Anti-Government Extremists: On the Rise and On the March

by: Evan Thomas and Eve Conant, Op-Ed

Anti-Government Extremists: On the Rise and On the March
(Photo: Marissa Babin / flickr)

Stewart Rhodes does not seem like an extremist. He is a graduate of Yale Law School and a former U.S. Army paratrooper and congressional staffer. He is not at all secretive.

In February he was sitting at a table at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at a fancy downtown hotel in Washington, handing out fliers and selling T-shirts for his organization, the Oath Keepers. Rhodes says he has 6,000 dues-paying members, active and retired police and military, who promise never to take orders to disarm U.S. citizens or herd them into concentration camps. Rhodes told a Newsweek reporter, "We're not a militia." Oath Keepers do not run around the woods on the weekend shooting weapons or threatening the violent overthrow of the government. Their oath is to uphold the Constitution and defend the American people from dictatorship.

But by conjuring up the specter of revolution or counterrevolution is Rhodes adding to the threat of real violence? Oath Keepers are "a particularly worrisome example of the 'patriot' revival," according to Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which monitors hate speech and extremist organizations. "Patriot" groups described by the SPLC as outfits "that see the federal government as part of a plot to impose 'one-world government' on liberty-loving Americans" are "roaring back" after years out of the limelight, according to Potok. Notorious in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, the patriot groups seemed to fade away under the shadow of 9/11, but hard times and the nation's first African-American president seem to have brought about a revival from 149 groups in 2008 to 512 (127 of them militias) in 2009, according to the SPLC.

It is easy to exaggerate the numbers of these groups or the threat they pose, especially if you are an organization, like the SPLC, dedicated to exposing such things. Extremist outfits have come and gone over the years. With their preening and prancing about in Nazi garb or white robes, skinheads and white supremacists are often more about showing off than committing acts of violence. Law-enforcement experts worry more about "lone wolves," disturbed loners with military training, like Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, than they do about loudmouth militia groups. But the feds and local authorities will be watching closely on April 19, when the Oath Keepers mark their first anniversary and join a Second Amendment March on Washington to celebrate the right to bear arms. The Oath Keepers say they are commemorating the first shots of the Revolutionary War fired at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775, but April 19 is also the anniversary of the end of the FBI siege at Waco, Texas, in 1993, as well as the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

This is a season, or perhaps an era, when politics seem more intense than usual, and the domestic extremist threat seems more real. Partisan disputes are rarely pretty, but lately they have taken a particularly ugly, menacing turn. Last week the FBI arrested individuals for making death threats against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Patty Murray of Washington for their votes on health-care reform. A series of -expletive-strewn voice-mail messages left for Senator Murray were particularly creepy: "You're gonna have a target on your back for the rest of your life," the caller warned. "How long do you think you can hide?"

Senate Sergeant at Arms Terrance W. Gainer said last week that serious threats to members of Congress had nearly tripled, from 15 in the last three months of 2009 to 42 in the first quarter of 2010, with most of them coming in March during the height of the health-care debate. Some of the calls and e-mails were "very vicious" and included threats to members' homes and families. "You had people saying, 'I'm going to get your kids, I'm going to get your wife,'E" says Gainer. "It was very disturbing to members."

After the health-reform vote, a tea-party activist in Lynchburg, Va., posted an address for Rep. Tom Perriello on his blog and encouraged readers to "drop by" and express their anger over Perriello's vote for the bill. The blogger got the address wrong. Perriello's brother returned home that day to find that someone had cut the line to a propane-gas tank behind his home. The fact that haters are sometimes incompetent renders them only marginally less frightening. Some threats come from people who are truly unhinged. Federal authorities have charged a man with multiple -- personality disorder with threatening in a YouTube video to kill Rep. Eric Cantor; the suspect is not competent to stand trial.

Economic distress and social change make for fear, and fear makes for anger, now and always. Night riders terrorized the defenseless after the Civil War. During the Great Depression, two demagogues in particular whipped up conspiracy theories against Jewish bankers and the rich elites to arouse angry mass movements. Huey Long, governor of Louisiana, later a U.S. senator who wanted to soak the rich, and Father Charles Coughlin, an anti-Semitic Catholic priest whose radio show reached 40 million people, seemed a political threat to FDR, until Long was assassinated and Coughlin became increasingly unhinged.

