Is Wall Street Making Life or Death Decisions?

by: Dora Calott Wang, M.D., t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Is Wall Street Making Life or Death Decisions?
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: takomabibelot, massmatt)

Is your health insurance company traded on Wall Street?

If so, is Wall Street deciding your medical care?

It's hard to recall that for-profit corporations were once kept out of health care - in fact, for most of the 20th century. During this time, the nation's medical system was built largely by non-profit and charitable organizations, which is why so many hospitals are named for saints. Courts across the country ruled that for corporations to profit from medical care was simply "against sound public policy." In the early 1980's, however, when the financial and airline industries were deregulated, a similar process occurred for American medicine. For-profit corporations became newly encouraged to take leadership of health care. Deregulating health care into the free market was intended to drive down costs and to improve care. After all, medical care in 1980 consumed a whopping 9.1 percent of the nation's GDP.

Never mind that after 30 years in the free market, health care costs have doubled to consume 18 percent of the GDP (with a third of these precious dollars wasted on bureaucracy). Never mind that health care has gotten increasingly inaccessible to the uninsured and even the insured, or that American health care has become an international poster child for reform.

The real issue is that modern medical care has simply, finally, gotten so effective. Today, even cancer and AIDS are no longer death sentences, and if organs fail, you try to get a new one. But prior to the discovery of antibiotics and vaccines in the 1930s, leeches were routinely applied, and medicine was steeped in superstition. Between 1918 and 1920, three percent of the world's population was wiped out - by the flu.

The fair and effective distribution of life-sustaining resources like food, water and shelter, is the very story of civilization. Yet now, thanks to a culmination of centuries of civilization and scientific inquiry, we have at last a new life-sustaining resource - modern medical care, which is less than 80 years old.

How should this powerful new resource be distributed? Medical care is no ordinary product. The laws of the free market (as applied to athletic shoes and burgers) simply don't work for products as complex as medical care. Furthermore, medical care is no luxury. It has become as essential as water.

In our brave new world, DNA is already being tweaked to grow new organs. There will be no easy answers for the bioethical questions in our future. Rather, we are embarking on a new, complex and long chapter of history.

Busy schedule? Click here to keep up with Truthout with free email updates.

No one believes that health care reform was solved with the signing of the Affordable Care Act in March.

More likely, health care reform will be our entire future.

In the meantime, how is modern medical care, a new Prometheus' fire, being allocated and decided in the United States?

Physicians and patients sit face to face and discuss medical decisions - about whether a life-sustaining cardiac bypass surgery is warranted, or whether a new liver should be gotten. But ultimately, the purse strings on medical care are held by health insurance companies.

The new health reform laws will obligate insurance companies to provide "coverage" even when patients become sick or if they have a "pre-existing condition" or what I still call "illness." The ACA has a provision on "administrative simplification" which in 2014 will aim to streamline the process of doctors and health care providers requesting approvals from health insurance companies before treatments are rendered.

But even after the ACA is fully implemented, health insurance companies, many of them for-profit corporations traded on Wall Street, will continue to hold the purse strings on medical care.

The ACA is landmark progress in the right direction.

However, in the last thirty years, the values of Wall Street have so infiltrated the values of American society that seemingly all aspects of life are impacted - even medical care of the human body and mind - even the life or death decisions that happen each day in doctor offices and hospital rooms.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Dora Calott Wang, M.D., is Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine. A graduate of the Yale School of Medicine and the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, she received her M.A. in English literature from the University of California, Berkeley, and has been the recipient of a writer's residency from the Lannan Foundation. Her memoir, The Kitchen Shrink: A Psychiatrist's Reflections on Healing in a Changing World was published by Riverhead Books, The Penguin Group.

For more information please visit www.doracalottwang.com and follow the author on Facebook and Twitter.
 


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



While HCR is and has been

While HCR is and has been needed for ages, the fact that Wall Street and Corporate America in general controls everything is cause for major concern, as Dr. Wang points out above.

That said, a couple of my doctors don't seem to be on the HRC bandwagon just yet. To put it bluntly, they're scared shitless. But then again I live in the southeastern US, which means any semblance of change, even for the better, will be met with wild criticism.

I do think it'll be at least 5 years to determine if this HRC will work. But a lot of that determination will depend on how much the Right reworks it to serve corporate interests and not those of the patients.



Soon Wall Street will be

Soon Wall Street will be purchasing life insurance policies from hapless individuals in need of instant cash. Will the regulators step in when the banksters that own your life insurance policy also control your access to life-saving care?



