Finding the Forgotten Majority

by: David Sirota, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

"There is a need for some reflection here -- what is too far now? What was too far when Oklahoma City happened is accepted now. There's been a desensitizing. These town halls and cable TV and talk radio, everybody's trying to outdo each other."

Those were the words of an unnamed Republican senator after America's latest shooting rampage, this one a political assassination attempt in Tucson, Ariz. How sad -- and telling -- that the lawmaker refused to attach his or her name to such an important truism.

But that is the larger story of the slaughter's aftermath. As conservative pundits spent the week insisting that their violent political rhetoric is somehow unrelated to political violence; as Sarah "Don't Retreat, Reload" Palin scrubbed her website of rifle-sight graphics targeting Rep. Gabrielle Giffords; as right-wing radio hosts sanitized the Tucson shooter as a "lone gunman" rather than a "terrorist" -- in the midst of all this obfuscation, few public figures found the courage to acknowledge truths that so desperately need to be aired.

One of those truths is that media can set societal norms and, thus, can help create conditions for violence -- whether a mass murder in Tucson, an IRS bombing in Austin or any other future massacre. Another less obvious truth is that the new media economy encourages ever-more violent vitriol because that's now become the most reliable way to build a following and, thus, generate profit.

Save for sensationalists like Rupert Murdoch, media owners today aren't deliberately manufacturing this dangerous dynamic -- for the most part, it reflects a convergence of market forces. In this brave new world of infinite information conduits, the audience is more fragmented than ever. That has made the pursuit of audience share more intense, ultimately rewarding the loudest violence-glorifying demagogues in the noisy rabble. And remember: The situation is being further exacerbated as many media outlets transform their business models from mass broadcast to niche narrowcast -- a shift that allows relatively small fringe mobs to sustain the most vituperative voices of hate.

Add to this a recession that is reducing resources for real journalism, sprinkle in our dehumanizing politics of vilification, and America has built a media economy that incentivizes violent bombast. Indeed, rather than nurturing the talent and intellect necessary to build a following through solid reporting and analysis, the system makes it far more efficient to generate viewers, listeners and Web clicks by simply screaming, "If ballots don't work, bullets will," as one Florida radio host recently thundered.

Like many who still cling to journalistic ideals and democratic principles, I've grappled with the pressures of this alarming change in the media landscape. As a radio host, I feel the constant pull of the pack mentality -- that temptation to follow the path of least ratings resistance and use the public airwaves as a "blowtorch" (as the saying goes in the industry). Oh, how easy that would be -- I could just add my voice to the now-ubiquitous hatefest that polarizes issues and too often suggests violence is a legitimate form of political expression.

Alas, I've done my best to avoid this sadistic melee. I'm sure I haven't been perfect, but I've tried to find an alternative route that circumvents the pitchforks, torches and glocks. And thankfully, I've found support. My Colorado radio station has unabashedly backed my attempt to create a different kind of programming, and I've found a diverse and growing listenership that values something more than violent invective.

This is what still gives me hope in such dark times. For if there is an audience in my state that wants something more -- something substantive and non-violent -- then there are audiences everywhere that want something more, too. It's the media's responsibility to start finding that forgotten majority before more blood is spilled.

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose upcoming book "Back to Our Future" will be released in March of 2011. He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.

Copyright 2011 Creators.com

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



This is the age of 'cheap

This is the age of 'cheap shot politics'. This is because the political rhetoric of public policy debate is subtly deceptive. Because most voters don't realize how much of this debate is sophistry, effective democracy in the U.S. is slowly dying, . Most voters don't really know what they're voting for. We need the help of professional specialists to point out both the obvious and covert sophistry and other rhetorical 'sleight of tongue'. Modern democracy needs the sports equivalent of knowledgeable, objective, nonpartisan, non-ideological referees and umpires. Journalism is a declining profession, because it's current practitioners refuse to call balls and strikes, late hits, offensive fouls ('charging'), etc. Sports fans would be frustrated by an umpire who only discussed whether the runner might be 'safe' or 'out'. The public is frustrated by "on the one hand, on the other hand" and "he said, she said" political news reporting. A good part of mainstream journalism's audience has switched to Rush, Shawn, Glenn, Rachel, and/or Keith and their internet counterparts because they do call balls and strikes; but unfortunately they do more than that. (And, obviously, they are not objective, nonpartisan, and non-ideological news reporters.) Many more citizens have dropped out civically and don't read or watch political and public policy news (or even bother to vote), because they know they don't know what they are voting for or against. Whatever room they walk into the national press corps are "the smartest guys in the room". They have the best 'b... s... detectors' in public life. They are probably the best professional press corps of news reporters in history. But that's not good enough anymore. We need them to use their professional expertise and objective judgment to explicitly supply hidden context, and identify fallacious arguments, rhetorical tricks, statistical misrepresentation, misplaced priorities, irrelevant emotionalism, mendacious sophistry, and just plain 'b... s...'! Reporters need to make it a requirement of professional journalism to 'call balls and strikes'!

(Afterthought: There is one baseball rule that I wish reporters would stop inadvertently following. In baseball a runner must touch all the bases before touching home plate, otherwise he might not score a 'run' for his/her team and would instead be scored as an 'out'. But here's the catch -- the opposing team must request a ruling of the umpire every time it is possible that the runner missed a touching a base, otherwise the umpire just keeps quiet. Too many reporters wait until after the election is over to reveal a hidden context, or to rectify the mistaken importance ranking of an issue or event.)



Nike Mercurial Pas Cher

Unquestionably pent articles , enjoy it on the subject of fastidious data files .



Louboutin

http://www.old.orzelbialy.com/galeria/view.php?gid=27&phid=92



Louis Vuitton Antwerpen

Spontaneity. Perfection is often a solution to be in control. But control limits spontaneity.



wXngumcIjgMEfxHida

5mqqd6 bedxivvtsaeg, [url=http://hqdzzsbgftcq.com/]hqdzzsbgftcq[/url], [link=http://ucfoygnhmhut.com/]ucfoygnhmhut[/link], http://cxjrdedobsul.com/