Census Data: America Got Poorer in 2009

by: Max Fraad-Wolff, t r u t h o u t | News Analysis

Census Data: America Got Poorer in 2009
(Photo: adwriter; Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)

2009 was a year of accelerating economic pain and loss, according to US Census data released today. Although the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) tells us that the "Great Recession" officially ended in December of 2009, the labor force of the US shrank by more than 130,000 from 2008 to 2009. The median family income - a better measure than average income because it reflects the exact middle of income distribution - decreased by $2,254 or 3.5 percent. The median income for all workers in the US fell from $29,868 in 2008 to $28,365 in 2009 - a 5 percent decline.

A staggering 48 percent of households earned less than $50,000 per year in 2008, but in 2009, 49.8 percent of households earned less than $50,000. What's more, income per person in the US declined from $27,589 in 2008 to $26,409 in 2009.

Are you still surprised by anger at the polls? Might these numbers explain the seeming willingness of voters to try anything that looks different? Rising inequality, falling incomes and increasing poverty are very pronounced. When the data comes in next year for 2010, it is likely to show us that the period from 2008 through 2010 witnessed a historic increase in poverty and inequality in the US. Our massive budget deficits have been directed in ways that lower poverty, increase employment or reduce inequality. Surely, these numbers would have been worse absent many programs. That is true and valid. However, it is way too hard out there to be smug about how much worse it could have been. Yes, it could be worse. Yes, it is getting worse.

Below follows a sketch of just how bad it is- from a poverty perspective. All graphs in this article are based on the recently released census data.

Percentage of Americans by Age Under 100% of Poverty Income

It is clear that the younger you are in America, the more likely you are to live in poverty. Young Americans are nearly twice as likely to be poor as older Americans. The bar graph demonstrates this trend for African-Americans.

Percentage of Black Americans by Age Under 100% of Poverty Income

Being American gives you a one in seven chance of being poor. Being young raises this chance to one in four. Further, being black in America means a one in four chance of being poor. Being young and black raises your chance of being poor up to one in 2.5.

Education played a role in 2009 poverty rates, as indicated in the graph below. Dropping out of high school puts you on a path to a one in four chance of poverty. Finishing college drops your chance of poverty in 2009 to one in 25.

Poverty percentages by education level

2009 American Consumer Survey: Selected Economic Characteristics. US Census Bureau.

Urban populations were particularly hard hit. More than 18 percent (18.7 percent) of Americans living in major cities spent 2009 living in poverty, while 27.8 percent of Americans living in major cities and under 18 years of age spent 2009 living in poverty. That means that nearly one in three young, urban Americans were poor last year.

Female-headed households fared especially badly: more than one in three lived in poverty in 2009. More than 17 percent (17.3 percent) of these female-headed households lived in extreme poverty - earning less than 50 percent of the federal poverty level.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Max Fraad-Wolff teaches economics in the New School University graduate program in international affairs. Max's work can be seen at the BBC, NPR, Al Jazeera English, Bloomberg TV, The Wall Street Journal, and many other outlets.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



The data also show that the

The data also show that the age group least likely to be poor are those collecting social security. Tell me that this would be true if their money had been in the stock market in privatized accounts. Tell me that this would be true if the Republicans get their wish to destroy social security.



from what the numbers had

from what the numbers had shown ... the average worker under Bush was making 2000 less a year than under Clinton in 2006.

more poor ? not hard to believe on this train wreck Bush put us on.

funny how the rich and corporations are showing profit.



And where is all this

And where is all this wealth? Who got wealthy on the backs of the middle class? Who decided to make a correction and do away with middle class?



77 percent of households in

77 percent of households in a recent poll by CareerBuilders report they are living from paycheck to paycheck, up from mid 30s 4 years ago. (from an article by David DeGrew at Alternet, Sept. 25) The bottom 40% of households on average had a net worth of $2,200 in 2007, and the average in 2009 is known only to a few in the Federal Reserve who do keep track.(from a report by Edward Wolff, Levy Economics Institute, March 2010, and/or Federal Reserve's report Survey of Consumer Finances)



YOU HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING

YOU HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING YET. PUT THE GOP GREEDY GOOD OLD BAG MEN FOR CORPORATE AMERICAN BACK IN CONTROL AND WATCH HOW MUCH POORER YOU CAN GET. THEY TOOK YOUR 401 K AND NOW THEY WILL TAKE YOUR SS AWAY. HEY, IT'S THE REPUBLICANS STUPID.. VOTE YOURSELF POORER. VOTE FOR REPUBLICANS.



The power that is removing

The power that is removing wealth from the middle class is not the republicans. Both political parties are corporate fronts for dealing with the public. As long as the public fears one or the other they can be played.



Nice try, Anonymous on 9/30

Nice try, Anonymous on 9/30 at 13:42, but FALSE. If Republicans become the Congressional majority after November, such wealth as there is will be removed from the Middle-Class AND from Small Business owners AND from Senior in a most egregious manner. If the Democrats increase their majority, the rich will have to start paying their fair share to support American infrastructure.