Cranks Resist Security at Airports - and in the Senate
Wednesday 24 November 2010
by: Michael Winship, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed
To paraphrase that cult movie classic, "Eating Raoul," frisk me, pat me down, make me write bad checks. If it keeps my flight from falling out of the sky, do what you must. Just don't expect breakfast in the morning and a thank you note.
Because let's face it, as onerous as you might think these new airport body scans are, not to mention the pat-downs with benefits if you refuse the scan, they may be a necessary part of life in these United States circa 2010. Facebook already has wiped out most vestiges of your privacy; the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) simply takes care of the rest.
Not that there aren't problems, bugs that have to be worked out as these systems go through their shakedown phase. Overly aggressive and handsy TSA inspectors, for one. And according to The Washington Post, a scientist claims there's a "cheap and simple fix" to the scanners that would "distort the images captured on full-body scanners so they look like reflections in a fun-house mirror, but any potentially dangerous objects would be clearly revealed," thus quelling the protests of those who object to real-time, nude outlines of the human body.
The former nuclear weapons designer, who helped develop the scanners at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, says he offered the solution to Department of Homeland Security officials four years ago during the Bush administration, but was "rebuffed."
There's also some concern about radiation, although The Associated Press reports the TSA claim that "radiation from one scan is about the same as a person would get from flying for about three minutes in an airplane at 30,000 feet, where atmospheric radiation levels are higher than on the ground. That amount is vastly lower than a single dental X-ray.
"You would have to go through scanners more than 1,000 times in one year to even meet the maximum recommended level - and even pilots don't do that." (So, why are pilots and flight attendants being allowed to duck the scanners? Just asking.)
And here's an interesting tidbit from Amy Goodman's Democracy Now! web site on November 23: "As the national debate over airport screening practices intensifies, little attention has been paid to the increasing lobbying power the manufacturers of full-body scanning machines have in Washington. USA Today reports L3 Communications has spent $4.3 million on lobbying, up from $2.1 million in 2005. L3 has sold nearly $40 million worth of machines to the federal government. Lobbyists for L3 have included Linda Daschle, the wife of former US Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle. Meanwhile, Rapiscan Systems has spent more than $270,000 on lobbying so far this year, compared with $80,000 five years earlier. The company made headlines last year when it hired former US Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who has become a prominent proponent of body scanners. The CEO of Rapiscan's parent company, Deepak Chopra, recently traveled with President Obama on his three-day trip to India."
(And, no, not that Deepak Chopra. The New Age guru would determine your terrorist potential by evaluating your aura, no machines or strip-searches necessary.)
In any case, if you're contemplating staging a protest while in line at an airport this holiday weekend, in the name of all that's holy, please don't. I'm not flying anywhere this week, but think of the 1.6 million Americans who are and show a little common sense and thoughtfulness. Also ask yourself, would I be doing this if George Bush were still in the White House urging me to be patriotic and patient? And to shop my terrors away at the mall?
Besides, when it comes to security, frankly, there are more important things to worry about than some anonymous, federal rent-a-cop scanning your privates for grenades.
Like North Korea. On Tuesday, it shelled the island of Yeonpyeong, killing two South Korean soldiers and wounding 18 military personnel and civilians. The attack occurred just days after Stanford University nuclear scientist Siegfried S. Hecker, former director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory was shown a secret North Korean uranium enrichment facility. The New York Times noted, "The development confronted the Obama administration with the prospect that North Korea country is preparing to expand its nuclear arsenal or build a far more powerful type of atomic bomb." Nuclear technology they've already demonstrated they're willing to sell to the right bidder.
Just one of the many good reasons that, in its lame-duck session, the United States Senate should ratify the New START (Strategic Arms Reduction) Treaty with Russia: to maintain stability and strengthen the alliance with that former cold war enemy that helps keep North Korea - and Iran - in line. And to restore on-site inspections of Russian missile sites and storage facilities to prevent nuclear weapons from disappearing into the hands of terrorists, state sponsored or otherwise. And to limit the number of strategic warheads held by the two nations.
The treaty needs 67 votes for ratification, which means eight Republicans must support it along with all 59 members of the Democratic voting bloc. But some are trying to hold off the vote until the new Congress in January, when 14 Republican votes will be required for the necessary two-thirds majority. That doubtless would put a stop to START, and seriously undercut our worldwide credibility.
This is foolish, dangerous partisanship, plain and simple, Republicans denying President Obama even the most sensible initiative just to further undermine his chances for re-election without regard to the international consequences, which include a possible strengthening of Russian hardliners, an end to that nation's cooperation on Afghanistan and Iran and a general destabilization of the balance of power.
This is a treaty endorsed, as Steven Benen of Washington Monthly has pointed out, not only by the leaders of NATO, but by six former secretaries of state and five former secretaries of defense from both parties, seven former Strategic Command chiefs, national security advisers from both parties and nearly all former commanders of US nuclear forces. Not to mention Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen, who described START as "essential to our future security."
But to many hard-line Republicans, like the cranky travelers who balk and rage at scans and searches, security may no longer be the priority it once was. Not when there's a presidency to destroy.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Entirely unpersuasive.
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 15:35 — Enabling liberal (not verified)Entirely unpersuasive. Winship surrenders his 4th amendment rights because "it's what's necessary today." Bullshit. Al Qeada, if they exist, is no where near an American airport. It's astoundingly cynical to hear this writer say that we all need to assume anyone of us could try to take down an airliner. That is nearly as insane (but quite real) as the entire war of terror. We already have anonymous, federal rent-a-cops scanning everything about out private lives - I thought this was about "terrorists" from the middle east, how can any American be "ok" with any of these massive, expensive efforts to keep notes on every American? For what purpose then? No American should ever trust what their current Government is telling them to be afraid of - not after the last 10 years.
