Is it Almost Over? BP Will Try to Stop Oil Flow Next Week
Friday 09 July 2010
by: Mark Seibel | McClatchy Newspapers | Report

(Photo: BP)
Washington - In a dramatic turn of events, the Obama administration has given BP the go-ahead to remove the containment cap atop the runaway Deepwater Horizon oil well and replace it with a tighter fitting one in an attempt to stop all the oil now flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, perhaps as soon as the middle of next week.
If successful, no oil would gush into the Gulf of Mexico for the first time since soon after the Deepwater Horizon exploded in flames on April 20.
Thad Allen, the Obama administration's point man on the oil spill, said Friday that the current containment cap will be removed on Saturday and that installation of the new one would begin three or four days later.
Once the new cap is in place, engineers will attempt to stop any oil from flowing out.
"Our first goal," Allen said of the new containment device, "would be to shut . . the well in. In other words, close all the means of oil to escape."
It was unclear how, after more than 80 days, officials suddenly had a seeming solution to the gushing oil ready in a short period of time. While the new containment cap has been under construction for weeks, officials previously hadn't portrayed it as having such a potentially crucial role.
Allen didn't say how many days it would be before the cap would be in place, but a timeline that BP provided to Allen on Friday shows that if all things go as planned, BP would be able to close off the well five days after the old containment cap is removed.
If technicians encounter difficulties, that period might stretch to nine days, the timeline showed.
Bob Dudley, the BP executive in charge of the Gulf oil spill, said in a letter to Allen that included the timeline that switching the containment cap wouldn't begin until hoses are connected that would allow BP to add a third ship to collect oil from the blown-out well.
Allen, however, appeared satisfied that those preparations are well on the way to completion and that engineers "will likely be in a position to be able to start removing the current cap . . . tomorrow."
Just Wednesday, Allen had declined to lay odds on whether the Obama administration would approve the new containment cap, and Thursday he remained skeptical that BP would be able to close off the well until mid-August.
Allen laid the decision to the weather, saying forecasters are predicting a seven to 10-day window of calm weather.
"We think this weather window presents a significant opportunity for us to accelerate the process of capping — shutting down the well from the top and increasing the prospects for being able to kill the well from below through the relief wells," Allen said.
Allen also said other events had come together to assuage earlier concerns that capping the well at the top would cause damage to the well itself — a concern that caused officials to halt the so-called "top kill" effort in late May.
"If there is a problem and we have to release the pressure ... there'll be four different ways to take (crude out) . . . and produce it," lessening the pressure.
Allen described a multi-step process of robots unscrewing six bolts to remove the sheared-off riser pipe, strapping together two pipes that will remain so it's easier to fit the containment cap over them, then bolting the new contraption in place and sealing it with a valve.
There are, of course, no guarantees.
For one, while Allen talked of a seven to 10 days of calm weather, BP's timeline shows only an eight-day window — a window just barely long enough to accommodate the work if unbolting the well's riser pipe takes longer than the ideal.
BP also provided Allen with a list of backup plans should the new containment cap take longer to install than anticipated or not work as officials hope.
Among those, Dudley wrote, would be the stationing between the Deepwater Horizon site and the Gulf Coast of nearly 400 boats and more than 50 aircraft that would be expected to spot and scoop up the additional oil that would flow into the Gulf between the time the current containment cap is removed and the time the new one is installed.
The primary backup plan, however, is the completion of connections that would allow oil to flow from the Deepwater Horizon well's failed blowout preventer directly to the Helix Producer I drill ship. Those connections are in place, Allen said, and the Helix Producer may begin receiving oil as soon as Sunday.
Having the Helix Producer in place will help ease one immediate negative result of removing the current containment cap — once it's gone, the 15,000 or so barrels of oil a day that had been collected through it by the Discoverer Enterprise drill ship will spew directly into the Gulf until the new cap is in place.
Allen said, however, that by Tuesday the Helix Producer will be taking on at least as much oil as the Discoverer Enterprise was.
"We're hoping to mitigate the gap without having the capping device on by bringing the Helix Producer on board," Allen said.
