The "Family" - Who Really Is Behind This Secret Organization?
Thursday 30 December 2010
by: Yana Kunichoff, t r u t h o u t | Book Review

(Image: Hachette Book Group)
What if someone were to tell you that your Congressman routinely bandies around phrases such as "Jesus plus nothing," used to mean the complete rule of Jesus, and compares the desired reach to that of Hitler or Ho Chi Minh? If this makes you at all apprehensive, then Jeff Sharlet's "C Street: The Fundamentalist Threat to American Democracy" is a must-read.
"Jesus plus nothing" is the mantra of the Fellowship, also known as the Family, a secret, fundamentalist Christian organization peopled primarily by devout policy makers and high-ranking individuals. Though the nonbeliever's view of religion can often be dismissive when faced with such catchphrases, in "C Street," a nonfiction account of the extended reach of the Family, these phrases fuel moral crusades with real, and terrifying, impact.
Sharlet first introduced the world to the unseen hand of the Fellowship in "The Family" in 2008, in which he reported on the organization's beginnings in the 18th century, uncovered the role of the Family in America's legislative system and uncovered the role of religious fundamentalism in our supposedly secular nation.
In his latest book, Sharlet traces the powerful orthodoxy's chilling influence on governments both inside and outside of the United States as well as the devastating effects of fundamentalism within the military. He uses the Fellowship's Capitol Hill boarding house, C Street, as a passageway to a broader discussion of the Family's influences, which range from mediating the marital disputes of Congressmen to increased military aid for countries whose prominent politicians have connections (spiritual or otherwise) with the Family.
"C Street" is thoroughly researched; in addition to his travels and interviews, Sharlet says he spent weeks photocopying documents from archives all over the country. In particular, he went through nearly 600 boxes of documents at the Billy Graham archives in Wheaton, Illinois, where he stayed in a rented room furnished only with an air mattress and a card table.
Sharlet begins his story at the C Street Center Inc., a nonprofit offshoot of the Family in a red brick house on Capitol Hill to "assist [congressmen] in better understandings of the teachings of Christ, and applying it to their jobs."
Members of C Street, "the underground network of Christ's men in Washington," include Sens. Don Nickles (R-Oklahoma), Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Pete Domenici (R-New Mexico), John Ensign (R-Nevada), James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma), Bill Nelson (D-Florida) and Bill Nelson (D-Florida), as well as Reps. Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), Frank Wolf (R-Virginia.), Joseph Pitts (R Pennsylvania), Zach Wamp (R-Tennessee) and Bart Stupak (D-Michigan), and believe they have been appointed by God.
Their actions in the name of the Lord include prayer meetings at the Department of Defense and the Pentagon, and helping Governor Sanford, Representative Pickering and Senator Ensign (whom Sharlet describes as having "the most impressive tan in the Technicolor portrait gallery of golf-happy, twenty-first-century political America") cover up extramarital affairs and continue their political careers. In one case, the Family even pays off Ensign's former aide - with whom he was having an affair while he was living at C Street.
This is a mild version of the Family's philosophy - "the best way to help the weak is to help the strong." Yet, it is their naïve, but powerful, influence on religious rhetoric used in conflicts and legislature abroad that leads one from simply raised eyebrows to widened eyes.
According to Sharlet, the Family had "cells in the governments of seventy nations by the late 1960s, more than double that of just a few years earlier." These cells operated, as many of the Family's projects do, through God - "the Catholic generals and colonels who rotated coup by coup through the leadership of Brazil, Guatemala, El Salvador ... consented to the Protestant ministrations of the Fellowship in return for access to American congressman."
More recently, after meetings between members of Sri Lanka's own prayer breakfast and Congressional representatives of the Family, the small, Southeast Asian country received more than $50 million in military aid between 2004-2007. In the previous three years, from 2000 to 2003, it only received a fifth of that amount, and in 2008, Sri Lanka was accused of "intentionally and repeatedly" wantonly shelling civilians, hospitals and humanitarian operations with weapons that, it is likely, came from American military aid.
Most vivid is Sharlet's focus on the Fellowship's activities in Uganda, where, in 2009, a bill was introduced into the Ugandan Parliament that would condemn to death individuals convicted of "aggravated homosexuality," which includes "simply sex, more than once," and three years in prison "for failure to report a homosexual within twenty-four hours of learning of his or her crime."
