Bernie Sanders Wants NBC-Comcast Merger Stopped Following Olbermann Suspension
Thursday 11 November 2010
by: Nadia Prupis, t r u t h o u t | Report

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) opposes a merger between Comcast Corp. and NBC Universal. (Photo: Morris K. Udall Foundation / Flickr)
After MSNBC suspended Keith Olbermann from "Countdown" for making contributions to political campaigns, activists and pundits on both sides of the aisle used the occasion to speak out on journalistic integrity and freedom of the press.
On November 5, Politico reported that Olbermann had given $2,400 to Arizona Reps. Gabrielle Giffors and Raul Grijalva and Kentucky Senate candidate Jack Conway; later that day, MSNBC President Phil Griffins announced that he would be suspending Olbermann indefinitely to be "mindful of NBC News policy and standards."
And while MSNBC Griffin announced Olbermann's reinstatement to the air on Monday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has placed the controversy in a different perspective, stating his opposition to a merger between Comcast Corp. and NBC Universal, which owns MSNBC.
"I want to take this opportunity to congratulate the hundreds of thousand of progressives and others who demanded that Keith Olbermann be reinstated to his position at MSNBC," Sanders stated. "These people understand the enormously important role that the media play in contemporary American politics."
The union would grant Comcast majority ownership over NBC Universal, replacing its current parent company, General Electric (GE). Critics of the deal include media watchdog and reform organizations such as Free Press and Media Access Project, as well as Sen. Al Franken. Media Matters for America and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee could not be reached for comment.
Sanders emphasized that Comcast is the biggest cable provider in the country. If the merger goes through, "the new head of that company would be Stephen B. Burke, Comcast's chief operating officer and a 'Bush Ranger' who raised at least $200,000 for the 2004 reelection campaign of President George W. Bush," Sanders stated. Sanders also criticized GE, stating that the company has "an anti-labor history of outsourcing jobs and with financial links to military and nuclear power industries."
Click here to sign up for Truthout’s FREE daily email updates.
"Surely we understand that GE is not going to provide the same backing for MSNBC commentators that Rupert Murdoch provides for his mouthpieces at Fox News," Sanders said, referencing arguments made by Media Matters for America and MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow that Olbermann's suspension by MSNBC demonstrates a journalistic integrity lacking at Fox News.
Comcast has denied that it had any influence in the decision, stating, "Comcast is committed to the independence of NBC's news operations."
Yet, advocacy blog Think Progress points out that Comcast CEO Brian Roberts implied otherwise in a New York Times article published in May 2010. Media executive Peter Chernin, who chaired News Corp. before Rupert Murdoch, asked Roberts how he would oversee the daily editorial operations of a large news group.
"'Are you saying that you'll never interfere?' he asked. Mr. Roberts blanched slightly at the question, which included a hypothetical situation that had Keith Olbermann, an MSNBC host, attacking a couple of Republican congressmen just as the approvals were being finished. 'Let's have that conversation in six months or 12 months,' Mr. Roberts said."
Media Matters for America also noted that other MSNBC anchors, including "Morning Joe" co-host Joe Scarborough and CNBC's Larry Kudlow, were found to have contributed to Republican candidates for Congress and did not face repercussion.
"We do not need another media giant run by a Republican supporter of George W. Bush," Sanders said. "That is the lesson we should learn from the Keith Olbermann suspension."

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
You tell 'em, Bernie!
Thu, 11/11/2010 - 16:09 — Anonymous (not verified)You tell 'em, Bernie!
The latest news, The German
Thu, 11/11/2010 - 17:44 — Anonymous (not verified)The latest news, The German Government is calling George Bush a liar about his lies regarding
the invasion of Iraq. Pass it on
The best I've seen so far is
Thu, 11/11/2010 - 20:22 — Anonymous (not verified)The best I've seen so far is the cartoon of the bookstore window with the banner, "Revision Accomplished".
I've been suggesting for
Thu, 11/11/2010 - 22:16 — Anonymous (not verified)I've been suggesting for years that people boycott their cable television masters. Do you really need Comcast that much? In the age of widspread internet and DVD access? There's so much crapola on these stations and you're PAYING for it. So much of it is offensive, and you GIVE THEM MONEY TO HAVE IT IN YOUR LIVING ROOM. FOX gets money through them! People moan and complain but they don't take action through their pocketbooks which is the only thing these creeps understand. Plus, the last time I considered reconnecting and using Comcast -- they had offered me this deal -- and the guy comes into my home and they deliberately changed in on their paperwork. When I told that I therefore didn't want the contract -- this guy tries to negotiate another "deal" with me. I told him that I wasn't interested and it was time for him to leave -- a Comcast representative -- and he acts like he's not going to leave my home. I do know someone who worked for them years ago who is a great person -- but I think they increasingly have creeps and thugs in their business. Which is yet another reason not to GIVE THEM MONEY to cheat you and the rest of America.