I worship Winship -- usually
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 16:45 — Dwight (not verified)I worship Winship -- usually -- but this one is bad.
I think one of the biggest
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 16:54 — Anonymous (not verified)I think one of the biggest down-sides to our culture of instant gratification is our lack of ability to recognize and appreciate the power of incrementalism. For years now I've been hearing "it's just shoes...it's just gels...it's just laptops...its just pat-downs...it's just body scanning..." Our poor fucking kids! What a world we're about to hand them.
I don't buy the premise that these procedures make us any safer, and therefore should not be asked to surrender not only my rights, but the right of my and your children, for "security."
Sac-up America! You've gone soft.
wow can't believe truthout
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 17:12 — Anonymous (not verified)wow can't believe truthout has a dumb sheep writing articles for it. thought this was for progressives not brain washed, asslicking idiots. the scanners are highly dangerous, anyone with a brain knows not to trust government sources as to the safety of anything. the scanners can see everything, even if a woman is wearing a tampon, or if a man is circumcised and the images are being stored and can be posted on the net. Does the author not see the problem with unskilled, non medical, men and women look at naked little children. Any person can compare facebook with having naked images of us stored on computers is an ignoramous. Lets not ven get into the fact that terrorism is largly a myth and that most terrorist attacks are carried out by elected governments. totally shocked cancelling subscription, no time for any more bullshit, mainstream propragada
I remember a week after 911
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 17:33 — thedavehaze (not verified)I remember a week after 911 happened a reporter was asking people on the streets of Manhattan if they would be willing to give up their rights to be safe. Everyone said sure. (Of course I'd bet my eyes that they cut out the emphatic nos.)
What the reporter didn't ask was the more pertinent and honest question are you willing for everyone to give up their rights for you to think you are safe.
Anyone willing to give up their rights have already given them up and probably only had the foggiest idea what they were to begin with. Oh, Bush and Gulliani said they could retain the right to shop and consume. Thank god.
In my opinion the writer of this op-ed is delusional.
I'm so offended. This is
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 17:49 — Prairie Coyote (not verified)I'm so offended. This is like the hit piece in The Nation. Ugh. Does not belong in Truthout.
Equating the refusal of the
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 18:00 — AmyTN (not verified)Equating the refusal of the Republicans to ratify the START treaty with what's wrong with the TSA naked scanners and pat downs is completely off base. One has NOTHING to do with the other except for partisan Republicans in Congress who have hijacked both issues for their own purposes. The REPUBLICANS holding office currently have one agenda to privatize EVERYTHING and to give Obama NOTHING. The TSA issue and the treaty with Russia are only means to an end. They truly don't care about what they are doing to this country because they can't stand the fact that we have a black man as our President. They want to find a way "to put him in his place" as they long for a pre-civil rights world once again.
The average non-elected person who is against the loss of our privacy with these naked scanners and pat downs are the same people who were outraged by much of the Patriot act. We are constantly having knee jerk reactions to whatever threat comes about and the solutions are always two steps behind the groups that are a threat to our security. As Benjamin Franklin said that when we give up our liberties for the sake of security we get neither. We have become subjugated to ourselves, we have spent billions and trillions of dollars unwisely at the expense of our country's financial welfare and the very independence that our forefathers fought so hard for us to have and the terrorists have won.
Airport security is yet
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:27 — Anonymous (not verified)Airport security is yet another in a long line of issues to distract us from what's really going on. We need security at airports like we need a hole in the head. It's ridiculous, costs millions which is passed on to the traveling public and does nothing to keep us safe.
100% safety against terrorism is never going to happen - unless you want to subject everyone to strip searches (including body cavity probes). It's a question of proportionality.
We don't stop driving because people die in motor accidents even though more people die on US roads every MONTH than died in the 911 attacks.
The chances of any particular person being killed or injured by terrorists in the US is miniscule. So why are we putting EVERYBODY through these intrusive and embarrassing security checks?
Having lived through the IRA bombings in London I see how rational people deal with terrorism... They allow the intelligence gathering agencies and police to do their job. We don't close down the London Underground by searching every passenger! This is bullcrap.
Thank you for the comments
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:32 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Thank you for the comments that say what I would have said! This writer is so woefully ignorant of and traitorous to the Constitution in his blind, ignorant, sycophantic, "wanna-be-slave" surrendering of the human and civil rights delineated therein, that it is absolutely nauseating! Rights and liberties that are not only the bedrock foundation and "Supreme Law of the Land" of this country, but are our innate liberties and rights written down that we are born with and that cannot be taken away for any reason(s) and/or "justifications" whatsoever!
So what is it about "unalienable", or "inalienable", and/or immutable, etc., that the instant writer and most so-called "Americans" don't understand?! What, terrorism has supposedly come into existence for the first time, or for the first time to the extent that it has, and suddenly the Constitution is supposedly "variable", "changeable", "quaint", "outdated", and/or "interpretable-right-out-the-window"?! Terrorism is nothing new. It's been around since time-immemorial. And, as the Founders of this country so rightly said, and warned us regarding, we must NEVER give up our "God-given-rights-and-liberties-written-down", or sacrifice ANY liberty(ies) for so-called "security"!!...
