Hundreds of National Guard Troops to Be Deployed to US-Mexico Border
Wednesday 21 July 2010
by: Yana Kunichoff, t r u t h o u t | Report

(Photo: Spc. Karen Kozub / The National Guard)
Hundreds of National Guard troops are expected to begin their deployment to the US-Mexico border on August 1 as part of the Obama administration's attempt to halt the flow of weapons, cash and people to El Norte.
In a joint announcement with the National Guard Bureau, the Obama administration said it will send 1,200 troops to border regions, as per an agreement made in May. The soldiers are expected to go to Arizona, Texas, California and New Mexico.
The announcement of a firm date for the troop surge comes on the tail of the federal governments suit against Arizona over its anti-immigrant law SB 1070, which would allow police to question anyone they suspect of being an undocumented immigrant, and as drug-related violence in Mexico continues unabated.
The decision to further militarize the border is a cornerstone of American policy both at home and in the region, said David Bacon, a journalist who has reported extensively on the plight of migrants in Mexico, the United States and the Philippines, along with the macro political events pushing their movement.
At home, the seemingly contradictory nature of the administration further militarizing the border while simultaneously going to court to stop a law which targets undocumented immigrants who cross the border was "simply Obama trying to cover his right flank politically."
"Will it stop people from crossing the border?" Bacon asked, of the administration's plan. "No, how could it - it doesn't deal with why people cross the border in the first place. This is the worst kind of political theater."
Janet Napolitano, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and former Arizona governor, said the troops heading to the border will be equipped with enhanced security technology like thermal-imaging binoculars and observation aircraft to focus on the area around Tucson.
Arizona will also be where the largest number of troops, 524, are deployed. Meanwhile, of the rest of the volunteer force, 224 will be sent to Texas, 224 to California and 72 to New Mexico.
In addition, 300 agents and officers from the United States Customs and Border Protection will also head to the border, according to Alan Bersin, Customs and Border Protection commissioner.
The Border Patrol, which grew from 9,000 agents in 2001 to 20,000 in 2009, costs an estimated $4 billion annually. The cost of this deployment will be shared between the Department of Homeland Security and the Defense Department.
These forces will be stationed along more than 670 miles of border fence, walls, spikes and bollards being constructed since 2006, at an estimated cost of $4 billion.
While the focus of border enforcement is also to stop the smuggling of drugs and other illegal substances into the United States, the conversation politically has centered on stemming the flow of undocumented immigrants. "Sealing" the border has long been a precondition for any immigration legislation considered and with immigration reform now on the table, Obama has taken up the mantle of a stronger border.
In his speech on the subject earlier this month, Obama called the state of US borders "porous" and "broken," said that controlling them was an "obligation" and a "responsibility" and noted that the nation has "more boots on the ground near the Southwest border than at any time in our history."
According to Bacon, if the administration wanted "to start picking apart border enforcement, you have to look at why people are crossing the border in the first place. Poverty in Mexico, trade agreements, structural adjustment policies we imposed through the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, the North American Free Trade Agreement and encouraging the Mexican government to break trade unions" while at the same time "it is virtually impossible to get a visa to the United States."
Reading Truthout on your smartphone is easy. Click here to sign up for email updates.
Despite the little enforcement policies do to remedy the root causes of migration, said Bacon, they have become an essential part of any immigration bill because they are not used "not to reduce the pressure on people to migrate, but to pressure them into migrating based on corporate friendly programs."
These programs, Bacon continued, are what could be called "corporate labor supply bills. Basically, they are built around the idea that employers need immigrant labor, they should get it and they should get it at any price that they want to pay."
In addition, he said, many undocumented immigrants who would otherwise travel back and forth between Mexico and the United States think twice before doing so because the journey north again is dangerous and expensive.
A report released in 2002 by Princeton University sociologist Douglas Massey, with Jorge Durand and Nolan J. Malone, also argued that the border buildup discouraged seasonal laborers from going back home when they were not working, thus, increasing the number of people who reside without status in the United States.
Despite most political conversation to the contrary, recent reports have shown that, in the past year, undocumented immigration has declined by nearly one million, supporting the arguments of those who say that immigration depends on the economy, not on American policies or border walls.
The exact role of the National Guard troops is unclear. In a statement, Napolitano said the troops "will provide direct support to federal law enforcement officers and agents working in high-risk areas to disrupt criminal organizations seeking to move people and goods illegally across the southwest border."
Bersin, commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, said the soldiers are "there to support the efforts of law enforcement, not to have a direct law enforcement role."
Regardless of whether the National Guard troops' work is largely administrative or assists in picking up migrants, Bacon says the one thing that they won't be doing is protecting the most vulnerable group on the border.