"There was a lot of hatred in the 1930s," says Alan Brinkley, the Columbia University historian and expert on populist movements. But the current surge of fear and loathing toward Obama is "scary," he says. "There's a big dose of race behind the real crazies, the ones who take their guns to public meetings. I can't see this happening if McCain were president, or (any) white male." (Secret Service spokespeople reported spikes in threats against Obama after his election and inauguration, but they've also said the president generally receives about the same number of threats as did Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. They've declined to comment on whether there's been a spike in threats related to health-care reform.)

Fear of "the other" has long fueled hate crimes, from the torture and lynchings by the Ku Klux Klan beginning in the late 1800s, to the violence of the 1950s and '60s, to the virulent anti -- immigrant groups today. In 2008 the Census Bureau announced that whites will make up only half the U.S. population in 2050. "That was a big deal," says the SPLC's Potok. In recent years white-power groups mushroomed and the Klan reversed declining membership.

The Internet has made it easy to express hatred, and may act as a kind of safety valve. But the Internet can also abet twisted minds with vitriol and practical tips, like how to make a bomb.

Middle-aged guys sitting around their basements fantasizing are one thing; addled war veterans with weapons training are another. Timothy McVeigh was a Gulf War veteran who read white-supremacist literature and the sort of books that predict a takeover by one-world government agents flying black helicopters. He has, or had, some potential heirs apparent in a recently indicted group called the Hutaree, a Michigan-, Indiana-, and Ohio-based militia. According to the Hutaree Web site, the group ranked its followers with weird sci-fi titles like "Radok" and "Arkon." The Hutaree militiamen speculate that the Antichrist is Javier Solana, a former NATO secretary-general and senior official of the European Union. The evidence? "There is a virtual media blackout on this man," writes John Reynolds, author of a screed on Solana and the Antichrist on the Hutaree Web site. "I see Jacques Chirac and Silvio Burlusconi (sic), Tony Blair, and Prince Charles on the TV all of the time, yet not a word one regarding Solana. Why not?" ("Mr. Solana has now retired and is an elderly private gentleman. This is quite insane," says a spokesman for the European Union's

The rambling rants of the Hutaree might seem funny, in a sick sort of way, but they are far from harmless. The FBI busted nine members last month for allegedly plotting to trigger an "uprising" against the government by assassinating a local police officer and then ambushing colleagues who attended the funeral by blowing up improvised explosive devices. They may have had some professional instruction: one of the men in the group, Michael Meeks, is a Persian Gulf War veteran who served four years in the Marines and was a decorated rifle expert, according to Marine Corps records. Another member, Kristopher Sickles, is an Army vet (discharged "under other than honorable conditions," according to prosecutors). William Swor, the lawyer for Hutaree leader David Brian Stone, says there is no evidence the group was doing anything other than exercising its First Amendment rights.

The Internet offers a dark social network for militiamen and real soldiers. A July 2008 FBI intelligence report by the bureau's counterterrorism division warned that white-supremacist leaders were encouraging followers to "infiltrate the military as 'ghost skins' in order to recruit and receive training for the benefit of the extremist movement." (The report said the hate-group leaders were especially interested in planting moles without any documented history with neo-Nazi groups or "overt racist insignia such as tattoos" so they could more easily slip by military recruiters. The FBI identified 203 people with confirmed or claimed military service who were active in extremist groups. On the NewSaxon.org Web site for white supremacists, a blogger called "shadowman" posted a photo of a U.S. Army enlisted man in camouflage carrying a weapon with the boast "i am a professional killer ... a soldier born of war." The Defense Department has long had a "zero tolerance" policy for membership in extremist groups, but last November the Pentagon quietly tightened its regulations governing such activity, a Pentagon official confirmed to Newsweek. Not only are service members barred from "active participation" in such groups, they also may not "actively advocate supremacist doctrine, ideology, or causes," according to a copy of the Pentagon regulation.

