All Shook Up for BP
Tuesday 22 June 2010
by: Eugene Robinson, Op-Ed

Congressman Tom Price of Georgia.
(Photo: Gage Skidmore)
Washington - Joe Barton is not alone. The Texas congressman's lavish sympathy for BP -- which he sees not as perpetrator of a preventable disaster but as victim of a White House "shakedown" -- is actually what passes for mainstream opinion among conservative Republicans today.
The GOP leadership came down hard on Barton after he apologized to the oil company for the beastly way it was being treated by the White House, saying he was "ashamed" that BP was being pressured to put $20 billion into a "slush fund" to compensate victims of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Barton was reportedly threatened with losing his powerful position as ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee if he didn't retract his words, and pronto.
But Barton was only echoing a statement that Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., had issued a day earlier in the name of the Republican Study Committee, a caucus of House conservatives whose website claims more than 115 members. The statement groused that there is "no legal authority for the president to compel a private company to set up or contribute to an escrow account" and accused the Obama administration of "Chicago-style shakedown politics."
Just to review: A group comprising roughly two-thirds of all Republicans in the House takes the position that President Obama was wrong to demand that BP set aside money to guarantee that those whose livelihoods are being ruined by the oil spill will be compensated. In other words, it's more important to kneel at the altar of radical conservative ideology than to feel any sense of compassion for one's fellow Americans. This, ladies and gentlemen, is how today's GOP rolls.
To be sure, there are Republicans who realize that this is not the message the party should be sending as the midterm election nears. "I couldn't disagree with Joe Barton more," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Party leaders insisted that there was nothing to see at the cliff where Barton went through the political guard rails and that everyone should just move along.
But no. Let's slow down and crane our necks.
Barton's remarks were no spontaneous gaffe. They came in a prepared statement and clearly represent his genuine view of the situation: that the rights of a private company are absolute even when weighed against the clear interests of the public.
While the party leadership has managed to squelch members of Congress who might have been tempted to weigh in on Barton's side, the conservative amen chorus can't help itself. Rush Limbaugh called the agreement on the $20 billion escrow fund "unconstitutional" and accused the administration of acting like "a branch of organized crime." Newt Gingrich said the White House was "extorting money from a company." Stuart Varney of Fox News claimed -- falsely -- that Obama had moved to "seize a private company's assets" and complained that the action was "Hugo Chavez-like." Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol said that "I have no sympathy for BP," but then proceeded to be sympathetic, offering that "it's not helpful for the country, for the economy as a whole, for the president to bully different companies and different industries."
I'd advise these people to get a grip, but they're just saying what they believe. It just happens that what they believe is absurd.
There is ample evidence that BP, one of the biggest and most profitable oil companies in the world, cut corners in operating the Deepwater Horizon rig that resulted in the worst spill ever to despoil U.S. waters. BP's assertions about its ability to prevent, contain and clean up any leakage of oil turned out to be patently false. If we were not dealing with such a tragic situation, the company's tin ear for public relations would be comic; the unforgettable line from BP's chairman -- "We care about the small people" -- sounds like something Mel Brooks might dream up for a sequel to "The Producers."
Meanwhile, thousands of fishermen, shrimpers, oil-rig workers, restaurant owners and others along the Gulf Coast are suffering the economic effects of the spill. The environmental damage, still worsening, will be felt for decades. A mile beneath the surface, that noxious plume of gas and oil continues to billow.
Yes, President Obama used the power of his office to pressure BP to set money aside for compensation. If Republicans believe he shouldn't have, then by all means they should speak up. Come November, the voters will be able to decide who's right.
Eugene Robinson's e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Barton is only being honest.
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 09:18 — mainsail (not verified)Barton is only being honest. Environmental and social costs resulting from corporate greed are to be socialized. Imagine requiring compensation claims to be forced into the courts! Twenty-five years from now, claimants will get pennies on the dollar, the lawyers will make fortunes, and BP will continue with business as usual.
