If Troops Are Pulling Out, Where Are the Parades?
Tuesday 10 August 2010
by: Robert Weiner & Noah Merksamer | Orlando Sentinel | News Analysis

(Photo: Sgt. Timothy Kingston / U.S. Army)
Where are the Iraq troops that have been withdrawn under the Obama administration's plan?
To draw attention to the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson, a Democrat from Orlando, and U.S. Rep. John Conyers, a Democrat from Michigan and chair of the House Judiciary Committee, have co-sponsored legislation to limit defense spending to $548.9 billion and use the savings to eliminate federal income taxes on the first $35,000 of every American's income.
Grayson is on a mission to end the Iraq War. As of Monday, 191 troops from Florida have been killed in Iraq, fifth most among the states, behind California, Texas, Pennsylvania and New York. He has filed successful lawsuits against Iraq War contractors and forced them to return funds to the government after they were found guilty of overbilling fraud.
We've spent $3 trillion on the war including post-war veteran rehabilitation. "The purpose of this bill is to connect the dots, and to show people in a real and concrete way the cost of these endless wars," Grayson has said.
But the real question is where are the withdrawn Iraq troops? Conyers has said, "It won't do any good if we just move the troops from Iraq to Afghanistan."
Do you like this? Click here to get Truthout stories sent to your inbox every day - free.
In a speech to veterans on Aug. 2, President Obama reiterated his plans to bring troops home. "I made it clear that by Aug. 31, 2010, America's combat mission in Iraq would end," he said. "And that is exactly what we are doing — as promised, on schedule." After the combat brigades are withdrawn, a transitional force made up of about 50,000 U.S. troops will remain in the country to support the Iraqi government.
This could be the hidden jewel for the Obama administration and the Democratic Party. It would represent American politics in the best sense of the word: This is what the American people wanted regardless of party. The American people elected Obama, in part, because of his commitment to a timeline to end the Iraq war.
But it's a stealth withdrawal. Where are the troops? Where are the celebrations of the homecomings of the withdrawn 70,000 men and women? Are they coming home or simply being sent to Afghanistan? Patriotic homecoming events in Orlando and cities across the nation would prove to the American people that the Iraq War is over; moving troops from one internal war in Iraq to another one in Afghanistan will just make them angry.
Democrats gained a majority in the House and Senate in 2006 largely because of their commitment to end the Iraq War. Americans could not then, and do not now, understand how misstating where al-Qaida and weapons of mass destruction are located justified going to Iraq, the location of neither. Because the 2010 midterm elections are only two months after the scheduled Iraq troop withdrawal date, a successful troop reduction in Iraq will be perceived as a promise kept and will help incumbents.
Even the withdrawal from Iraq, regardless of where-to, is far from a done deal. Obama must ignore the military excuse that poor ground conditions should delay the withdrawal. Take it for granted — conditions will be poor. Ethnic fighting won't end in 2010. "It is not our responsibility to have the Shiites, Sunnis and the Kurds love each other," said Grayson.
Conyers pointed out, "There has rarely been a general who hasn't wanted more troops and equipment or who has given up turf."
If Obama fulfills his promise to withdraw the troops by the end of August, and not simply move them to Afghanistan, it will reinvigorate the American people's faith in the election. But we want the parades.
Robert Weiner is a former spokesman for the Clinton administration and the House Government Operations Committee. Noah Merksamer is a policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
The parade is going to be
Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:35 — wimpy (not verified)The parade is going to be financed by Dick Cheney as soon as he is able to lift his enormous wallet. This invasion was to secure the Oil fields for his buds however the war in Afghanistan to secure his oil pipeline has taken a bit longer than anticipated so the parade will be short.
Parade? People have parades
Tue, 08/10/2010 - 19:50 — goobagooba (not verified)Parade?
People have parades anymore?
Since when does Halliburton or Chevron do anything but rip us off? Do I need to celebrate the behavior of Blackwater, since they did so much to exacerbate the work of the GIs sent there? For that matter, the National Guard is usually on reserve to help citizens in this country deal with catastrophes such as Hurricaine Katrina. Are there parades for the citizen volunteers who did the actual work there? Or would that draw too much attention to the chicanery the Federal Government is committing in the name of 'reconstruction?'
Until this country can focus on the people who do the real work here, and acknowledge and reward them, there is nothing to celebrate.
No Parades for
Tue, 08/10/2010 - 21:22 — Anonymous (not verified)No Parades for You!
Parades?
The parades for the Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan veterans are the same place that the parades for the Viet Nam, Laos and Cambodia veterans were.
We only have parades for veterans when we actually win the war.
(Yeah, yeah, veterans, we all know it's not your fault you lost the war. Nobody blames you personally.)
Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan veterans, no parades for you!
It's no secret that the
Wed, 08/11/2010 - 00:52 — Active Duty (not verified)It's no secret that the troops are being moved from Iraq to Af-Pak. Army, Marines, Air Force - even the Navy sends its Sailors individually over to assist on the ground.
We don't want parades. We just want to have something left of a country to come back home to when we finally do come back home.
The US military is the
Wed, 08/11/2010 - 08:42 — Bang (not verified)The US military is the largest corporation in the world. It calls its corporate divisions, 'branches of service'. It has a legal presence in almost every country in the world (and probably an illegal one in most others). Heck, they even have floating offices (several fleets), air-born offices (SAC) and even underwater offices (submarines). The leaders, unlike the Wall Street scum, don't get to skim off the top and steal directly from till. They have to keep conflicts active and promote potential threats to the status of immediate action (or the preparedness for that action) in order to retain a steady payday process. They don't have "stockholders" that they have to provide dividends to or show profits and growth to. They have us. The people that provide the funds for their wars (corporate ventures) as well as the resultant body count (reported losses).
As stated in the article, there are no military leaders interested in reducing the expense of their activities. They have no "budget" to be held to. If they fail in their objectives, they don't get laid off. There's no competition, no mergers, no acquisitions, no stockholders to answer to.... even the companies they use as contractors (mercenary/consultants) have no accountability to us citizens. And it appears that the only attributes displayed by these contractors, which consistently outperforms their patriotism, are dishonesty and ineptitude. Even Wall Street holds the feet of their contractors to the fire and has contractual penalties for failure to perform services. And if Wall Street ever found out that they were bilked ... would that contractor ever have access to another Wall Street opportunity? 'US Military, Inc.' has a staggeringly simple philosophy ... it is to perpetuate conflict and war. They learned it after the last truly successful patriotic effort they participated in, WWII. They realized, AFTER they came home, that war was more profitable than peace.