Democrats Avoid Budget Vote, Risk Losing Future Clout

by: Yana Kunichoff, t r u t h o u t | Report

Democrats Avoid Budget Vote, Risk Losing Future Clout
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Morris K. Udall Foundation, Simon Greig, andres musta)

As the federal deficit hits the $1 trillion mark, Democrats are attempting to avoid electoral fallout by approving an enforcement resolution instead of a full budget. By doing so, they disallow the use of budget reconciliation next year. Critics fear that the loss of this key legislative tactic may hammer the final nail into the coffin of a comprehensive jobs bill and other crucial legislative efforts.

The distinction between an enforcement resolution and a full budget is largely technical, but the crucial difference is that with the former approach, Democrats can no longer engage in reconciliation, under which debate on a budget bill is limited to twenty hours. This tactic, long seen as one of the most powerful tools that Democrats can use to pass controversial budget legislation, allows bills to pass with 51 votes in the Senate, as opposed to the usual 60 needed to overcome a filibuster.

Democrats' aversion to voting "yes" on a budget that would add to the deficit seems to have overcome their desire to preserve the reconciliation option.

"Members looked at the budget and said, 'We might need more deficit spending,'" said Jim Horney, the director of federal fiscal policy at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. "And anything you do to try to reduce those deficits would necessarily include policies that might not be popular - tax increases, cuts in major programs." The House leadership judged the enforcement resolution as less of a political risk for conservative Democrats who face difficult reelection campaigns in the fall.

Gary Therkildsen, a federal fiscal policy analyst with OMB Watch, which seeks to keep oversight of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), said, "Congress is literally paralyzed by [the fear of] deficits right now."

Some notable examples of bills killed or delayed due to defecit worries are the administration-backed jobs bill, a federal extension of unemployment benefits and federal funding for Medicaid.

Taking reconciliation off the table "basically dims the chances of the Democrats being able to put through any substantive policy that they really like that would be controversial or wouldn't garner any Republican support," Therkildsen continued.

Stimulus and job measures in particular would have been prime candidates for the reconciliation process.

Attempts to pass a jobs bill in early June were stalled due to concerns over the deficit. The measure, which would have extended unemployment benefits through November, extended subsidies for municipal bonds and provided $24 billion in aid to state governments, was blocked by all the Republicans in the Senate, 11 conservative Democrats and Senator Joe Lieberman (I-Connecticut).

While negotiating cuts in the bill to reduce the projected $80 billion it would have added to the deficit, lawmakers decided to end a 65 percent subsidy created last year to help the jobless buy health insurance.

Many of our contributors have become unemployed or are struggling. Please help support our work if you can!

The week lawmakers failed to extend expiring unemployment benefits, the Labor Department estimated that more than 900,000 unemployed Americans would see their unemployment aid cut off. Physicians were also expected to be hit with a 21 percent cut in their Medicare reimbursements while lawmakers debated the legislation.

Some lawmakers viewed reconciliation as a last hope to push through such contentious measures.

"What we want to do is end up with legislation that is going to create a substantial number of jobs," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) told reporters. "We don’t have 60 votes to do that. We could do that through majority rule, 51 votes."

An additional challenge to passing any legislation, Therkildsen noted, is that "bills that deal with finance normally lean to the right anyway. Conservative Democrats - any number of those Senators in the Democratic caucus - would vote against their caucus several times."

Horney, from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, says this may be a sign that the Democrats have not committed to any other significant legislation such as the health care bill, for which reconciliation was kept in last year's budget.

"Even if they had gotten a full budget, there was no agreement that they would want to have reconciliation instructions for any big, significant legislation," Horney said, noting that Democrats had promised not to move either cap-and-trade or a carbon tax via reconciliation. "There was just no consensus among Democrats about what to do here."

Therkildsen says the inability to use the tool of reconciliation could have significant consequences, not only for budget-related legislation like the jobs bill but also for immigration or climate-change legislation.

"You can look at what the effect of that will be further down the road" for Democrats tackling "all the issues that are divisive between Republicans and Democrats," he said. Their lessened ability to act might mean a "do-nothing" Congress so unpopular with voters that it would stand little chance of the Democrats maintaining a hold in the White House.

Despite their efforts to avoid criticism, Democrats will most likely face heavy disapproval both now and down the line, according to Therkildsen.

"They are going to face consequences either way," said Therkildsen. "They chose short-term political expediency over the benefits that could have been included down the road."

