If the Choice Is a CEO, Obama Should Say No

by: Paul Krugman, Krugman & Co. | Op-Ed

If the Choice Is a CEO, Obama Should Say No
(Cartoon: KESHAV / The Hindu - New Delhi, India)

There has been a great deal of speculation in the media lately about whether President Barack Obama will, or should, decide to appoint a former chief executive officer to take over for Lawrence H. Summers, the director of the National Economic Council.

Mr. Summers announced in late September that he will be leaving at the end of the year.

Now, obviously, Mr. Obama should simply choose someone who can do a good job as his top economic adviser. Forget about image, or the message the appointment would supposedly send — there are about 600 people in the United States who care, and most of them are paid to care about these sorts of things.

Is having been a successful C.E.O. a good qualification for this job? The answer is no.

For one thing, the director of the economic council is supposed to serve as a coordinator and honest broker of competing views — not, or at least not primarily, as a decision maker. One of the widely repeated complaints about Mr. Summers was that he supposedly wasn’t sufficiently willing to let others air their views. That is not what C.E.O.’s are paid to do — their job is to be decisive, not to summarize other people’s arguments.

Beyond that, the idea that business executives know what the economy needs is just wrong.

In 1996 I wrote an article for Harvard Business Review titled “A Country Is Not a Company.” The theme was that economic policy requires a very different kind of thinking from that needed to formulate company strategy. Companies are open systems, selling the vast bulk of what they produce to other people; companies are able to draw in resources from outside, mostly at will. Countries — even small countries — mainly sell within themselves and must make the most of their labor, land and capital.

Beyond that, companies — even if they have relatively decentralized management — are top-down organizations in which people do what they’re told.

Market economies are free-for-alls, in which policy can be used to implement changes largely by providing incentives to do things (and yes, that’s true even if we’re talking about monetary policy and fiscal stimulus).

I have no doubt that a really smart C.E.O. could master enough economics to do the job, but so could a really smart engineer, or a really smart singer-songwriter.

Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.

Experience as a business executive is no preparation for managing the economy.

And no, I am not a good candidate.

Aside from the fact that I’m in a pretty good place for influencing public discussion right now, the job does come with some administrative responsibilities, and it also, obviously, requires significant bureaucratic skills.

Alas, I don’t have them. 

------------------------------------

Backstory: A Short List, a Massive Task

As President Barack Obama looks ahead to this November’s midterm elections, his most daunting challenge has been convincing a recession-weary public that he and the Democratic Party have indeed put the economy on the right track over the past two years.

The unemployment rate in the United States hit 10.1 percent in October 2009 — a high not seen since 1982 — and, despite the fact that the recession officially ended more than a year ago, the economy remains sluggish.

If that was not enough to make voters skeptical, by the end of this year, three of Mr. Obama’s original four economic advisers will have left his administration. Over the summer, Peter R. Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Christina D. Romer, chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers, resigned in close succession, and in September National Economic Council director Lawrence H. Summers announced that he will return to his tenured post at Harvard University in January.

While Mr. Summers’s announcement came as no surprise — when he joined Mr. Obama’s team in 2008, he said that his stay would only be temporary — his resignation no doubt pleases some Republicans in Congress who have publicly demanded a revamping of the Obama administration’s economic team for months.

White House insiders have suggested that Mr. Obama will appoint a prominent business leader to Mr. Summers’s post in order to counter the impression that the Obama administration disfavors Wall Street. Amid the media speculation about this possibility, several names consistently top the list, with not one economist in the bunch — Citigroup chairman Richard Parsons, General Electric chairman and C.E.O. Jeffrey Immelt and former Xerox C.E.O. Anne Mulcahy among them.

A decision is expected after the November elections.

Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

Paul Krugman joined The New York Times in 1999 as a columnist on the Op-Ed page and continues as a professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University. He was awarded the Nobel in economic science in 2008.

Mr Krugman is the author or editor of 20 books and more than 200 papers in professional journals and edited volumes, including "The Return of Depression Economics" (2008) and "The Conscience of a Liberal" (2007).

Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Paul Krugman you should go

Paul Krugman you should go for it, if there is really any way you would be chosen. You can learn what you do not know faster than the ceo's can learn the economics needed for the job.



Unfortunately, there was

Unfortunately, there was little protest when Obummer appointed Summers and very nearly Robert Rubin, both of which should have been impeachable offenses as far as the American people are concerned. But hey, let's give them credit, they either don't know (media) or don't care (media).



If Obama selects a CEO, what

If Obama selects a CEO, what does it say about his view of America in this era of corporatism, of Citizens United vs FEC, of that business model which has given us Goldman Sachs, Monsanto, Bechtel, BP, Countrywide, etc? So far it's clear Obama has no qualms about utilizing those people who have a very narrow view of who deserves to realize the American dream. It remains to be seen what the next two years hold for the American economy. Americans should demand that his choice reflect his copious rhetoric.



President Obama should ask

President Obama should ask Robert Reich to take this critical job!!



Please, not another feather

Please, not another feather their own nest insider. Please no revolving door from the corporate board room to the white house then back. Please.



I'm sure there are hundreds

I'm sure there are hundreds of Jr. Colleges filled with economics teachers smarter than Summers, Geithner and Bernanke.



Aaaahh, right. We don't

Aaaahh, right. We don't want the White House to look like it disfavors Wall Street. Did I read that wrong?