...If the Founders of the
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:33 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...If the Founders of the U.S. were alive today, what do you suppose they would be doing in response to this country and "Americans" voluntarily surrendering their liberties which were bought at the HUGE price of so many heroic lives?! They would be yelling from the rooftops not to do it, no matter what, and they wouldn't stop doing so until the government murdered them, that is what they would be doing!! They would know without any doubt(s) whatsoever that the government probably would very likely murder them for doing so, and that they were putting their very lives on the line for the truth, but they would not flinch or in any way hold back from fulfilling that duty and responsibility to do so!!
Therefore, can we do any less?! Of course not!! "Give (us) liberty or give (us) death"! What the U.S. government is doing right now is completely traitorous anathema (damnation) to the most important things this country is supposed to stand for, True Liberty and Freedom; and is erecting a totalitarian militarized, corporate-fascist police state in this country that is the antithesis (the exact opposite) of what this country is ONLY supposed to be about; again, True Freedom and Liberty, WITHOUT EVER SACRIFICING THEM FOR ELUSIVE AND/OR ILLUSORY "SECURITY"!
ALSO, DAMN IT, TRUE
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:38 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)ALSO, DAMN IT, TRUE AMERICANS STANDING UP FOR THEIR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES, AND AGAINST THE EVISCERATION OF THEM, ARE NOT "CRANKS"!!!!!
"I think one of the biggest
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:40 — Rick Levy (not verified)"I think one of the biggest down-sides to our culture of instant gratification is our lack of ability to recognize and appreciate the power of incrementalism. For years now I've been hearing "it's just shoes...it's just gels...it's just laptops...its just pat-downs...it's just body scanning..." Our poor fucking kids! What a world we're about to hand them."
Thanks, Anonymous. My sentiments exactly. I just couldn't articulate them as well. "Incrementalism" is a term that beautifully sums up the issue.
The evil residing in their
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:47 — Anonymous (not verified)The evil residing in their ivory towers are once again laughing at all the idiot pee-ons below whom which they have infighting with each other using the buffer of their appointed (some think elected LOL) government officials keeping up this facade.
Carbon Footprint.
We are a carbon footprint to them, get it.
Must reduce the carbon footprint.
Carbon mean of the Human Body:
(6) protons, (6) neutrons, (6) electrons.
Humans ARE the Mark of the Beast.
What does this have to do with TSA or START?!
Nothing and Everything.
HA HA HA. Joke is on US.
Wonder when those same 'people' are going to give up their right to breath for improved security.
Ha Ha HA. Hey Henry, don't ya' just love our new digs'.
Dear Lord, Truth-Out, do you
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:49 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Dear Lord, Truth-Out, do you read and/or screen submitted articles for true terrorism and/or treason against this country before you post them?! That's what this article defends, and therefore is!! Please don't let such evil, traitorous, un-American, anti-American, anti-Constitutional propaganda be propagated here!! Nip it in the bud!! There is NO excuse for it!! If you allow treasonous propaganda such as this article to be propagated, and to more and more deceive Americans, you are being traitorous and treasonous yourselves, and EVERYONE should boycott you and stop reading anything you post entirely!! Geez, are you True Americans or not?! Winship obviously isn't!! Boycott HIM, and all those who write such anti-liberty, anti-freedom tripe such as this article!! Completely do the right thing, for God's sake, or you might as well sell out to the "Fawning Corporate Media (FCM)" propaganda ministry of the now corporate-fascist government, if you haven't already!! God, and you, spare us from ALL such true treason and terrorism here on Truth-Out!!
I think a more appropriate
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:50 — Anonymous (not verified)I think a more appropriate place for scanners and gropers is malls. Just as many people if not more pass through them, and a terrorist could do more harm to more people than the passengers of one plane. Think that's gonna happen? Hell, no! Nothing that impedes our 4th Amendment right to shop will ever be enacted. That is sacred. Oh, wait - is the 4th amendment the one about shopping or our right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure? Maybe a Constitutional refresher course is i order for Mr. Winship. it's hardly about "cranky" passengers. It's not what's "necessary today." I'm sorry someone might be inconvenienced and late for their Thanksgiving dinner by my exercising my Constitutional Right, which I DID NOT "give up" when I bought an airline ticket. I think since the Constitution guarantees these rights, I can't "give them up" even if I'm braindead enough to want to. I certainly did not by buying a plane ticket. What a bunch of rubbish.
On the good side, this issue has been taken up by people across the political spectrum - so let's not squander the opportunity for grassroots uprising. Progressives have common ground with Libertarians and TeaPartiers - let's use it.
Some are complaining that
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 21:08 — Anonymous (not verified)Some are complaining that TruthOut should boycott submission by authors such as this due to being non-patriotic.
Well, I thought there was such a thing as FREE SPEECH. Are some here hypocrites???
Should you get your foot out of your mouth which seems to be stuck where the sun does not shine, you may realize that this may be one of the ways to root out such treasonous thinkers.
"Make sure you know which way the barrel is pointing before you pull the trigger"!
Yes, "Anonymous @ Thu,
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 21:21 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Yes, "Anonymous @ Thu, 11/25/2010 - 01:27"! The "S.T.A.R.T. Treaty" is also a distraction, and is being particularly used by Winship in this article to distract us, from our innate rights and liberties being whittled away to nothing right now. How adroit of him as an obviously evil, traitorous sycophant propagandist for the anti-American U.S. government, to use tying the START Treaty in with the completely unconstitutional, and Constitution-destroying, activities or the airport "Gestapo", and trying to make it look like those who stand up against all of the violations of our privacy and other innate rights and liberties are supposedly idiots who don't deserve the time of day.