"Congress is literally caught between a rock and a hard place, and they decided to go with the rock instead of the hard place," he said.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Yana Kunichoff is an assistant editor at Truthout.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



All BIG corps need to bring

All BIG corps need to bring jobs BACK into the USA. So go for it!: Levis, Hoover, Hanes, etc... or nothing will change...& yo'all laughed at the "rice burners" a few decades ago...



"They chose short-term

"They chose short-term political expediency over the benefits that could have been included down the road."

When has the Senate done anything else? Democrats have again aimed at their foot, and are about to pull the trigger.



When you have a statement

When you have a statement like this coming from someone you'd presume to be apolitical, the conclusion is corruption has spread to every corner of the District:

Gary Therkildsen, a federal fiscal policy analyst with OMB Watch, which seeks to keep oversight of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), said, "Congress is literally paralyzed by [the fear of] deficits right now."

Who is paralyzed? The unemployed? Is defense spending paralyzed?



Pathetic. What a bunch of

Pathetic. What a bunch of short sighted, narcissistic, greedy, corrupt, idiots. I am soooooo sick of this!



The Democrats absolutely

The Democrats absolutely worst flaw is their lack of backbone and the way it consistently leads to the worst and most conservative Democrats holding a veto over legislation.



One more point, the

One more point, the Democrats caucus is weak because its leadership is inept.

Crack the whip on the conservo-dems, and then the caucus will be able to get something done.

The most consistent result of cowardice is failure.

And to be successful Obama will also have learn how to run proactively against the opposition, as Clinton ran against Newt Gingrich and forget the eternally pathetic bipartisanship goal, the GOP will never meet him half way.



the man in the white house

the man in the white house proved he could raise big bucks fast to to overcome prejudice and win, while eschewing public finance, he is still popular. so take me to your leader! this is a formula for success how can you expect the rank and file to go out on a limb. when the "change" is business as usual and there is no courageous leadership.



Face it... Even if the GOP

Face it... Even if the GOP is insane, Corporate Run and Anti-We the People... The DEMOCRATS are Spineless, individually-self serving, Global-Corporate-CONservative-Media-Terrified Jelly Fish who simply cannot and do not act very much in the collective interest of We the People.

They certainly can't govern or lead.

Corporations Run America now, and the Insane Republicans are the Corporate Funded, better united-in-their-jack-booting-ways Party which happily does whatever it takes to seize power and give Corporations what they want under the flag-Pin-Wearing, Foisted Banner of 'Freedom and Liberty' as they can and do daily Hoodwink MILLIONS of Americans through their Global corporate Media Empire to go along with them.

And this all occurs as the 'Democratic' Spineless Jellyfish Party full of Individuals working Individually for themselves looks on with impotent horror and complains about how the Republicans will destroy the Country the Corporate Run, Terrified, Spineless Jelly Fish fail to Govern and Lead.

Me Thinks the Corporate Sponsored Fat Lady has already sung the 'Fall Of The Republic'.... Perhaps she sang it on Fox News (so-called) to the cheering multitudes of the Tea Party Crowd and the many other Corporate CONservative Media Hoodwinkees who may have attended such a tribute to their dedicated and hard-efforted outcome and that's why I missed the Corporate Foisted Event if such actually occurred.



this is why they might lose

this is why they might lose in November. They buy into the media nonsense. The msm hasn't been correct now for at least 4 or 5 years. The Dems will be in trouble due to their lack of spine, their appeasement nonsense. This is also eroding confidence in Obama. He will never win the opposition over, he should stop trying. And to go towards what they want is disaster for us all.

They are cowards. The Republicans elected a fool two times and he always got his way. Is it solely due to their control of the media (while having every one accept the opposite premise, that it's a liberal media)?



The Lie: "Congress is

The Lie:

"Congress is literally paralyzed by [the fear of] deficits right now."

They are not.

Remember that they passed the TARP in two weeks when they wanted to.

They passed bushes tax cuts for the wealthy, and will renew them if they can.

They never mentioned deficits when they were funding the military jobs program (the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan/Pakistan).

They refuse to reform how medical services are paid for, which would save hundreds of billions of dollars.

They're only "terrified" that this spending would not benefit their social class.