Americans need to realize
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 00:53 — whaler (not verified)Americans need to realize that, while voting is important, our election system is too corrupt to produce change. The one non-violent power they have, as a people, that CAN produce real results, CAn bring these S.O.B.'s to their graves, is the power of the purse. The power of boycott. Stop buying their products, Amerika. Stop buying the cable television product, stop buying the health insurance company's "product".
Get off your knees and FIGHT BACK with real ammunition, Americans!
BOYCOTT THESE BIG BUSINESSES THAT ARE SCREWING YOU. That is the real "shot" that can be heard around the world.
Indeed! Pass this piece on.
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 07:19 — Anonymous (not verified)Indeed! Pass this piece on. These type mergers etc. tend to go on behind closed doors, so while most media distract us by constantly focussing our attention on trivia like what Levi Johnson is doing next,or frightening us into abject powerlessness, harsh decisions are being made by powerful individuals whose predatory corporate interests conflict with our Constitution's long standing democratic promise of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness... with justice for all.
Comcast has an effective
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 09:18 — Anonymous (not verified)Comcast has an effective monopoly on internet services. In our area, nobody else offers better than 1MB/s internet access. Thus anyone who works at home is saddled with Comcast's bloated, incompetent infrastructure. And we have to PAY for the privilege.
Comcast needs to be disbanded, not expanded. We need real competition in the internet services arena.
Comcast sucks. They are my
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 09:59 — Anonymous (not verified)Comcast sucks. They are my local provided. They kept jacking up rates for having extra cable station that used to be on basic cable. I finally, five years ago, cut back to $14/month basic. Channels two through 36 only, no ESPN, Fox Sports or cartoon channel, and no Fixed Noise, CNN, CNBC, or MSNBC (I can see Olbermann on the net!). I watch less TV and don't miss it. When I did have digital cable, it was like that Springsteen song about 5oo station and nothing to watch!
Yup, Comcast really bites.
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 13:52 — Floresta (not verified)Yup, Comcast really bites.
Where I am, Comcast offers
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 15:35 — whaler (not verified)Where I am, Comcast offers "introductory deals" at over 20-25 a month. After 6 months their regular rates for basic kick in, which is something like 50-60. That's without HBO and the movie channels. But hundreds of stations of garbage including Fox everywhere. I watch Keith on the internet too.
One reasonable solution, if
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 17:37 — Steve S (not verified)One reasonable solution, if Comcast really wants to buy NBC Universal, would be to require that they spin off their Internet operations as a condition of the deal.
Controlling cable television and Internet-by-cable, but not controlling the networks, is the current situation, and it's OK, because the network can deliver news without editorial interference by the cable company.
Controlling cable television and controlling one family of networks, but not controlling Internet-by-cable, is also reasonable, because as long as they don't control the Internet side people can get their media through that channel.
Maintaining network neutrality on the Internet should cover the same territory, but I don't really trust Comcast to play by those rules even if the law stands.
It's good to hear about
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 22:24 — Anonymous (not verified)It's good to hear about lawmakers who are actually doing their job and fighting for the everyday person. I don't like to criticize liberal/progressive/socialist media (since support is so important), but I'm a little tired of the ever-constant-peering at people in the right wing (e.g. Sarah Palin, what's his name's son, and the other tea bag representatives in the elections, and prior to ..) In some ways, I feel like these proponents of liberal principles have helped empower these right wing radical lunatics by always talking about them, and no one else. Truthout is not particularly high on my mind when this criticism comes to mind. Rather, media sources, for example, like Huffpost where idiots like Sarah Palin are paraded day and night, often in more than one headline, and real people working on real issues, like Bernie Sanders, are completely absent from the public's eye. I would much rather hear about Bernie's work, and people like John Conyers or Dennis Kucinich, or what Jesse Jackson is up to these days, professionally (besides his personal life or comments). But I get the feeling that the liberal/progressive media buys into the very game that the conservative media wants them to. Instead of focusing of real people's WORK of real import. So I appreciate this article.
PS/continued from above
Fri, 11/12/2010 - 22:28 — Anonymous (not verified)PS/continued from above (about continuous coverage of idiots instead of people like Sanders)
I actually feel like liberal media -- like huffpost -- was responsible for the Republican victories in Congress.
More than conservative media.
Again, I'm not referencing truthout. But these bigger outlets made them look *bigger than life* and fueled popularity, a point which could not have escaped them, since they are versed in the politics of psychological manipulation of the public.
No, Anonymous on 11/13 at
Tue, 11/16/2010 - 14:43 — Frances in California (not verified)No, Anonymous on 11/13 at 3:28 - You're not looking anywhere near deeply enough. The mid-term was stolen; it's horrible but you really need to stop letting any media pull your focus . . . unless, of course . . . you're part of the problem.
Frances @ 19:43, one is
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 21:17 — Anonymous (not verified)Frances @ 19:43, one is hardly "part of the problem" (rather than the solution, I take it you mean) because they look at Huffpost with a critical eye, instead of lapping up their propaganda. Which you apparently have a hot button for. Bothers ya? Tough. I don't have stock in any such place that parades Sarah Palin night and day, along with every other candidate that won on behalf of the Tea Party -- while progressive candidates in many districts weren't even mentioned! YOU are part of the problem, AH.