When Americans are being True Patriotic Americans defending their rapidly-disappearing Constitution, and their innate civil rights and liberties written therein which are also rapidly disappearing, they are supposedly idiots and to be shunned; but when so-called "Americans" like Winship are being anti-American, anti-Constitutional and thereby treasonous and/or traitorous, and committing true terrorism against the Constitution, its people, the country, and True Liberty and Freedom thereby, they are supposedly scholars and to be looked up to.
But this traitor to all True Freedom and Liberty, Michael Winship, should be tried in a court of law for treason, and held completely accountable. He is NOT above the Constitution or the rule of law! He has most-definitely committed treason by saying what he has in this article, and so has Truth-Out by publishing it! God save us from all such so-called "Americans", and from all those who promote them and/or their writings!
"Anonymous @ Thu, 11/25/2010
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 21:45 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)"Anonymous @ Thu, 11/25/2010 - 02:08", there is NO "free speech" for those who commit true, anti-Constitutional treason, or real treason, without consequences and their being held accountable for perpetrating that treason. At least there wouldn't be if the U.S. were truly the Constitutional republic that it's supposed to be, and not the more and more authoritarian, fast becoming totalitarian, corporate-fascist militarized police state that it has become. And, if the U.S. were the Constitutional republic that it is supposed to be, and not the total antithesis of that which it is supposed to be, and is becoming more and more, they would be held accountable, too. Yet, are they held accountable? No, they are allowed to destroy us and all of our True Freedom(s).
The U.S. is no longer the country of the rule of law, and True Liberty and Freedom, that it was designed to be. "We, the People" let extremely criminal traitors rule over us, eviscerate our Constitution, hold the Constitution in contempt, violate it with impunity and immunity, take away our precious liberties and freedoms completely, enslave us more and more, laugh at us with extreme derision all the way to the bank while they are robbing all of us and the entire country dry, completely destroy this country, and bring it under the international enslavement of globalism, the "New World Order (NWO)" and one-world government and religion; all of which is the most absolute treason that could ever be perpetrated against us and this entire country.
Wow... No one likes this.
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 21:56 — Anonymous (not verified)Wow... No one likes this. Guess what, I don't either.
Give in to "Big Brother", in
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 22:17 — Anonymous (not verified)Give in to "Big Brother", in whatever small and seemingly inconsequential way, and you give up any rational or after-thought alternatives to that loss of liberty, and more.
Every single signer of the Declaration of Independence and writers of our Constitution, between them all warned US, the future generations, of every conceivable danger to those freedoms and liberties spelled out in those still-historical and unique documents.
I heard this one so long ago that I can't remember even how little I was at the time, or know today who gets the credit (I'd guess Benjamin F). But it was immediately as self-evident a truth as any I have heard even from those whom created this once great nation:
"Give THEM an inch, and THEY will take a mile"
Another one which should be true, but isn't because it takes an active role by those whom might administer the required justice:
"Give THEM enough rope, and THEY will hang THEMselves"
sssigh...
"Those whom the Gods wish to
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 22:36 — John of Perth (not verified)"Those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad". Read an SF article about how a strong civilization was brought down by scaring them into excessive and prolonged security scares.
It is not surprising that the Russian Empire in Eastern Europe crashed when the people lost confidence in it.
Now we are spending huge amounts of time and effort to 'prevent terrorism from occurring’. At the same time we will lose more people to car accidents than from all significant terrorist incidents so far.
Time to back off the over security, ensure that those who do any thing are chased down. Yet at the same time look carefully at policies which may be encouraging those terrorists and systematically penalize the elites of the countries where they are sourced and funded. So what if they supply most of our oil, time to get alternatives any way and not be over a barrel.
I still can't imagine that
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 22:47 — Bubbiesue (not verified)I still can't imagine that the risk is high enough to warrant the intrusion of radiation, much less a pat-down. I might trust a scientist who's done tests on the Xray scanner, but I've seen no reliable information as of yet. And neither of the two recent threats originated in the U.S. Is there some evidence that somebody's about to do something? Why don't they just tell us?
I'm going on a trip before long and I'm practicing saying, "No radiation, please, and privacy if you must do a pat-down, and a same-sex person to do it." If Schipol (Amsterdam) could do a non-radiation scanner that IDs only suspicious items, what's the matter with the U.S besides being in love with the people who make the scanners? After all, building them creates jobs, doesn't it?
TSA Gestapo Empire by, Paul
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 23:13 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)TSA Gestapo Empire
by, Paul Craig Roberts (former U.S. government employee as a member of the Reagan administration)
Infowars.com
November 24, 2010
infowars.com/tsa-gestapo-empire/
Follow the money. It's all
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 23:16 — Anonymous (not verified)Follow the money. It's all about business and making money, and nothing to do with the whole made-up, created by those secretly in power, perceived threats by forces unknown.
It's like we're walking around in a Halloween haunted house 24/7/365 - only this one ain't run by the JAYCEES baby!
Or WE could just quit flying the airlines. They're runnin' out of gas anyway...
