On the Wing and a Victimhood

by: Eugene Robinson, Op-Ed

Washington- When did the loudmouths of the American right become such a bunch of fraidy-cats and professional victims? Or is it all just an act?

The hysteria over plans for an innocuous Muslim community center in Lower Manhattan -- two blocks from Ground Zero, amid an urban hodgepodge of office buildings, eateries and strip clubs -- is wildly out of proportion. It would be laughable if it didn't threaten to do great harm to the global campaign against Islamic terrorism.

It is by now firmly established that the project, dubbed Park51, is promoted by a peacenik Muslim cleric whose sermons often sound a bit like the musings of new-age guru Deepak Chopra. It is also undisputed fact that the imam in question, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is such a moderate that the U.S. government regularly sends him as an emissary to Muslim countries to preach peace, coexistence and dialogue.

Yet right-wing commentators and politicians have twisted themselves in knots to portray the Park51 project as some kind of grievous assault -- and "the American people" as victims. Victims of what? Rauf's sinister plot to despoil the city with a fitness center, a swimming pool and -- shudder -- a space for the performing arts?

The whole "controversy" is ridiculous. Yet conservatives who should know better are doing their best to exploit widespread ignorance about Islam by transforming it into fear and anger. They imply, but don't come right out and say, that it was Islam itself that attacked the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, rather than an extremist fringe that espouses what the vast majority of the world's Muslims consider a perversion of the faith. They paint Park51 as a "victory dance" over the hallowed ground where thousands of Americans died -- never mind that there wouldn't even be a sight line between the building and Ground Zero -- and suggest that the project, even though it would be run by an imam who's practically a flower child, could somehow serve as a recruiting center for terrorists.

Message to anyone who will listen: You're a victim. Be very afraid.

In the process, this anti-mosque pitchfork brigade is surely recruiting terrorists left and right. As Ahmad Moussalli, a professor at the American University of Beirut, told the Los Angeles Times: "Rejecting this has become like rejecting Islam itself." All the Islamophobic rhetoric tends to reinforce the jihadists' main argument, which is that the United States and the West seek to destroy the faith held dear by more than 1 billion souls.

The thing is, though, that the manufactured brouhaha over the Park51 project is part of a larger pattern in which the far right embraces victimhood and stokes fear. The faction that likes to portray itself as a bunch of John Waynes and "mama grizzlies," it turns out, spends an awful lot of time cowering in the corner and complaining about how beastly everyone else is being.

Witness the frequent eruptions over instances of reverse racism -- real or imagined. The Shirley Sherrod affair was the most recent example of how eagerly the far right wants to sell the false narrative that African-Americans, once they achieve positions of authority, will use their newly acquired power to punish whites for historical discrimination. The facts of the Sherrod case, as they finally emerged, argue persuasively against this fictional tale of longed-for revenge. But it will be back.

And look at the hysteria over illegal immigration. Facts don't matter -- for example, that the flow of undocumented migrants has decreased, or that border enforcement under President Obama is much tougher than under George W. Bush, or that illegal immigrants are not responsible for any kind of crime wave. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, has gone so far as to sound the alarm about alleged "terror babies." The idea is that undocumented pregnant women would cross the border so that their children could have U.S. citizenship, then take the babies away to be raised as terrorists -- who would be able to come back in 20 years or so, with legitimate U.S. passports, and presumably wreak untold havoc. No, I did not make that up.

Is the far right really afraid of its own shadow? Do these people really have so little faith in our nation's strength, resilience and values? I hope this is all just cynical political calculation, because there are genuine threats and challenges out there. We'll be better off meeting them with a spine, not a whine.

Eugene Robinson's e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.

(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group 

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Bravo, Mr. Robinson! A rare

Bravo, Mr. Robinson! A rare voice of sanity in contemporary America.



Well said Gene. A bit of

Well said Gene. A bit of sanity in this immensely stupid hysteria. Right-wingers who protest this site have too little time on their hands and no brains in their heads.



So now the left is against

So now the left is against victimhood? Isn't that something!

The Imam Rauf supports Sharia, in this country, as a parallel jurisdiction. It doesn't matter how nice he is, nor how much he says he's for peace. He is a Sharia supporter, and that is good reason to oppose the mosque. He will be preaching Islamic supremacy in this mosque.