Allen also said the new capping device will help officials determine whether the Deepwater Horizon's wellbore was damaged by the April 20 explosion and fire that raged for more than 36 hours after. The condition of the wellbore has been a concern for weeks. A damaged well bore would complicate plans to kill the well permanently by pumping heavy drilling mud into it through a relief well.
Allen said that with the cap in place and closed, technicians will be able to measure the pressure inside. A pressure of 9,000 pounds per square inch, engineers believe, will be a sign that no oil is leaking out of the wellbore. A lower pressure would indicate that oil and natural gas are leaking out of the wellbore into the surrounding seabed.
The decision to move ahead with capping the well also complicates the task of determining how much oil is leaking from the well. Previously, Allen had said that government scientists would have a better chance of refining estimates of the leak once three ships were in place with a capacity to collect 53,000 barrels of oil a day. Currently, government scientists have said the well is gushing between 35,000 and 60,000 barrels per day.
With the new cap sealing the well, however, Allen said government scientists would have to estimate the well's flow rate solely by knowing precisely the pressure within the cap.
In addition, Dudley also outlined a schedule for permanently sealing the well with heavy drilling mud and cement through the relief well by Aug. 13, a date more in line with what Allen and others have long said was the most likely timeline.
That schedule forecasts that drillers of the relief well will be within 100 vertical feet of where they hope to intercept the runaway well by Monday and that by a week later, they should be ready to drill into the well bore and begin pouring heavy drilling mud into the well's "annulus," the space between the wall of the well and the drilling pipe inside.
That process will take 10 days, BP estimated, after which drillers will enter the pipe itself and pump in drilling mud and cement, a procedure that will take 14 days.
On The Web
Letter from BP's Bob Dudley outlining plans to cap gushing well.
Transcript of Thad Allen's Friday briefing.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Will this nightmare of
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 11:23 — Anonymous (not verified)Will this nightmare of corporate greed and short-sightedness ever end?
And now Obama has just approved over a million acres in Alaskan wilderness for oil drilling.
Putting a containment cap on
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 12:50 — Anita Stewart (not verified)Putting a containment cap on this well will not stop the leak. The title of this article is distorting the facts and misleading. This simply means there will be a cap put on so it will be easier for BP to COLLECT the oil coming out.
maybe ,maybe not, just last
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 12:55 — Anonymous (not verified)maybe ,maybe not, just last week the cap that's on there now was knocked off completely ,its a loose fitting device that accounts for the considerable leakage,now they will install a tight fitting cap if they encounter the same lateral shifting forces they did last week the entire bop may be torn off its its mount but maybe not they could have gone to the trouble cementing a brace around the bop, but they have not
BP is working to fix the
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 12:59 — Robert Alft (not verified)BP is working to fix the leaking oil well in the Gulf of Mexico by 27 July, weeks before its publicly stated deadline.
The company is due to report second-quarter results that day.
I don't believe anything
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 13:04 — An (not verified)I don't believe anything anymore. And why is the price of gasoline goiong down, when the supply of oil is spilling away? We are the pawns in a large chess game, where we don't even know we are on the black or the white side, and even what other pieces are in the game. Democracy? hardly. Corpocracy? Definitely.
what about the oil coming
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 13:22 — ih8zionists (not verified)what about the oil coming out from the cracks of the floor? what about multiple sites where oil is gushing out? its not just one place, from what i've seen and heard the oil is not going to stop anytime soon. Sorry America, your leaders have let you down again.
"The decision to move ahead
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 13:29 — Anonymous (not verified)"The decision to move ahead with capping the well also complicates the task of determining how much oil is leaking from the well. " This is the object of the exercise. Since BP will be fined according to how much oil has leaked, the cap will make that determination impossible. Will the new cap stop the oil leak? If the well casing is already damaged and oil and methane are leaking from fissures in the sea bed, it could make the problem unimaginably worse. This is an incredibly dangerous procedure.
President Eisenhower was
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 14:13 — Bick Eubanks (not verified)President Eisenhower was right when he warned against the "military industrial complex". They are in control now.
