In West Virginia, Coal Miners' Slaughter

by: Michael Winship, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

In West Virginia, Coal Miners' Slaughter
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: ChuckHolton, designshard)

The high cost of energy in America was paid in human lives this week, with the deaths of more than two dozen miners in a massive explosion at the Upper Big Branch coal mine in West Virginia. It's the worst mine disaster in a quarter of a century.

Upper Big Branch is owned by Massey Energy Company, which operates 47 mines in central Appalachia. According to the Los Angeles Times, it employs nearly 6,000 and in 2009 reported revenues of $2.3 billion, with a net income of $104.4 million.

At the center of this week's catastrophe is Massey's president and CEO Don Blankenship, a man so reviled nowadays he had to be escorted away by police when he and other company officials tried to address a group of distraught family and friends outside the Upper Big Branch mine in the early morning hours after the explosion. The crowd hurled invective - and a chair.

Blankenship hates unions (Upper Big Branch is a non-union mine), thinks global warming is a figment of our imaginations and that those who do believe in climate change are crazy; supports destructive, mountain-top-removal mining; serves on the board of the conservative, free market U.S. Chamber of Commerce and now, lucky us, shares his pearls of right-wing wisdom via Twitter. "America doesn't need Green jobs," he tweeted pithily last month, "but Red, White, & Blue ones." David Roberts of the environmental magazine Grist described him as "the scariest polluter in the U.S. ...The guy is evil and I don't use that word lightly."

Just one example of Massey Energy's earlier history of environmental malfeasance was described in a May 2003 issue of Forbes Magazine: "In October 2000 the floor of a 72-acre wastewater reservoir built above an abandoned mine in Kentucky collapsed, sending black sludge through the mine and out into a tributary of the Big Sandy River. The sludge killed fish and plants for 36 miles downstream. Water supplies were shut down in several towns for a month. In total, 230 million gallons spilled out, 20 times the volume of the crude oil from the Exxon Valdez. Lawns nearby were covered in as much as 7 feet of muck...

"... The reservoir had shown signs of leaking right before the accident and Massey failed to report that fact to regulators as required, according to the U.S. Mine Safety & Health Administration. The cleanup has cost $58 million so far."

This week's Upper Big Branch mine disaster is the latest in a string of environmental and safety-related calamities linked to Massey and Blankenship. In 2008, the company paid a $20 million fine to the Environmental Protection Agency, and that same year, a Massey subsidiary, the Aracoma Coal Company, pled guilty to safety violations and agreed to $4.2 million in civil penalties and criminal fines connected to the 2006 deaths of two miners in a fire.

According to The New York Times, "After the fire broke out, the two miners found themselves unable to escape, partly because the company had removed some ventilation controls inside the mine. The workers died of suffocation. Federal prosecutors at the time called it the largest such settlement in the history of the coal industry."

The Upper Big Branch mine has a long history of violations. Last month alone it was cited by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration for 53 safety violations, many of them for inadequate venting of dust and methane and improperly maintained escape passages. Last year, the Times reports, "the number of citations against the mine more than doubled, to over 500, from 2008, and the penalties proposed against the mine more than tripled, to $897,325." So far, only $168,393 of those fines have been paid.

Blankenship's response? "Violations are unfortunately a normal part of the mining process," he told a radio interviewer. West Virginia and federal laws were toughened after the Sago mine disaster in 2006 that killed 12 men. But as the number of safety citations has increased, so, too, has the number of appeals by the mining companies, and while that long bureaucratic process unfolds, it's business as usual.

Blankenship and Massey Energy play our political system like a country fiddle, a system corrupted by money and influence. A certified public accountant (he's actually in the national CPA hall of fame - I'm not kidding), Blankenship apparently sees the world as one big balance sheet, with human life an expendable commodity and - especially if they're judges or other officials - something to be bought and sold. The non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics says that since 1990, those associated with Massey and its political action committee have given more than $300,000 in campaign contributions to federal candidates. And in 2006, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics, Blankenship spent more than $100,000 trying to elect pro-business candidates to the West Virginia state legislature.

