Bleeding-Heart Republicans

by: Jim Hightower, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Bleeding-Heart Republicans
(Photo: Okko Pyykkö; Edited: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t)

 Who says that Republican congress-critters don't care about minorities in our society? Why, at this very moment, they are pushing hard to pass a $372 billion federal program to lift the economic fortunes of just one minority group -- a far more generous proposal than Barack Obama has even dared to contemplate.

The focus of the GOP's generosity is a true American minority: the richest one-tenth of one percent of our people. Living in penthouse ghettos like Manhattan's Upper East Side, this tiny minority of about 120,000 people (who have an average annual income of $8 million) would get some $3 million each over the next decade from the Republican proposal. Doesn't that just make your heart bleed with empathy?

This windfall will go to the most un-needy among us if the GOP gets Congress to renew the Bush tax cuts for the superrich. Yes, the same Republican lawmakers who have opposed even modest funding to keep schoolteachers and firefighters on the job are wailing that we should take hundreds of billions of dollars from our public treasury and hand them to some of the richest people on the planet.

What's at work here is the narcissistic psychosis of the privileged -- the delusional belief that they are entitled to special treatment because they're ... well, they're rich and therefore consider themselves to be both superior and especially deserving.

This attitude was expressed in a recent letter to The New York Times by a guy with the rather foppish name of Mr. Standish Fleming. He deplored any effort to deny these special tax giveaways to the elite, declaring that such efforts "discriminate" against the minority of wealthy and "productive" members of our society, thus rending America's "social fabric of trust and respect."

Of all the crying needs in our country today, these Republicans are wringing their hands over the discrimination against the wealthy minority. Sometimes, I don't know whether to laugh or cry or go bowling!

This is one of those times.

Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.

Is it possible that these pampered ones and their congressional pamperers haven't noticed that "America's social fabric of trust and respect" has already been rended by three decades of policies knocking down the workaday majority? America is now in a Great Jobs Depression that already has lasted 10 years and continues to rage unabated across the land. This Depression has devastated our country's middle class.

Yet, it took two months and endless compromises this summer for Senate Democrats to woo a few Republican votes needed to pass even a weak and meek jobs bill to help deter mass firings of schoolteachers and firefighters by local governments. Pious, purse-lipped Republicans -- who have eagerly backed Wall Street bailouts, needless wars and other budget-busting expenditures -- demanded that other programs be cut as the price of saving these essential public-service jobs.

So, what program did our stalwart senators choose to loot? Food stamps!

Yes, even as millions of Americans are stuck in long-term, relentless unemployment, thus increasing the urgent need for family assistance, our well-fed, big-butted solons grabbed nearly $12 billion from the supplemental nutrition assistance program. This puts the "dumb" in dumbfounding!

Because of the economic collapse caused by the reckless greed of Wall Street bankers, there has been a 50 percent increase in the past two years in the number of Americans relying on food stamps. In the coming months, more and more people -- including schoolteachers and firefighters -- are going to lose their jobs, and many of them will need the helping hand that Congress has now so stupidly and callously withdrawn.

Instead of stealing funds from our country's essential food stamp program, Congress should get the money for its jobs bill by taxing the multibillion-dollar bonuses that Wall Street bankers are paying out to themselves. And if that's not enough money, cut the pay, pensions and health care freebies that congress-critters give to themselves -- most of them need to go on a diet anyway.

National radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the book, Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow, Jim Hightower has spent three decades battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be - consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses, and just-plain-folks.

Copyright 2010 Creators.com

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



I am fortunate to earn

I am fortunate to earn enough to keep my head above water. Indeed, my wage has been in decline since 1988 but am comfortable in the fact that I contribute little to the perpetual war machine. There are desperate people everywhere and I help when I can. But desperate people do desperate things. If the anger of desperation can ever be focused on the powers that deprive normal people from housing and feeding their families then watch out fat cats and war pigs. Hopefully soon, these megalomaniacs will realize that social security IS national security. But probably not and lead will become precious metal.



Roy S., well put. And this

Roy S., well put.

And this missive by Jim Hightower needs to be seen by every American. If that were to happen, no Republican would ever win another election (of course if there were no election fraud.)