It's definitely not just the
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 23:52 — BH (not verified)It's definitely not just the far right resisting this one. The TSA encroachments on our dignity are authoritarian in nature, as are the rationalizations for them, so anti-authoritarians of all stripes (mostly left of center, naturally.) Yes, right-wing libertarian bloggers helped gin up the controversy by lying about their experiences and getting caught, but no rational people I know are blaming this on President Obama or the Democratic congress. To the contrary, it's just a symptom of our country slipping ever farther to the authoritarian extreme right.
"Cranks Resist Security at
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 01:40 — RA in NYC (not verified)"Cranks Resist Security at Airports"? It is obvious to anyone who is paying attention that resistance to the TSA's new security policy goes way beyond a few "cranks".
Public anger is finally boiling over at the degrading way we are treated just to get on a commercial airline flight. The security theater of removing your shoes, being denied an ordinary size bottle of shampoo, going through metal detectors, etc. was bad enough. But the new routine of x-ray body scanners and/or intrusive patdowns that verge on sexual groping take us to a place that is very close to what the inmates experience in prison. And if you object, you can be fined thousands of dollars and subject to arrest!
We are right up against the line where ordinary, law-abiding citizens can get in trouble, just for trying to take an airplane flight. And for what? For some ideal of absolute, one-hundred-percent security that is not obtainable on this earth? That is no way to live, and it is certainly not what the founders of our country had in mind as acceptable government conduct.
Mr. Winship should be ashamed of himself for trying to pass off this evisceration of our civil rights as some sort of minor inconvenience.
"I don't buy the premise
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 02:24 — Anonymous (not verified)"I don't buy the premise that these procedures make us any safer"
Of course they don't, and the lack of streamlining at security stations produces a giant, unsecured target at every single US airport.
I'm talking, of course, about the crowds of people, completely unscreened, standing in packed crowds waiting to be screened.
It's outrageous that they expose me to this much more centralized risk. I'd much rather take the chance of being on one of several hundred "less" secured flights than be compelled to stand more or less trapped with thousands of people in a compact crowd in a central travel hub for a whole region.
The author is simply a
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 04:03 — Pat (not verified)The author is simply a coward and a traitor to what this country was founded upon. He certainly doesn't deserve security nor liberty.
Shame on TO for posting this garbage!
WHAT AN ASSHOLE!!!
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 06:51 — James Lascko (not verified)WHAT AN ASSHOLE!!!
Hear, Hear. I'm with
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 06:53 — CJRMD1 (not verified)Hear, Hear. I'm with Entirely unpersuasive. In fact this author is such a sheeple that I almost think he's a plant.
I also think he's probably too young and stupid to see what has already happened during our last nebulous 'war', the war on drugs where the erosion of our civil rights exploded.
Now he thinks this new round is almost cute. Ben Frank would have vomited after reading this garbage. I did. Oh and for the record Chertoff ordered the scanners while still in public offic and that's a felony.
Totally disagree w/ this
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 07:57 — kindnblue (not verified)Totally disagree w/ this author. I am not a Republican crank, and I don't give up any of my rights easily. Even if it is such a silly little 4th Amendment.
To combine START issues and compare them in this article was nonsense, though their stance on START most agree with.
I usually forward Truthout's articles to get friends and family informed and engaged. This time I would be embarrassed to do so.
seems americans are not
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 09:41 — not america (not verified)seems americans are not buying this bullshit propaganda that the TSA security theatre is necessary
because it's NOT necessary.
It's also repugnant and ugly and invasive and so very fascist it's a freaking NAZI police state level, Orwellian Nightmare
Let's just put an end to the nightmare
they say the machines are
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 09:46 — Anonymous (not verified)they say the machines are safe , let them be tested in Sweden ,until then its bunk
All the hoo-ha about privacy
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 11:35 — nazani14 (not verified)All the hoo-ha about privacy obscures the main issue- these expensive machines and rude patdowns will not keep explosives off planes. You don't have to have any EOD training to realize that.
Neocon propaganda BS comes
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 14:31 — Kevin Schmidt (not verified)Neocon propaganda BS comes to TruthOut, and the truth, well it is out!
Meanwhile, our Constitutional rights go down the drain, again.
I guess I'm one of the
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 16:13 — billy bob (not verified)I guess I'm one of the cranks - along with 61% of ALL Americans (according to Zogby, no less) and probably 99% of Truthout's readers.
If Truthout intended to actually offend its readers it succeeded.
This isn't really just a choice between terrorism and inconvenience. This is about whether the United States of America can SURVIVE. I'm not refering to our place on the map. I'm refering to another piece of paper on which this country was founded.
What does it mean to be an American anyway? Does it mean being kept safe and warm at all costs, and "protected FROM our freedoms"?
Tell me again, Uncle Sam, what are we "fighting" FOR?
One thing I'm getting pretty
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 16:14 — billy bob (not verified)One thing I'm getting pretty sick of is "authority" preaching to us from "our" media that ANY DEVIATION from the official script must be coming from "cranks", "crackpots", and of course that most over-used of ALL chestnuts: "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS".
What a great way to shut down the debate on any subject! All you have to do is accuse your opponent of being a "conspiracy theorist", or pandering to "political correctness", and you no longer have to defend your position. The argument is effectively, over.
So, apparently, only TENS OF
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 16:16 — billy bob (not verified)So, apparently, only TENS OF THOUSANDS (rather than millions) of American citizens participated in the protests yesterday. As a result, according to the hillariously cute and DEEPLY OFFENSIVE, patronizing, and un-American headlines from the AP yesterday, not much of a delay was felt. While writers for the AP, fox and, Michael Winship, were on the sidelines jeering wildly at the humor of watching ordinary American citizens trying to regain SOME control over this country, YET ANOTHER of the very rights we claim to be colonizing the Middle-East to defend, is being STRIPPED AWAY.
