Iraqi Forces Struggling, Forcing US Troops to Fight

by: Shashank Bengali and Mohammed al Dulaimy  |  McClatchy Newspapers | Report

Iraqi Forces Struggling, Forcing US Troops to Fight
(Photo: U.S. Army; Edited: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t)

BAGHDAD — In the two weeks since President Barack Obama declared the end of the U.S. combat mission in Iraq, a series of bloody skirmishes has sharpened the questions about the Iraqi security forces' ability to protect the country.

In three incidents in different parts of Iraq, American forces stepped in with ground troops and air support when their Iraqi counterparts were threatened by suicide attackers or well-armed gunmen, according to U.S. and Iraqi military accounts.

The incidents suggest that the 50,000 U.S. soldiers who remain in Iraq, far from merely "advising and assisting" Iraqi forces, as the Obama administration has described their new role, are still needed on the battlefields as insurgents try to exploit the diminished American military presence and the six-month political stalemate that's failed to produce a new Iraqi government since the country's March 7 elections.

In one example of the challenges facing the Iraqi forces, an operation against at most 25 fighters dug into a palm orchard in Diyala province, northeast of Baghdad, escalated into an intense, three-day battle that left 11 Iraqi soldiers dead and 22 wounded. On the third day, Iraqi forces called for help from an American Army brigade, which sent Special Forces troops, Apache attack helicopters and Air Force F-16 fighters that dropped two 500-lb. bombs, the U.S. military said.

"If it wasn't for the American air support and artillery," said an Iraqi lieutenant, who described the battle to McClatchy on condition of anonymity to protect his job, "we would never have dreamed of entering that orchard."

Despite years of training by the U.S. military at a cost of some $24 billion, according to the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, the Iraqi forces have failed to win the public's confidence. Their performance lately has generated only criticism.

On Friday in Fallujah, 40 miles west of Baghdad in the heart of Sunni Muslim Anbar province, protesters condemned Iraqi security forces for a raid Wednesday that killed seven people, including a fifth-grade boy, and badly injured a woman in her 90s. U.S. ground troops and helicopters accompanied the Iraqis on the raid, which targeted a suspected Sunni insurgent, the U.S. military said.

"We hold the Iraqi government responsible for the unjustified excessive use of force," said Sheikh Hameed Jadoa, reading a statement issued by Fallujah's religious leaders, who called for a federal investigation into the incident.

On Sept. 5, suicide bombers riding in an explosives-rigged minibus attacked an Iraqi military facility in central Baghdad and killed 18 people. After one bomber detonated his explosive vest and the car bomb exploded outside the compound, two suicide bombers slipped past Iraqi guards and into the facility.

U.S. soldiers based on the site opened fire on the two men as Iraqi soldiers gave chase.

Rashwan al Hiti, 33, whose brother-in-law, an Iraqi Army sergeant, worked on the second floor of a building in the compound and was found shot in the head, was stunned that insurgents could penetrate a supposedly well-guarded government facility.

"Where are the guards, where are the (workers at) reception?" al Hiti said. "How do terrorists enter that building?"

When Obama announced the end of U.S. combat operations on Aug. 31, he voiced confidence in the Iraqi forces' readiness, saying they "have moved into the lead with considerable skill and commitment to their fellow citizens."

Although six U.S. brigades remain in Iraq with all the manpower and weaponry of combat brigades and rules of engagement that allow them to defend themselves if they're attacked, military officials now describe U.S. troops as "advisers." In joint operations, officials emphasize that Iraqi units are in the lead.

However, after the incident in Diyala that's been dubbed the Palm Tree Battle, the Iraqi lieutenant expressed exasperation at his unit's performance.

The fight in the village of al Hadayda, just west of the city of Baqouba, began on Sept. 11 after police reported fighters and a possible bomb-making site in the area, the lieutenant said. Fighters were dug into trenches in a one-acre grove, and the lieutenant's battalion called for backup when the 19th Brigade of the Iraqi Army immediately came under fire from snipers.