Many Islamists truly believe that Sharia is best for everyone. They can be very nice people. They envision a happy world in which everyone is peaceful in submission to Islamic rule. However, they still are promoting a repulsive theocratic ideology. Don't be fooled.



While you're at it, 14:42,

While you're at it, 14:42, be sure to ban all Christian dominionist sects too. They're "nice folks" also but promote a repulsive theocratic ideology and the myth that this is a "Christian nation." Don't be fooled.

Perhaps, though, you only object when the dominionists are Muslims and minorities?

Obviously, anyone whose ideas you disagree with should be silenced and prevented from building community centers on private property.

So much for the First Amendment . . .



In this case the protesting

In this case the protesting victims are self-righteous horses' asses who use suffering to defend their prejudices. They and the tinhorn politicians who exploit them believe they have a right to define sacred space and identify those who profane it according to their whim. Remarkably, the 9/11 hijackers were motivated by the United States' presence on the holy ground of Saudi Arabia. The framers of our Constitution would be sickened by these yahoos.



15:24 You may notice that it

15:24

You may notice that it was Islamists who bombed the WTC. This is why I object to Islamists having a Ground Zero mosque, just to spell it out for you.

I am all for ex-Muslims, who are also minorities. In fact, they are an even tinier minority, and they are persecuted much more than Muslims. Also, religious minorities in Muslim countries are heavily persecuted, which is fully consistent with and even demanded by Sharia. I am all for supporting ex-Muslims and religious minorities in Muslim countries and giving them priority in immigrating to this country.

I did not say they do not have a First Amendment right to build a mosque there. However, we also have a First Amendment right to put up great big posters of Mohammed cartoons. Let's do it right outside of every mosque in the country. If you object, you must be against the First Amendment. (That's your logic, anyway.)



For the millionth time there

For the millionth time there is no "ground-zero mosque." That's a creation of Faux News, religious bigots, and opportunist politicians such as Gingrich and Palin.

The Cordoba House, a community center with a prayer room, will be six blocks from the North Tower. The people constructing it are moderates who are in NO WAY culpable for the events of 9/11. Dozens of Muslims were killed in those attacks too, btw.

Sure, your cartoons are protected by the First Amendment. If you want to go out of your way to offend fellow citizens, be my guest. Be sure to put a "Piss Christ" outside every Christian church too. Or, again, do you only enjoy the idea of offending Muslims?

The Cordoba House itself was not conceived of in this type of vindictive spirit. It has been twisted into something it's not by right-wing propagandists--i.e., the mythical "ground-zero mosque."



The video here demonstrates

The video here demonstrates how far it is from the World Trade Center to the Cordoba House and how busy an area it is. The article makes many good points as well:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-sledge/just-how-far-is-the-groun_b_660585.html



Y'know all the 9/11

Y'know all the 9/11 terrorists were MEN.

I am DEEPLY OFFENDED that MEN are allowed anywhere near ground zero!



I'm all for ex-Christians

I'm all for ex-Christians too.



Simon Deng, an escaped slave

Simon Deng, an escaped slave who was kidnapped at age 9 by an Arab muslim in Sudan, is against the Ground Zero mosque. Slavery is permitted under Sharia.



"If you want to go out of

"If you want to go out of your way to offend fellow citizens, be my guest."

That is exactly what the mosque organizers are doing. They could have a mosque somewhere else, but no, they want one at ground zero.

Evidently you are happy for 70% of the population to be offended, just so long as we don't offend any Muslims.



I love these Christian

I love these Christian bigots who keep trying to come up with excuses to violate the First Amendment.



Feisal Abdul Rauf (imam of

Feisal Abdul Rauf (imam of the mosque) himself has called it the "Ground Zero Mosque"! So let's hear no more of "there is no Ground Zero mosque". Evidently, the fact that the building on the site was damaged in the attack makes it "Ground Zero" to imam Rauf.



Christians were perfectly

Christians were perfectly capable of rationalizing slavery back in the day. We had to fight a Civil War in which 600,000 people died to end that.

And, yeah, I'm sure there will be plenty of slaves at the Cordoba House.

Just more bigoted propaganda.



22:06 Like you, I am also

22:06

Like you, I am also all for ex-Christians. Lucky for them, they are not threatened with systematic persecution like ex-Muslims are. Under Sharia, there is no penalty for killing an ex-Muslim. There is also no freedom of speech for them to express why they left Islam.