With the right acting like
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 09:38 — marble rye (not verified)With the right acting like drunken frat-boys in their zeal to protect Corporate American interests at all costs, I do think if voters put the power back in the Reps' hands in November then it's indicative that this country's people just lack all intelligence. We wouldn't be able to point the finger at politicians anymore for our ills, we'd have to point to the voters who continually elect them to power to begin with. And if the people prove to be the core problem in this country, we are indeed doomed because there will be no way we can elect proper leadership.
The Gulf catastrophe has
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 09:41 — Tom Outland (not verified)The Gulf catastrophe has unveiled--yet again--the destructive orientation of unfettered capitalism. The Republican party remains an anachronistic slave to a callous, unnuanced, and disastrous ideology. And its apologies for ideological excess are purely hypocritical PR efforts. If we want any vestige of social justice and environmental health in our world, then the GOP must remain out of power.
Imagine making someone pay
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 10:29 — basta (not verified)Imagine making someone pay to clean up the mess they made.
Barton & Tom Price are
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 10:35 — Anonarcmous (not verified)Barton & Tom Price are traitors to America. They should be hanged. PresObama was gentle w/ BP--he really should have legally seized their assets. Might suggest they at least to take a family vacation down there & swim in the waters.
What is so difficult for you
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 13:07 — Anonymous (not verified)What is so difficult for you liberals to understand? BP deserves its day in court, not arbitrary decrees from the oval office. We are a country of laws, not men.
If they are (almost certainly) found guilty, then they will be made to pay, but NOT until then. Even the despised are presumed innocent, until proven guilty. Even in the case of overwhelming evidence, still the presumption is of innocence.
If the law only protects the favored, what use is it?
It's not that Barton should
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 13:35 — FR Tothus (not verified)It's not that Barton should not have apologized to BP, it's that both the President and the Congress should be apologizing to the American people for allowing back-room dealing to take the place of the rule of law. The fact that there are either no laws to regulate and compensate, or the laws are not being enforced, puts the blame squarely where it belongs: our government, which is dysfunctional for the majority, while it rewards and protects the minority of the opulent.
"Although tyranny, because it needs no consent, may successfully rule over foreign peoples, it can stay in power only if it destroys first of all the national institutions of its own people."
(Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951))
What is so difficult? I'd
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 13:42 — Anonymous (not verified)What is so difficult? I'd ask what is so difficult about understanding that this has nothing whatever to do with liberal or conservative--whatever those terms might mean. The lack of oversight that led to this calamity is a entrenched philosophy of our government. The oil industry did exactly what Ronnie R. wanted--they got government off their backs. The idea of taking this to the courts is ludicrous. More than half of the sitting judges in the Gulf areas hardest hit by this have ties to the oil industry. As usual there will always be those who disparage any attempt to correct the effects of unchecked greed--a process that has generated untold riches for the oil industry. The courts will do nothing to offset the catastrophic loss to the people of the Gulf states. Bp knows that.
Bah! Everything Obama has
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 15:25 — Anonymous (not verified)Bah!
Everything Obama has done in response to the spill is purely legal.
A court was not necessary for the $20 billion to be set aside--and BP itself agreed to this measure. End of story.
Conservatives invoke "rule of law" and "the courts" only to score cheap political points. They happily go along with actual subversions of the Constitution such as Iran-Contra, etc. when it's their own pathetic leaders.
Had Obama not gotten BP to set aside the $20 billion, the same hypocritical conservatives would be complaining that Obama was "doing nothing". These people have zero principles; they are only interested in SPIN.
@anon18:07. You really are
Wed, 06/23/2010 - 11:46 — Anonymous (not verified)@anon18:07. You really are a fool. BP doesn't deserve a day in court because they were caught by the world redhanded and they plead guilty. Obama doesn't need a law in order to get BP to pay up. He only has to ask them or tell them. Their guilt is what made them comply. Its not like there were possibly three or four oil companies who might have done it. We don't need to pick BP out of a lineup. The were standing in the spotlight with the gun still smoking in their hand. Republican fascists have to stop apologizing to corporations.
Chicago shakedown politics
Thu, 06/24/2010 - 08:06 — radline9 (not verified)Chicago shakedown politics is exactly what we need in this situation. BP didn't even put up a fight, so I can't say you could actually call this Chicago style shakedown politics. Also, just look to see how Exxon Mobil escaped from the full cost of the spill in Price William sound.