use of phenomenon'phenomenon". The author uses the word correctly. I was replying, quite mistakenly, to another article.
The content---please do pay
Thu, 09/16/2010 - 04:49 — Patricia in UK (not verified)The content---please do pay attention to it!---is pretty chilling, considering how Hitler rose to power in Germany with the backing of the rich, who thought they could control his movement. So similar now is the threat in the US and the weak response of the progressive and intellectual stratum of society. The idea of a country as huge and mechanised as the US letting a Hitler into power is horrifying.
The German elite too said 'it can't happen here', citing the proud history of literary, musical and philosophical originality in their country, much as Americans cite the Constitution. And yet it did, and could again.
outlet chanel
Thu, 10/18/2012 - 09:27 — flilmbut (not verified)click chanel bags outlet to your friends UMlMELGM http://www.africancanadianmodels.com/outletchaneldfs/
burberry swimwear
Fri, 11/02/2012 - 23:27 — BOUNKKEK (not verified)check burberry outlets and get big save ZNnQINWx http://www.burberryoutlet--online.com/
ghd australia xnwgvk
Mon, 03/25/2013 - 04:43 — Suttonjvy (not verified)ghd etrwzxhn GHD Hair Straightener icpjicvo GHD Australia inctuluc cheap ghd