General strike. American

General strike. American citizens, the time for a strike against your government is at hand. It is embarrassing watching other countries citizens strike against their government while American voters work, go home watch tv or play video games or eat processed food. For crissakes liberals, progressives or whatever label you apply to yourselves...get off your asses and sit in somewhere or disrupt something. Jeez, the economy is already defucnt and the perpetual war machine will continue operate. Marches n rallies are nice however accomplish nothing. Disrupt the money man, disrupt the money.



How about an anti-fat cat

How about an anti-fat cat and anti- war rally on the commons in Washington?



Jon Stewart and Al Franken

Jon Stewart and Al Franken would probably consider your rally "extremist."

Glenn Greenwald, who would disagree with Stewart and Franken, still wouldn't support such a rally because it would constitute "tribalism" (and we all know from Ayn Rand and Ron Paul how awful that is).

The Democrats and the MSM wouldn't like it because it would be "shrill" and "unserious."

If it gets really big, the police will bust it up with heat rays and god knows what else.

It's a tall hill, buddy. I hope you know a lot of workers who are willing to help you climb it.



General strike, the sooner

General strike, the sooner the better and masses descending on Wall Street on a Monday with sit downs. As one group is dragged away another wave of resisters take their place. Enough!



As long as the right-wing

As long as the right-wing war machine continues its incredibly successful propaganda campaign to convince Americans to vote against their own best interests, the rich will get richer and the poor will become more numerous.



A general strike....I like

A general strike....I like it! Anarcho-syndicalism at its best. Let's pick a date and call in sick.



There is a rally coming up

There is a rally coming up in DC in a week. This will be interesting to see if the protesters of the modern era finally get it.

Marching does not solve anything, because at the end of the day, everyone goes home. So the next day, it's back to business as usual, again.

All we have to do instead is simply sit down and not get up. If we do that enmasse, we will be practicing a fundamental First Amendment Right, which is "peaceable assembly".

If we were to start a massive sit in, by the end of the next day, I would expect several million people to have joined us, not only in DC, but also at virtually every one of the 525 Senate and House offices back in their own states and districts.

If we have over 500 simultaneous sit-ins throughout the US, I would expect our government would be forced into finally obeying the will of E Pluribus Unum, Out of Many, We are One, WE THE PEOPLE.



While I'm not opposed to

While I'm not opposed to Kevin Schmidt's proposal above, here's what'll happen if this thing gets any legs...

Companies will send out a memo to all employees "encouraging" them to not participate in this. There will be veiled threats of losing your job, to be certain. If not the threat of firing, they'll play it snarky by telling employees to "choose wisely" or "use your best judgement". But again there will be threats by employers to employees.

Unfortunately, I see most employees backing down, as I don't think Americans, as a general rule, have the backbone to stand up to their employers. Sure, they'll protest politicians and blast Obama or whoever, but they normally won't dare stand up to employers.



"In findings echoed by other

"In findings echoed by other economists and studies, Moody's economist Mark Zandi said the Moody's study shows the fastest way to infuse money into the economy is through expanding the food-stamp program. For every dollar spent on that program $1.73 is generated throughout the economy, Zandi said.
 
"If someone who is literally living paycheck to paycheck gets an extra dollar, it's very likely that they will spend that dollar immediately on whatever they need - groceries, to pay the telephone bill, to pay the electric bill," Zandi said.

 
"Tracking that single dollar spent through the economic chain shows what economists call the ripple effect, Zandi said. For example, that dollar spent at the grocery store in turn helps to pay the salaries of the grocery clerks, pays the truckers who haul the food and produce cross-country, and finally goes to the farmer who grows the crops.
 
The report pointed to expanding unemployment benefits as the program that gets the next biggest bang for the buck. That's because, although the unemployed are already getting checks, they need to spend the money. For every dollar spent here, the economy would see a return of $1.64, Zandi said."
 
Source:  http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/29/news/economy/stimulus_analysis/index.htm
 
 

 



Excellent! Another

Excellent! Another down-to-earth, no nonsense, tell-it-like-it-is article written as only Mr. Hightower can do. Give 'em hell, Jim!



Last time I looked, the

Last time I looked, the Republicans were trying to hold taxes down for EVERYBODY, not only the rich. Obama is the modern-day DENNIS MOORE (Monty Pyhon) who won't be happy until we're all poor....although the "royal family" has been spending money like it was sand, haven't they?

