Feds Approve Monsanto Herbicide-Resistant Crops

by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | Report

Feds Approve Monsanto Herbicide-Resistant Crops
(Photo: Ian Hayhurst; Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has approved plantings of three genetically engineered (GE) crops in as many weeks, including Monsanto Co.'s Roundup Ready sugar beets and alfalfa that are engineered to tolerate Roundup Ready weed-killing herbicide.

The USDA on February 11 also legalized, without restriction, the world's first GE corn crop meant for biofuel production. Biotech giant Syngenta's Event 3272 seed corn will simplify ethanol production and is not meant to feed animals or humans.

The approvals flew in the face of legal and regulatory challenges posed by GE crop opponents and members of the agricultural industry. Opponents fear the GE crop varieties could contaminate conventional food crops and promote the overuse of herbicides like the glyphosate-based Roundup and more toxic chemicals used to kill glyphosate-resistant weeds.

Monsanto won a victory on February 4 when the USDA partially deregulated Roundup Ready sugar beets. A federal court in August 2010 temporarily banned the beets and ordered the USDA to re-review the environmental impacts of the Roundup Ready sugar beets as the result of a lawsuit filed by farmers and environmental groups.

Plaintiff attorney Paul Achitoff from the environmental group Earthjustice said the USDA's decision to allow plantings of the sugar beets under "lax conditions" violates federal law. However, the USDA said the beets pose no "plant pest risk" and farmers can start planting them before a final Environmental Impact Statement is issued in 2012.

Roundup Ready alfalfa was legalized without any restrictions on January 27 after nearly five years of legal battles that pitted farmers and GE critics against the USDA and Monsanto.

The USDA disappointed GE critics again last week when it fully deregulated Swiss agribusiness giant Syngenta's Event 3272 GE corn. The corn is genetically engineered to produce an enzyme that converts starch to sugar, making it easier to process the corn and turn it into the biofuel ethanol.

The North American Millers Association (NAMA), a normally pro-biotech organization that represents 170 agricultural mills in 38 states, is concerned that Event 3271 kernels could accidentally mix with corn meant for food processing and damage the quality of food products like snacks and breakfast cereals.

"USDA has failed to provide the public with sufficient scientific data on the economic impacts of contamination on food production, or information on how USDA will ensure Syngenta's compliance with a stewardship plan," said NAMA President Mary Waters.

Fight the lies and misinformation; support truth! Please make a tax-deductible donation to Truthout today and keep real independent journalism strong.

The USDA is counting on a "closed loop system" created by Syngenta to prevent Event 3272 corn from contaminating the food supply and is encouraging dialogue between Syngenta and the food industry, according to a release.  The USDA is aware that some millers and food processors are concerned about Event 3272 and is promoting participation in an industry advisory council sponsored by Syngenta to review the "closed loop system."

Bill Freese, GE critic and policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety (CFS),  said that the USDA should to take a closer look at Syngenta's track record.

A 2004 investigation conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that Syngenta had illegally distributed GE seed corn engineered to produce an unregistered pesticide on over 1,000 occasions to farmers in the US, South America and Europe.

The EPA fined Syngenta $1.5 million in 2006 for distributing the seed corn, which produced a then unregistered pesticide called Bt 10.

The USDA did not classify Event 3272 corn as a crop grown to produce an industrial compound during its review of Syngenta's petition to legalize the corn, and NAMA argues that the agency would have completed a more thorough scientific review of the product if it regulators classified it as industrial.

A USDA spokesperson told Truthout that Event 3272 is not considered an industrial product crop because its extra genetic traits turn starch into sugar, not ethanol itself.

Syngenta's own recently released data shows Event 3272 would have "adverse impacts" on food quality if it entered the conventional corn supply, according to NAMA.

NAMA spokesperson Terri Long said the millers' association is concerned about food product quality and not Syngenta's past violations.

Freese said that Event 3272 is supposed to be used for domestic ethanol production, but Syngenta has applied for import approvals for Event 3272 in nations where the US exports corn. Freese said Syngenta is trying to avoid liability in case Event 3272 does contaminate the domestic corn supply.

Freese and CFS helped represent plaintiffs in the lawsuits against the USDA that challenged initial approvals of Roundup Ready alfalfa and sugar beets.
 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Mike Ludwig is a Truthout Fellow.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



It's unfortunate that

It's unfortunate that Truthout fails to do their research to speak to the specific risks of Genetically Modified food, how these foods affect the entire food chain, and will permanently make US dependent on Monsanto for their GE seed, round-up and fertilizing triggers to make the seed perform. Worse, GE alfalfa, corn and sugar beets means that all associated products made with sugar and corn along with all animals that eat their alfalfa will be affected this affecting a majority of food consumed in North America and beyond.

But look at this article, there is no call to action except 'please donate to truthout' presumably so in the future a call to action may occur? After its too late.

The fact is once the seed is released it may be nearly impossible to end its influence.

GE has is not natural, it has no place in our bodies or in our world and yet this company continues its reign as among the worst polluters of the earth with these GE modified seeds, aspartame, neotame, agent orange etc...

This even will affect every person in North American now and forever, and yet while we move forward toward our own demise, few if any will speak to the issue, few will study it and apparently no one has the courage to stand against the destruction of our natural world-all for profit-while people suffer the consequence and die an early death.



Hey Mike, a datum shows this

Hey Mike,

a datum shows this or that

data show this or that



Welcome to the Brave New

Welcome to the Brave New World, whether you like it or not. Good luck with that...