Definitions Please: Does

Definitions Please: Does 'Liberal' mean borrowing and spending on social programs more money than you can ever possibly pay back, and by so doing, destroy the economy and the currency and bring about Third World living conditions for most Americans? And does 'Conservative' mean borrowing and spending more money than you can ever possibly pay back on Wars of Aggression and maintaining a preposterously large Military Industrial Complex? Seems like the two have a lot in common - namely spending ourselves into destitution - not a way to build wealth or security of any kind. It is, however a fine way to do the bidding of the Central Banks and the War Machine who own both sides of the aisle and have for most of a century. A balanced budget forces the issue and both sides are hiding from it. Expect another National emergency to justify wanton spending to continue - until our credit runs out. Think about what it means for the US to lose it's credit rating - what will that look like and how will it change your life? Ron Paul has advocated closing most of our 700 military bases around the world for many years now to balance the budget - is he a Liberal or a Conservative? How well can a country defend itself if it is bankrupt?



This article is mistaken on

This article is mistaken on a number of grounds.

First, it's not the House that blocked a budget resolution this year but the fact that the Senate simply didn't have the votes and wanted to use the floor time for other matters (unemployment extension, etc).

Secondly, failure to pass a budget resolution this year does not "disallow" a reconciliation bill next year. The reconciliation process normally would occur in the same calendar year in which the budget resolution is considered. Under the normal process a budget resolution is passed in the spring with the reconciliation bill being passed prior to the beginning of the fiscal year on October 1. Thus, Congress can pass a budget resolution next year that will provide for reconciliation next year.

Thirdly, due to the Byrd Rule in the Senate, provisions that do not directly impact taxes and spending cannot be included in a reconciliation bill. That's why the health care reform bill was not considered through reconciliation. A smaller set of fixes to the Senate health care bill was done through reconciliation, however.

Finally, even if congress were to pass a budget resolution this year that provides for a reconciliation bill, it cannot determine the content of matters that are part of reconciliation.



THE DEMOCRATS ARE

THE DEMOCRATS ARE COWARDS...!

THE REPUBLICANS ARE INSANE...!

GLOBAL CORPORATIONS RUN EVERYTHING..!

THE REPUBLIC IS OVER...!

Lets all watch it fall apart on Global Corporate TV...!

Popcorn anyone..?



one of two things could be

one of two things could be true here that y'all missed:

1) perhaps there will be no filibuster next year. Reid has already hinted at this possibility;
and/or 2) we roll the whole thing over to the next year's appropriation--and use reconciliation then if we so choose.

either way, the author jumped to conclusions--without a full understanding of the lay of the land.

we compound obama's problems by freaking out and not being smart enough to see the big picture. in so doing, we do the tea party's evil work for them.

nice going.



I hope " that truthout" has

I hope " that truthout" has the guts to print this.

If the Dems and the president can't grow some balls this country deserves to fall like Rome. Show some damn leadership and back the Progressives. One of the main reasons Obama is down in the polls is because he's acting like a wimp. Draft Ralph Nader as Attorney General to start with and have HIM pick a new Cabinet. Get rid of these gutless moderates, It's time to show some strength. Come on Mr. Obama knock one Republican on his or her ass every day, and BE PUBLIC ABOUT IT.



All this claptrap about

All this claptrap about maneuvering around to stop this or prevent that or make one side(no such thing, they are both the same side) look more malicious than the other is just what it is, politics of obfuscation, not anything to do with proper governmental functioning; any of it when looked at closely enough will reveal the protectionism of those involved in the grand larceny, the aristocracy.

All this works in grand fashion when the proceedings in congress especially, become so involved and complex in ways to subvert the seemingly 'other side' that the laws of complexity, as fragile as they are, collapse with the the hopeful appearance that those people we elect have done their job.

Another thing about congress' sweet little club that only caters or includes the democrats and the republicans should be illegal, unconstitutional or traitorous shenanigans that will leave the ability of any 3rd parties to have a real affect on what happens in the hollowed out halls of congress.



From "Anonymous: "I hope

From "Anonymous: "I hope that truthout has the guts to print this.

They do. Do you have the guts to name yourself and come out of the anonymous closet?



THIS congress will pass NO

THIS congress will pass NO meaningful legislation.
VOTE this year. Kick out your lying pigs.
That will be nearly all republicans and a big pile of democrats too.
Look at your state and what your rep and senator are doing.
VOTE out you lying pigs this year, and don't expect THIC congress to do ANYTHING useful. Focus on next year.