Cut the Budget? Then Arm the Citizens, Judge Says
Thursday 22 April 2010
by: Connie Schultz, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed
You may have heard the latest those-folks-are-crazy story coming out of my home county in Ohio.
It started two weeks ago with a local television station's tiny sound bite starring Ashtabula County Common Pleas Judge Alfred Mackey. The judge was asked what advice he'd give to the 100,000 or so residents after budget cuts left them with only one sheriff's cruiser to patrol about 700 square miles along Lake Erie.
"Arm themselves," the judge said slowly. "Be very careful. Be vigilant. Get in touch with your neighbors, because we're going to have to look after each other."
Oh, boy. Pass the grits and thank God you don't live in Ashtabula County, right?
I was born and raised in Ashtabula County, and my three siblings and extended family still live there. Both of my parents are buried in a tiny cemetery just outside Andover. Like so many residents of Ashtabula County, my family has had an up-close-and-personal view of the area's climbing crime rate. Five years ago, someone slashed all of my dad's tires on his car in the driveway. Earlier this year, one of my relatives had all her front windows blown out.
So Judge Mackey's comments resonated for a lot of residents there. He also urged neighbors to organize anti-crime block watch groups and emphasized safety, but you're forgiven for not knowing that, because it didn't get as much play until Plain Dealer reporter Sandra Livingston talked to the judge.
"Do these things lawfully and you may need to get a firearm to protect yourself," he told Livingston. "If you do so, then make sure you are competent to handle it. Don't put anybody else unnecessarily at risk."
But the story blazing across the country is about one judge in Ohio telling residents to get their guns. Now all kinds of people think my people are nuts.
The thing is the problems of Ashtabula County are the same problems visiting a load of hurt on communities all across America. The difference is that in Ashtabula County, there's a judge named Mackey who had the nerve to talk about the consequences when budget cuts whittle away at law enforcement. Too bad we relied on a judge for breaking news.
Mackey doesn't regret saying it, and he won't take it back. The 68-year-old judge grew up on a dairy farm in the county. He went away to attend college and law school and then served as a Marine in Vietnam before returning. From his perch on the bench, he's seen too much decline in the county he loves.
"There are a lot of hardworking people here, and these are tough times," he told me. "We used to bend metal up here and mold plastic for automobiles. Our port used to be busy, too. I worked one summer on the Great Lakes carrying ore from Michigan to Ohio.
"Now the jobs are going and gone. If you lose your job, it's hard to find a new one. We're one of the poorest counties in the state. We have more foreclosures every year. We have furlough days at the courthouse. When I heard the sheriff was down to one cruise car per shift, I thought people needed to know the gravity of the situation."
The judge's point, of course, is that no community should have to rely on its citizens to maintain law and order, but that's what happens when government services get cut and cut and cut. Criminals get emboldened, and good people get scared.
Sheriff Billy Johnson, who's threatening to sue county commissioners over lack of funding, said he hopes voters will approve a sales tax increase on the May ballot. Maybe then he could put five cruisers back on the road.
In the meantime, some worry that Judge Mackey's warning telegraphs an invitation to criminals looking for easy prey. But Charles Riley, a Monroe Township trustee in the county, is all over that one. Sounding like a gunslinger at the Ol' Kook Corral, he told reporter Livingston that when it comes to arming the citizenry, size matters:
"They should use shotguns, not handguns, and that way we don't have to send (criminals) to court or to jail because they'll be dead."
Now see? That's how those-folks-are-crazy stories get started.
But that doesn't mean they're true.
Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and essayist for Parade magazine.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
This is happening in lots of
Thu, 04/22/2010 - 14:41 — Anonymous (not verified)This is happening in lots of places. I live in Sacramento County where our police are once again being cut. The comments on the newspaper articles are carry a gun. It is illegal to carry a concealed weapon here, but they want to change the law. Colorado Springs is proud to tell the world they have eliminated most of their government other than a few police and firefighters. I have not heard the effect on their crime rate.