Who makes jobs? The government? At times, but where does the money come from? Taxpayers....so government jobs are just an additional tax burden on everyone else!

The only real job creation comes from the private sector. Where is there enough money to start businesses and create jobs? Banks and Rich folks. Yeah, we'd all like to be rich.....but right now I'm feeling lucky to be a teacher with a job! I was also paying attention during my econ and finance classes...I guess Mr. Hightower wasn't!

"You can't raise the cane back up when it's in the feed"....a great line from a great song! (The Night They Drove old Dixie Down). England found this out the hard way--they taxes all the old, land-owning families until NOBODY had any money to create new businesses (and new jobs). Let's not kill America's potential for economic growth and new investment! Instead, lets encourage the rich to invest their money in new, AMERICAN companies, employing AMERICAN workers by offering tax credits for those who do.

Of course we can just dance down this path of class envy, kill the "goose that lays the golden eggs" and prove the truth behind the old poem:

Tax the rich and feed the poor
Until there are no rich, no more
And still the poor will still be poor!



11:06: The tax cuts you &

11:06:

The tax cuts you & your Republican f(r)iends would like to keep for the Fat Cats were in effect when the financial crisis engulfed this country. Open your eyes. The rich aren't using that extra money to create jobs; they are using it to BUY ELECTIONS.

This country enjoyed great prosperity when the top tax bracket was 91%. Explain that with your voodoo economics.



The Bush tax cuts started

The Bush tax cuts started going into effect in 2001.

They are still in effect.

In the meantime we've had the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and soaring unemployment.

And yet tax cuts are still touted by some as a "solution" to unemployment?

What a triumph of theory over fact!

Take off the blinders and realize you are being scammed by greedy rich bastards who could care less how the rest of us live or whether we live at all.



@13:34... "...realize you

@13:34...

"...realize you are being scammed by greedy rich bastards who could care less how the rest of us live or whether we live at all."

Of course they care whether we live. Who else are they expecting to do their work for them?



They'd be just as happy with

They'd be just as happy with automatons, where available.

The point, I think, is that they care nothing about the general welfare (to quote the Constitution) of *individual* citizens. Individuals are more-or-less "useful" and easily replaceable--not ends unto themselves. Thus, who cares about preexisting conditions and such matters?

A liberal viewpoint, by contrast, treats individuals as ends, not means.



Ah! I see Dickens' London

Ah! I see Dickens' London coming to pass on the horizon for America. Or maybe Louis and Antoinette's France. Picture it. Too much luxury squandered at the top, the rest of us dragging around in filth and rags. . .and you know the rest of THAT story. Not good, not good. Heed history people. WAKE UP!



This depression was created

This depression was created by Cheney (alias Darth Vader?)) , his callous superrich f(r)iends and the pitiful stunned deer of a 'president', GW and now the Repugnicans want to blame Obama.
These Repugnican tax cuts for the superrich and large corporations!! have been IN EFFECT since 2001... so WHERE are all these mythical jobs these supposed corporate do-gooders were going to create?
Why, for example, do enormous utilities use their tax cuts to pay for lawyers to raise rates on middle and lower class consumers, but put NO money into necessary jobs like, e.g., meter readers (try getting ComEd to send an adequate no. of meter readers out), or customer service representatives (try getting ahold of a representative of AT&T ON THE PHONE for example)
WHY IS THE PUBLIC DUMB ENOUGH TO BUY THIS TAX-CUT/ JOB CREATION MYTH???



I don't want to get off on a

I don't want to get off on a rant here, but I am SO there. My income probably peaked in 2001 as an Art Director, two downsizings and salary cuts later, I am barely keeping above water as a Self-employed Graphic and Web Designer. It's gotten so tight, I can't in good conscience recommend my profession to young people as a viable career choice. And I'm GOOD at this.

The current anti-debate is essentially is that a straight line tax cut favors the wealthy and MASSIVELY favors the ultra-rich. But of course the problem with having the wealthy and powerful pay their fair share is that they can AFFORD to buy Senators and Representatives while us working class folk are on our own.



People out of work in New

People out of work in New York can rally on Wall Street; someone who is not unemployed might sponsor signs for them, with the names of the Wall St criminals painted on, jail bars over pictures of their faces . . . what? Too subtle?