Sharlet draws links between the Family and evangelical church leaders and politicians championing the bill in Uganda (including David Bahati, who introduced the legislation into Parliament); the Family has donated millions of dollars to Uganda for "leadership development" - more, writes Sharlet, than it has invested in any other foreign country.
Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.
Though he draws the line at saying that the virulently anti-gay bill in Uganda means that the Family supports the death penalty for gay people, he notes that that "the real question is instead one of ideological transmission, the transfer of ideas.... the Family didn't pull the trigger; they provided the gun."
Sharlet travels to the East African country to meet politicians, who blithely call the closet "a strong African tradition," and speak confidently of their "American friends," various American evangelicals, including some from the family, but also speaks to a young, gay man on the run, illustrating with affecting anecdotes the human lives ruined by such a tide of "morality."
Near the end of the book, Sharlet brings the story back home again: to the role of the Family in the military. He tells the story of a US unit in Iraq which heads into combat with "Jesus Killed Muhammed" painted in both English and Arabic on one of their tanks, as well as Muslim and Jewish soldiers who crack under the constant religious taunting.
The book itself reads like a hyper-real nightmare; the detailed glimpses of emotionally stifled Congressional love affairs come with the added intimacy of love letter excerpts, and Sharlet's conversations with evangelical politicians in Uganda are especially well-fleshed. For example, during one conversation with an evangelical politician, Sharlet became keenly aware that he could also be prosecuted under Uganda's homophobic legislation - for promoting homosexuality by not turning in any gay people he may know.
The extent of the connections between the Family and chastised senators, the Sri Lankan government's decision to drop bombs on civilians, a virulently homophobic bill in Uganda or extreme religious pressure applied to soldiers in combat zones are at times somewhat murky, but this is itself a symptom of how the Fellowship functions - "the more invisible you can make your organization," Doug Coe, associate director of the Fellowship, says in "C Street," "the more influence it will have."
The Family divides its finances "between several smaller offshoots, some off-the-books accounting ... and the Fellowship Foundation." In addition, Sharlet notes, it shifts around its properties and supporting organizations - for example, the Downing Foundation in Englewood, Colorado, describes its mission as supporting the Family's Fellowship Foundation - "to which it sends an average of $88,000 a year."
Sharlet highlights numerous front organizations, though there are other sources of funding for the Family's expenses that are even less kosher - for example, Sen. Tom Coburn charged American taxpayers $11,000 for a trip to Lebanon to, Coburn says, build prayer groups - in one of the most religiously contested areas in the world.
Though a review in The Washington Post calls Sharlet's thesis of an America without contraception or public schools "almost unhinged," the recent rise of the Tea Party since "C Street's" publication and legislation such as unemployment benefits held hostage to tax cuts for the wealthiest American cast doubt on whether we can dismiss the threat posed by the actions of the Family to positions such as gay rights, religious freedom or the separation between church and state.
This brings us to one of Sharlet's central points in the book: how do we hold lawmakers accountable who believe they have a divine right to rule?
Mikey Weinstein, a former Air Force commander and founder and president of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, who deals with calls daily from soldiers with testimony of religious harassment, says the only way to combat the influence of the "multi-dimensional, theocratic, dominating, democracy-destroying monster" that is the Family is to court-martial them all.
Sharlet, however, is more circumspect. "I'm doing it the best way I know how ... it's also the only honest way. You compete with them in terms of free speech," he said. "You keep the pressure on, you keep people asking questions and you make it in the Family's best interest to become transparent."
Full disclosure: Mikey Weinstein is a member of Truthout's board of advisers.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
ANY POLITICIAN FOUND
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 15:51 — Bite (not verified)ANY POLITICIAN FOUND CONSORTING WITH THESE THEOCRATIC TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE ARRESTED IMMEDIATELY AND DETAINED ON CHARGES OF TREASON.
These guys associated with
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 17:21 — Anonymous (not verified)These guys associated with the Bushes??? Yale? Order of Skull and Bones? CIA? Drug smuggling?
Fabulous article - can't
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 17:32 — Fred (not verified)Fabulous article - can't wait to pick up the book. Thanks for the enticing review.
I recall reading that Hilary
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 17:51 — Anonymous (not verified)I recall reading that Hilary Clinton was a member of this group a couple years ago. If true, then we'd be just as screwed with her as we are with Obama. Another closet conservative masquerading as a liberal. I'm ready to vote third party from here on.
