Calling All Future-Eaters
Monday 19 July 2010
by: Chris Hedges | Truthdig | Op-Ed

(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Reini68, NASA)
The human species during its brief time on Earth has exhibited a remarkable capacity to kill itself off. The Cro-Magnons dispatched the gentler Neanderthals. The conquistadors, with the help of smallpox, decimated the native populations in the Americas. Modern industrial warfare in the 20th century took at least 100 million lives, most of them civilians. And now we sit passive and dumb as corporations and the leaders of industrialized nations ensure that climate change will accelerate to levels that could mean the extinction of our species. Homo sapiens, as the biologist Tim Flannery points out, are the “future-eaters.”
In the past when civilizations went belly up through greed, mismanagement and the exhaustion of natural resources, human beings migrated somewhere else to pillage anew. But this time the game is over. There is nowhere else to go. The industrialized nations spent the last century seizing half the planet and dominating most of the other half. We giddily exhausted our natural capital, especially fossil fuel, to engage in an orgy of consumption and waste that poisoned the Earth and attacked the ecosystem on which human life depends. It was quite a party if you were a member of the industrialized elite. But it was pretty stupid.
Collapse this time around will be global. We will disintegrate together. And there is no way out. The 10,000-year experiment of settled life is about to come to a crashing halt. And humankind, which thought it was given dominion over the Earth and all living things, will be taught a painful lesson in the necessity of balance, restraint and humility. There is no human monument or city ruin that is more than 5,000 years old. Civilization, Ronald Wright notes in “A Short History of Progress,” “occupies a mere 0.2 percent of the two and a half million years since our first ancestor sharpened a stone.” Bye-bye, Paris. Bye-bye, New York. Bye-bye, Tokyo. Welcome to the new experience of human existence, in which rooting around for grubs on islands in northern latitudes is the prerequisite for survival.
We view ourselves as rational creatures. But is it rational to wait like sheep in a pen as oil and natural gas companies, coal companies, chemical industries, plastics manufacturers, the automotive industry, arms manufacturers and the leaders of the industrial world, as they did in Copenhagen, take us to mass extinction? It is too late to prevent profound climate change. But why add fuel to the fire? Why allow our ruling elite, driven by the lust for profits, to accelerate the death spiral? Why continue to obey the laws and dictates of our executioners?
The news is grim. The accelerating disintegration of Arctic Sea ice means that summer ice will probably disappear within the next decade. The open water will absorb more solar radiation, significantly increasing the rate of global warming. The Siberian permafrost will disappear, sending up plumes of methane gas from underground. The Greenland ice sheet and the Himalayan-Tibetan glaciers will melt. Jay Zwally, a NASA climate scientist, declared in December 2007: “The Arctic is often cited as the canary in the coal mine for climate warming. Now, as a sign of climate warming, the canary has died. It is time to start getting out of the coal mines.”
But reality is rarely an impediment to human folly. The world’s greenhouse gases have continued to grow since Zwally’s statement. Global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from burning fossil fuels since 2000 have increased by 3 per cent a year. At that rate annual emissions will double every 25 years. James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies and one of the world’s foremost climate experts, has warned that if we keep warming the planet it will be “a recipe for global disaster.” The safe level of CO2 in the atmosphere, Hansen estimates, is no more than 350 parts per million (ppm). The current level of CO2 is 385 ppm and climbing. This already guarantees terrible consequences even if we act immediately to cut carbon emissions.
The natural carbon cycle for 3 million years has ensured that the atmosphere contained less than 300 ppm of CO2, which sustained the wide variety of life on the planet. The idea now championed by our corporate elite, at least those in contact with the reality of global warming, is that we will intentionally overshoot 350 ppm and then return to a safer climate through rapid and dramatic emission cuts. This, of course, is a theory designed to absolve the elite from doing anything now. But as Clive Hamilton in his book “Requiem for a Species: Why We Resist the Truth About Climate Change” writes, even “if carbon dioxide concentrations reach 550 ppm, after which emissions fell to zero, the global temperatures would continue to rise for at least another century.”
Copenhagen was perhaps the last chance to save ourselves. Barack Obama and the other leaders of the industrialized nations blew it. Radical climate change is certain. It is only a question now of how bad it will become. The engines of climate change will, climate scientists have warned, soon create a domino effect that could thrust the Earth into a chaotic state for thousands of years before it regains equilibrium. “Whether human beings would still be a force on the planet, or even survive, is a moot point,” Hamilton writes. “One thing is certain: there will be far fewer of us.”