Carers and clients may just

Carers and clients may just as likely avoid the entire conventional mess. My neighbor, a dentist, says increasing numbers of people like me are saying no to painkillers and antibiotics. We have our exceedingly effective and side-effect-free traditional Chinese herbs and other practices we use on ourselves, including exercise regimens. In Portland, two women have a business called Missionary Chocolates, part of the profits of which will go to fund a naturpathic hospital. I look forward to contributing my due part, to the goal when it is reached and to imbibing some theobromin along the way.



F.D:R: made a law that kept

F.D:R: made a law that kept banks investment firms, s&ls, mortagage companies, and insurance companies etc. separate, and forbade them to mingle assets. Clinton cancelled that Glass-Steagal act, to "modernize banking" the crashing monopoly has been the result.
This is made all the worse by the fact that no one investigates or prosecutes insurers who comit crime to avoid covering... they just hire more lawyers and a few doctors to deny need.
Me.... I was deliberately crippled for life... I caught them but no one went to jail.
Iris: ( the expat useless mouth..).



The real Death Panels? Let's

The real Death Panels? Let's call these things for what they are.



People can get really

People can get really depressed in the shackles of debt, which is why foreclosures are associated with some suicides. Banks can only profit when they own you, thus they've always been in the life, death, and information business.



"The fair and effective

"The fair and effective distribution of life-sustaining resources like food, water and shelter, is the very story of civilization."

Haven't people been warring since the dawn of time for these very things? Where in the civilized world is this actualized?



Where in the world do these

Where in the world do these folks come from that are describing HCR as some kind of coup? Aliens looking in from outer space must be laughing hysterically. Max Baucus contibuted by taking bribes and having Doctors arrested!
On to single payer, no compromises with organized crime and no center-right "Vichy" compromise.



"Medical care is no luxury.

"Medical care is no luxury. It has become as essential as water." Interesting how potable water has also become a market commodity; look at the shelves of bottled water in your grocery store, or how many Latin American cities have privatized their public water supplies. "Clinton canceled that Glass-Steagal act, to "modernize banking" the crashing monopoly has been the result." Actually, that was the GOP Congress that pushed that through while Clinton was weakened with the Lewinsky affair, both houses passing it by veto-proof majorities. But I agree, it should be reinstated if only to put the power back into the hands of the people instead of the Wall Street oligarchs.



Michael Moore made the case

Michael Moore made the case for national single payer health care in the USA as eloquently as anyone possibly could with his great documentary film "Sicko." That it was not followed by the reforms necessary to bring about national single payer health care in the USA is a tribute to the way this country's government officials have been bribed and/or terrorized by its billionaires.

I hear right wing folk say Moore's facts were incorrect, but, clearly, they have not consulted the lavish footnotes for every scene of each of his films, which are available on his website. Also, they need to consider that if lies are told in media, the liar is vulnerable to lawsuits. A teller of truth cannot be sued for libel or slander. Not one of the billionaires whose questionable business practices were exposed in Michael Moore's films has sued him over the content of his films. There is a reason for this.



"" In the early 1980's,

"" In the early 1980's, however, when the financial and airline industries were deregulated, a similar process occurred for American medicine. For-profit corporations became newly encouraged to take leadership of health care."

So it was only 30 years ago that health care became a for-profit "industry," yet, somehow, now that the camel has its nose under the tent we cannot disentangle health care from industry. We have had Medicare for far longer than that--a government administered health insurance has existed since the 1960s, but somehow has never been extended to the entire population as was intended once people saw how well it worked.

Today we have retiree Tea Partiers screaming "Keep government's hands off my Medicare," while fighting to prevent the rest of America from enjoying the same privileges they do, and yet the irony goes unnoticed in the press. Dr. Wang has done a lovely whitewash of a very dirty process. It's time to get Wall Street's hands off of our health care!



And thanks to the miracle of

And thanks to the miracle of modern medicine, we're watching unsustainable populations devour more and more each year, driving us to conflict over the scraps.

Thanks modern medicine!



tyler-durden is unfair to

tyler-durden is unfair to the medical profession. Or maybe he knows nothing about contraceptives. Maybe he has not even used a condom.
Come on, don't accuse the medical profession for over populating the world..
How about blaming the Pope who is against contraception? Or other religious sects that insist on "full quiver" families. Or countries where there is no SS so that couples try to have enough children to provide for them in their old age.
I think he had better stick to music.