As the border becomes filled with people with guns, most of whom are troops, it becomes " a very dangerous place for migrants, increasing their risks of getting shot or seriously injured in the process" of crossing, Bacon said. The Border Patrol are "not there to keep woman from being raped or people from having their life savings stolen" as they run from hunger and poverty in Mexico.
The concentration of troops near city points such as Tucson "forces migrants into rural areas, so people have to walk further and further." Rather than deterring people, Bacon said, "today, the average border crossing takes several days" of walking through the desert.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Poor guys...hope they are
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 16:45 — Mel (not verified)Poor guys...hope they are ready for a heat worse than Iraq's!!! Will they expel Ready's neo nazi group or are even they burnt enough to know when to go home for the season?
Hah! Do they really think
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 16:49 — Anonymous (not verified)Hah! Do they really think those National Guard troops can keep us in?!
While it would really make
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 17:53 — brother_unknown (not verified)While it would really make sense to bring back a division or two of troops from foreign lands where they subsist at taxpayer expense and put them to work guarding the border, all that has happened here is that we have increased the military payroll. The inevitable outcome given the US is almost bankrupt, as described by Jay Cuze in his book, 2011: The Military Takeover of American democracy, is just that a military takeover at our insistence. Let's make the implicit, explicit.
I wonder how many of them
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 18:05 — Anonymous (not verified)I wonder how many of them are Hispanic?
% of Hispanics in National
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 18:23 — Mel (not verified)% of Hispanics in National Guard:
from Puerto Rico: 99 %
New Mexico: 35 %
California: 30 %
Texas: 29 %
New Jersey: 23 %
Arizona: 21 %
Florida: 20 %
New York: 20 %
So Mel 277 % of the National
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 19:57 — Anonymous (not verified)So Mel 277 % of the National Guard are Hispanic ?
Once again, the young lady
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 22:00 — Anonymous (not verified)Once again, the young lady for Chicago tells us what's going on along the border. All she knows is what Corporate media tells her, that troops cannot stop illegal immigration. Here is a great article that exposes this myth.
Defending America at the Border
The corporate media in the USA is extremely powerful and dumbs down all Americans. They want cheap labor pouring across US borders to drive down wages, so they invent simple phrases to confuse Americans. "We are a nation of immigrants" is a meaningless phrase used to end rational discussion about what is best for the American people. England and Mexico are also nations of immigrants. In fact, most scientists agree that man originated from a spot in Africa, so every nation on Earth is a nation of immigrants and everyone's ancestors were immigrants. Even the misnamed "native Americans" came from Asia, albeit a few thousand years before those from Europe.
US citizens are not demanding new immigration laws, they just want the federal government to enforce existing laws. If the nation needs more immigrants, quotas can rise and those selected screened for diseases, criminal records, and motives. People who break the law by entering the US illegally, then break more laws by working illegally using false identification, do not qualify as potential good citizens. To keep the gates for cheap labor open, corporate television along with corporate sponsored politicians have used irrational slogans to convince many Americans that putting US troops on the border is unconstitutional, illegal, impractical, dangerous, and futile. This is why the few thousand "National Guardsmen" recently deployed to the border are prohibited from guarding the nation; they can only perform menial chores. Let us review these myths:
The rest is here http://www.g2mil.com/border.htm
Ms Yana, you sound foolish
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 22:07 — Carl (not verified)Ms Yana, you sound foolish writing:
"The Border Patrol, which grew from 9,000 agents in 2001 to 20,000 in 2009, costs an estimated $4 billion annually."
They you write:
"Despite most political conversation to the contrary, recent reports have shown that, in the past year, undocumented immigration has declined by nearly one million, supporting the arguments of those who say that immigration depends on the economy, not on American policies or border walls."
Yes the economy is bad, but no sane person would argue that doubling the number of border patrol agents had no impact. Our military has 1,400,000 plus 1,000,000 civilians and millions of contractors. Perhaps some of those could engage in true "national defense" like in South Korea, where illegal immigration from the North is zero.