If our law enforcement
Thu, 04/22/2010 - 19:11 — Anonymous (not verified)If our law enforcement officers were not so busy interfering in our private lives by executing unConstitutional laws that fill up our courts and prisons , then they might get the support they need and deserve . But I choose what I wish to ingest and to have a law enforcement agency to step on my right to medicate myself , to me , is treasonous !
It is unfortunate when
Thu, 04/22/2010 - 19:14 — Anonymous (not verified)It is unfortunate when government cannot provide security for citizens, but the judge's advice is sound. He did not advocate recklessness, but rather responsible, careful gun ownership. This will help restrain crime in Ashtabula County because the criminals will not know who is armed and who is not. Thanks for this story; it's a breath of fresh air to be spared the hand-wringing by people who think this will be the end of civilization.
Here in Florida, a law was
Thu, 04/22/2010 - 20:27 — RJames (not verified)Here in Florida, a law was passed which did not require a person to retreat if their life was threatened. Immediately idiots predicted blood running in the streets.
Instead, violent crime has dropped by ten percent. The simple economic explanation is the cost of doing business for criminals went up.
This is what it comes down
Fri, 04/23/2010 - 00:22 — borisjimbo (not verified)This is what it comes down to when you say you want smaller government and less taxes. Hope you tea baggers are happy.
Funny... people are crying
Fri, 04/23/2010 - 10:14 — Anonymous (not verified)Funny... people are crying and moaning about the lack of police - in THE MOST oppressive police controlled nation in the world! LET the cops stay at home, or get real jobs doing something useful. A well armed and watchful citizenry (backed up by sensible judges who rule that bad things may happen to people DOING bad things) is the best way to keep neighborhoods safe. And, as other posters noted... keeping police noses out of other people's private lives will give them more police to deal with REAL crime - like rooting out the arch criminals in our fascist corporate controlled government police state that turned our once great nation of opportunity into a third world prison camp. When, in my life's experience, someone blows out windows of a particular house - or slashes the tires on a particular car - they are usually seeking revenge on somebody. And this naturally begs the question... what did your relatives do to them to elicit this action or probable payback?
Why do the gun nuts
Fri, 04/23/2010 - 12:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Why do the gun nuts everywhere think they are more safe with this granny carrying a Lady Winchester in her purse? My Grandmother carried one in the wild west and it was not a safe place to live. We have over a 30 minutes police response time where I live and some of you think that is great. So much for "law and order". Don't now tell me about your moral values.
Maybe instead of having an
Fri, 04/23/2010 - 13:42 — Sandy (not verified)Maybe instead of having an unrealistic expectations that the police can be everywhere and prevent crime, this will lead to neighbors getting to know each other better, organizing, and backing each other up in times of trouble. Some folks will have guns for self defense, and would-be assailants won't know who has them and who doesn't, which is a deterrent. And while we're getting to know our community better, maybe we can also work on solutions to some of the problems that cause crime in the first place, like unemployment, and substance abuse.
the boston police went on
Sun, 04/25/2010 - 22:44 — Anonymous (not verified)the boston police went on strike in 1919,criminals went on a rampage,today lawmakers are urging the Gov. of Ill to send the national guard into Chicago to get violent crime under control,owning a gun for self defence under the most extreme circumstances can save your life ,folks will own a 3000 pound dangerous instrument , a car,and keep it under control but wont own a 5 shot 38 revolver that is completly inert until the trigger is pulled
Why is it that the mere
Tue, 04/27/2010 - 10:22 — Anonymous (not verified)Why is it that the mere mention of legally owning a firearm (of any kind) for self protection immediately brings responses of gun nuts, fanatics, kooks, extremists, and the like. What is wrong with protecting ones family and possessions from those who would try to harm or take them? If you think any body else is going to do this for you, including the police, you are sadly mistaken. If you think otherwise just ask a policeman what their function is. The idea of serve and protect has been dead for years! The Founding Fathers of our country included the 2nd Amendment for just that reason - to protect you and yours. Pray you never need to defend yourself but it's better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it! Arm yourselves while you can!