Reinforcements failed to stop the barrage of sniper fire and grenades. On the second day, when the Iraqis called for a mortar battery, the soldiers were "shocked" to find that the team wasn't armed with any mortars.

"Morale was down to the ground," he said.

It wasn't possible to verify the lieutenant's account independently. According to the U.S. military, the Iraqi army called for help that afternoon from a nearby U.S. advisory unit — a Stryker brigade from the 25th Infantry Division based in Wahiawa, Hawaii — which arrived at night with a burst of airpower and reconnaissance planes.

About 25 Special Forces soldiers helped cordon off the palm grove, said Lt. Col. Robert Forte, the deputy commander of the division's 2nd Advise and Assist Brigade. The soldiers met with Iraqi commanders as they planned a ground attack for the following morning.

Throughout the next day, Iraqi forces took fire from the fighters. Finally, U.S. planes bombarded the grove, and Iraqi soldiers moved in on the morning of Sept. 13, arresting 50 people, Forte said.

One of the Special Forces soldiers suffered non-life threatening injuries.

Forte praised the Iraqis' performance, saying that the commanders acted on their own intelligence and led the operation. The Iraqis also efficiently evacuated a wounded soldier from the battlefield, he said.

"It was deep, dense, jungle terrain, incredibly thick," Forte said. "The enemy forces . . . had a very effective defensive network, different hiding positions, different fighting positions. It was very difficult to fight in."

The Iraqis, however, remember the Palm Tree Battle differently.

"The number of fighters we faced wasn't more than 15," the lieutenant said in frustration.

"Three-quarters of our soldiers only care about their salaries. They have no readiness to fight. And to add to it, we have no good command that can plan and lead the army to victory."

Another soldier from his brigade had a simpler take.

"Bottom line," he said, "if it wasn't for God and the Americans, we would never have won this."

Dulaimy is a McClatchy special correspondent. Special correspondent Jamal Naji contributed to this report from Fallujah, Iraq, and a special correspondent who can't be named for security reasons contributed from Diyala province.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Morale SHOULD be down to the

Morale SHOULD be down to the ground. Why should Irakis want to fight to support an imperialist-resource-sucking entity on their land destroying their families, land, & world treasures forever??What the Irakis need is another Saddam to energize & rally them against the oppressor.Irakis donot need us, but we need them, so they let us do the dirty work.Of course.



We've lost the war to Iran

We've lost the war to Iran already, pull every goon, contractor, soldier out. Reinvest in the US!



Operation NudeOn disrobed

Operation NudeOn disrobed (with Agent Orange).



To correct .. the victims of

To correct .. the victims of Falluja assault a( mother and her three children ) and is documented with pictures



SURPRISE, SURPRISE,

SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE! This was predictable from the start if one looked through all the spin coming out from Washington. We keep pulling the wool over our own eyes and ignore the base of what Iraq society is all about. It's the same nonsense that led us into the invasion in the first place and had our greed to steal the oil become so great we ignored these factors. So things really have not changed that much and likely never will--according to our wishes. In the real world, things will happen the way Iraq society will dictate and we can do little to prevent this. We must wake up to the real world!



Please get all our troops

Please get all our troops out of there. The Iraqi people will have to suffer again and fight their own terrorists, but we are not helping with our presence there, and we are putting more people at risk, both Americans and Iraqis. Let us not forget that this was an illegal war started by a president we would all like to forget.



Geo. Bush and his henchmen

Geo. Bush and his henchmen ruined this country and its people. I don't know how that man can sleep at night.

We will never be rid of all the things we have broken. According to that moron Colin Powell, if we break it, we pay for it.



There never was a good

There never was a good reason to go into Iraq. The only result has been the profits made by the military industry and it's gang of affiliates. Meanwhile, millions of deaths have occurred, all for naught. And who paid for it? Well, you know who and guess what, we are still paying for it. And paying for Afghanistan too. Wonder why America is on a downward trajectory? Does the word "Fascism" mean anything to you? Are't you glad Citizen United is the new law of the land? There's no turning back now!