It is hard to know how much such grim fantasies are stirred by the steady stream of conspiracy theories pushed by talk-radio hosts. Rush Limbaugh talks about the Democrats planning to "kill you" with health-care reform and suggests (agreeing with black Muslim minister Louis Farrakhan, of all people) that it "seems perfectly within the realm of reality" that the H1N1 vaccine was "developed to kill people." Like many talk-show hosts, he uses martial language to rouse the faithful: "The enemy camp is the White House right now," he says. Former Alaska governor turned media star Sarah Palin posted on her Facebook page a list of House Democrats who voted for health-care reform with crosshairs aimed at their home districts, while tweeting to her followers, "Don't Retreat, Instead reload!" She strongly denied any intent to incite violence. Other conservative talkers insist their foes are preparing violent attacks on them. Glenn Beck of Fox News is the master purveyor of this particular brand of sly paranoia. He suggests that he will be the victim of violence. "I'd better start wearing a (bulletproof) vest" to guard against White House attacks, he says, and warns that the Democrats will sic goons on him to break his kneecaps. Some talk-show hosts see the risk of going too far. Bill O'Reilly, the top-rated talker on Fox News, interviewed Stewart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers in February and treated him coolly. After the interview O'Reilly said to his audience, "We have a system to uphold the Constitution. It is called the judicial branch. The Supreme Court. The Oath Keepers are not the system." Wise words, but it's a sign of disturbing times that O'Reilly felt required to say them.

With Michael Isikoff, Mark Hosenball, Katie Connolly, and Daniel Stone in Washington

(c) 2010, Newsweek Inc. All rights reserved.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Perhaps if the

Perhaps if the pro-Corporation Government Extremists would back-off their weapons of mass distraction, deprivation and destruction?



Americans are historicly

Americans are historicly anti government. Kings, queens, dictaters, and tyrants have always demonized free men and women. We are falling further into fascism every day. Those who speak out against tyranny and for the people are made out to be enemies of the state. Its like the sheep complaining that the sheep dogs are threatning to hurt the hurd. When its the wolf in sheperd's clothing the sheep dog sees threatening the sheep.



When government does not

When government does not govern with the consent of the people, intelligent people will oppose it. The violent extremists are usually goaded by someone else who try to use them to get concessions or to blackmail. This becomes particularly dangerous when combined with perceived or actual abuse by government.



We have a wide spectrum of

We have a wide spectrum of dim views concerning the direction the u.s. federal government has been heading under Democrat and Republican presidents and congressional majorities for 40 or 50 years. Some of these views are entirely warranted, whereas some are overblown and almost as insane as the policies they are criticizing.
All I can say is no band of grown up woods-humping boy scouts with guns and compasses are a match for a colossal military-industrial complex with weapons well designed (and paid for by us) to take out as many people in a flash, wherever and whenever they feel like it. And they obviously feel like it more and more - have you noticed?
Be discerning, folks. Nothing is as presented, particularly by gusts of methane like O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Beck and Palin.
'Course we know our government would never lie to us or intentionally do us harm in any way. Sit back and catch up on your sleep.



This is a very biased

This is a very biased article. Remember, Americans fought a war against a dictatorial king who gave us more liberties back in the 1700s then our own government gives us now. The true violence is coming from our own government. They are sponsoring state-terrorism in wars around the world. They are the ones putting guns to our heads and say obey or go to jail. This is not a left-right thing. Liberty must be for everyone. And when government begins to destroy out life and liberty, something must happen. I hope it will be peaceful. But the government is never peaceful -- the always have the gun in the room and know how to use it. How long will we put up with their coercion.



On another thread there was

On another thread there was an Oath Keeper defending their motives and raison d'etre. He listed maybe a dozen things they had promised in their oath and all of them were various phrasings of "defend the Constitution." In none of them did they ever actually list what they considered to be a threat to the Constitution and at no time did they ever mention what the Bush regime did to desecrate that "just a Goddamned piece of paper!" to quote Mr. Bush.

In sum, their attitude seems to be contradictory to what they state their goals are.



Read TRAGEDY and HOPE by

Read TRAGEDY and HOPE by Professor Quigley, a book about Why History Happens, not just a record of what happened. Today's U.S. situation is all laid out in the book whichwas written in 1976.