But it's in the courthouse that Blankenship has really tried to spread the wealth. In 2008, photos were published of him wining and dining West Virginia Supreme Court Justice "Spike" Maynard along the Riviera. They were popping corks in Monaco as Massey Energy was before the court appealing a $50 million judgment that had been won by smaller mining companies charging Massey with fraud. Subsequently, Maynard recused himself from the case and was defeated for re-election. Now he's running for Congress.

Blankenship had better luck when he went on the offensive against West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Justice Warren McGraw, creating a PAC called "And for the Sake of the Kids." He contributed $3 million and created campaign ads described by USA Today as "venomous." They made particular hay with a case in which Justice McGraw was part of a majority that voted to free a mentally disturbed child molester, who got a job as a school janitor.

McGraw was defeated by Blankenship's candidate, Brent Benjamin. When the appeal of the $50 million came before the court, ABC News reports, "Justice Benjamin refused to recuse himself from the case and twice provided the deciding vote in Massey's favor. The jury verdict against Massey was overturned."

So egregious were Benjamin's actions that even the current United States Supreme Court, so heavily pro-business in its recent decision-making, was appalled. It ruled that the judge and Blankenship were out of line. Even so - and even with Benjamin finally recusing himself - on a third vote, Massey again won its appeal.

When you can't beat 'em, buy 'em. Meanwhile, miners working for Massey Energy and Blankenship continue to risk their lives deep below the earth, digging out the fuel that helps keep our lights burning at the price of never knowing if the tiniest of sparks will ignite the next fatal explosion.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Michael Winship is senior writer at Public Affairs Television.
 


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



I'm currently reading

I'm currently reading "Germinal" by Emile Zola. This is about the state of French mines and the excesses of mining interests in the 1860's. But there are resonances of "Germinal"in this Massey affair!



Think windmills: save lives,

Think windmills: save lives, endless pain & great amounts of eergy w/ these mines out of business. There is no clean coal ever possible.



The short stories of Breece

The short stories of Breece D'J Pancake present a beautiful but haunting picture of West Virginia... I also thought of this essay by George Orwell:
http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays/downthemine.htm

Because our civilization is so completely dependent of fossil fuels, in a direct way we owe everything to oil-rig workers and coal-miners like the ones this story is about.

The story is also another egregious example of the evils of the resurgent neoliberal 'free-market' (i.e., anti-union) climate in America. This Blankenship must be persecuted and jailed! He has robbed the mineworkers, and now essentially killed them. Is there no justice left in the US? I'm generally against violence, but in this case there is a class war, and Blankenship has demonstratively slaughtered a number of hard-working men. Throwing chairs at this creep is a form of self-defense.



Mr. Blankenship delivers! He

Mr. Blankenship delivers! He seems to be a super efficient man who gets things done - without tedious delays by petty safety measures or time consuming communication with stupid unions.

His could be a glorious career in North Korea! That country is really in need of people of his stamina and quality. Yeah, leaving for North Korea he will be laughing all the way to their concentration camps.
And we should not cry, we should try to get over the loss. Some parts of the world need people like him.



It is tragic how corporate

It is tragic how corporate interests have so convinced people to advocate against their own best interests.
One of the network news shows ran a clip of a West Virginia miner saying: "What am I supposed to do, put up a windmill in my backyard? I don't think so...we need the coal."
Actually, he should put up a windmill. Mountainous regions like West Virginia are very good candidates for wind energy production.
And for myself, the sight of a row of windmills along a mountain ridge is preferable to no mountain top at all.



Greg Scott -- you are so

Greg Scott -- you are so right. Solar panels, windmills, geothermal (tapping energy from under the ground) are ways that West Virginia could wean itself from coal mining as a source for jobs. If clean factory jobs hadn't moved away to lower labor cost countries, West Virginia could have a decent way to make a living. It is so evil for the corporations to steal the jobs away, knowing that desperate people would do desperate jobs (coal mining, totally unnecessary if we were to go solar) that benefit those predatory corporations with no regard for local economies. As Bob Dylan sang "We're just pawns ... in their games"



This is mainly to Greg, or

This is mainly to Greg, or any others who would make political points out of tragedy:

Have you ever been on the ground in WV? Ever been to Mountcoal or Red Jacket or talked to miners' families? It is specious and arrogant to tell them what they could do better with their land and their lives.

