Food Safety Overhaul Gives New Authority to Regulators
Tuesday 04 January 2011
by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | Report

Margaret Hamburg, commissioner of Food and Drugs. (Photo: Eric Bridiers / US Mission Geneva)
A law signed by President Obama on Tuesday gives federal regulators new authority and enforcement tools to oversee the safety of the country's food supply and requires the food industry to take preventative measures to reduce the risk of spreading food-borne illnesses.
The new law, dubbed the Food Safety Modernization Act, expands the regulatory authority of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and authorizes the FDA to issue mandatory recalls of contaminated foods.
US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the new food safety law is "long overdue." Food-borne illness cases in the US have risen significantly since the 1990s, with an average of one in six Americans becoming sick and about 3,000 dying from contaminated food each year, Sebelius said.
FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said that, while the food industry is usually cooperative when regulators issue a recall, there have been instances where the FDA had to push state authorities to take action during illness outbreaks and even take food companies to court.
The FDA can also require food producers to issue and implement preventative action plans to stop illness outbreaks before they start.
"Federal officials for decades have acted as detectives to track down food borne illness, now this will reverse that with an emphasis on protection," said Erik Olson, a director of the Pew Health Group, which helped push the law through Congress.
Implementation of the law will cost $1.4 billion over the next five years, and Hamburg said the FDA would work with Congress to make sure the funding is available.
The law saw some resistance in Congress from Republicans seeking to curb domestic spending, but Olson said the emphasis on prevention of food-borne illness outbreaks could save billions in dollars in health care costs alone.
Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.
An amendment to the law exempts small farmers from implementing some of the more costly measures included in the FDA's new food safety plan, which appeased organic food and consumer groups concerned that the cost of keeping up with new regulations could favor big business and cripple small family and organic farms.
Hamburg said the law establishes a new set of standards for food safety, but there will not be a "one size fits all" approach to implementation because the agency works with a diverse range of food producers.
The law also gives the FDA more power to regulate imported foods. Food importers will be required to show that food brought to the US meets domestic standards, and the FDA can block imports if foreign food production facilities refuse US inspections.
New whistleblower protections included in the law guarantee that food company employees will be protected if they report food safety violations.
Pam Bailey, president of the Grocery Manufacturers Association, said the food industry supports the new law and strong government oversight, and the food industry will remain responsible for the safety of its products.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
What?! Spending money to
Tue, 01/04/2011 - 14:38 — Anonymous (not verified)What?! Spending money to police our food supply when we're practically taking hostages, while drowning in debt, to cut taxes for the super-rich?! Look at Iraq and Afghanistan: even more soldiers killed, and there's no problem keeping warm bodies on the ground there. Besides, the food industry can police itself, right?
Wanna save billions in
Tue, 01/04/2011 - 15:08 — Kathleen (not verified)Wanna save billions in health care costs? Support breastfeeding:
"These additional health care services cost the managed care health system between $331 and $475 per never-breastfed infant during the first year of life."
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/103/4/S1/870
Support natural childbirth. Support teaching women and families how to approach their health care from a place of empowered knowing instead of blind obedience to the giant medical model.
More legislation? I dunno, but I do know there are better ways to save billions in health care costs that start much closer to home.
Want to save even more?
Tue, 01/04/2011 - 15:37 — Anonymous (not verified)Want to save even more? Don't have kids! A lot of birth control education and cheap BC saves a ton of money on health care in the long run.
Empowering women to plan their families and even say "no" to being a brood mare saves money and improves their standard of living. Planned pregnancies are more likely to get prenatal care, which improves health births. Enabling them to have their babies in non-medical environments (midwives, natural childbirth) for uncomplicated pregnancies saves money.
Putting a spike in the anti-woman "right to (run a woman's) life" movement would save the most - family planning and prenatal care save money and women's lives.
Killing the sheep of farmers
Tue, 01/04/2011 - 19:13 — JadeQueen (not verified)Killing the sheep of farmers who believed they had complied with all the fine print, pouring out raw milk for which there is a willing market, on-line harrassment of medical doctors discussing herbs used for thousands of years in China (e.g. astagalus), harrassment of Howard Lyman for talking about diet changes and health, this is the legacy of the present fine-print/agency collusion with corrupt parts of the food biz. This bill has the potential to make the harrassment worse. The only thing that may stop it is the financial mess corruption has landed us in. They may not be able to hire more despoilers.
This whole thing was enacted
Tue, 01/04/2011 - 19:17 — Anonymous (not verified)This whole thing was enacted based on scaring people into giving the FDA control over our food supply. Bad idea. They want to spray everything with chemicals and irradiate all food, so it is completely dead. Really, how can a problem like this possibly cost "billions"??? And where are these 3,000 people who died last year from contaminated food? Show us the stats. They already changed the definition of "organic" so now they can wash your organically grown food in chemicals! It makes more money for them. Google Codex and see what you get. You might be surprised at how big a deal this really is...
Almost all the food borne
Tue, 01/04/2011 - 21:23 — jaja (not verified)Almost all the food borne illnesses are caused by factory farming. This bill does nothing to address that...nothing! It does give the FDA more power, though. This is the organization that looks the other way when over 100,000 people a year die from pharmaceutical drugs. They have become the enforcement arm of Big Pharma and now will become the enforcement arm of Big Ag and Big Dairy. Also, in case of a..."Food Emergency"...our food supply goes under the control of The Dept. of Homeland Security! You know...the same dept. the TSA is under!
This is the same government
Tue, 01/04/2011 - 22:51 — JohnDrake07 (not verified)This is the same government that, thanks to Wikileaks, has the state department (Hillary Clinton) asking STDept employees/agents to make up a hit list of anti-GMO French officials who are resisting Monsanto's GMO crops - so as to to cause them harm - physical, financial and political. All to push the Monsanto agenda across Europe - despite medical studies that show depleted fertility rates, genetic mutations and other GMO-related disorders. So you think that the FDA is looking out for the American public? Fool…think again!
Its good to see everyone
Wed, 01/05/2011 - 00:13 — Barry Gordon (not verified)Its good to see everyone replying understands the truth of the fascist takeover of medicine and agriculture as well as most everything else in the US. First of all why is one agency in charge of two completely different categories, food and drugs. Food can be a medicine but is not a drug. Why this law when the FDA and Ag are not carrying out the inspections they already can do? Or enforcing the laws already in place for big biz? I think eventually we will see the end of farmers markets and CSA's. The IRS has already ruled that farms can not barter food for volunteer work.
The only thing this
Wed, 01/05/2011 - 07:57 — Anonymous (not verified)The only thing this legislation does is empower the FDA to get the same standard of bribes, kickbacks and hush money the Mine Health and Safety Administration (MHSA) gets from corporate persons like Massey Energy.
It means nothing. Pure political theater reinforcing the false consciousness of a representative and responsive government.
The following story is my
Wed, 01/05/2011 - 14:11 — Bernie Starzewski (not verified)The following story is my personal connection to this.
http://www.todaystmj4.com/features/specialassignment/111201309.html