People seem to have

People seem to have forgotten, Iraq had an army, that was a least functional, at one point. But then the brilliant minds in Washington, and, of course, the brilliant Paul Bremer, decided that it would be better if Iraq had no army, so they sent all the soldiers home, with their guns, of course. And what did all those disaffected soldiers do? Why they joined the Insurgents, naturally.
In their dumb, misguided stupidity, the Bush administration decided anything that smacked of the Ba'athists and Saddam, had to go. That included the Army, and just about anyone Iraqi who had any professional qualifications. Hospitals lost doctors, universities lost professors, businesses lost businessmen. And the dismantling of a civilized country began.
And now, Iraq is back in the Stone Age. No electricity, no water, no doctors and no Army. So the U.S. Army has to do it for them. And will continue to do it, no matter what lies come out of Obama's mouth.
The U.S. is there to stay, folks. They don't build army bases the size of small cities in a country like Iraq, unless they plan to stick around for a long, long time.
There's a reason the new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad is the largest in the world. Iraq is the new 51st state, nicely situated in the middle of the Middle East, where America can keep it's eye on its best buddy Israel's interests, and right next to Iran, America's latest terrifying(?) enemy.
So if your boys are dying 'cos the Iraqi Army is incompetent, don't forget, the U.S. disbanded them, and then put together a new Iraqi army, and trained them to be absolutely useless in combat.
Withdrawal? Don't make me laugh. There are more mercenaries than U.S. Army personnel in Iraq already!



Surely, if any nation has

Surely, if any nation has taught us about the senselessness and futility of war, it is the Americans, and they hold the key to changing the world through disarmament.
If the American people were to democratically choose to lay down their arms, de-construct their ideology and denounce their materialistic Machiavellian philosophy of war and reconnect with the passion of Jesus Christ, the world will follow. Even the Ummah of Islam will follow and overthrow their Islamic Right Wing.
Until the US/UK Empirical approach to peace does a complete U-turn and disband their entire military force, there will NEVER BE PEACE and TRUE DEMOCRACY



The Bush Administration

The Bush Administration wasn't dumb. They got everything they wanted.

<> Sun, 09/19/2010 - 06:29 — Paul W

This war has been privatized, as you quite accurately pointed out, and secreted thereby, and the American people have paid (and will continue to pay) for the whole thing. We will pay for this latest exercise of paying US corporations to destroy a country for whatever given reason, and then pay the corporations to "rebuild" it (the shoddier the better, so repairs can be billed), with endless cost overruns and decisions in boardrooms, all with borrowed money from their banker friends who we also bailed out, and will bail out again. The US doesn't do "foreign aid".

Putting Saddam out of business because US corporate and banking interests didn't like the way he was tending the store was mission accomplished.

Shutting off the Iraqi oil supply to boost oil prices and thus the value of the US-Saudi petro-dollar was mission accomplished.

And, as you've astutely pointed out, Paul W., the US has, after an ILLEGAL invasion, forced upon Iraq military garrisons, because it is so "nicely situated in the middle of the Middle East, where America can keep it's eye on its best buddy Israel's [US proxy/cop on-the-beat] interests, and right next to Iran, America's latest terrifying(?) enemy."

The Regressive Neocons got all of this and more.

And now our government is on the verge of bankruptcy, with interest payments soon to exceed military spending, fully half of the US discretionary budget, with future debt-service obligations rising. The poor have been made poorer, the rich richer, and the looters have gotten away clean, with pensions and book deals and Secret Service protection to boot.

I mean you no offense here, brother, and mean you every respect, but if we think they were dumb, then we are the ones being dumb. If we think they are stupid, then we are the ones who are stupid.

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money,
first by inflation and then by deflation,
the banks and corporations that will
grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
(Thos. Jefferson)

"To initiate a war of aggression ... is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
(International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Germany - 1946)



Oh, what a surprise. Around

Oh, what a surprise.

Around and around and around we spin,
with feet of lead and wings
of tin.



Sorry, forgot to credit Kurt

Sorry, forgot to credit Kurt Vonnegut for that little rhyme.