I'm sickened by the sentiment of this truly repulsive article.
If Truthout intended to actually offend its own readers, it succeeded.
Ah yes, fear is a very good
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 18:58 — DHFabian (not verified)Ah yes, fear is a very good tool for achieving the public's cooperation. History shows that humiliation is a powerful tool for winning cooperation. Fear teaches unruly Americans how to obey. Obedience will make us safe. We will surrender our wills for the sake of safety. We will surrender our fundamental rights - we will even scrap the United States Constitution- for the sake of being safe. We will surrender everything, even our very souls, for (at least the illusion of) being safe. If there is one thing that defines this generation, it is that the thing we fear most is fear itself.
Usually I enjoy reading the
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 19:10 — Don (not verified)Usually I enjoy reading the comments to Truthout articles. But the comments on this article are generally disgusting and display a remarkable lack of intelligence and common sense.
The hype about the body scanners is just that --- hype ---overblown, paranoid reaction to non-existent "threats" to privacy and/or health. In a few days or weeks, you won't see anything about this in the news.
As Winship tried to point out (and apparently not grasped by some) is that there are many more issues that are far -- extremely -- more important than the scanner "issue."
I'm reminded of the "death panel" charade that the Conservatives made up to scare the gullible and divert attention from the real issues. It is not too far fetched to think that those who seem to protest the loudest --- about "privacy" and "4th amendment" -- are really ultraconservatives who would rather have us focus on scanners than on what is really going on to undermine democracy and rational thought in this country.
So, Don, the over 90% of
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 01:15 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)So, Don, the over 90% of commenters to this disgusting article, 100% of whom recognize it for the un-American, anti-American, anti-Constitutional, traitorous, offensive, deplorable, repulsive propaganda piece it is, are all supposedly wrong; and you, almost if not the only one who is defending it and its anti-American, repulsive content, are supposedly the only commenter who is right. Get real, get a clue, study your Constitution, study what the Founders of this country said, and then fulfill your DUTY to
obey, uphold, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution from ALL enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC, which includes defending and protecting us from the treason of writers and propagandists such as the author of this article. There are no excuses or justifications for professed-"Americans" defending truly-treasonous ideas such as this article unconscionably defends, upholds and promulgates.
People are either True Americans or they aren't. To be True Americans, people have to completely obey, protect and defend the Constitution. All those who don't do the latter, are NOT True Americans AT ALL, and are nothing but traitors. Most so-called "Americans", especially gung-ho brainwashed veterans, may have some vague understanding of the Constitution and believe, as they're involved in mass-murdering for empire, that they're supposedly obeying, protecting and defending the Constitution; but most of them, like you, have little or no clue what they are doing. Yet, their ignorance does NOT excuse them, anymore than your's does. Everyone has the opportunity(ies) to learn what the Constitution really means and stands for, and what obeying, protecting and defending it really means, but most choose to remain in ignorance of it, and to therefore falsely call themselves "Americans"...
...Therefore, the response
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 01:16 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Therefore, the response of most of the people here to this article is NOT "overblown", contrary to your ignorant, dismissive, and anti-American attitude and beliefs, and your defense of anti-American attitudes and beliefs. In actuality, it is what you have to say that "lacks intelligence and common sense", and that is "hype" and "overblown", as well as a traitorous response to the article; not the majority of people here who are defending the Constitution and its principles. But, according to you and your ilk, defending privacy, the Fourth Amendment, our Constitution, and our civil liberties is supposedly irrational; when it is those who do not obey, defend and protect the Constitution, like you and your kind, who are the truly irrational ones, and who have little or no idea what they really stand for.
You are so blind to the fact that you are standing on a foundation of quicksand, that you can't see the forest for the trees, or the real truth because of the lies blocking you from the real truth. You've been so indoctrinated, conditioned and programmed to not take the principles, standards, duties, responsibilities and laws of the Constitution seriously; and to defend not obeying, protecting and defending them; as well as to defend almost everything the government does, especially to violate, contravene and abrogate them, that you evidently cannot even recognize that you and your entire premise, as well as all of those like you and the writer of this article, are defending the completely indefensible, and are speaking against True Patriotism and those who are carrying out, which is the ultimate in traitorousness.
Correction (in capital
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 02:26 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Correction (in capital letters): ...you evidently cannot even recognize that you and your entire premise, as well as all of those like you and the writer of this article, are defending the completely indefensible, and are speaking against True Patriotism and those who are carrying IT out, which is the ultimate in traitorousness.
I am glad to see all the
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 10:13 — Anonymous (not verified)I am glad to see all the opposition among the progressive community. I hope truthout reads all the replies to this garbage specious argument. This is not a partisan issue as winshit and hannity would have us believe. It is time for us to rise up against this fascist assault on all of our freedoms...our god given rights, before we are involuntarily put into concentration camps for our own security...to protect us from the terrorists.
In case readers missed it,
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 11:05 — Anonymous (not verified)In case readers missed it, "S. Wolf Britain" has all the earmarks of a CYBER BULLY who results to nasty language, grand generalizations, personal attacks ("traitors", "idiot" etc) on those who dare disagree, who is the only one who REALLY knows "True Patriotism", who mistakes beliefs for facts (e.g. confusing the Declaration of Independence with the Constitution) and tries to monopolize the conversation with endless notes.
