Not Much to Celebrate with Obama's Tax Deal
Monday 27 December 2010
by: Karen Dolan | OtherWords | Op-Ed
We enter 2011 with a few more dollars in our paychecks. For about 98 percent of Americans, the extension of Bush tax cuts and the new payroll tax holiday will make it easier for us to afford a gallon, rather than a quart, of milk for our families each month, and to fill our tanks almost as high as we did with lower gas prices last year.
(We ought to be consuming less gas and driving electric cars, but I'll leave that for another commentary). On the other side of the Great Divide: the richest two percent of Americans will get vast windfalls from the deal Obama made with the GOP--ample enough to refurnish second and third homes, or get those boats they've always needed.
But studies show us that they won't. They'll sock that money away for the kids' inheritance. We'll get no stimulative boost to the economy, but it sure will help some dynasties from dying. To give the rest of us some lunch money, House and Senate Republicans insisted this Christmas season on stuffing huge lumps of gold into Paris Hilton's velvet stockings. That's what happened when they extended tax cuts for the highest-income Americans and lowered the estate tax, which only gets levied on the wealthiest of the wealthy.
The rich keep getting richer. And richer. But, there is some stimulus in this deal, and it's better than no deal at all. And hey...didn't we all get a boost from the "payroll tax holiday?" We didn't have that before! A holiday after Christmas, for a whole year! Hallelujah, Auld Lang Syne, and Happy Valentine's Day!
Let's hold the confetti for a minute and take a closer look. Just because the deal was better than no deal, that doesn't mean it was a good one, even given this difficult political climate.
In addition to non-stimulative and expensive tax cuts and estate tax favors for the wealthy, this package has another poison pill in it. In the 2009 Recovery Act, the Making Work Pay provision gave those of us making less than $95,000 annually ($190,000 for couples) a refundable tax credit. Income above that level didn't see a tax credit. It was progressive. Those most likely to use the money, stimulating the economy, received the money.
The new tax deal replaces this Making Work Pay credit with the Payroll Tax Holiday.
According to the Center on Economic Policy Research and the Tax Policy Center, a little more than half of tax-filers will indeed get a bigger paycheck due to a tax holiday than they would have under the Making Work Pay credit. However, about 42 percent of taxpayers will actually pay more taxes in 2011 than they would have if the Making Work Pay Credit had been extended.
So, the less you earn, the more you need, the less you get under this tax deal.
Further, critics of this aspect of the tax deal worry that this payroll tax holiday could become permanent. Congress has been more than squeamish in the past to reinstate taxes after temporary cuts--the incoming Congress even more so. But either way, this shift signifies political willingness to start altering the way we pay for Social Security in way that has never been politically possible before.
As Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) cautioned in a floor debate in December leading up to the vote, “You’re talking about the beginning of the end for Social Security.” Couple this with a deficit-hysteric incoming Congress and it's hard not to fear for the long-term well-being of America’s imperiled middle- and low-income families.
Entering the New Year, I'm feeling less financially secure. There's not much to celebrate with Obama's tax deal, which accomplished far less than what is necessary or possible.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Thanks to the Great
Tue, 12/28/2010 - 11:27 — Anonymous (not verified)Thanks to the Great Negotiator in Chief: President Barack Obama. With friends of the middle class like him, who needs enemies? Here is the first thing he's done outside the military that has won him praise from Republicans, and claims of true bipartisanship, and it's very likely a bad deal for the middle class. Is this surprising to anyone outside the Beltway? Enjoy it while it lasts, Prez.
But Obama has no legislative victories in his entire Presidency that deal with the economy, that benefits the middle class in a meaningful way. In a way that a middle class person can say, yes, I have benefitted. The credit card reforms are as meager as this tax cut capitulation. Everything else is wait and see for a few years, at best.
The recent articles about Obama back on top in DC must truly be a head scratcher for anyone in the middle class, unless you realize who is reporting, and for whom.
It's the Bill Clinton
Tue, 12/28/2010 - 11:45 — Anonymous (not verified)It's the Bill Clinton Stealth Presidency II: with music provided by Stevie Wonder, instead of Fleetwood Mac.
Suggestions for the 2012 campaign:
-Signed, Sealed, Delivered (a duet with Karen Ignagni)
-All Day Sucker (with special guest Hank Paulson)
-Part Time Lover (music video with staff from OFA)
You get the idea...
Why is celebration being
Tue, 12/28/2010 - 12:43 — Vic Anderson (not verified)Why is celebration being suggested at all with this typical Obamanible Trojan HEARSE law-breaking?! It's simply the vehicle for Obummer taking a dive (like Kerry before him) for the Bush (DIE-NASTY)!! JEB: "the Spirit of DEMcrappy SCREW Years yet to cum!!!
I don't see why anyone who
Tue, 12/28/2010 - 21:37 — Westcoastliberal (not verified)I don't see why anyone who truly believes in the "good of the the country" would agree with any of the legislation Obama has succeeded in getting passed (with the exception of DADT which was a big mistake from the start).
We shouldn't be giving millionaires tax breaks while we carry the full cost of TWO unfunded wars on our backs, and the healthcare bill stopped short of solving the main problem; costs that are way too high, for the sole reason of lining the pockets of the big health insurance companies & big pharma.
Obama has set up the GOP to start slicing on Social Security and Medicare, and they're sharpening their knives now. Too bad, because social security is totally funded for the next 30 years. If the "no negotiation" provision neatly included in the last go round on Medicare was changed so the gov could make the drug companies negotiate, then Medicare would be funded for many years as well.
I'm not sure of his motivation or real intent, but Obama in my opinion has let not just liberals, but the country down. When you consider his refusal to investigate and prosecute Bush/Cheney for war crimes, and how he mishandled the BP/Gulf gusher, there's not much that's good I can say about him at this point.
The only good thing about
Wed, 12/29/2010 - 10:17 — Anonymous (not verified)The only good thing about Obama is that we can get rid of this liar that betrayed us in 2012.