Goldman Hires Obama's Ex-White House Counsel to Defend Bank Against Fraud Charges

by: t r u t h o u t | Report

Goldman Hires Obama's Ex-White House Counsel to Defend Bank Against Fraud Charges
(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: macten, Seabamirum)

Wall Street banking behemoth Goldman Sachs, which was charged with securities fraud last Friday over its role in the subprime mortgage meltdown, has hired President Obama's former White House Counsel Greg Craig to defend the company, according to a report published late Monday by Politico.

Reporters Eamon Javers and Mike Allen, citing an unnamed source, reported that Craig was hired “in recent weeks to help navigate the halls of power in Washington.”

“Whatever the reason for his hiring, Craig will presumably be a key player in the intricate counterattack Goldman Sachs officials in Washington and Manhattan improvised during the weekend — a plan that took clearer shape Monday as Britain and Germany announced that they might conduct their own investigations of the firm,” Politico reported.

As Truthout reported, Craig was ousted last November after he fell out of favor with some Obama administration officials, including White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, because Craig backed public disclosure on documents and photographs related to the Bush administration’s use of torture against alleged terrorist detainees and his role in pushing the White House to shutter Guantanamo within a year.

Craig’s efforts, originally championed by the administration, led to blistering attacks against the Obama White House by former Vice President Dick Cheney and Republican lawmakers who accused the president of giving aid and comfort to the “enemy.”

Craig is no stranger to high-profile cases. He represented fomer President Bill Clinton during his Senate impeachment trial. was also instrumental in working closely with Karl Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, and House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers and his staff that resulted in Bush’s former political adviser testifying before the panel behind closed doors about the firings of nine federal prosecutors in 2006 and the apparent political prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman. Craig also arranged a similar deal for former White House Counsel Harriet Miers.

As Goldman's attorney, Craig will have defend the bank against charges that it failed to inform its investors that one of its clients had a hand in creating a mortgage-based investment portfoloio and then bet the housing market would collapse, which led Goldman to lose $1 billion. The trader earned $3.7 billion, according to a civil suit filed last week against the company by the Securities and Exchange Commission following a nine-month investigation.

Despite the allegations the SEC levled against the firm in a civil complaint last week, Goldman still intends to dole out about $5 billion in bonuses, the Times of London reported.

Separately, Newsweek reported earlier Monday that Sen. Carl Levin, the chairman of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, has obtained new documents that link “certain actions to specific people” at Goldman Sachs related to deals the company made that precipitated the housing market crash.

Levin’s office wouldn’t disclose the substance of the documents he has obtained nor would his staffers identify the individuals at Goldman the Michigan Democrat intends to name as having played a direct role in the collapse of the bank and the financial collapse that ensued.

But come next week, according to an unnamed legislative official quoted by Newsweek, Levin believes the information he has collected will result in “another big shoe to drop on Goldman.”

Levin’s subcommittee is scheduled to hold hearings next week where Goldman’s Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein will testify about what he knew and when he knew it. It’s unknown if Craig, who returned to private practice after his departure as White House counsel last year, will accompany Blankfein to the hearing.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Is this payback from Craig?

Is this payback from Craig?



Goldman Sachs has lots of

Goldman Sachs has lots of ties to the Obama administration, and to Democrats generally. Evidently Obama received $994,795 from GS in campaign contributions. Does anyone think he'll return the money?



I give up. Craig, do you

I give up.

Craig, do you really need the money that bad?

You should be out there defending the NSA whistleblower ( Drake) -- pro bono!

With all the unemployed in this country, with all the home foreclosures in this country, with all the refugees in all the countries our armed forces are in, with the Rule of Law being shoved aside for every secret emergency Booz Allen can dream up, and who do you choose to defend?

Nobody ever asks, but how much has Goldman profited from the War On Terror? The resource wars in Africa?

THE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO PROTECT THE WEAK AND DEFEND THE INNOCENT! and you decide to do the opposite.

You're a disgrace.



Considering the timing of

Considering the timing of this, perhaps a good old-fashioned conspiracy theory is in order:

1. Obama wants to pass regulatory reform.

2. Coincidentally at the same moment, the whole Goldman Sachs thing comes out.

3. Obama's people will make sure GS does not suffer.

4. GS will end up profiting from the regulatory reform.

Oh, and Obama keeps GS campaign contributions, too. About a million. Business as usual.



During the campaign, Senator

During the campaign, Senator Obama repeatedly promised transparency and openness, unlike the illegitimate 'administration.' So when Craig wants to release information about the torturers and when he wanted to close that symbol of the joke that is human rights in Guantanamo, he was ousted. Is that about the size of it?
Boy was I sold a bill of goods. Green from now on for me!



Too bad Rahm wasn't

Too bad Rahm wasn't available.



Wow. He's gone over to the

Wow. He's gone over to the dark side. So he's taking revenge out on the American people by defending the Vampire Squid, Goldman Sachs? Good riddance to the creep then. I hope England and Germany sue the bejezus out of Goldman Sachs and may Greg Craig get the karma he deserves for caving.



Some of the stupidest

Some of the stupidest comments I've read in a while. "The Goldman Sachs thing came out" ///Groan!
Most folks already knew what was going on. Investment banks and their ratings agencies essentially brought economic devastation.



1:47 You forgot to mention

1:47 You forgot to mention Wall Street elected Obama. Obama has goons like Larry Summers,
Tim Geithner and Ben Bernanke workin' for him.
He's been "Goldman Sach's" president since the day he was elected.



Guys! Guys! Guys!!! So,

Guys! Guys! Guys!!! So, you're willing to admit (largely to yourselves) that the Oligarchy owns everything, but you can't wrap our little minds around the fact that owning everything includes owning the Presidency? If Obama strays from the dictates of the Power Elite, he goes down (seriously, are you all too young to remember?). Until and unless, all these way-conceited commenters get together on street corners and seriously discuss Seizing the Means of Production (complex when what is produced is ideas, but get over yourselves, 'k?), NOTHING WILL CHANGE; NOTHING WILL BE REGULATED; MAIN STREET WILL NOT BE BAILED OUT.