I'm puzzled here, why would
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 14:36 — RemyC. (not verified)I'm puzzled here, why would the "Obama administration have to give BP the go-ahead" on anything that could plug the leak? Isn't that the whole point? Isn't that what everyone has been trying to do? I'm reading the Navy could have gone in and squeezed the well pipe shut with a strategically placed explosive under the bedrock two days after this started. My question, is why did they let this leak for so long? I also read that many men on Obama's nuclear energy committee are BP executives! Has the whole thing been used to stage a PR scam to sell people on nuclear?
isn;t just obvious that BP
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 14:58 — Anonymous FFJ (not verified)isn;t just obvious that BP just wants the oil. The conntainment cap; will let them have most ofit, if it works. But we will still have leakage around the Cap. And what does BP care about that. Our coastlands will never be same 50 to 100 years from now when most of us will be dead. Easy to sathey will pay for all this, But saying is one thing and doing another.
BP lawyers will know how okeep this in court for a decade or two, maybe longer. Right now the navy should be told to blast the well shut; cover it with tons of rock. Then fine BP out of existence.
Bp's New Cap. A Ruse? -
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 15:57 — morris (not verified)Bp's New Cap. A Ruse? - Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zSf6dNe4MY
What better way to create calm and hope than to announce that next week there is going be a new cap put on the well, and maybe the leak will be stopped. I fear the worst, that it is a ruse, to buy time. What for? Martial law is all I can think of. With the restrictions on journalists, and the use of Corexit, it seems that suspicion is begged for.
Sounds really fishy to me,
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 16:16 — Anonymous (not verified)Sounds really fishy to me, since the topkill operation was called off due to oil, gas, and mud ESCAPING INTO THE FORMATION...the wellbore is compromised, and they know it. and 9,000 psi would show the well is intact? that oil and gas is rumored to be coming out at around 80,000 psi. Sounds to me like this is going to be a staged "accident" to cause an even worse situation. The worst part is that there have been tilt meters on the BOP for about a month now. The BOP is leaning, and if it were just from the rig and riser pulling the BOP over as the rig sank, the tilt meters would not be necessary...the very fact they are there implies that BP is watching for CHANGES in the tilt of the BOP. In other words, it is unstable now or they suspect it may become unstable. A total seal on that cap will put tremendous pressure on the already unstable BOP and lower marine riser package. This sounds like a catastrophe waiting to happen if you ask me...or maybe a PLANNED catastrophe in the works???
goodygumdrops!!!!! Problem
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 17:15 — truthspill (not verified)goodygumdrops!!!!! Problem solved!!!!
Remember,
Lies are truth. Lies are truth. Lies are truth.
It is not 'almost over'. BP
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 17:40 — Your Future (not verified)It is not 'almost over'. BP has been 'trying to stop' the oil flow for over two months.
The oil will continue to flow into the formerly blue Gulf waters.
if pressures are at 80,000
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 19:33 — Anonymous (not verified)if pressures are at 80,000 psi back pressure the two relief wells will make this a triple disaster,i suspect the rumor about ultra high pressures is bogus information ,the flow from the uncapped riser begins to eddy about 10 inches out maybe there is no great pressure, if the worst case happens kiss seafood goodbye
Title is a precursor of the
Sat, 07/10/2010 - 20:03 — Anonymous (not verified)Title is a precursor of the media approach to follow: It's over, the well is capped. Go home. There is nothing to see here. The empty suits at BP and in the White House will have their lives back.
I call BS on BP and
Sun, 07/11/2010 - 00:02 — Thebes (not verified)I call BS on BP and BHO.
They've known since top kill that the well bore is damaged. Capping it is NOT an option. As it is there is oil coming out from over 1000 ft down, and exiting cracks in the ocean floor up to 5 miles from the broken well bore.
The only reason this makes sense is if they think they are losing whats left of the integrity of the bore and are removing the capturing funnel to reduce pressure with no intention of capping it.
Actually, I can think of a second reason they'd try this. Currently BP is capturing water and oil, much better for their bottom line if the oil is salable instead of hazardous waste... but BHO would not have agreed if they put it that way.