House Democrats Pass Historic Health Overhaul, 219 to 212
Sunday 21 March 2010
by: David Lightman and William Douglas | McClatchy Newspapers

(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: o palsson, takomabibelot)
Washington - The House of Representatives late Sunday passed by a 219 to 212 vote the biggest overhaul of the nation's health care system in more than four decades, sweeping changes expected to make coverage easier and cheaper to obtain.
The largely party-line vote — 219 Democrats voted "yea," while all 178 Republicans and 34 Democrats voted no — meant President Barack Obama's biggest domestic initiative inched closer to the end of its year-long political and legislative odyssey.
The vote sent a bill passed on Dec. 24 by the Senate to Obama for his signature. The House, however, will consider later Sunday another bill that would make major changes, called reconciliation.
If that passes — and approval seems virtually assured — it would go to the Senate immediately. Should the Senate concur, probably later this week, all the health care changes would need is Obama's certain signature.
The $940 billion legislation would make the biggest health care since Medicare was created 45 years ago. Under the new plan, most consumers would be required to have coverage by 2014, and most employers would have to offer it.
Within a year, insurers would be barred from denying coverage to children because of pre-existing conditions, imposing lifetime limits on coverage and dropping people from coverage when they get sick.
The reconciliation bill makes several key changes to the Senate measure. A Medicare payroll tax would increase of 0.9 percentage points, to 2.35 percent, for earnings of more than $200,000 a year for single filers and $250,000 for joint filers. In addition, such earners would pay 3.8 percent on dividend, interest and other unearned income, starting in 2013.
The bill also provides more help with insurance premiums for lower- and middle-income consumers and expands Medicaid funding to states.
"I know that this bill is complicated," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. "It's also very simple. Illness and infirmity are universal, and we are stronger against them together than alone. Our bodies may fail us. Our neighbors don't have to."
Republicans warned the plan's impact would reverberate beyond health care policy.
In an impassioned floor speech, House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, chastised House Democrats for ramming through a bill and suggested that the majority party will pay the price in November's midterm elections.
"We have failed to listen to America," Boehner said. "If we pass this bill, there will be no turning back. It will be the last straw for the American people. In a democracy, you can only ignore the will of the people for so long and get away with it."
The outcome was in some doubt early Sunday as about a dozen anti-abortion Democrats threatened to withhold their support unless they got guarantees that the legislation wouldn't expand the government's role in abortion. However, the White House said Sunday afternoon that Obama would issue an executive order to ensure that the administration will enforce long-standing restrictions on the use of federal funds for abortion.
Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., who led the anti-abortion group, was pleased, and flatly predicted that when the House votes late Sunday, it will have the 216 needed for passage.
"We wanted to see health care reform, but there was a principle we wanted to see — the sanctity of life." Stupak said. Another group member, Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., said he now planned to cast "the most pro-life vote" in his 34-year congressional career.
The lengthy executive order, negotiated over several days, resolves several thorny problems — it removes from the legislation any changes to abortion policy, which would have required the difficult prospect of getting Senate approval. It also assures the support of the last big bloc of holdout Democrats.
Democrats picked up other key votes Sunday. Rep. Brian Baird, D-Wash., who'd voted no on the House bill in November, said he'd now vote yes. "This legislation before us in not perfect, but it does make substantial improvements on what exists today," he said.
Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, one of the anti-abortion Democrats on the fence, told Toledo, Ohio, said she got assurances from administration officials that current federal law on abortion would be preserved.
Democrats, though, were still having trouble convincing a lot of "Blue Dogs," or fiscal conservatives. Rep. John Tanner, D-Tenn., Sunday decided to vote "no" because "I am unconvinced the long-term trend of rising health care costs is adequately addressed."
The debate Sunday began as the Capitol buzzed with an electric atmosphere. Outside in warm early spring weather, crowds protesting the health care bill and others supporting it rallied.
"Things are colliding today," said Maria Robalino, 35, of Washington, carrying a purple "Catholics for Healthcare Reform" sign.
Inside the Capitol, the mood could be tense. Particularly after a protester jumped up during the debate and shouted "kill the bill." Police quickly pounced and escorted him out of the chamber.
The debate on the House floor was a rerun of sorts, as Republicans and Democrats took turns offering well-rehearsed talking points.
"We know a nation is truly health when all of its citizens can have health care," said Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash.
"These bills are not the answer. They compound current problems and make health care even more expensive for small businesses," argued Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C.
(Erika Bolstad and Les Blumenthal contributed to this article.)
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Shame on DEM. (Up next,
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 09:04 — Vic Anderson (not verified)Shame on DEM. (Up next, their ELECTORAL TERMination!)
Great image. I like that
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 09:37 — NYCartist (not verified)Great image. I like that comment "Shame on dem" pun. I am no longer calling myself a Dem. but will keep my registration so I can vote in NYS/NYC primaries, which is where the "action" is in NYC.