It is somewhat amusing that
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:16 — Tom (not verified)It is somewhat amusing that these characters picked the name of Charles Manson's collection of loonies for their organization; the Family. The Bush-Cheney crowd were proud to be associated with this kind of lunacy and at least 50% of American voters agreed with them. This is exactly how past imperialist dynasties have collapsed on themselves. It appears that the worst thing that could happen to an empire is for gods to be on its side.
This is of a pair with the
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:19 — Anonymous (not verified)This is of a pair with the adulation of that horrendous pervert, Ayn Rand, whose 'philosophy' is very similar. Now that we have Randians as well as followers of the Fellowship crawling all over our congressional proceedings, we can expect to see something even slimier than what we have already seen coming out.
I believe Hilary Clinton only attended prayer breakfasts with them when she was having her own marital troubles.
But the Family/Fellowship does sponsor the National Prayer Breakfast.
And we talk about the
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:26 — Anonymous (not verified)And we talk about the separation of church and state. What a joke.
Confront in groups, not as
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:34 — JadeQueen (not verified)Confront in groups, not as individuals. Consort with entities that have visible opposition and clear policies of inclusion. Congregations can be pressured by insurance carriers to be exclusive in use of their buildings. Reward those entities that are hospitable to diversity in interactions that are clear on their public bulletin boards and in radio and TV news reports. Newspapers may be too captured to be relevant, and they lose readership for this. The Mel Brooks approach of parody is a favorite of mine. An atmosphere of too much seriousness fosters the fears that hypocrites work to nourish. Flat managements cause them to lose time looking for heads to demonize and cut off.
This is greed, hatred,
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:38 — Anonymous (not verified)This is greed, hatred, stupidity and self-indulgence, masked with religion, doing what politics alone does best.
Ditto, on just about all the
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:40 — Anonymous (not verified)Ditto, on just about all the comments here. I would also be interested in their influence within specific school districts and boards of education, as well as principals, teachers and those with hiring power. We have seen what we wrought upon districts in Kansas and Pennsylvania with the Wedge Strategy. How far does their reach extend in other areas?
Out them all.
Another area of research
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:44 — Anonymous (not verified)Another area of research insofar as their influence is concerned is in the health insurance industry and their fight against guaranteed health care for all Americans.
See the lunacy for yourself:
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 18:50 — Anonymous (not verified)See the lunacy for yourself:
http://www.jesusplusnothing.com/commands.htm
Psychopathology hidden under
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 19:00 — Anonymous (not verified)Psychopathology hidden under cloak of religion.
It is predator behavior that calls for victims. Compare the sayings to confessions of serial killers and con people (men). Of course comparable to Muslim extremists.
"The Family" is less far
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 19:25 — tomo (not verified)"The Family" is less far from the American tradition than we might want to think. When the Puritans found it convenient to slaughter the Pequod Indians in Connecticut, back in the 1600s, they did so an the pretext that the land on which the Pequod lived had been consigned to Puritans by God. The Pequod were trespassers! The Cherokee were removed from the Carolinas pretty much on similar grounds of white entitlement. Later, Northern Mexico was taken from Mexico pretty much on the ground that it was our God-given destiny to have it.
What we see happening is that the Puritan sense of a Mission from God was gradually converted into "American exceptionalism." As an exceptional people, we were appointed by God to lead the world--which meant we could grab anything we wanted. This attitude carried us through the War on the Plains and the Spanish American War--and the acquisition of the Philippines. From there, there's been no stopping us--at least no stopping us from trying. The Family are just very very "good Americans" appointed by God to rule the world--and, as their mantra suggests--not beholden to any law, including American law. (Jesus, I am sure would have a hard time recognizing their top-down approach [Make the strong stronger] as anything remotely Christian, but Obama--unlike Jeremiah Wright or Martin Luther King--should be right at home with them.)
Just to say the unsaid -
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 19:39 — Unverified Poster (not verified)Just to say the unsaid - "The Family" - is a very apropos title they have given themselves. They are truly mobsters.
Beware of "the three
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 19:59 — moodymack (not verified)Beware of "the three professions.
Yeah, but calling these guys
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 20:39 — EmeraldGreenSea (not verified)Yeah, but calling these guys Christian is like calling Glenn Beck a journalist. Can't people see that these guys are Astroturf Christians?