Obama needs to stop hiring

Obama needs to stop hiring just for credentials. All of that is useless if the hire lacks the moxy to get the job done. Ladder climbers, arm chair quarterbacks and big talkers are killing this country.



Rubin, Summers and Geithner

Rubin, Summers and Geithner all need to get another line of work. They have been disastrous for the ordinary citizens of this country. What Obama needs is someone who can put the country back onto a solid and sustainable economic footing, someone who thinks long-term about the predicament of the millions of people who are ignored by both parties and (in spite of all the rhetoric) by Obama himself. There is NO republican who cares about the general welfare of the country and ordinary citizens. It is against the religion of Social Darwinism which is the very foundation belief of Republicanism. Their 'christianity' might take us to hell but they, like Summers et al, will never abandon that belief. We've got one out. Two to go. Let's keep at it.



I would certainly like to

I would certainly like to see a LOT more of Disfavoring Las Vegas East -- whoops! I mean Disfavoring Wall Street. I am hoping that very, very soon, Geithner and Bernanke will follow their former colleagues out of the Obama cabinet.

I wish too that we, the people, would start demanding loud and clear that government "bailouts" will do more good for jobs and
infrastructure than for banks who only know about cheating. Are you listening Mr Obama?



Perhaps we could get "The

Perhaps we could get "The Donald" to read this article since he has virtually announced his candidacy for Prez on the basis that what this country really needs is the employment of a bunch of his super-shark biz-types to to get it on the right tract!



Obama must not be listening,

Obama must not be listening, or he wouldn't even mention CEO's for this job. Well, he's listening to the wrong people if he's concerned that he may be viewed as negative towards Wall St. Viewed by whom? Wall Street!



I voted for President Obama

I voted for President Obama and I find myself
hoping every day that he will have a long
talk with Paul Krugman and listen to him!
Just what we don't need is another CEO.
Come on Mr. President this is serious, not
a time to experiment!



Brooksley Burke

Brooksley Burke



I agree Brooksley Borne

I agree Brooksley Borne should be considered. Other comments:

1) If the economic indicators suggest that the recession ended over a year ago, we need different economic indicators.
2) The administration will win in 2012 if it "disfavors" Wall Street. Considering the disapproval rating for Congress is only slightly better than that for Wall Street, Obama should focus on doing what's right for policy and what's perceived to be right by VOTERS. Oh, geez, for a minute I actually forgot about Citizen's United.
3) As for the whole CEO as guru nonsense, you'd think anyone with a brain would be over that after the debacle of our so-called CEO President.
4) There are definitely business policy considerations (especially as small business creates the most jobs), and we have think tanks that are supposed to interact with business to incorporate them. But CEOs - even the best among them - know profits and shareholders (and occasionally customers). They don't know policy from a darn hole in the wall.



Why wait till after

Why wait till after elections?

Because he most likely has already made up his mind to pick yet another CEO type. He can't make the announcement now because then even more Democratic voters would stay home on Election Day.

Obama is a traitor to the Progressive movement and is nothing but a Blue Dog DINO-Fascist. He MUST be voted out of office during the Democratic Presidential Primaries. Everyone, please stop pretending otherwise.



Another CEO speaking into

Another CEO speaking into the ear of the President on national economic policy in now an era of vast disparity between the corporate rich and the rising rates of the poor, and an alarming unemployment rate to boot, is an outright DISGUSTING decision, Mr. President!!!

You have an array of excellent, well-educated and broadly-based experienced national economic policy individuals with which to chose from, sir, like Robert Reich, Joseph Stiglitz, or Paul Krugman (despite his said protest.) You are flatly obfuscating your Presidential duty to our republic if you ONLY consider the needs of corporations while seeking to fill this pivotally critical post!!!



Standard on every piece of

Standard on every piece of literature about any mutual fund is a notice that past performance is not an indicator of future performance. But since there are few other indicators, that is one that most people go on.

The same thing goes with CEO's in government positions. Just because every one of them in the last ten years has totally screwed up is not an indicator that others are incompetent. I give as examples Cheney, Snow, Rumsfeld, Bush, jr., Paulson, Summers and others that don't come to mind, but if they were competent, they would stand out against the crowd. But given their consistent performance, it is a good bet that there is something about CEO's that is antithetical to being able to perform competently at a governmental level. The country cannot afford to run an experiment to see if there are competent CEO's in existence.



Unimployed Singer songwriter

Unimployed Singer songwriter applying for the job

QUALIFICATIONS

not a CEO
Not rich
Not a cheat
Not a lire
Not a politician
Not religious
Not a lobbyists

I give myself a B grade for common sense



Kevin, who you got to

Kevin, who you got to replace Obama? Yes, it matters.



Hey, all you sensible,

Hey, all you sensible, conscientious problem-solvers! Read C. Wright Mills's totally amazing "Power Elite" (yeah; from 55 years ago), but don't despair. Smart people all over the country (like most of you) are figuring out that CEOs are a COMPLETE WASTE! They aren't needed and are a drain on resources of the companies they "head". Get a clue, America. Time to lay off the real slackers; you, too, Mr. President.



outlet coach handbag

for coach outlet for less VMjYBhxN http://www.coach-outlet--online.org/



xfvxucv

vjpnhrua



zgrrqgio

xvzpjlz