Stick together for a public
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 10:51 — whaler (not verified)Stick together for a public option. It may not be in this bill, but I am hopeful they will pass it soon. Giving consumers the clout they need access to.
In the meantime, I am GLAD that tens of millions of Americans withe preexisting conditions will have access to coverage, it is immediately banned insofar as children are concerned. This is a big kick in the cajones to the health insurance industry. Also, no caps on coverage.
Do no forget subsidies for the middle class, either, and an expansion of medicaid.
Don't stand with a bunch of ignorant, fear-ridden, superstitious brownshirts, people.
Stick together and walk towards a public option.
Health care is a human right. We SHALL overcome.
@ VicAnderson: Care to
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 11:13 — CapitalismWithAConscience (not verified)@ VicAnderson: Care to elaborate?
@ NY Cartist: What specifics about the bill have made you renounce being a Democrat?
Perhaps you both are upset that the bill will cover an additional 32 million uninsured people?
Or perhaps you are upset that it will save 148 billion dollars over the coming decade?
Or perhaps you are upset that the strict restrictions on abortion are being upheld?
Or perhaps you are upset that the government has chosen to pay for these costs by increasing the taxes of those with an income of 200,000 dollars or more and couples with an income of 250,000 dollars or more?
Care to have an actual argument with points and counterpoints so we can all see the depth of your reasoning against health care reform?
Great! Obama, like Ali
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 11:31 — Craig From Canada (not verified)Great! Obama, like Ali before him, has a defining 15th Round - The Champ!
Ok, my America friends - this is not perfect, or like our single payer system (which is not perfect either) - but, it's a game changer - FDR Lives! The Dems find their fighting Left Roots; this is the most important thing right now.
Keep it up!
After the dust clears, it
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 11:48 — RB (not verified)After the dust clears, it will be interesting to see whether healthcare will allow American businesses to shift the cost of benefits from their workers, increase wages and allow our products to be exported and COMPETE with businesses in other countries with government healthcare...methinks this will be a welcome and unintended positive consequence.
There, they got it. Over
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 13:02 — Anonymous (not verified)There, they got it. Over and done with. Lets move on now. This has dragged on more than long enough. I think this president does still have great potential, but he has allowed himself to get dragged down by this whole issue and shame on him for not acting more...well, presidential. Well, you got your "reform" bill passed now. Try focusing on something else for a while.
At last... a positive step
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 17:07 — slidingHomeInOregon (not verified)At last... a positive step forward. This could be a game changer in November, alright. Time to take a few more Republicans and a handful of Dems out of the Congress. Remember those who voted against helping their neighbors with healthcare - and vote them OUT.
Why should those
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 18:29 — Dr. Bill Bushing (not verified)Why should those representatives worry about helping their "neighbors" with healthcare. Heck those on both sides of the aisle get such a sweetheart deal already... we should have all been included in that one.
And just who voted them that sweetheart deal? They did. I think we need a process where such nonsense is put to a vote by the voters themselves.
I see no reason to give a one-term senator (or especially a Congress person) lifetime pension, health care and other benefits. None of us get that... we get "voted out" by management and we're up the creek without a paddle. They get voted out and they get a pretty fantastic parachute.
I'm a left winger, but I agree with many on the right... until we return to a system where (1) politics is not a lifetime career and (2) the money from all lobbyists (corporations, unions and even environmental groups) is eliminated, we will continue to get a system that is deplorable.
This appears to be nothing
Mon, 03/22/2010 - 22:28 — Chip (not verified)This appears to be nothing more than a "land grab" by the government. They seem to be using their power to usurp the will of the majority of Americans, and do as they wish. They are resorting to "reconciliation" because there is no way this would have passed through normal means.
It is amazing to me that anyone can truly think this is a good thing.
Forget calling names - "brown shirt, fear mongers" - and focus on one simple question. Name one thing the government has ever taken over that got better over the long run?
My misgivings are that this will only grow and grow; as all government subsidies have done. I just wonder to what end?
Like a gun, this bill is not evil...it is those behind it that we must concern ourselves with, and I believe our freedoms are in their sites.
Escape the illusion indeed.
To 03:28, who asked: "Name
Wed, 03/24/2010 - 15:49 — Liced-Christ (not verified)To 03:28, who asked:
"Name one thing the government has ever taken over that got better over the long run?"
Name one thing the government created and ran that was subsequently funded properly once it had been established so that it could continue to grow and improve itself.
Chip, you need to study the health care system of France which is 80% government operated and 20% privatized. It was rated the best in the world (U.S.A sunk to #37!) by the WHO back in 2001 (the last year they rated health care systems). You also need to study the tremendous socialist systems in Europe and Scandinavia and Japan. Of course, if you get your information from Fox News it may be too late for you to attain salvation from your ignorance.