We have fallen prey to the illusion that we can modify and control our environment, that human ingenuity ensures the inevitability of human progress and that our secular god of science will save us. The “intoxicating belief that we can conquer all has come up against a greater force, the Earth itself,” Hamilton writes. “The prospect of runaway climate change challenges our technological hubris, our Enlightenment faith in reason and the whole modernist project. The Earth may soon demonstrate that, ultimately, it cannot be tamed and that the human urge to master nature has only roused a slumbering beast.”
We face a terrible political truth. Those who hold power will not act with the urgency required to protect human life and the ecosystem. Decisions about the fate of the planet and human civilization are in the hands of moral and intellectual trolls such as BP’s Tony Hayward. These political and corporate masters are driven by a craven desire to accumulate wealth at the expense of human life. They do this in the Gulf of Mexico. They do this in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong, where the export-oriented industry is booming. China’s transformation into totalitarian capitalism, done so world markets can be flooded with cheap consumer goods, is contributing to a dramatic rise in carbon dioxide emissions, which in China are expected to more than double by 2030, from a little over 5 billion metric tons to just under 12 billion.
This degradation of the planet by corporations is accompanied by a degradation of human beings. In the factories in Guangdong we see the face of our adversaries. The sociologist Ching Kwan Lee found “satanic mills” in China’s industrial southeast that run “at such a nerve-racking pace that worker’s physical limits and bodily strength are put to the test on a daily basis.” Some employees put in workdays of 14 to 16 hours with no rest day during the month until payday. In these factories it is normal for an employee to work 400 hours or more a month, especially those in garment industry. Most workers, Lee found, endure unpaid wages, illegal deductions and substandard wage rates. They are often physically abused at work and do not receive compensation if they are injured on the job. Every year a dozen or more workers die from overwork in the city of Shenzhen alone. In Lee’s words the working conditions “go beyond the Marxist notions of exploitation and alienation.” A survey published in 2003 by the official China News Agency, cited in Lee’s book “Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt,” found that three in four migrant workers had trouble collecting their pay. Each year scores of workers threaten to commit suicide, Lee writes, by jumping off high-rises or setting themselves on fire over unpaid wages. “If getting paid for one’s labor is a fundamental feature of capitalist employment relations, strictly speaking many Chinese workers are not yet laborers,” Lee writes.
The leaders of these corporations now determine our fate. They are not endowed with human decency or compassion. Yet their lobbyists make the laws. Their public relations firms craft the propaganda and trivia pumped out through systems of mass communication. Their money determines elections. Their greed turns workers into global serfs and our planet into a wasteland.
As climate change advances we will face a choice between obeying the rules put in place by corporations or rebellion. Those who work human beings to death in overcrowded factories in China and turn the Gulf of Mexico into a dead zone are the enemy. They serve systems of death. They cannot be reformed or trusted.
The climate crisis is a political crisis. We will either defy the corporate elite, which will mean civil disobedience, a rejection of traditional politics for a new radicalism and the systematic breaking of laws, or see ourselves consumed. Time is not on our side. The longer we wait, the more assured our destruction becomes. The future, if we remain passive, will be wrested from us by events. Our moral obligation is not to structures of power, but life.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
LIFE, not lyfe!
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 09:54 — Vic Anderson (not verified)LIFE, not lyfe!
Shift all verbs to past
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 10:18 — Anonymous (not verified)Shift all verbs to past tense, and you have a truer picture. We really need to get ourselves in corrective mode. We are beyond start-up thinking.
meh... let it all burn. We
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 12:23 — PK (not verified)meh... let it all burn. We deserve it for what we've done to this planet. BTW - If you've ever eaten a hot dog, rooting around for grubs would be a step up.
What is CO22?
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 12:43 — Anonymous (not verified)What is CO22?
"Decisions about the fate of
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 12:52 — K.G. Smith (not verified)"Decisions about the fate of the planet and human civilization are in the hands of moral and intellectual trolls such as BP’s Tony Hayward. These political and corporate masters are driven by a craven desire to accumulate wealth at the expense of human life. "
Like bears preparing for a hard winter, our "political and corporate masters are driven" to enrich themselves because on some subconscious level they know that global disaster approaches. What makes them such dangerous leaders is the fact that they consider themselves better than the common human being and imagine that their wealth and power will insulate them from the consequences of their actions. Like the Robber Barons of the Rhine, they are preparing to withdraw behind their "castle" walls and ride out the coming storm in comfort. Disaster is for suckers, right?