Now, for the first time in history, with the anonymity of the internet, they are speaking up, and what they have to say is pretty interesting. However, even in the US, life is dangerous for prominent ex-Muslims.

Dr. Rashad Khalifa in Tucson was declared to be an apostate in a fatwa. He was subsequently killed. Dr. Khalifa did not even consider himself to be an apostate; however, he was deemed a heretic and thus an apostate by the clerics of Sharia.



Provide a reference for the

Provide a reference for the imam's comment.

Otherwise, we'll assume it's just yet another right-wing lie.

And was he calling it that himself or simply referring to this idiotic media firestorm?



"But if we say that a mosque

"But if we say that a mosque and community center should not be built near the perimeter of the World Trade Center site, we would compromise our commitment to fighting terror with freedom.

"We would undercut the values and principles that so many heroes died protecting. We would feed the false impressions that some Americans have about Muslims. We would send a signal around the world that Muslim Americans may be equal in the eyes of the law, but separate in the eyes of their countrymen. And we would hand a valuable propaganda tool to terrorist recruiters, who spread the fallacy that America is at war with Islam.

"Islam did not attack the World Trade Center--Al-Qaeda did. To implicate all of Islam for the actions of a few who twisted a great religion is unfair and un-American. Today we are not at war with Islam--we are at war with Al-Qaeda and other extremists who hate freedom.

[...]

"The first colonial settlers came to these shores seeking religious liberty and the founding fathers wrote a constitution that guaranteed it. They made sure that in this country the government would not be permitted to choose between religions or favor one over another.

"Nonetheless, it was not so long ago that Jews and Catholics had to overcome stereotypes and build bridges to those who viewed them with suspicion and less than fully American."

--Michael Bloomberg, 8/24/10



Yo, 23:57: I think you've

Yo, 23:57:

I think you've got things messed up here.

You obviously object to Muslim extremists. So do I. So do most Muslims.

The best way forward for Islam in the modern world is to encourage modernization, integration, and moderation. Believe me, it's possible. There are 5 million Muslims living in America as peaceful citizens.

And that's exactly what the Cordoba House represents: modern moderate Islam.

But by reacting to it with fear and prejudice and by painting the moderates as extremists and pretending that the whole religion is defined by its worst tendencies, you're actually only deepening the divide and inflaming the radical elements, giving them further tools for recruitment.

Can't you see that?



00:25 No, Imam Raif is not a

00:25 No, Imam Raif is not a moderate. Would you call a Christian who openly advocates for a separate Christian law jurisdiction in the US a moderate? I seriously doubt it.

It is a big mistake to call any Muslims who does not openly advocate for violence a moderate. There are actually Muslims who are truly secularist, who have no desire to live under Sharia ever, and who work tirelessly to promote a secularist vision within Islam. Those are the ones we should be supporting, not Sharia mongers like Rauf.

There are many secularist Muslims who are against the ground zero mosque, such as Zuhdi Jasser. Google him.



Some facts about Imam Rauf

Some facts about Imam Rauf (not Raif):

* He has been imam of a mosque in NYC since 1983.
* He is a Sufi.
* His whole life has been dedicated to building bridges between Islam and the West.
* He has condemned the 9/11 attacks in no uncertain terms.
* He was the State Department's outreach man to moderate Muslims under the Bush administration.
* He has written: "The truth is that killing innocent people is always wrong and no argument or excuse, no matter how deeply believed, can ever make it right."
* He has also said: "American Muslims have the right to practice their religion in accordance with the Constitution of the United States."

Right-wing attempts to vilify him and to portray him as a radical promoter of Sharia have no foundation in fact.



02:07 Every single "fact"

02:07 Every single "fact" you list is fully consistent with Rauf being a Sharia monger.

Some additional facts about Imam Rauf:

* Following the brutal crackdown on Iranian dissidents in 2009, he said Obama should support "a just government, based on the idea of Vilayet-i-faquih, that establishes the rule of law." Vilayet-i-faquih means that the people are under the permanent guardianship of the mullahs.

* There are all kinds of Sufis. Some support violent Jihad. Some support Sharia. Being a Sufi means nothing.

