Learning About Reality From Fiction: "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo"

by: Thom Hartmann, t r u t h o u t | Book Review

Learning About Reality From Fiction: "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo"
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Chealion, ScottD_Arch, Gordana AM)

Sometimes politics and nonfiction writing can seem altogether too intense and we feel like we need a break. For some, like myself, reading fiction is a guilty pleasure that is re-energizing.

In that respect, the best-selling novel - the first in the acclaimed trilogy, - "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo," by Stieg Larsson, is both a brilliant page turner and raises a number of interesting and important issues of our day.

The first among these is the debate over what is news and whether corporations can "own" it. Since the hero of this novel (although, over time, he becomes a secondary character) is the co-owner and editor of a pro-democracy magazine in Sweden, the entire realm of issues having to do with news comes to the fore. Who owns the news? Who controls the news? What is the importance of independent media in a world where giant monoliths and monopolies have become the norm? And, most important, what is the relationship between news, in a free and open society and democracy?

Secondly, there is the issue of both the politics and the reality of what we call mental health, neurological variations from person to person and how society deals with people who don't fit into the neat little category of "normal." I've written seven books on the topic of ADHD and learning disorders and one on psychotherapy, which largely takes on and exposes the history of Freudian psychotherapy ("Walking Your Blues Away"), and having spent nearly a decade in the late 1990s giving workshops, speeches and keynoting conferences on four different continents about learning disabilities and education, I can tell you that this entire realm of mental health, learning disabilities and differences and education is fraught with politics. Not to mention the way society turns a blind and cold eye toward the abuse of women, which often is tied back to mental health issues and social "norms."

Click here to sign up for Truthout’s FREE daily email updates.

The initially secondary character of this novel, the young woman who is literally the girl with the dragon tattoo, has Asperger's syndrome - it's even explicitly mentioned in the book - and, as in my books and writings on ADHD, her neurological differences define her, challenge her and give her strengths and abilities beyond the realm of ordinary humans. Through this brilliantly-drawn character, this book in a very subtle way confronts head on the whole montage of political and societal issues of neurologic variability.

So, go ahead and read "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo" and enjoy it with full knowledge that while you're having a wonderful time reading a great page-turner of a book, you're also educating yourself about the culture of Sweden, about the media and the whole spectrum of increasingly controversial issues that we refer to as mental health.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Thom Hartmann is a New York Times best-selling Project Censored Award-winning author and host of a nationally syndicated progressive radio talk show. You can learn more about Thom Hartmann at his web site and find out what stations broadcast his program. You can also listen to Thom over the Internet.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



It's worth pointing out that

It's worth pointing out that Lisbeth was never officially diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome, or anything else for that matter. Whether or not she really is mentally ill, and what she may or may not be suffering from is a very important part of the second and especially third novels.
The only thing we can label about Lisbeth's mental state is that she has a photographic/eidetic memory. Everything else is just speculation on our and the characters' parts.



Hey, I was going to comment

Hey, I was going to comment on the Asperger, or lack of, diagnosis. Did Thom assume this (like the bureaucracy in the book) - Thom?

Of course I could have read right over it. Sure not going back to find out. I've said for a long time I've learned more about life and people from fiction than from anything said to be fact. Of course good documentaries are of limitless value, if we are given only the raw data.

Great books...even if you don't care about any deeper meaning.



Who owns the news?

Who owns the news? Increasingly, the answer is: Ruppert Murdock. Charles Dickens couldn't have come up with a more apt name for one of his villains.



did anyone see the movie?

did anyone see the movie?



Haven't read the book yet,

Haven't read the book yet, but saw Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. The extreme sadism and sexual violence deserve a warning, a trigger alert for rape survivors.

Yes, the perps are the bad guys, and we need more social commentary on violence against women, but the movie at least is extremely upsetting to watch. It would be good to at least acknowledge this fact.



To add to the first letter -

To add to the first letter - though it doesn't need my endorsement - an interesting point of reference in all three books is the series "Pippi Longstocking," any reading of which can serve to frame Lisbeth Salander as a person.



Seen the movie. It does a

Seen the movie. It does a good job of covering the first novel. That saying , it is a movie. A movie is not a novel. Two different media. It manages to capture the essences of the two lead characters but is not as in depth as the novel. still, I highly recommend it.
BTW the movie based upon the second book in the trilogy is now being shown in the US.



I loved the novel, but one

I loved the novel, but one problem I had with it was this half-diagnosis of Asperger's. A primary characteristic of those on the autistic spectrum is the inability to interpret facial expressions and social cues. Lisbeth, on the contrary, is extremely perceptive at reading other people, however introverted and anti-social she may be.

Considering that the character is horrifically abused, I have to say--isn't that enough? More than enough explanation for distrust of other people and social isolation. Asperger's seems like piling on.



