The Real Democratic Whiners
Thursday 07 October 2010
by: David Sirota, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed
The way Democratic leaders tell it, their party's current "enthusiasm gap" comes from rank-and-file voters who are irrational and pessimistic complainers.
"Democrats, just congenitally, tend to (see) the glass as half empty," President Obama said last month during a $30,000-a-plate fundraiser at the Connecticut home of a donor named (no joke) Rich Richman. Days later, Vice President Biden told a separate audience of donors that voters need "to stop whining." Apparently, the two believe that a mix of Marie Antoinette's "let them eat cake" motto and Phil Gramm's "nation of whiners" mantra will excite the Democratic base.
Who knows? Maybe it'll work. But probably not. The sight of Washington politicians attending fat-cat fundraisers while berating a recession-hammered nation is not exactly inspiring. It's more like a recipe for electoral backlash.
That said, this campaign season is defined neither by unreasonable petulance, as the White House asserts, nor by justifiable rage against the plutocratic machine. Instead, the moment is all about the more muted despondence expressed by that recent CNBC town hall speaker -- the one who told the president that voters are "exhausted" and "deeply disappointed" in his administration.
The desperation is understandable. The Iraq War continues, and the Afghanistan War is intensifying. The Wall Street "reform" bill has been exposed as a sham, with the Associated Press reporting that banks are already planning to exploit the new rules for even more profits. Meanwhile, Obama aides admit that the new health care legislation coddles the industries it purports to regulate.
"During the campaign we fought against insurance companies," White House adviser David Axelrod said about the Obama-crafted bill. "(But) after the deals with insurance companies, the deals with Pharma -- all these people are supposedly our friends."
As Axelrod's comment implies, this is not "real change" or "yes we can" -- it's the demoralizing status quo of "no we won't." And few disappointments better underscore that reality than the recent non-debate over the Bush tax cuts.
Since those tax reductions were enacted, Democrats have -- rightly -- criticized them as ineffective economic policy that unduly expands the national debt. The data support the allegations: The Bush tax-cut years were "one of the weakest eight-year spans for the U.S. economy in decades," according to The Washington Post, and the tax cuts are the single largest factor in the deficit, according to the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Americans understand these facts, as evidenced by polls showing majority support for eliminating the specific tax cuts that benefit the wealthy. In fact, when considering both public opinion and Democrats' previous criticism of Bush's tax policy, it's clear that opposition to the Bush tax cuts was a primary reason voters elected Democrats in the first place.
And yet, this week, the White House and Democratic congressional leaders announced they are postponing any legislation that might permanently modify the Bush tax cuts.
That's right, we're not talking about Democrats deliberately letting all the cuts expire -- Democratic lawmakers say they will extend the cuts for the middle class. The issue is whether they will simultaneously deliver on promises to terminate the tax cuts that apply to income above $200,000. On that pledge, the party is now blocking a vote.
No doubt, Democratic politicians would have us believe that Republican obstructionism makes a vote pointless and that those saying otherwise are back to "glass half empty" whining. This, of course, has been the same excuse on nearly every issue.
But who are the self-defeating whiners here -- politicians who don't even attempt to fulfill their own promises, or voters who expect those politicians to at least make a minimal effort? The honest answer to that question shows who is really responsible for the enthusiasm gap.
David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books "Hostile Takeover" and "The Uprising." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com or follow him on Twitter @davidsirota.
Copyright 2010 Creators.com
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Well yes, let's stop whining
Thu, 10/07/2010 - 11:37 — Anonymous (not verified)Well yes, let's stop whining about the candidate who disappeared on inauguration day. Let's all us progressives and liberals stop whining about the wall street insiders the candidate said he'd not do business with, then held them lover close as his advisers. Let's all stop whining about the "health care for everybody" carrot that was held before us, then whisked away when the republicans said NO - and the president and congress cowered before them. Let's all stop whining about the crimes committed by the previous administration that the current one doesn't have the guts to investigate. Yea, lets all stop whining about the lies we were told just to get our votes. Obama, you're in big trouble in '12. We have good memories, and we'll remember come election day 2012. Then you'll hear out whine like the siren on a fire truck.
This jerk in the white house
Thu, 10/07/2010 - 11:47 — mysterioso (not verified)This jerk in the white house has done everything wrong he possible could when he had a democratic congress to play with. His lack of political experience and his cowardice has cost him the trust of his electorate and independent voters like me. In the next two years he's going to have to run the mile in 2 minutes and hit 100 home runs in a season to get my vote again. O.k. Obama, fish or cut bait.
This disappointing, whining
Thu, 10/07/2010 - 16:31 — sharonsj (not verified)This disappointing, whining Democrat will be voting in November, if only for two reasons: 1. to make sure no effing nutjob Republican takes office, and 2. so that maybe Obama can get some liberal judges onto the Supreme Court before us disappointed, whining Dems decide that "let them eat cake" is a good reason to drag out the guillotine.
Face it, our government
Thu, 10/07/2010 - 16:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Face it, our government hasn't acted in voters' best interests since Roosevelt, and then it was only because we were able to hold his feet to the fire. (Remember when we had a vibrant Fourth Estate? Ah, those were the days.) Even Clinton is best described as the most competent Republican president we've ever had.