No, the percentages are for
Wed, 07/21/2010 - 22:28 — Anonymous (not verified)No, the percentages are for each state -- that's why 99% of Puerto Rico's National Guard are Hispanic! 25% of New Mexico's NG are Hispanic, 30% of California's, and so on,
England and Mexico are also
Thu, 07/22/2010 - 01:39 — maarthaardy (not verified)England and Mexico are also nations of immigrants. In fact, most scientists agree that man originated from a spot in Africa, so every nation on Earth is a nation of immigrants and everyone's ancestors were immigrants. Even the misnamed "native Americans" came from Asia, albeit a few thousand years before those from Europe."Despite most political conversation to the contrary, recent reports have shown that, in the past year, undocumented immigration has declined by nearly one million, supporting the arguments of those who say that immigration depends on the economy, not on American policies or border walls."
colopure cleanse review
http://www.wellnessstarts.com/colopure-cleanse.html
41 years ago this week, we
Thu, 07/22/2010 - 07:41 — Pere Ubu (not verified)41 years ago this week, we sent three men to the Moon in a program that cost us $4 billion total and injured or killed essentially no one. Now we spend $4 billion yearly on a Draconian border policy of walls and militarization which injures or kills thousands, full of sound and fury but signifying nothing against the corporate interests that make their profits off the backs of cheap undocumented labor.
Just thought I'd mention that.
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION CAN BE
Thu, 07/22/2010 - 10:45 — cheyennebode (not verified)ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION CAN BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY....IF WE HAD ANY REAL LEADERSHIP..AMERICA IS GOVERNED BY A HERD OF APPEASERS...THE ONE ASSET THAT AMERICA LACKS IS ONE HUMAN BEING THAT IS A NATURAL BORN AUTHENTIC LEADER...THAT IS BEING HELD BACK BY ALL THOSE GREEK GODS THAT PULL HUMANITIES PUPPET STRINGS.
"Immigration control is
Sat, 07/24/2010 - 17:02 — Dennis Wilson (not verified)"Immigration control is UN-Constitutional!" http://tinyurl.com/yeyd7kq And so is Drug Control, for all the same reasons! That means that ALL the Federal “laws” regulating immigration and drugs are themselves ILLEGAL! The PROPER course of action for Arizona and other states is to invoke the 10th Amendment and NULLIFY the Federal drug and travel prohibitions within their state’s boundaries.
The Constitution is SUPPOSED to be the supreme law of the land. If the Federal government is allowed to break "the law", why should WE be required to obey it? Where does that leave statements about "The Law APPLIES TO EVERYONE" or “Enforce the existing laws”? What happens when the government makes and “enforces” UN-constitutional, i.e. ILLEGAL laws? We saw what happened during alcohol prohibitions--and those laws actually WERE constitutional laws! We have prohibition and we have violence. We repealed prohibition and the violence stopped—immediately! Gee, is it really that simple? Could REPEAL really work again?
BEFORE drugs were artificially made illegal there were no black markets in drugs, there were no drug lords and there were no gun fights over drug territories. And BEFORE the established border crossings were closed with armed guards— BEFORE un-constitutional “laws” were created making travelers “illegal” —there were no “illegal” immigrants (or “illegal” migrant workers) and no trespassers over private lands and thru deserts because it was easier and safer to cross at the long established, public border crossings.
“Illegals” only have that status because the Federal government created “laws” that are un-constitutional and therefore are “illegal” themselves. The WRONG THINGS are being called “illegals”!
Today’s problems are no different from the problems CREATED by the government’s Prohibition of Alcohol. (See http://tinyurl.com/ProhibitionFailed-Again for details).
It is US drug prohibition that created the Mexican Drug Lords—just like US alcohol prohibition created Al Capone and his ilk--and it is continued US drug prohibition that makes them rich.
The SOLUTION that nobody wants to talk about is the SAME solution that our grandparents used. The ONLY solution that WILL work is the same one that DID work: REPEAL! REPEAL THE PROHIBITIONS!! The violence stopped IMMEDIATELY for our grandparents and it will do so for us.
fake purses
Wed, 09/19/2012 - 07:23 — rarpZome (not verified)purchase replicas purses online JEFIKwbq http://www.replica-purses.us/
ugg boots coupons
Sun, 10/14/2012 - 05:34 — jeonunda (not verified)ugg boots coupons suprisely gehzdHLM http://www.ugg-coupon-code.com/
ugg coupon
Mon, 10/15/2012 - 00:23 — Shigobip (not verified)ugg coupon suprisely NXnwDVLx http://www.ugg-coupon-code.com/
online designer fashion
Fri, 10/26/2012 - 13:36 — Shampups (not verified)I am sure you will love designer boutique online with confident WcNXOBdZ http://designerhandbagsonline.clammo.com/
shop designer online
Sat, 10/27/2012 - 01:58 — kabsVops (not verified)order an designer handbags online for promotion code qwqtnGJW http://designerhandbagsonline.clammo.com/
cheap christian louboutin outlet
Tue, 02/05/2013 - 00:43 — Omimbgam (not verified)buy christian louboutin outlet online UcEQXdvg [URL=http://www.christian--louboutin-outlet.net/ - christian louboutin outlet shop [/URL - online WKuaEuxk http://www.christian--louboutin-outlet.net/