Chris Thank you Thank You
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 13:13 — Anonymous (not verified)Chris
Thank you Thank You Thank
So well said!!!!!!!!!
K.G. Smith 17:52: "Like the
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 13:23 — inL.A (not verified)K.G. Smith 17:52: "Like the Robber Barons of the Rhine, they are preparing to withdraw behind their "castle" walls and ride out the coming storm in comfort. Disaster is for suckers, right?"
That's when the "little people" will finally rise up, although it will all be too late by then. Even though I don't believe in the death penalty killing the planet is a special circumstance. Before I go I just want to see a few of them taken by an angry mob and executed for their crimes.
a life lottery,he who buys
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 14:05 — Anonymous (not verified)a life lottery,he who buys the most tickets has the best odds ,losers will be disposed of in the usual ways,
I'm a genius ,no ?
Blame the culprits for the
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 14:58 — Anonymous (not verified)Blame the culprits for the chaos that reigns the earth - which is WHITE PEOPLE!!!!
Global warming is ANOTHER
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 14:59 — Anonymous (not verified)Global warming is ANOTHER White lie!!!!
passive and dumb? speak for
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 15:13 — alyce santoro (not verified)passive and dumb? speak for yourself. offering doomsday scenarios that do more to frighten and DISEMPOWER people is basically the same tactic the right used to get us into this mess.
what follows is an excerpt from my article here at truthout.org entitled SPACESHIP EARTH: NAVIGATORS WANTED. please see the full article here: http://www.truth-out.org/spaceship-earth-navigators-wanted59735
"Right this very moment, scientists and citizens who recognize that we are quite a ways down the path that leads to failure – failure of our society to find common ground, and to care for that ground – are in the midst of a teachable moment. And we are bungling it...
Unless we change course…
Scientists, you need to know that when you say “climate change”, many cannot hear you. Demanding that your data is real and that those who doubt are ignorant is only serving to further alienate those you’d hoped to convince. But that’s not to say the situation is hopeless. The issue simply needs to be examined from a different angle...Cut straight to the bottom line: it is pollution that is the problem, not global warming. Pollution may be the cause of global warming, but it is the harmful effect of pollution that we can all see and feel and understand with our own bodies, hearts, and minds....There’s no more time to waste trying to convince us that our actions are responsible for destroying the planet at some arguable rate when it would be so much more efficient to make the case that our actions are very quickly destroying ourselves...Instead of reiterating the problems, assuage peoples’ fears by offering solutions – most importantly, that we can and must build a new foundation for our economy based on that which benefits society as a whole, and not based solely on what’s best for corporations.
WHAT CAN WE DO TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
1. Not give up. James Lovelock, famed progenitor of the “Gaia Hypotheis” which described planet Earth’s biosphere as one enormous, organism-like system that stayed in delicate balance via an infinite number of intricately connected feedback loops, claims that we are past the point of no return – planet Earth will not be able to support human life for much longer. By giving up hope, we also relinquish any modicum of contentment and peace that may come from striving for that which we know is right. When hope is gone, humanity is lost.
2. Understand the true cost of resources and be willing to pay for them. A few simple shifts would go a long way towards encouraging an overall reduction in resource consumption. Imagine a system (common in many European countries) whereby the less one uses, the less one pays, rather than the other way around. Our current model encourages waste and instills a false sense of value by rewarding the biggest consumers with a discounted price per kilowatt or gallon and by penalizing those who use the least with higher cost per unit.
3. Take it personally. We are all complicit in environmental catastrophe until each and every one of us takes responsibility for our actions. We can’t wait for the perfect legislation or the cheapest, most efficient “green” technology. We must strive everyday to be conscious of how our actions impact our own health and that of our communities and society.
4. Work together. The problems of our society and our environment do not belong solely to the government or to the corporations - we are the government and the corporations. By taking matters into our own hands and pooling our knowledge and expertise, enormous change is possible. Every child and teacher in every classroom across America, every engineer, plumber, doctor, artist, cook, cashier, carpenter – even those out of work – it’s time for us all to unleash our “comprehensive propensities” (as Buckminster Fuller called the human inclination toward creative innovation). We’re going to need all hands on deck to get our little Spaceship Earth back on course."
Thanks, Chris. It's looking
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 16:53 — Anonymous (not verified)Thanks, Chris. It's looking pretty grim out there, and active resistance is required. But guys like Tony Hayward are in the saddle, as Emerson said, and "ride mankind". It's gonna be one helluva struggle in the coming decades if more of us don't wake up pretty soon.
