Clinton's Contrition

by: David Sirota, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

In 1992, I was in 10th grade. Hence, I didn't care about much more than the girls I could never get, the Philadelphia 76ers' playoff chances and the shortcomings of my own unimpressive basketball career (in that order) -- and I certainly didn't care about politics. So when my teacher assigned me to represent a Southerner I'd never heard of in a mock presidential debate, I was, um, not psyched.

My attitude changed, though, when I started researching -- wait, what was his name again? Oh, right -- Bill Clinton. To my surprise, what I found was inspiring. The lip-biting saxophonist seemed like a forthright guy with some heartfelt "feel your pain" outrage at the unfairness of the moment's Gordon Gekko zeitgeist. An early campaign speech I discovered particularly captivated me -- the one in which Clinton said, "I expect the jetsetters and featherbedders of corporate America to know that if you sell your companies and your workers and your country down the river, you'll be called on the carpet."

Call me crazy or gullible -- at 16, I was probably both -- but I bought it. If not for Clinton's campaign (and that irrepressibly optimistic Fleetwood Mac jingle), I might have followed star-crossed hoop dreams already doomed by my god-awful jump shot. Instead, I chose a political path, genuinely believing in that place called hope.

This naive faith, of course, is why I would later come to detest Bill Clinton.

Upon assuming office, he championed the very corporatist policies he railed on -- lobbyist-written free-trade pacts and financial deregulation, to name a few. To me, a fervent supporter turned spurned groupie, Clinton eventually looked like an opportunist who knew he was selling out -- and yet sold out anyway.

Because of his reversals, I ended up in my adult years being critical of Clinton -- so consistently critical, in fact, that I'm shocked to find myself about to spend the next few paragraphs praising him. No, not for his (admittedly impressive) humanitarian work, but for his recent contrition.

Whereas former presidents typically devote their retirements to history-revising legacy preservation, Clinton is laudably doing the opposite -- and the nation will, hopefully, benefit.

It began with his congressional testimony last month. Discussing his administration's trade policy, Clinton admitted that it "has not worked" to alleviate poverty, as promised.

"It was a mistake," he said of his agribusiness-backed initiatives forcing impoverished countries to eliminate tariffs. "It was a mistake that I was a party to ... I had to live every day with the consequences of the loss of capacity to produce a rice crop in Haiti to feed those people because of what I did."

Clinton didn't stop there. In a subsequent ABC News interview, he said that when it came to 1990s-era financial deregulation that so harmed today's economy, "I think (my advisers) were wrong, and I think I was wrong."

Some will undoubtedly say "too little, too late." But with Clinton having nothing to gain from these admissions -- and, really, lots to lose -- the 10th-grade idealist in me says "better late than never."

Better he acknowledge the failure of misguided trade and deregulatory initiatives, rather than pretend they succeeded. Better he apologize for the betrayals that deflated his supporters, rather than feign indifference. Why? Because the penitence may now spur change.

Clinton's compunction could, for instance, convince President Obama to shelve new free-trade proposals and avoid undermining Congress' current financial regulatory legislation. It may compel Obama to fire the same Clinton economic aides who now work in his administration. And it might even prompt a nation of exceptionalists to admit its errors and actually reform itself.

After all, if Clinton can learn from mistakes, then America should be able to do the same.

David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books "Hostile Takeover" and "The Uprising." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com or follow him on Twitter @davidsirota.

Copyright 2010 Creators.com 

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



" then America should be

" then America should be able to do the same."

One would hope so, but I fear that it is an illusionary hope. The American public has rarely shown any reflective ability at all, e.g., the massive popular push to invade Iraq less than a generation after Viet Nam. And I fear that reflecting on our misdeeds is not an American trait. Most Americans are faith based in their thinking, not evidence based, and as such have no use for reflection since they "know" that their dogma is true.



Love the attitude towards

Love the attitude towards women--the girls I could not get. Perhaps time to move on from that? We're tired of being objectified and wanted only for our sexual organs.



Sirota is COMPLETELY WRONG

Sirota is COMPLETELY WRONG when he says that Clinton has nothing to gain and and lots to lose from these admissions!

Clinton seeks to gain the respect he deservedly lost and irresponsibly squandered during his presidency. Clinton seeks to gain credibility. Clinton seeks post-presidential appointments to committees and other positions.

As for lots to lose, well he does stand to lose those overly-generous corporate speaking engagements, overly-generous publishing deals, and overly-generous corporate sponsorship for his presidential library.

Better late than never isn't good enough! It's garbage!

Clinton is trying to atone for a failed presidency, a reputation as a sleezebag and adulteror, a reputation as a traitor to the people who elected him, a reputation as a neo-Republican, the legacy of damage done to the Democratic party and for the failed policies that doomed the political candidacies of his vice-president Al Gore and of his sometime sex-partner, Hillary Rodham, who were both thankfully held accountable and deservedly punished by Democratic voters for their irresponsible support of his failed policies.

Obama is too arrogant, too naive and too stupid to learn anything much from Clinton and will also leave behind a legacy of a failed presidency and damage to the Democratic party.

Clinton didn't learn from his mistakes until it was too late to do anything positive about them and sadly America is doomed to do the same.

Clinton deserves to be held in contempt and disgrace by the American people and the Democratic party.



I expect to hear the same

I expect to hear the same thing from young Bush someday, exacting apologies. I am sorry, but Clinton is all drama -- all smoke and no fire. Why, I ask, do these people go through such dramatic character changes when it's too late. Right: too little, too late, David. Do you, after all, hear Clinton ripping Obama for taking on many of the same policies he enacted and is now apologizing for? Do you see this drama by Clinton as anything more than a "privatized confession?"



Wrong, Liced-Christ: Bush

Wrong, Liced-Christ: Bush will never apologize; he could never admit his mistakes and he never will.