From the safety of your computer you can spout any talking points that you have never even thought about, but just give lip service to.

Show some respect. These people died doing their jobs and supporting their families. Would you take such a risk?



Bruce B: I would ask you the

Bruce B: I would ask you the same question, but turn it around. Not knowing your background, I'll take the risk and put it out: would you risk your life in the military to do your job and your duty, and support your family doing so?

Show some respect. These forums are open for public debate and Greg Scott made a fair observation: there are better ways for the world in general, not just West Virginia, to manage land and resources.

I am curious - what do all these miners and their families intend to do when the coal runs out? (As a non-renewable resource, it will, eventually, whether that's tomorrow or in another five generations.) It is in the best interests of the state to lead the way in retraining its fossil-fuel extractors for green energy production.

Securing America's energy independence from within: that will bring and keep our troops home, and allow us to rebild our shattered foreign reputation. Simultaneously, we could begin to honor the principles on which the Kyoto Treaty was signed, even if it is no longer in effect, and the effort of retooling and retraining will create many, many jobs in poverty-stricken Appalachia - and beyond.



Deborah: To answer your

Deborah:

To answer your question. Yes, I am an army vet and had started a family when I was drafted. I served, came home and got on with my life.

Please don't lecture me about respect. I have great respect for those workers. I have little respect for those that would tell others what to do.

"It is in the best interests of the state to lead the way in retraining its fossil-fuel extractors for green energy production." That is a rather telling statement of your position. What is in the best interests of the miners and their families? You would tell them what retraining they need? Or does the state know best?

What I am trying to say (poorly, perhaps) is that it is really up to the miners to make their own decisions.

Your last paragraph reads like it was cribbed from a grad student's thesis on the progressive agenda. Is our "shattered foreign reputation" being enhanced by our President apologizing to the world and bowing and scraping before oil despots and other two-bit cranks that we need a favor from?



My Lord but your stupid.

My Lord but your stupid. Bring in a Bill immediately that says criminal charges against the employers of worker deaths. Stop being so afraid.

Canada has Bill C-45 and it hasn't been legally tested yet, but is now with the deaths of men at a construction site. 29 JOBS VACANT! step right up!
Good Luck Appalachia.



Bruce B I am not talking

Bruce B

I am not talking about the miners killed in the explosion...the tradgedy there is the negligence of those responsible for the miners safety. Mining is a dangerous occupation, it does not need to be made more dangerous by ignoring established safety proceedures in the name of expediency.

What I am speaking to is the mindset that says that coal mining is a "necessary evil". You say the miners have a right to make a choice...I am saying do they understand, do we all understand, that there IS a choice. A lot of money...and partisan political rhetoric has gone into convincing Americans that there is NO choice, that "we need the coal"...the man quoted on network news seemed to believe that this is true.

I understand that it is very much in some coal and energy companies financial interests to convince people that there is no choice. But it is not necessarily in the best long term financial, health and energy independence interests of Americans...or in this particular case, the very personal interests of these miners and their families...to think that we can't do without mining coal.

Actually, we can. Alternative energy CAN power America. But I didn't learn this from ads from oil companies or coal companies...it's not in their interests...at least until they can invest in "green" technology. I had to do the numbers myself...and when I did, I learned that I could put enough solar panels on my roof to provide all my electricity needs and more.

Mining is historically a dangerous occupation. I don't think it is disrespectful of miners to point out that they, and all Americans have safer and less damaging choices to get the energy they need. Or to suggest that energy policies promoted by companies with vested financial interests are not necessarily best for miners... or for Americans in general.



To everyone: I should not

To everyone: I should not have joined this comment thread when I did. I was and still am, too mad/sad at the events to respond coherently.

However, no one has answered my basic question: Have you ever been on the ground in Mountcoal or Maitwan or Red Jacket, WV?

If you go, I would suggest that you keep the liberal platitudes well under wraps.