I have gone from writing
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 20:59 — Adoregon (not verified)I have gone from writing essays about FBOM
(Funny Bunch Of Monkeys) to FUBOM (Fu*ked Up Bunch Of Monkeys).
Desires are limitless. The poor of India and China all want Beemers and Mercedes. Monkey see, monkey want.
See the monkeys self-abort. Your desires make rich monkeys possible. Stop buying all the shit.
Things will cool down.
One thing we can do is to
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 21:32 — Alan8 (not verified)One thing we can do is to vote for a party not on the corporate payroll.
The Green Party doesn't accept any corporate money and represents citizens' interests, not corporate interests.
One of their Ten Key Values (http://www.gp.org/tenkey.shtml) is Future Focus and Sustainability:
"Our actions and policies should be motivated by long-term goals.
We seek to protect valuable natural resources, safely disposing of or “unmaking” all waste we create, while developing a sustainable economics that does not depend on continual expansion for survival.
We must counterbalance the drive for short-term profits by assuring that economic development, new technologies, and fiscal policies are responsible to future generations who will inherit the results of our actions."
THIS is the kind of party you want in Congress and in the White House.
VOTE GREEN!
Alan8: You're right. If
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 22:26 — Paul W (not verified)Alan8: You're right. If Americans really gave a shit, they'd have started voting Green a long time ago.
Unfortunately, for every Chris Hedges, and the rest of us who see the sense of Green politics, there are millions of mouth-breathers who can't wait to get their next gas-guzzling SUV, or Sea-Doo, or Ski-Doo, or Air Conditioner. And as Adoregon says: Monkey see, monkey want.
There is only one sane political choice anymore. If it ain't Green, its obscene!
Very nice. I was about to
Mon, 07/19/2010 - 23:13 — Wexl (not verified)Very nice. I was about to stop reading this website and then this piece came by. I'll be checking more often now.
I like it when you keep it real.
There is a somewhere
Tue, 07/20/2010 - 08:37 — Anonymous (not verified)There is a somewhere else--it is called space. The real elite will have its escape. The rest of us will be rooting for grubs!
5% Green Party vote will
Tue, 07/20/2010 - 09:13 — Alan8 (not verified)5% Green Party vote will make a difference!
A mere 5% will get the Green Party matching Federal funds, and will throw the corporate parties into a panic.
With matching funds, the Green Party will be able to more effectively advertise.
Also reaching the 5% threshold will encourage more people to vote Green, and will make it harder for the corporations to exclude Greens from the debates.
VOTE GREEN!
The people in charge will be
Tue, 07/20/2010 - 15:18 — Anonymous (not verified)The people in charge will be wanting plagues around now; something to get rid of, say, 50%-65% of world's population.
Chris really makes me open
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 01:22 — tony (not verified)Chris really makes me open my eyes to so many things going on in the world….
Just saw this….
Chris Hedges live Q&A session to discuss his latest column.
http://www.truthdig.com/q_a/item/live_chat_with_chris_hedges_20100718/
Humans are the best killers
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 13:02 — David (not verified)Humans are the best killers ever seen. We are great at killing, consuming, polluting, destroying, deluding ourselves, not feeling guilt, etc. Humans in general are a destructive out of control species, but we Americans win a prize for being particularly destructive, obese, arrogant, prideful and blind. Check out Chris Hedges' videos too. He is one of few commentators on Truthout who goes to the heart of the matter. Bottom line is that unless we all give up most of what we are addicted to in out technoindustrial petroleum-addicted lifestyles, we're going to be guilty of the biggest crime this universe has ever seen.
I think it's a very bad idea
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 20:49 — Brian (not verified)I think it's a very bad idea to say that CO2 is pollution, for many reasons. First, it is not a pollutant! It's not a poisonous substance - it's necessary for life. The deniers will point out these things and use them as arguments to convince more people global warming is a hoax. It's the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere and the effects that causes that is the problem.
Second, when you equate global warming with pollution you greatly diminish the dangerousness of the problem. Pollution is very short-lived compared to excess CO2 in the atmosphere. Even nuclear waste doesn't hang around nearly as long. Third, there is a long lag time between emitting CO2 and feeling the full effects. With most pollutants, you can wait until you see the harmful effects, then reduce or stop the emissions, and within a few years, things will be back to normal. With excess CO2, if you wait until you feel the full effects, it's way too late to do anything about it.
