Elections Are a Waste of Time -- If...
Monday 20 September 2010
by: Norman Solomon, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed
A pithy idea - now going around in some progressive circles - is that elections are a waste of time.
The idea can be catchy. It all depends on some tacit assumptions.
For instance: elections are a waste of time if you figure the U.S. government is so far gone that it can’t get much worse.
Elections are a waste of time if you’ve given up on grassroots organizing to sway voters before they cast ballots.
Elections are a waste of time if you think there’s not much difference on the Supreme Court between Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia, or Sonia Sotomayor and Samuel Alito.
Elections are a waste of time if you’re so disgusted with Speaker Pelosi that you wouldn’t lift a finger to prevent Speaker Boehner.
Elections are a waste of time if you don’t see much value in reducing - even slightly - the extent of injustice and deprivation imposed on vulnerable people.
Or, if you see the organizing of protests, community groups, unions and the like as “either/or” in relation to working for the election of better candidates.
Or, if you think the goal of those who struggled and suffered for the right to vote - seeing the ballot as an essential component of democracy p- is outdated and rendered moot by present-day frustrations and outrages.
Elections are a waste of time if you think corporate power has grown so immense that state power has become irrelevant.
Or, if you still believe it was smart when some of us progressives figured we had no stake in efforts to defeat Ronald Reagan in 1980 or George W. Bush in 2000.
Or, if you think it doesn’t much matter whether Californians elect to make possible Senator Carly Fiorina and Governor Meg Whitman, or whether Wisconsin voters remove Russ Feingold from the Senate.
Or, if you’d just as soon bypass any plausible path for electing more genuine progressives like Dennis Kucinich or Barbara Lee to government positions.
Or, if you see the raising of political awareness as an alternative to - rather than intertwined with - the building of progressive electoral power to challenge corporate power.
Elections are a waste of time if you don’t realize or care that the powerful forces behind Wall Street and the warfare state are thrilled if progressives retreat from electoral battles.
Elections are a waste of time if you conclude - due to chronic suppression of electoral democracy - that the ideal of electoral democracy should be discarded rather than pursued.
Elections are a waste of time if you think progressives should opt out of electoral struggles for government power, leaving it to uncontested dominance by the heartless and the spineless.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Below are my reasonings for
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 16:42 — MR (not verified)Below are my reasonings for not voting...
Elections are a waste of time if you don’t see much value in reducing - even slightly - the extent of injustice and deprivation imposed on vulnerable people.
Elections are a waste of time if you think corporate power has grown so immense that state power has become irrelevant.
Add to these...
Elections are a waste of time if you think there is no realistic chance of a legitimate third party that is powerful enough to fend off the incumbent Republicans and Democrats and soundly defeat them.
Elections are a waste of time if you think the very voting machines, as manufactured by Diebold, etc, are not merely imperfect but rather very flawed and thus highly vulnerable to corruption (Memphis, New York)
Elections are a waste of time if you think Citizens United has essentially destroyed any hope of a government "for and by the people" as it now empowers Corporate America to, essentially, purchase votes in clandestine fashion.
Elections are a waste of time if you think the electoral system has already proven that it can in fact be bought and corrupted to serve a few individuals (2000 presidential election).
One can vote for a democrat
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 18:36 — Anonymous (not verified)One can vote for a democrat and elect a republican or one can vote for a republican and elect a repu-democrat. So it does not make any difference, the republicans are always elected, regardless.
The time for elections to
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 19:51 — Anonymous (not verified)The time for elections to make a difference is past.
It's time to organize undergrounds.
Elections are a waste of
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 06:04 — howie bledsoe (not verified)Elections are a waste of time because;
A) Diebold voting machines rig votes.
B) There is no difference between the parties any longer.
C) The "3rd" party, the Teabaggers, are an arm of the GOP.
D) No one gives a shit what you think.
E) Politicians implicitly understand that the only way to get ahead in todays political reality is to either work for the corperations, or get out.
Just ask Ron, Dennis, or Cynthia.
F) Voting just encourages these bastards.
00:51 — Anonymous (not
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 06:21 — MR (not verified)00:51 — Anonymous (not verified)
The time for elections to make a difference is past.
It's time to organize undergrounds.
Agreed.
It's not an either/or
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 11:17 — Anonymous (not verified)It's not an either/or proposition - elections consist in part of drawing from a stacked deck, so they're not a cure for the disease of the State. But elections do matter - and sometimes quite a bit. And will you be called for jury-duty if you don't vote? When you are called for jury duty you can let somebody go free - this opportunity is lost if you don't go through the motions...
Solomon's logic is, I think,
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 14:00 — davichon (not verified)Solomon's logic is, I think, solid. And no ideologue will convince me, a priori, that Kucinich, Lee and a few others are useless; they are beacons of hope and (small) progress. But despite the passionate elegance of Solomon's closing statement, it leaves the following open:
Electoral politics is not exclusively about voting -- and pointedly not in the too-frequent cases where the choice is really a lesser evil. (Look back on Solomon's points and see how many are lesser-evil arguments). So:
Where are the "grassroots," and where does our energy go? For many of us (including, alas, the President) it is easier to say or write to suggest "another world is possible," than to know much about bringing our vision to life. I sure don't know -- except it's obviously more than rescuing Speaker Pelosi not only from the Repubs, but from her own pragmatism.
Vote! Hold your nose,
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 14:41 — Miner987 (not verified)Vote! Hold your nose, grimace in disgust, but Vote! Do not be discouraged into lying down and giving up to the evil forces besieging the good Democrats and Progressives and, in truth, all the citizens of our country. If the brown shirts and fascists prevail in November, it will be a prelude to disaster, and their subsequent failures will resonate for generations, perhaps finally giving painful lessons that the scourges of Nixon, Reagan, the infestation of Bushes and the harridan Palin did not.