Frankly, I think the bullies like "S. Wolf Britain" are more dangerous to our constitutional rights than the TSA or the terrorists. Maybe even more dangerous than Sarah Palin!
My advice -- take off the aluminum foil hat and those voices won't bother you any more!
-Don, What is going on in
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 15:35 — billy bob (not verified)-Don, What is going on in this country that is more important than the destruction of our civil rights? Seriously, Don, what could be more important to this country than the Constitution on which The United States of America derives its purpose in even existing in the first place?
---------
-"anonymous" 16:05, I've personally had disputes with s. wolf britain myself. I've wondered about the aluminum foil myself.
Still, did he make some kind of a threat to you? I read his comment & I didn't read ANYTHING that could be construed as a "threat". I'm sorry he used harsh words in his replies. I think there's plenty of room for passion on BOTH sides of an argument. But, if he didn't threaten you, HE'S NOT A "CYBER BULLY".
Also, do you honestly want us to believe that the "cyber-bullying" of one individual against another is worse than the REAL AND PHYSICAL bullying of the U.S. government against ordinary citizens who've committed no crime other than wanting to board a commercial plane after paying through the nose for tickets?
I'm very disappointed in
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 17:51 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm very disappointed in this truthout article.
Also, I don't know what "Cranks" the writer is referencing, but the ones I heard about were intelligent and articulate with well-founded concerns.
One was a young woman who went through with a bikini under her trenchcoat (which she was planning to simply take off for them. The media did not report on what happened when she finally went through, but she certainly made clear the point as to what they were "patting down" in their effort to make America safe from terrorism.
Thank you, Billy Bob, for
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 18:21 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Thank you, Billy Bob, for someone coming to my defense; but, more importantly, to the defense of the principles for which I stand, and the defense of that which is against the un-American heresy and its proponents who buy all of the "U.S.-government-manufactured-terrorism" lies that supposedly justify our doing away with our Constitution and its embodiment of our rights which we are born with, and that we must NEVER sacrifice for so-called "security".
The U.S. government now creates "Reichstag fires", and creates and sets-up patsies, like Nazi Germany did in order to "justify" invading Poland, and in order to get the "good Germans" to give up their liberties and freedoms, and accept the setting up of a totalitarian police state in their country, a dictatorship taking over everything, and exterminating all dissenters and opposition from all walks of life and political persuasions.
All of that is being repeated in "America" today, but those who defend the totalitarian takeover of the U.S., or who refuse to face that IT IS HAPPENING, call all those who speak the truth about it, so-called "threats", as happened in Germany, feeding right in to what the government wants in order to stir up enough opposition to the truth and its proponents, to be able to eradicate all dissenters and opposition from all walks of life AGAIN...
...History is repeating
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 18:22 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...History is repeating right before the very eyes of "Americans" today, but they refuse to face it, and they fall right into the government trap of decrying all those who do face it, who are trying their darnedest to fulfill their duty(ies) to warn everyone that it's happening, and to get every True American to stand up against it before it's too late, if it isn't already too late.
Those who speak the loudest against these truths, and against those who speak them, won't be satisfied until all of the truthtellers are taken away and never heard from again, just as in Germany. They believe it supposedly won't happen, just as most Germans believed as well; and no amount of warning them, appealing to their "reason", trying to get them to wake up---as many of those in Germany tried to do, and who were as a result "disappeared" and never heard from again---will get them to see what's really happening until it's FAR too late.
Even the "William Rivers Pitts", who used to tell it completely like it is about the threats of overreaching government, "Richard Lichtmans", and "Michael Winships", etc., of this country are falling for it, and defending that some sort of so-called balance must supposedly be found between destroying our Constitution and preserving it, which is a complete impossibility.
Why do they do this? Because they don't want to be called those who are supposedly aiding the "terrorists"; because they want to protect and save their own hides, and the hides of their families, whether they're conscious of it or not, from the "Fourth Reich" corporate-fascist scourge that is sweeping and taking over the U.S.; and because, whatever it takes, they too want some illusory "security", even at the expense of our liberties and freedoms bought at the cost of so many extremely courageous and heroic lives...
...They have lost sight, or
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 18:22 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...They have lost sight, or are losing sight more and more, of the fact that we must NEVER compromise with the destruction of freedom and liberty; and that we must be willing to stand against that destruction---even if it means sacrificing ourselves and dying at the hands of the totalitarian plague that is overcoming "America"---in order to warn our fellow-citizens that they better rise up en masse against this destruction of everything we should hold dear above all else except God Himself, which are our liberties and freedoms that were purchased at the monumental price of millions of American lives, no matter what.
Because, if they don't rise up en masse against it, no one except those who sell-out and betray their very souls, their liberties and freedoms, their Constitution, their country, their fellow-citizens, and their entire world will be supposedly "safe" and "secure"; and because, in truth, they will be no more safe and secure than all of their fellow human beings, and everything else, that they betrayed and sold-out.
So, the most important question at this point in time is, are we going to be cowards and traitors like those people named above, and far too many "Americans"; or are we going to exercise the True Heroism and Courage that our forbears exercised, "come liberty or come death" (my words), to preserve, protect and defend our freedoms and liberties no matter what it takes, as long as it does NOT, IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, FORM OR FASHION WHATSOEVER, "take" surrendering those liberties and freedoms?