A very real political objective of this group - in addition to whatever policies and legislation they try to advance - is to get people upset! They want to get people angry, mistrustful and divided. That's it; divide, divide, and divide again. That's how Carl Rove could envision a permanent majority: by dividing the entire polity into countless suspicious, fearful, and misinformed minorities.
There are those that adhere to Christianity, and there are those who don't. Then there is are those who misunderstand Christianity and this group may overlap either of the first two groups or may misunderstand Christianity on wholly on their own. Then there are those who hate Christianity; and they may belong or come from anyone of these groups. C-Streets "Family" is reeking havoc with all of these groups, but ultimately gets to blame all that they do wrong on Christianity.
Henry David Thoreau is the standard by which to measure the sincerity (the character) of American political Christianity.
01:39 Actually, these sick
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:57 — Bite (not verified)01:39
Actually, these sick Christians are the natural result of Christian theology, which is sickly dualistic, all about enthronement of a God that sits back and watches, actually enjoys watching, all those squirming bodies in mortal agony crying out to him for help. Christianity is a religion devised by sadists for masochistic practical application.
@1:39 Thoreau was not a
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:11 — Bite (not verified)@1:39
Thoreau was not a Christian. He was a Transcendentalist, in the manner of Emerson, and a naturalist, perhaps even an anarchist.
Wouldn't they all be
Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:58 — Janet (not verified)Wouldn't they all be surprised if they found out that Jesus and Mohamud were the same guy??? "Ages in Chaos" by Emanuel Velikophsky posits that the traditional Egyptologists were off by about 400 years------just about the amount of time that is supposed to separate Jesus and Mohamud, historically. All of the history in the region was tied to Egyptology (except for the Jewish traditions). Not that these guys are limited by reality, but wouldn't it be interesting to see them explain that one away???
03:57 You prove my point.
Fri, 12/31/2010 - 00:25 — EmeraldGreenSea (not verified)03:57
You prove my point. Anger, misunderstanding and mistrust and they win. They get to define Christianity, just as Rush Limbaugh has defined "liberals" in the minds of millions. Divide, divide, and keep dividing until we are all angry and powerless. (By the way: Television is our real National Religion anyway.)
@04:11
You've got some reading to do. Transcendentalist is a pretty big word. But all it really meant is that being a person of faith didn't mean you had to surrender critical thinking; the kind of discernment that develops a conscience - a soul that can act in a moral emergency. Can anyone think of any moral emergencies going on right now?
Thoreau's essay: Life Without Principle would be a good start.
It's funny how many people hate Karl Rove's buddy Bush, and curse him for all the lies he told, but yet they take him at his word when he describes himself as a Christian. Yeah we know what those Christians are all about. (I suspect Bush is an Oil Pagan myself; which is OK, but I just don't think Oil Pagans should ever be President.)
I'm deeply skeptical of a
Fri, 12/31/2010 - 04:16 — Jack B. Nimble (not verified)I'm deeply skeptical of a religion that venerates a Roman torture device. Looks like a death cult to me, one that metastasized. And that just at first glance. A closer look at their history confirms my first impression.
Transubstantiation, the transmogrification, of wine & bread into the ACTUAL flesh & blood... that's the dogma.
So. Does that make 'communion' ritual cannibalism or actual cannibalism? I'd guess that for believers it becomes actual cannibalism...?
I wish we could just get the
Fri, 12/31/2010 - 04:43 — Anonymous (not verified)I wish we could just get the rapture over with!!!!!!
Just a note to Yana
Fri, 12/31/2010 - 10:28 — Anonymous (not verified)Just a note to Yana Kunichkoff: the article (good one) has two Sen. Bill Nelsons instead of one Ben & one Bill.
Peace and prosperity are
Fri, 12/31/2010 - 10:48 — Steve Consilvio (not verified)Peace and prosperity are based on moral clarity. One is more likely (perhaps only possible) to find moral clarity with God.
The founding fascists were deists, and put religion secondary to their political and economic ambitions. The atheistic communists were worse.
Separation of Church and State is not the same as separation of religion and state. No system can work without moral participants.
Checks and balances obviously fails when all the players are motivated by greed and lust for power. Only self-restraint, which is morally inspired, can create a just society.
This article, unfortunately, is just more tripe of a long serenade of the 'fear of religion.' The reason for freedom of religion is because of the irrational fear of religion. While usually it is by other religions, atheism is just as much a religion as any other religion, and is consumed with hypocrisy and self-righteousness, too.
