Using Race to Smear Obama

by: Eugene Robinson, Op-Ed

Using Race to Smear Obama
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Christian Haugen, webtreats)

Washington - After the Shirley Sherrod episode, there's no longer any need to mince words: A cynical right-wing propaganda machine is peddling the poisonous fiction that when African-Americans or other minorities reach positions of power, they seek some kind of revenge against whites.

A few of the purveyors of this bigoted nonsense might actually believe it. Most of them, however, are merely seeking political gain by inviting white voters to question the motives and good faith of the nation's first African-American president. This is really about tearing Barack Obama down.

Sherrod, until Monday an official with the Department of Agriculture, was supposed to be mere collateral damage. Andrew Breitbart, a smarmy provocateur who often speaks at tea party rallies, posted on his website a video snippet of a speech that Sherrod, who is African-American, gave to a NAACP meeting earlier this year. In it, Sherrod seemed to boast of having withheld from a white farmer some measure of aid that she would have given to a black farmer.

It looked like a clear case of black racism in action. Within hours, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack had forced her to resign. The NAACP, under attack from the right for having denounced racism in the tea party movement, issued a statement blasting Sherrod and condemning her attitude as unacceptable.

But Breitbart had overstepped. The full video of Sherrod's speech showed she wasn't bragging about being a racist, she was telling what amounted to a parable about prejudice and reconciliation. For one thing, the incident happened in 1986 when she was working for a nonprofit, long before she joined the Obama administration. For another, she helped that white man and his family save their farm, and they became friends. Through him, she said, she learned to look past race toward our common humanity.

In effect, she was telling the story of America's struggle with race, but with the roles reversed. For hundreds of years, black people were enslaved, oppressed and discriminated against by whites -- until the civil rights movement gave us all a path toward redemption.

With the Obama presidency, though, has come a flurry of charges -- from the likes of Breitbart but also from more substantial conservative figures -- about alleged incidences of racial discrimination against whites by blacks and other minorities. Recall, for example, the way Obama's critics had a fit when he offered an opinion about the confrontation between Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. and a white police officer. Remember the over-the-top reaction when it was learned that Justice Sonia Sotomayor had once talked about how being a "wise Latina" might affect her thinking.

Newt Gingrich called Sotomayor a racist. He was lightning-quick to call Sherrod a racist, too. I'd suggest that the former House speaker consider switching to decaf, but I think he knows exactly what he's doing.

These allegations of anti-white racism are being deliberately hyped and exaggerated because they are designed to make whites fearful. It won't work with most people, of course, but it works with some -- enough, perhaps, to help erode Obama's political standing and damage his party's prospects at the polls.

Before Sherrod, the cause celebre of the "You Must Fear Obama" campaign involved something called the New Black Panther Party. Never heard of it? That's because it's a tiny group that exists mainly in the fevered imaginations of its few members. Also in the alternate reality of Fox News: One of the network's hosts has devoted more than three hours of air time in recent weeks to the grave threat posed by the NBPP. Actually, I suspect that this excess is at least partly an attempt by a relatively obscure anchor to boost her own notoriety.

The Sherrod case has fully exposed the right-wing campaign to use racial fear to destroy Obama's presidency, and I hope the effect is to finally stiffen some spines in the administration. The way to deal with bullies is to confront them, not run away. Yet Sherrod was fired before even being allowed to tell her side of the story. She said the official who carried out the execution explained that she had to resign immediately because the story was going to be on Glenn Beck's show that evening. Ironically, Beck was the only Fox host who, upon hearing the rest of Sherrod's speech, promptly called for her to be reinstated. On Wednesday, Vilsack offered to rehire her.

Shirley Sherrod stuck to her principles and stood her ground. I hope the White House learns a lesson.

Eugene Robinson's e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.

(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group  

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Charges should be brought

Charges should be brought against Breitbart. At the very least a civil suit.

He & Mark Williams have fully exposed what utter slime the "tea party" is. Not a few bad eggs--rotten through & through. No one associated with it can be taken seriously after this.



The shame of this is that

The shame of this is that Breitbart's actions work. His edited world produces exactly the intended results. We need to remember the recent ACORN fraud. This might be a good time to ask more questions about that episode before putting this one to bed.



The Tea Party talk

The Tea Party talk Constitution, but they are really about hate for Obama. They could learn a lot from Sherrod.



"The Tea Party talk

"The Tea Party talk Constitution, but they are really about hate for Obama."

And the irony is that Barack Obama taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago for twelve years. If the "tea party" wants to learn something about the Constitution, it should listen to him, not to racist nutjobs such as Mark Williams and Andrew Breitbart, who have nothing to offer but hate and lies.



When minorities reach some

When minorities reach some level of success they are constantly having to walk on eggshells, because they are scrutinized for every little thing they do, say, or otherwise by racist that want to see them fail. Republicans want to oppress minorities and confuse the issues by using psychological projection tactics! They are accusing minorities of something THEY ARE, racist! Revenge, how ridiculous!



It's easy to see that some

It's easy to see that some deeply felt but hidden guilt might cause some whites to project onto blacks what they — the whites —would do in similar circumstances. If blacks were that vengeful, the whites would have it coming, but fortunately, most black people — at least the ones I know — are bigger than that.



There's another factor in

There's another factor in the Tea Party agitations against Barack Obama -- they cannot abide his intellect and academic bent (how could someone they presume a priori to be so definitively inferior get to be so mentally superior?). Besides their racism, their anti-intellectualism is behind Sarah Palin's appeal to them, also Sharron Angle's, Michelle Bachmann's, and others' celebrated by that base. This entrenched racism is what drives the entrapment conspiracies (Acorn, Sherrod) contrived by Breitbart. (I hope Sherrod sues for defamation -- she mentioned that she might.) It's high time for the administration to recognize these tricks and stop stumbling into the traps -- anything in contemporary media can be finagled, and will be.



Now the formal TEA PARTY

Now the formal TEA PARTY CAUCUS has been formed on Capitol Hill. Time to take to the streets to fight for the poor AND Middle Class.



The really shameful part of

The really shameful part of this is that, according to the group, Color of Change, Obama was not that quick to re-instate Sherrod after the truth became known.

Why does the "left" not protect its own instead of trying to appease the far right constantly?



The really shameful part of

The really shameful part of this is that, according to the group, Color of Change, Obama was not that quick to re-instate Sherrod after the truth became known.

Why does the "left" not protect its own instead of trying to appease the far right constantly?



Hey, Anonymous on 7/26 at

Hey, Anonymous on 7/26 at 17:36: Why don't you stop lumping people into conveniently broad categories and painting them with conveniently broad brushes that obscure subtlety and detail? If you have to put quotes around the word left (indicating your fundamental misunderstanding of the term), you really belong at Yahoo!News, not here.