* His commitment to "building bridges" is probably related to his commitment to dawa (converting the infidel to Islam) and gaining acceptance of Sharia by the gullible West.

* Rauf applauded the Archbishop of Canterbury's misguided call for integrating Sharia law into British law.

* Rauf refuses to even call Hamas a terrorist organization.

* Among Rauf's allies for the ground zero mosque is Jamal Barzinji, the lead trustee of the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center. This infamous mosque has been tied to numerous terrorism plots.



"There are all kinds of

"There are all kinds of Sufis. Some support violent Jihad."--03:00

But clearly not Rauf. See his quotation against violence cited above at 02:07.

You accuse him of wanting to gain converts. Well, that's his right as much as it is that of evangelical Christians or any other group. (There's no danger of mass conversions to Islam in this climate, anyway! And it's not something that's likely to succeed in our modern Western pluralistic marketplace of ideas. But that's really beside the point.)

The guilt-by-association trick has been skillfully parodied and punctured by Jon Stewart. I suggest you watch his clip showing how the same tactics Faux News uses can be used against Faux News:

www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/23/stewart-fox-prince-alwaleed_n_692234.html

The bottom line remains that regardless of whether you or I or anyone else agrees with all of Rauf's opinions, he has a right to them and a right to build a community center on private property.

The Bill of Rights gives no ground to those who want to deny any person the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and freedom of religion.



"I may disapprove of what

"I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

--attributed to Voltaire



Yes, people have the freedom

Yes, people have the freedom of speech to advocate for theocracy. And people also have the freedom of speech to let these theocrats know just how totally we reject their ideology.

What really should be done is to ban all religious funding from countries that do not themselves have religious freedom, such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. Saudi Arabia does not have any Constitutional right to fund mosques, religious schools, etc., and we should put an end to it. Rauf is being quite elusive on just where the $100 million for this center is coming from.



If Sharia-promoting Rauf is

If Sharia-promoting Rauf is a "moderate Muslim", what does that tell you about Islam?

If he is really the best Islam has to offer, we should end Muslim immigration to this country immediately.

I have no objection to a steady stream of legal immigrants who share basic American values, such as are embodied in the Constitution. I enjoy meeting people from different places, with different religions, cultures, cuisines, etc. However, Sharia is not a religion but a political ideology which is not compatible with the Constitution. We should not be adding yet more people who want Sharia. We have more than enough already.



Rauf: "American Muslims have

Rauf: "American Muslims have the right to practice their religion in accordance with the Constitution of the United States."

He is correct. The narrow-minded bigots are wrong.



Tom Tomorrow on the bigoted

Tom Tomorrow on the bigoted "Refudiators":

http://www.truth-out.org/files/images/Tom%20Tomorrow%208-24.png



Christian theocracy is a

Christian theocracy is a political ideology as well and not compatible with our Constitution either. Many Christians in this country are far far less reasonable than Rauf. Need I mention Pat Robertson, Fred Phelps, millions of other yahoos?



14:17 So far as I know, none

14:17

So far as I know, none of these Christian theocrats are attempting to put a Christian Center at the site where other Christian theocrats murdered thousands of people in the name of God. If they had such a plan, I would join with you in protesting it. Will you join with me in protesting this ground zero mosque? Just because Christian theocrats are a problem does not mean that Islamic theocrats are fine.



"Will you join with me in

"Will you join with me in protesting this ground zero mosque?"

Absolutely not. The people building the Cordoba House had nothing to do with 9/11. You sound like a bigot who wants to claim all Muslims are terrorists. Nothing could be further from the truth.



Well... it's just certain

Well... it's just certain pink USians having another one of their numerous psychotic breaks (they're NOT... "white"). How very embarrassing to us other Pinks.



15:33 I am absolutely not

15:33

I am absolutely not claiming that all Muslims are terrorists. However, al Qaeda are Islamists. Imam Rauf is an Islamist. So far as I know, Imam Rauf is not a terrorist, even though he refuses to call Hamas a terrorist organization. The violent Jihadists and the Islamists have the same goal: establishing Islamic rule over the whole earth.

There are some Muslims who do not have this goal. Interestingly, the most prominent secularist Muslims think this mosque is a very bad idea. I agree with them.