Yes, progressives can be just as regressive as moralists can be immoral, or libertarians can be authoritarian. Doublethink (or triplethink) takes many forms.
If the people discussed in the article have doublethink, that does not mean that the author or other comments made here do not have doublethink, too.
The sins of another person do not make you innocent.
As a liberal I was not
Fri, 12/31/2010 - 11:26 — Joe the Voter (not verified)As a liberal I was not surprised at all the right winger there. But I was shocked when I saw the name of my democrat Senator Bill Nelson listed!
I sent an email to his aid with copies to my political friends and the local paper.
We need to publicly "Out" all of these politicians in our own districts and keep their feet to the fire to denounce the "family" and to bring to light how this group has influenced our government and others.
This should be broadcast on all of our Facebook pages as well.
I have no problem with anyone holding religious beliefs as a private right, but once someone in government believes he or she has a "DEVINE RIGHT" to tell the nation what to do...well that is dangerous to democracy and to the religious freedoms of everyone who may not hold their particular brand of religion.
"I recall reading that
Fri, 12/31/2010 - 14:36 — granny (not verified)"I recall reading that Hilary Clinton was a member of this group a couple years ago." -- Was this another Drudge or Wikipedia rumor?
Regardless of who is involved, it does little good to inveigh against the "Christian" right and the secret societies like C Street and the Family - and the Bush crowd in Skull & Bones - and all the secretive stuff the Big Dick Cheney and his cabal were involved in. We can complain, wring our figurative hands, weep and moan about what the world is coming to, and then sit back satisfied, comfortable, self-righteous.
Or we can get up off our collective duffs, take to the streets, and make something happen. We did it in the 60s. Why not now?
Hopefully, more people will
Sat, 01/01/2011 - 04:30 — Anonymous (not verified)Hopefully, more people will speak up about their secularism, agnosticism, atheism, non-affiliation with organized religion, whatever's.
Frankly, I am getting sick and tired of any reference or apologetics for religion as if there's something intellectually legitimate going on.
The plain truth is that the bible is filled with contradictions and inconsistencies, blatant scientific fallacie, promotions of immorality, cruelty, bigotry, sexism, authority trips, end of the world hysteria, ignorance, and .. just plain bad, bad, bad writing. (Yeah, yeah, I can some spouting their standard - oh, but the bible has some beautiful passages, song of solomon, etc. More of it is garbage, though.)
It has been the foundation for some of the worst events and developments in human history. People should face it, get over it, and speak their minds about it openly when the subject arises in any form whatsoever.
cheap prom dresses
Fri, 06/22/2012 - 06:53 — Adawsdaf (not verified)get prom dresses to take huge discount
evening dresses
Sat, 06/23/2012 - 17:27 — Blalarge (not verified)evening dresses uk with confident
dresseslady614
prom dresses
Sat, 06/30/2012 - 07:31 — occuxusa (not verified)prom dresses 2012 for more detail
promgirl629gb
replica purses
Wed, 09/19/2012 - 09:55 — LEATTBUG (not verified)click replica designer purses for gift RRIhuvhD http://www.replica-purses.us/
ugg coupon codes
Mon, 10/15/2012 - 03:15 — unjulaps (not verified)ugg coupon at my estore aBQfnpWX http://www.ugg-coupon-code.com/
cheap chanel purses
Wed, 10/17/2012 - 18:01 — Bumnoind (not verified)buy chanel bags for cheap suprisely BrGEekjA http://chaneldiscount.metroblog.com/
designer online shopping
Fri, 10/26/2012 - 15:27 — ineceice (not verified)must check designer shopping online for more detail aIRyVKcJ http://designerhandbagsonline.clammo.com/
designer outlet
Fri, 11/02/2012 - 23:31 — porbmozy (not verified)buy designer outlet , for special offer uCeSVYkF http://www.designer--outlet.com/
prada outlet orlando
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 05:43 — suizCili (not verified)sell prada outlet online at my estore CDgEwYOy http://www.prada--outlet.net/
dqvame
Wed, 01/02/2013 - 16:20 — dqvame (not verified)azcpvr
Isabel Marant Norge
Fri, 03/29/2013 - 04:05 — Isabel Marant Norge (not verified)¡°You¡¯re mad!¡± Sophie stated. ¡°You¡¯ve no proper to create jigsaws of people today!
shoe lift
Sat, 05/18/2013 - 10:55 — shoe lift (not verified)Im thankful for the blog article.Thanks Again. Awesome.