A Same and Spineless Duck?
Monday 15 November 2010
by: E.J. Dionne Jr., Op-Ed
Washington - The lame-duck session of Congress that kicks off this week will test whether Democrats have spines made of Play-Doh, and whether President Obama has decided to pretend that capitulation is conciliation.
Congress faces an enormous amount of unfinished business, largely because of successful GOP obstruction tactics during the regular session. Republican senators who declare themselves moderate helped block action on important bills, objecting either to provisions they didn't like or to Democratic procedural maneuvers.
Thus did Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine and Scott Brown of Massachusetts give themselves permission to fall in line behind their party's leadership even as they continued to claim that they were really and truly independent.
OK, let's test that. One of the bills blocked was the Disclose Act, designed to end the scandal of secret money in election campaigns. If the contest we just went through proves anything, it's that voters should have the right to know which millionaires, corporations and special interests are flooding the airwaves with attack ads on behalf of candidates who can blithely deny any connection to the slander and any knowledge of who might be trying to buy influence.
Shortly after the election, Michael Isikoff and Rich Gardella of NBC News reported that one of the big Republican secret money groups, Crossroads GPS, got "a substantial portion" of its money "from a small circle of extremely wealthy Wall Street hedge fund and private equity moguls." These contributors "have been bitterly opposed to a proposal by congressional Democrats -- and endorsed by the Obama administration -- to increase the tax rates on compensation that hedge funds pay their partners."
It shouldn't take investigative reporting after the fact for voters to learn such things. Snowe, Collins and Brown all say they are for disclosure, as does Mark Kirk, the new Republican senator from Illinois. The Senate Democratic leadership should be eager to give them a chance to prove it by bringing up the bill.
Another casualty in the regular session was legislation to end the military's foolish "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Again, Collins is a key player. We now have a court decision declaring the policy invalid and the military is reportedly ready to declare that ending discrimination against gays would not harm the armed forces. It's often said that the elected branches of government, not the courts, should make decisions of this sort. Fine. Let the Senate get it done.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid came out on top in a bruising re-election campaign partly because of strong support from Latino voters. He promised to bring up the DREAM Act, which would provide a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants who arrived here as children if they attend college or join the military. Reid should keep his promise.
There are a slew of judicial nominations as well as several executive branch appointments pending. The abuse of the confirmation process is another long-time scandal. The Senate shouldn't leave town without getting these appointees through.
An extension of unemployment insurance is set to expire at the end of this month, at a moment when the unemployment rate is 9.6 percent. Will Congress just go home without a thought to what the lives of these Americans will be like during the coming holidays?
Which brings up the biggest scandal of all: Imagine a Congress still controlled by Democrats passing an extension of the Bush tax cuts for millionaires but leaving the unemployed out in the cold. If this happens, laugh out loud the next time a Democrat claims to be on the side of working people.
Yet administration officials have been talking about capitulating to the Republicans on the millionaire tax cuts without a word about the jobless, or even about extending the president's own tax cuts geared toward the non-privileged. And some Democratic senators just don't want to be bothered with a long lame-duck session. They want to take care of the wealthy and not do much more.
If the president caves in on the tax cuts, then his speeches of the last few months were just empty talk. He'll be lending his hand to those who would drive the car right back into that ditch he loved to talk about. And if Democrats don't fight to turn the lame-duck session into a moment of action, they will end a Congress of remarkable achievement not with a bang, but with a craven whimper.
E.J. Dionne's e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
CRAP (Congress of Remarkable
Mon, 11/15/2010 - 09:52 — Vic Anderson (not verified)CRAP (Congress of Remarkable Achievement, Presidential getaway chauffeur)! Pre-emptive HAR-Har-har!! LOL, NOW!!!
Well yes, the president will
Mon, 11/15/2010 - 10:10 — mysterioso (not verified)Well yes, the president will cave. He's caved on everything else so I don't suppose he'll break stride now. He does need a new pair of shoes though. The ones he has are worn out from sliding to the right so much. When he let us know soon after he was elected that he would enjoy compromising with the republicans we didn't know he meant that the compromising would be all his. Shame on you Obama, shame. Bush lite is an apt description.
At the leading edge of the
Mon, 11/15/2010 - 12:19 — Jim in Seattle (not verified)At the leading edge of the Baby Boomers, I have voted in every election since the 1960s and I have always supported and voted for Democrats believing they stood for fairness for all, in particular the down-trodden and the working American. But the events of the past couple decades and the current administration in particular has pushed me to the edge. If the Dems cave in on tax cuts for the uber-wealthy (even if only temporary), I will be done with them for good. In fact, in my remaining years I will work actively against them. It will probably not change anything, but at least I will be able to sleep well.
The comment in this opinion
Mon, 11/15/2010 - 12:29 — Anonymous (not verified)The comment in this opinion piece that grabs my attention most is the possibility that Congress won't extend unemployment benefits. That's borderline criminal. I've already received notice from the unemployment office (I'm 58 and in a field dominated by 20-somethings) they don't expect Congress to extend. I've already vowed to never vote Republican again, but if the Democrats don't help us now, I won't--and maybe millions of other unemployed--won't vote for them again either.
So then, who has really
Mon, 11/15/2010 - 13:04 — Droslovinia (not verified)So then, who has really failed who? The Democrats in Congress are, by and large, spineless wimps who let themselves get bullied into irrelevance, but at least, in their cringing and craven way, they occasionally whined about trying to help the rest of us. The Republicans don't even have to embrace the pretense of caring about people, and it's a real strength for them.
But if you bail out and don't even try; give up on Dems, rather than working to force them to grow a set; deliberately embrace failure to "teach them a lesson; or just wash your hands of the whole thing; a significant portion of the blame has to fall on YOU.
Well, this really is a
Mon, 11/15/2010 - 13:12 — Brian (not verified)Well, this really is a moment of truth, isn't it? If congressional democrats and Obama continue down the road of capitulation, then I think it is incumbent upon progressives everywhere to mobilize, and announce our intention to mount primary challenges to all the compromisers, and if necessary third party challenges in the next general election. Yes, I recognize that fracturing the democratic party will likely lead to Obama's defeat in 2012. But I do think enough is enough. Republicans responded to beatings in 2006 and 2008 by doubling down on right wingerism; we should follow suit.
"Republicans responded to
Mon, 11/15/2010 - 13:33 — Anonymous (not verified)"Republicans responded to beatings in 2006 and 2008 by doubling down on right wingerism". Actually I think what helped them more is using their 90% control of mainstream media and secret contributions from billionaires and giant corporations. Now that Obama's window of opportunity has passed to fight those two things, I really don't know what will work against the Republicans. I'm all for my state seceding from this union that despises all of us who aren't rich.