The TSA and America’s
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 22:12 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)The TSA and America’s Turning Point
by, "Hobbes"
Scragged (Website)
November 26, 2010
infowars.com/the-tsa-and-americas-turning-point/
First, I would urge all
Sat, 11/27/2010 - 09:15 — Poetdowns (not verified)First, I would urge all readers, in fact all people; to read the article "Police State USA: TSA Gestapo Empire" by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts (go ahead and check his bona fides). Posted at GlobalResearch.ca; but I'm sure it's making the rounds.
Second, Mr. Winship merely quoted the party line regarding the amount and danger of the radiation from the device. Curiously, he did NOT include statements from radiologists, x-ray techs, cancer researchers, or any other such people. There are numerous individuals speaking out that this IS a serious health hazard, that what A.P. and Mr. Winship have been told to say -is a lie. Even one of the inventors of the device has stated that we are being lied to about the health risks of the device.
Silly me, I thought a writer WASN'T supposed to provide one-sided information. It seems to me I once heard about 'balance in writing'.
And since I'm on the subject, Mr Winship:
Were you just too lazy to do the fact-finding?
Are you just uninterested in the actual facts?
Who cut you a check for writing this?
The definition of "propaganda" is:
"As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda, in its most basic sense, presents information primarily to influence an audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus possibly lying by omission)"
I think I can guess who cut you that check.
Please check the following
Mon, 11/29/2010 - 19:53 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Please check the following out, for it just makes me literally cry, for this woman and mother, the other such women and mothers put through this kind of indignity, for our country, and for everyone in this country (including the willful idiots who stick together, above; and probably, very unfortunately, again as well, below):
Article title: TSA Targets Breastfeeding Mother
Article author: Christie Haskell
Website: "THE STIR: A CafeMom Blog"
Article date: November 29, 2010
thestir.cafemom.com/baby/113023/tsa_targets_breastfeeding_mother
Be a good little sheep,
Mon, 11/29/2010 - 23:05 — Anonymous (not verified)Be a good little sheep, because your little protest will be turned against Obama by the republicans. Show your allegiance to Obama by demurring!
"Anony-'mouse' @ Tue,
Tue, 11/30/2010 - 03:19 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)"Anony-'mouse' @ Tue, 11/30/2010 - 04:05", who cares what is turned against ObamaCON! He is an extremely evil traitor to The People, to this country, to the Constitution he claimed to believe in my being a professor of "Constitutional law", a traitor to liberty and freedom, and a traitor to the entire world. He is a globalist who is selling out the Constitutional sovereignty and independence of this country to the extremely evil "New World Order (NWO)" and one-world government. He is another "presidential" puppet of globalism who should be impeached, indicted, prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned for the rest of his life for the war crimes, etc., he has perpetrated, period!...
...The "opt-out"
Tue, 11/30/2010 - 03:19 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...The "opt-out" protest(ers) didn't "demur", the protest was over before it began because the TSA preempted it by shutting down the scanners and pat-downs temporarily, thus avoiding its effectiveness. But The People will just think "out-of-the-box" more and devise better protests against the traitors' unconstitutionally criminal procedures which haven't ended, that WILL be effective. Therefore, you ain't seen nothin' yet, anti-American.
So you be a good little sheep, show allegiance to the traitor Obama and evil, and demur. As for me and all True Americans, we will not demur, and we will show allegiance to fulfilling our duty(ies) as spelled out in that part of the Constitution, through the Supremacy Clause, known as the Declaration of Independence. All while you fellow-traitors-of-Obama are serving evil and selling us all out with your cowardice and traitorousness.
All that the U.S. government
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 01:10 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)All that the U.S. government is perpetrating today is intentional social engineering at its worst. The government message is: Submit to total tyranny or else. It starts out as "simply" humiliating people ("soft fascism"); making them feel hopeless (Obama's so-called "Hope"---Orwellian, "the-reverse-is-actually-true", kind of language; aka "double-speak"); and getting them to feel powerless (Obama's so-called "Change"), to voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms, to give up trying to stand up for their rights and freedoms, and to give in and bow down to the corporate-fascist totalitarian police state completely.
They are sending the message, you resist tyranny and you will be punished, with "slight" punishment at first, and then it will be ratcheted up a little bit more, a little bit more somemore, and so on, until no resistance whatsoever will be tolerated at all. So much for the "land of the free, and the home of the brave", now become "the land of (slaves), and the home of the (cowards)":
Article title: Mother Kept In “Glass Cage” For Almost An Hour By TSA For Resisting Over Breast Milk
Article author: Steve Watson, M.A.
Article websites: PrisonPlanent.com and InfoWars.net
Article date: November 30, 2010
prisonplanet.com/mother-kept-in-glass-cage-for-almost-an-hour-by-tsa-for-resisting-over-breast-milk.html
Do you finally see what's really going on, and do you now realize that it IS happening? God help us all if we don't completely put an end to all of this madness!
CORRECTION(S): Article
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 05:08 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)CORRECTION(S):
Article title: Mother Kept In “Glass Cage” For Almost An Hour By TSA For Resisting Over Breast Milk
Article author: Steve Watson, M.A.
Article websites: PrisonPlanet.com and InfoWars.net
Article date: November 30, 2010
prisonplanet.com/mother-kept-in-glass-cage-for-almost-an-hour-by-tsa-for-resisting-over-breast-milk.html
Do you finally see what's really going on, and do you now realize that IT IS happening? God help us all if we don't completely put an end to all of this madness!
Welcome to the Fascist
Thu, 12/09/2010 - 15:17 — Frances in California (not verified)Welcome to the Fascist States of America.