Nothing, however, will be possible until the anti-democratic and colossal idiocy and outrage of needing 60 (!) votes to pass anything in the Senate is thrown onto the dust pile of history. Majority rule and democracy will not be possible until that private club is made democratic!
@Miner987, while I admire
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 15:05 — MR (not verified)@Miner987, while I admire your noble beliefs on voting, it's simply not pragmatic in this day and age and it grows increasingly pointless every cycle. Don't think for a minute that I'm gullible enough to be guilted into voting because if I don't then it will lead of fascist victory. That won't fly with me or most other non-voters.
Fact is, America is already a burgeoning fascist state as that seed was planted roughly years ago. The Fascist-Americans, clearly, are currently working to rig the elections and steal the votes (as they did in 2000), and to participate in this just feeds fascism and strengthens it. But please, don't think for a minute that not voting leads to fascism - we're already there my friend.
Voting is not a waste of
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 15:25 — Jake Miles (not verified)Voting is not a waste of time. The system is corrupt, flawed, and favors those with the most money, but those are reasons to take action, not to give up.
Who said anything about
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 15:40 — MR (not verified)Who said anything about giving up? Have you considered that maybe some non-voters are taking action in unconventional ways? How do you know that's not going on?
Yes, voting is a waste because of the very reasons you yourself just mentioned. You destroyed your own argument with your inherent conflicts. Unless you're actually wanting everyone to intentionally and willfully participate in a widely-known corrupt and flawed system that favors the elite. In which case, I would highly be suspicious of your motivations because you're essentially saying "do it anyway".
Not to be argumentative, but your logic isn't there.
As long as one candidate is
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 17:55 — Anonymous (not verified)As long as one candidate is better than another, it is worthwhile and logical to vote.
For instance: In almost every case, a Dem will be better, from a progressive perspective, than a Thug. Just look at Senate votes on anything under the sun for examples--like this recent attempt to repeal DADT, which EVERY SINGLE Republican opposed.
You can vote for the best candidate (which is a tiny investment of time and effort) AND work in other ways for social justice and to improve the overall system.
Not voting would only be logical if candidates were equal or equally bad. They aren't.
If voting made a difference
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 21:36 — Anonymous (not verified)If voting made a difference elections would be illegal.
What is up with the Spam
Wed, 09/22/2010 - 01:46 — Joe the voter (not verified)What is up with the Spam filter? Is it run by Diebold? :(
To hell with cynicism. We
Wed, 09/22/2010 - 10:22 — Anonymous (not verified)To hell with cynicism.
We have an election to win.
So, your justification for
Wed, 09/22/2010 - 15:47 — MR (not verified)So, your justification for voting is that there exists the lesser of two evils and we should all vote for that at the very least? Wow, what a system we have! One that sets us up to continue our march toward the bottom each day.
No thanks.
Hey Folks,
Wed, 09/22/2010 - 22:11 — Joe the Voter (not verified)Hey Folks,
How hard is it to vote? Does it take some amazing effort? Basically it is as simple as signing a petition or calling an elected official. Heck, I called the city and told them about some potholes that were endangering bike riders. Guess f**king what- they got fixed within the month. Sit on your a** if you are a Right winger, GET TO THE POLLS (or fill in your mail in ballot) if you believe in Democracy (no matter how flawed and messed up it currently is [perhaps even non existent in some areas due to Diebold rigging etc.], or how you 'know it makes no difference'). It is the Republicans who have always worked to suppress turn out, to limit the franchise, just as they continue to. The more cynics who sneer, who walk away because they are 'too cool', 'too knowledgable', 'too fed up', etc. are just playing into the right wing's hands.
I, too, am unsatisfied with Democratic actions and selling out, however my 50 years have taught me one thing, UNDER REPUBLICAN RULE IT IS ALWAYS WORST FOR MORE PEOPLE. In fact, even the rich don't do as well economically. It just seems that way because everyone else does so much
worst.
And, yes, I am not naive- elections are stolen and we are way too close to being just like the banana republics we like to manipulate and look down on, but it is easy to vote and it does make a difference. Do you really want a violent revolution in the streets? Do you really want Newt Gingrich or Sarah Palin for president? Do you really want to stroke
your own damn ego by thinking that not voting makes any kind of positive difference (unless, of course, you are a tea bagger :)?
Wake up!
You seldom get the savior you pray for... or the politician you dream of, but if you want to stand by and let the G*P back into majority status just look in the mirror on Nov. 3rd and repeat to yourself "I am a cowardly idiot, a f**king cowardly, lazy idiot, and I deserve the screwing that I just bent over for."
I know it can seem hopeless, and quite futile, but until we can get progressive, green candidates elected to the local school board, to city councils, to utility boards continuously, we will have more Scalias and Roberts, more Reagans and Bushs, more Iraqs and Afghanistans, perhaps even an Iran...
Your choice. I know what mine will be. VOTE.
voting is a waste of time
Sat, 10/16/2010 - 21:30 — Anonymous (not verified)voting is a waste of time because:
1. elected officials care about winning, not issues.
2. dems are not any better or worse than republicans.
3. dems want to keep getting rewarded for civil rights gains that took place 40 yrs ago but not actually DO anything about those issues now
4. rewarding dems with votes for doing nothing gives them incentive to continue to do nothing.
5. voting for "complaining rights" is a crappy incentive to vote -- sets expectation that your vote will only generate something worth complaining about.
6. withholding votes is a way to hold elected officials accountable
7. 3rd parties are useless too because they have no influence in the 2 party system that rules the chambers.