The Government has largely

The Government has largely been bought. The real danger of these extermists is they cannot see the forest for the trees. When did so-called idiots start carrying signs claiming that they "didn't want to pay someone else's mortgage" last spring. The issue was Bankruptcy reform, if allowed to be reasonably adjusted, could have potentially saved millions from the hell of financial ruin not to mention foreclosure.
Instead, malicious propaganda was paid for by the status quo kleptocrats. *Many* of which are in prominent positions in our Government.
Can't decide whether this particular brain dead Bagger agenda was pure violence, or just seething corporate funded hate in the name of greed. Make no mistake about it, the very rich are terrified, and they'll fund unaccountable mercenaries domestically if need be, They are already doing it overseas.



it never fails to amaze me-

it never fails to amaze me- the myopic, singular paranoia about big government-if only many of these people would take the next step and understand that small, or puppet government where private corporate power really makes the policies is as bad or worse, or the same thing as any tyrant. Be paranoid all you want about big government, but despite all its faults and corruption, at least politicians have to be elected! I know thats not much but jeez... when was the last time any of these right wing nuts ever thought about the enormous power, say goldman sachs or GE or AIG or DUPont or Bank of America etc has and when was the last time you elected the head of one of these organizations? If an institution like some of the major banks are "too big to fail" and the entire economy is in the hands of a few individuals, then they are enormously powerful, at least as much (certainly more) as the president, but they aren't even subject to elections!!!



Are you kidding me? It

Are you kidding me? It depends on what you mean by so-called "anti-government extremists". Most Americans have very good reason to be "up in arms" about everything that's going on, from undermining and destroying our Constitution and our liberties and freedoms, to turning our country into an increasingly oppressive and becoming more and more repressive "national security state" where basic God-given human rights, decency and dignity are being done away with in the name of "protecting our security". What security? If we have none of the foregoing human and civil rights, we don't have any real security, and all of us are in extreme danger at the hands of "our very own" government.



This is a very biased

This is a very biased article. Remember, Americans fought a war against 1) a dictatorial king who gave us more liberties back in the 1700s then our own government gives us now. 2) The true violence is coming from our own government. They are sponsoring state-terrorism in wars around the world. 3)They are the ones putting guns to our heads and say obey or go to jail.

23:00, do you really believe what you said in 1, 2 and 3? If you do, you are in need of serious psychotherapy. I have to wonder about your grasp of reality, too, S.Wolf Britain.



Thank you, Smokey! Folks,

Thank you, Smokey! Folks, if you don't like the gov't. how'd you like the oil suits running the country? Or big Pharma? Or Big Agriculture? Pressure your Congressionals to put the brakes on the corporate abuses. Tell them you want real financial regulation. Keep their feet to the fire. It's not the gov't., but, the deep pockets of industry and their bedmates in the military that have our Congress on a leash. Turn your ire on them for a change. Corporations are only beholden to their shareholders. They only care about the bottom line---profit. Profit demanded by people who own their stocks. If you insist on voting for the guy with the best tv ads paid for by corp. contributions and not the candidate with a well-thought platform, then, you get what you deserve!



Obviously, by the very fact

Obviously, by the very fact that you say that about your questioning my grasp of reality, "BorisJimbo", it is your grasp of reality that should be questioned, especially by your very own self. You must be a typical "progressive" who lives in deep avoidance and denial about what IS really going on. And that's sad, very sad; for yourself, but even more for the people you influence. Wake completely up and face that EVERYTHING I said in my last comment, and everything I say in ALL of my comments, is completely true, unfortunately. Then, after you wake up, if you do, please do your DUTY to stand up against ALL of the corporate-fascist madness and total takeover of the U.S.; otherwise, you ARE complicit in it. (And the same goes for all those reading this who live in avoidance and denial that the things of which I speak are coming completely true and are getting worse and worse every day. Even "progressive" Noam Chomsky is now warning of fascism in the U.S. as well---although he's quite late by several years in finally warning about it, and is absurdly claiming simply that it "may" happen when IS IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW AND HAS BEEN SINCE 9/11 IF NOT BEFORE. But that's typical of a neo-lib "Left-gatekeeper" like him, especially of him. Naomi Wolf and others have been warning about it for years, and Naomi Wolf is entirely right-on about that!)

Those who want to completely face reality, edify themselves, take responsibility, and to learn what they can do to (further?) stand up against the completely tyrannical, treasonous and despotic total takeover of the U.S. and the eradication of all of our human rights and civil liberties, please go to my blog, at:

www.wolfbritain.com/