If you will not join with me in protesting this mosque, will you join with Zudhi Jasser, founder and president of American Islamic Forum for Democracy? He could use some help protesting this mosque, and you can be sure he likes a lot of Muslims.



Here is an excellent piece

Here is an excellent piece on Imam Rauf:

http://mediamatters.org/research/201008240027

As the article notes:

"Rauf has a long history of condemning terrorism, promoting pluralism, and arguing that the true meaning of Islam involves democracy, religious freedom and women's rights."

We don't need to be saved from Rauf; we need to be saved from the right-wing bigots who are smearing him. They are the mirror images of the Muslim extremists.



I'm far less concerned about

I'm far less concerned about a tiny number of moderate American Muslims in this country than I am about the Christian fanatics who assassinate doctors, bomb clinics, and found mercenary outfits such as Blackwater. (I'm referring to the notorious Erik Prince, who now, interestingly enough, lives in Dubai!)

The Bible belt types who go around saying this is a "Christian nation" and prop up the disgusting GOP are the ones to oppose. And of course all of them are up in arms about this community center because they hate pluralism.



And now a perfectly innocent

And now a perfectly innocent Muslim taxi driver in NYC has been stabbed by some idiot simply for being a Muslim.

The Islamaphobic bigots have created the climate of hate that led to this.



This is probably the most

This is probably the most Jew-friendly country on earth other than Israel. However, anti-Jewish hate crimes outnumber anti-Muslim hate crimes by 6 to 1 (according to the FBI statistics). There is not a major anti-Muslim hate crime problem in this country. People who tell the truth about Islam do not, for the most part, hate Muslims, any more than people who complain about Evangelical Christianity hate Evangelical Christians.

It is sad when anyone is stabbed for any reason. However, Muslims in this country are a heck of a lot safer than religious minorities are in Muslim countries. Recently 70 Ahmadis in Pakistan were killed by Muslims. Ahmadis are a peaceful heretical sect of Islam, often attacked by mainstream Muslims. Attacks on Christian churches has been on the rise in Indonesia, with little action to stop it from the government. A mob of 3,000 Muslims recently attacked a Coptic Christian community in Egypt over a rumor they were going to build a new church. There are less than 60 Catholic priests in Turkey, and five of them have been shot or stabbed in the last 4 years. "Allahu Akbar" seems to be a popular saying of these assailants. In Bangladesh at least 5 were killed and over 20 injured when some Buddhist groups were targeted and their houses burned down recently. A Christian church was also damaged and looted. In Malaysia, where it is illegal for a Muslim to convert to Christianity, 11 churches have recently been targets of arson because some Muslims don't want Christians to use the word "Allah" to describe God.

I would also note that Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Bangladesh are often considered to be among the most tolerant Muslim countries.



The real question is, are we

The real question is, are we a nation of laws, or of prejudices?

Will we uphold our Constitution's guarantee of religious freedom, or shred the document that has carried our great nation through 230+ years of democracy?

We must not allow those who cannot tolerate the melting pot of races, creeds and cultures that is---and has always been---America, to poison our country with their hatred.



The group New York Neighbors

The group New York Neighbors for American Values, which rallied yesterday in favor of the Cordoba House, includes families of the 9/11 victims.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/25/911-families-support-park51-islamic-cultural-center_n_694029.html

Well said by Sayward at 08:09.



Between 16 and 18 September

Between 16 and 18 September 1982 Christian Phalangists in Lebanon massacred at least 800 Lebanese and Palestinian civilians. Some put the number as high as 3,500. During May of 2004 Christian militias in Nigeria killed at least 600 Muslims. There are many other such episodes.

Then, look at the big picture: fanatical Jewish settlers in Palestine, the invasion of Iraq by "Christian" America. Take history into account and Christian civilization has been incomparably more violent than has Muslim: the Conquest of the New World, two World Wars, the Holocaust, nuclear weapons dropped on civilian populations in Japan, etc.



Christians are always so

Christians are always so quick to portray themselves as victims--and equally quick to forget their own history.

When I used to get dragged off to Sunday school as a kid, I was always told about "Romans feeding Christians to the lions." They never mentioned that the Christians later took over Rome, persecuted the Pagans, and went on to a glorious history of wars, purges, conquests, imperialism, forced conversions, burning people at stakes, Crusades, Inquisitions, witch hunts, and so on. What propagandists!