House Republicans Schedule Health Care Repeal Vote for Next Week

by: Nadia Prupis, t r u t h o u t | Report

House Republicans announced Monday that they would vote to repeal President Obama's health care overhaul on January 12.

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Virginia), the incoming House Majority Leader, made the announcement after Republicans posted the proposed legislation, "Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act," on the House Rules Committee web site.

"Obamacare is a job killer for businesses small and large, and the top priority for House Republicans is going to be to cut spending and grow the economy and jobs," Cantor spokesperson Brad Dayspring said in a statement. "Further, ObamaCare failed to lower costs as the president promised that it would and does not allow people to keep the care they currently have if they like it. That is why the House will repeal it next week."

Rather than replacing Obama's health care legislation, the Republicans' bill tasks four committees with crafting a replacement health care bill. The repeal bill requires the replacement legislation to include certain provisions, including lowering insurance premiums, ensuring that people with preexisting conditions receive access to affordable coverage, eliminating wasteful spending and fostering economic growth. The provisions would also prohibit taxpayer coverage of abortions and provide "conscience protections" for doctors.

Senate Democrats have promised to block repeal efforts, and a repeal would surely not withstand President Obama's veto pen.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) wrote in a letter to incoming House Speaker John Boehner, "We urge you to consider the unintended consequences that the law's repeal would have on a number of popular consumer protections that help middle class Americans."

In particular, Democrats have expressed concern over the fate of the Medicare "doughnut hole," should the repeal pass. Under the current health care law, Medicare recipients who have a gap in their coverage will receive a discount when purchasing brand-name drugs. "If House Republicans move forward with a repeal of the healthcare law that threatens consumer benefits like the 'donut hole' fix, we will block it in the Senate," Reid stated in his letter. "Taking this benefit away from seniors would be irresponsible and reckless at a time when it is becoming harder and harder for seniors to afford a healthy retirement."

Reid noted that many of the law's provisions have not yet gone into effect.

"This proposal deserves a chance to work," Reid wrote. "It is too important to be treated as collateral damage in a partisan mission to repeal health care."

The letter was co-signed by Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), Democratic Vice Chairman Charles Schumer (D-New York), Conference Secretary Patty Murray (D-Washington) and Policy Committee Vice Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan).

House Democrats are also developing plans to fight the repeal. The Hill reported that Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vermont) sent a memo to his colleagues urging them to co-sponsor amendments protecting important aspects of the health care law, to be presented during the House Rules Committee meeting.

"We intend to offer a series of amendments to their bill at the Rules Committee that will preserve critical provisions of this landmark law that have broad public support," Welch wrote in the memo.

Welch's amendments include preserving the elimination of lifetime limits, coverage of individuals up to age 26, free preventive care and access to coverage for those with preexisting conditions.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Nadia Prupis is Truthout's Media Policy Reporting Fellow.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Don't worry, our heroic

Don't worry, our heroic corporate Democrats will outflank the corporate Republicans - agreeing to repeal flawed legislation.



Hahahaha..Maybe PresBObama

Hahahaha..Maybe PresBObama gets it now--what we tried to caution him about, changing his change and agenda for worship at the [fake] 'bipartisanship/god/altar.Common sense could not prevail-may the awakening be real and time to play catchup.



won't somebody please

won't somebody please package an explanation of the health care plan in a form that can be absorbed for the average person to understand its value if any



00:40- good idea.Let's start

00:40- good idea.Let's start with not being denied access to insurance/care for preexisting conditions.Most everyone alive has preexisting conditions--it goes with your heredity that the insurance companies track very,very closely b/c statistically you have a 50%+ likelyhood of having those conditions.



00:40..[lost post]..this

00:40..[lost post]..this mean$ YOU and everyone else will NOT have to entirely pay for someone else's care thru YOUR taxS b/c they were denied insurance--they will have to participate in their own care to a degree.That would be reason #2. B/c if they are denied care by the insurance B$CEO/corportions, these insurance companies remove themselves from paying. They fool their premium payers into thinking they are not paying either--but this is not true.The genuine-flesh-and-blood-individuals--[not the corporate individuals] pay for care to other flesh-and-blood-individuals.



#3 call it the Polio reason:

#3 call it the Polio reason: don't much care if your neighbor or his kids get ill? Why $pend on them? Their problem if they cannpt take care of themselves?? You should b/c, as we learned mid-last-century--if s/he gets oplio, you/r kids chances of contracting it are also very high to very good, ditto tuberculosis, flu, etc...so spend the few $$ to make sure everybody gets a certain amount of basic care and protection..and guess what, you and yours are also safe and protected--everyone PROFITS. Imagine that??



Let them start by repealing

Let them start by repealing their own.

Funded by the taxpayers, after all. The socialists.



does this law articulate

does this law articulate ,what is a reasonable profit for the insurance companies and enforce that or what ,do the execs take bonuses out of this windfall or what, so far there isn't one organ of the us govt that's not politicized ,its sounds promising but so did Obama



Who cares? The Senate will

Who cares?

The Senate will reject this ideological BS.

Where are the jobs, Boehner?

Are you too busy stealing healthcare away from the needy to create them?



I'm still trying to

I'm still trying to understand where the liberal Democrats get there facts. Surly not from history and surly not from using their brain. I totally escapes me. I understand things like E=MC2, the theory of relativity. My IQ is 137 but but I still don't under the Liberals. They listen to to many opinions instead of thinking for themselves.



As usual, Eric Cantor is a

As usual, Eric Cantor is a spreading G-NO-P think tank lies.



Louboutin

The particular big day correlates with all the gathering of your Kuwait constitution annive