So many environmentalists really don't understand global warming and do great harm because they think they can solve it the same way the solve pollution. That's why they support bills like Kerry-Lieberman, even though they don't reduce emissions nearly enough to give us a fighting chance. They are not "a good first step" because they guarantee we will go above a 2 degree rise. There is actually a 20% chance those reduction levels would cause a 3.7 degree rise, and a 20% chance they'd cause a 6.9 degree rise.
And Hansen actually said letting the planet warm 2 degrees above preindustrial levels would be "a recipe for global disaster". So what do you think 3.7 or 6.9 degrees is? If we don't reduce emissions enough and quickly enough, we won't get a second chance. That's another big difference between global warming and conventional pollution. It's extremely important to understand these things, if we want to have any chance of solving this problem. Unfortunately, the people in Washington, and most mainstream environmental organizations still don't get it.
It's completely impossible to solve this with individual action alone, there isn't nearly enough time. The system itself has to change, and quickly. Only government can do this, just as only government can wage a war. We must educate the people in power or replace them with people who understand what we are up against.
Sorry, that should have been
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 21:46 — Brian (not verified)Sorry, that should have been a 50% chance the reduction levels in the Kerry-Lieberman bill would cause a 3.7 degree C temperature rise above pre-industrial levels, a 20% chance of a 6.9 degree rise.
I can't stress strongly enough that "making a difference" won't save life on earth from a horrible fate. If the difference is not big enough, the temperature will still rise enough to cause a feedback effect that will take us to a much hotter world. Once that happens, we can no longer stop it. So "making a difference", if it is too small, will really make no difference at all.
We need to treat this threat with the seriousness it deserves. We have to be on the safe side wherever there is uncertainty. When scientists give us a range of emission reductions to keep us below the danger zone, we have to aim for the high end, not way below the low end, and our federal government currently is trying to do. I'll say it again: if we get this wrong, we won't get a second chance.
“The prospect of runaway
Thu, 07/22/2010 - 01:13 — Emily Vicendese (not verified)“The prospect of runaway climate change challenges our technological hubris, our Enlightenment faith in reason and the whole modernist project. The Earth may soon demonstrate that, ultimately, it cannot be tamed and that the human urge to master nature has only roused a slumbering beast.” No no no!!! That's NOT the problem. The problem is UNreason. It is science and the forces of reason who have been jumping up and down trying to get people to come to the party on climate change, and it is greed, ignorance and religion which has impeded action on climate change. Clive Hamilton disappoints me more and more. He also supports internet censorship. I was enjoying this piece till I got up to that bit. Screw you Clive Hamilton you suck.
Chris writes a good
Sat, 07/24/2010 - 12:54 — Larry Gilman (not verified)Chris writes a good philippic, and it's all true. And no piece of writing can get in the whole truth, nor does any good writer ever try. Nevertheless, a truth left out of his essay seems to me to need mentioning: our universal involvement. That planet-eating baby in the graphic is you and me, too, not just BP and the Pentagon. Outrage is necessary, but we must have mirrors hanging about in which to glimpse ourselves. No matter what action we take, we must remain simultaneously aware that we are the world-eater also. I have known too many people who snarled at big SUVs while driving equally gas-hungry family vans, or even just smaller SUVs; who raged against developers while sitting in their second homes; or who carried on with a lifestyle of mere, blind, personally-decent-and-lovable consumerism, funneling materials and energy through their assumptions about the good life into the landfills, the water, the air, all the while vaguely disapproving of big, bad BP or Exxon or whoever. If we do not start to change our own lives, to consume less world -- ultimately a lot less, but anything will do for a beginning -- then our resistance to or criticism of the BPs of this world will ultimately be hollow, hypocritical, and (worst of all) ineffectual. If we expect and demand a life that only an unsustainable material economy can satisfy, living always by the Me exception, then somebody is going to supply that economy, and our support for what they are doing will always be more effectual than our loud loathing of it.
Ms. Vicendese: Actually, "faith in reason and the whole modernist project" _has_ been crucial to getting us into this pickle. And so has "UNreason." Reason and unreason are both screwing us -- in certain departments. Applied reason has made possible all the oil wells, the nuclear bombs, the industrial agriculture -- it sure as hell weren't Tarot and creationism! And faux rationality, really our unbounded faith in our ability to figure stuff out and control the world, beckons anew in the basically insane form of geoengineering. At the same time, of course, another aspect of applied reason (climatology et al.) warns of disaster, as you point out, and we unreasonably do not listen. But reason-vs-unreason is too simple.