The problem is, this

The problem is, this decision will result in future GMO contamination of all feed crops. Even if you grow your own food, you won't be able to avoid contaminated seeds.

And then there's the meat. Cows and chickens eating GMO feed.

Remember Thalidomide? That was thought to be safe too.



Well, it's not surprising -

Well, it's not surprising - O's Hamburg, who's advisor is Michael R. Taylor, the attorney and former Vice President for Public Policy at Monsanto, who has returned through Washington's revolving doors who advises the FDA on "Food Safety" - if it weren't catastrophic, it would be hilarious. O is not a traitor to his supporters - his supporters are Monsanto, the MIC, the big banks, etc. - he never worked for us. The Left/Right Paradigm is a fraud.

Time to take action on this - pick up the phone, it is an emergency, while the 'war on terrorism' is total BS.



Monoculture, insect

Monoculture, insect genocide, and unknown effects downstream.

Makes you want to go to East Cupcake-istan and eat quinoa, papas, choclo, barley, lentils, sorghum, millet and rice.

To hell with wheat, corn and soybeans.

Arrrghh...



If the good Lord wanted us

If the good Lord wanted us to fly (as in airplanes)he would've given us wings. Or so the argument against genetic engineering goes. Sort of 19th century gothic science fiction stuff: man's quest for domination of the world via science will destroy him! Whooooooooooo.......



Woooooooo.....don't worry.

Woooooooo.....don't worry. Rome is eternal, and lead is an excellent engineering advance for sealing wine jars and indoor plumbing.



What's natural is whatever

What's natural is whatever exists. Nuclear weapons are natural. The sun (without which we couldn't live) is a thermonuclear Hell. All perfectly natural.

If there's a good scientific argument against these specific Monsanto seeds, let's hear it, but please! none of the Mother Nature pseudo-religion. Natural and unnatural don't enter into it.



The damage to individuals is

The damage to individuals is minor to the mass starvation's that are in our future. Or to be more accurate our great grandchildren s future. In order to get population under the sustainable 2 billion mark drastic measures have to be taken on a world that just won't listen to reason. One day when nothing will grow but G.M.O. and that is all that is feeding them the control of who eats and who doesn't will be strategically easy. The plot thickens.



Isn't there some government

Isn't there some government agency that oversees food safety? Oh, wait, I think they're getting rid of that in the new budget.



Please get the ethanol out

Please get the ethanol out of my gas

Is ethanol for Big oil and Government Motors welfare to increase cars



Will the genetically

Will the genetically engineered cow feed affect the beef?



Oh, JC. I became a

Oh, JC. I became a vegetarian out of fear of contaminated meat, poultry & fish. Now what? Grow a garden and now worry that you're using uncontaminated seeds. Shop in the local farmers' markets and you still can't be sure.
It's obvious that appealing to our reps in Congress does zilch. The only possible remedy is boycotting, but the core of knowledgeable consumers is so small that it won't make a dent in the bottom line.



Is anyone from Anonymous

Is anyone from Anonymous reading this? Monsanto deserves your attention in the most major way.

Wouldn't it be wonderful to see a massive Cairo-style protest at their corporate gates in Creve Couer, Mo?

Do it mentally anyway. Close your eyes. Imagine a huge, peaceful but furious crowd, hundreds of thousands, even millions strong, stretching from Monsanto's front door as far as the eye can see. Placards. Chanting. Cessnas towing vast banners overhead: Monsanto: Poisoners of the Earth. Aljazeera and BBC cameramen reporting to the world, frightened Monsanto operatives scurrying for their helicopters...

One little real world idea: go to the managers of your supermarkets and tell them that you refuse to buy Monsanto-poisoned products and that if you find they stock them you will switch to Wholefooods or Trader Jo type stores. (I know that is not always possible).



I am deeply concerned that

I am deeply concerned that waste(crop matter left to decay) from GM crops is the "elephant in the room", as this "modified" material then becomes part of the natural cycle of things. There is no further control over the distribution of "modified" material. This means ecosystems and environments develop varying strains/levels of GM modification. Life forms involved in the breakdown of GM material then become GM life forms(and the property of GM companies?!, given GM companies persistence in claiming ownership of various seeds and livestock). In this way the use of GM crops is a major GM contaminant of soil resources and through other environmental factors water resources, such that the immediate area of initial growth is only the beginning of a gradual dispersal of GM contaminated areas, through no application by non-GM growers but rather the natural forces occurring throughout ecosystems and environments. It is a furphy that GM crops can be restricted to their immediate growing environments without imposing themselves on other areas and further expanding their influence into previously non-GM areas. What this means for all other life forms, plant and animal, in the future, is a complete unknown as these forms mutate and multiply, with the possible exception that any "contaminated" species(so long as of commercial value) will be claimed as "owned" by the GM companies.



Buy Local and Buy Local

Buy Local and Buy Local often.



Monsanto has proven

Monsanto has proven themselves to be evil. Genetic engineering for profit is one thing, selling food dependent on toxic product is another. Ban Roundup!



coach outlet online

sell coach outlet online , for special offer DOdblItr http://www.coach-outlet--online.org/



xgfuywb

aatkxho



Jonessabowehaveguaranteedasbeingafewunbelievablyuniversalmerchan

I consider something really interesting about your weblog so I saved to bookmarks .



heel lift

about play boy,pamela andereson and other porn stars