I've read all three books in

I've read all three books in the trilogy and found each of them absolutely captivating. It has been ages since I've read another work of fiction that so effectively drew me in.

However, I thought the "diagnosis" of Asperger's was speculation on the part of one psychiatrist, or more appropriately a politically motivated cover up.

The issue of who owns the news, as depicted in the first book, was chilling in consideration of the sad state of real news reporting in the U.S. today.



I read all 3 of the books

I read all 3 of the books and they sure are page turners. I saw the 2 movies.They stay true to the books but as one commentator said "it's a different medium". I think that Asperger's syndrome was mentioned as a possibility but there was no real diagnosis. Her outstanding memory and gifted computer use (hacker)suggests Asperger's but her physical and mental abuse should be considered contributing factors when evalutating her behavior.
No real conclusion was reached.
I listen to Thom Hartmann and love his program.



I read the 3 books and saw

I read the 3 books and saw the 2 movies. As one commentator said "books are a different medium". I think that the films stayed true to the books and the casting was excellent.The books are real page turners.
I don't think that there was a diagnosis of Aspergers syndrome just a suggestion. Her outstanding memory and extraordinary computer skills(hacker) may be symptoms but we must factor in her physical and mental abuse when evaluating her.



I think it's worth far more

I think it's worth far more than a quick sidenote in an otherwise well written article how directly & powerfully these books address the issues of rape, sexual assault, violence against women & domestic abuse. All of these are particularly important to me, due to experiences several of my loved ones have suffered in the past & my personal attempts to help them live with the aftermath in the years since. While the rape scenes in the books were stomach-turning for me to get through, I have great respect for the author's vividly direct efforts to pointedly portray the hideous & oft ignored realities behind these incomprehensible crimes. Even with the difficult passages, I say these books are easily the best fiction that recent years have had to offer.

I have seen the 1st movie (which was excellent) & am anxiously awaiting the US release of the 2nd; while I agree with the above comment about how the rape scene is very difficult to watch, but in all honesty, I was slightly relieved by the relative restraint used by the filmmakers in their portrayal. Sitting down to watch, I was significantly worried that said scene would be too much for me to "deal with" - there have been previous instances where rape or sexual violence in movies have disturbed me to the point where afterwords I was unable to focus on or even finish watching the film. At least once or twice I can remember being physically ill because of certain screen depictions. While all such things are subjective & what unnerves me may very well roll right off the backs of most others (and vice versa), I mention this only to give some context to my remarks here & my response that, yes, it is particularly difficult to sit through, but I don't think others coming from similar perspectives as myself or the previous commenter should be especially worried about such if they are planning to watch the movie. It's grotesque, but compared to what many of us have probably seen in other films (mostly of the more recent variety), it's not too, too severe. Anyway, I just wanted to say my peace on that...



This is a particularly

This is a particularly stupid article. Asperger’s, as Lucie13 points out, is an inability to understand social clues and others' body language and facial expressions. Understanding such clues is something the character Lizbeth is particularly good at. Her peculiarities have much more to do with being driven half-mad by human cruelty than any “biological mental disorder"—a half-baked, unsubstantiated theory proposed by the marketing departments of pharmaceutical companies, swallowed whole by a desperate psychiatric community and scientistic culture.   Asperger’s has become a badge of honor among hackers and such, who claim they are unfettered by emotions, like, you know, Spock.  Many, such as Adrian Lamo, claim to have the disorder because it’s trendy among their peers.  And if there’s an expensive treatment for someone claiming to have such a disorder, psychiatrists are more than happy to make a diagnosis and get their scripts out.  What rot. 

 
Anyone who thinks that psychiatry has any handle on the mind is delusional or brainwashed or just uninformed.  Psychiatry one of our many emperors with no clothes, and millions of lives have been ruined with their specious reasoning and claims to advances in “brain science.”  This pseudo-discipline needs to be exposed, and luckily, medical journalists such as Ethan Waters and Robert Whitaker are doing just that.
 
Truthout, if you’re going to write about psychiatric issues, get someone with at least half a handle on the reality.  This article may be titillating to the ignorant, but it is definitely an insult to the informed. 
 

 



Just a quick comment here.

Just a quick comment here. Haven't read the books nor seen the films, so shan't comment on them nor their quality.

This is directed at the various posters, none of whom, from the language they use in their posts, seem to have any great familiarity with people who've Asperger's Syndrome, Autism, Tourette's Syndrome or the other conditions found on the Autism spectrum.

Well, am a high-functioning autistic, diagnosed as such at age 11 in 1976. I can't, and won't, claim to have any great knowledge nor experience of these conditions beyond my own experiences with mine. But, I can say that Asperger's Syndrome, high-functioning autism and other spectrum conditions work in about as many different ways as there are people who have them.

Of course, there are commonalities among those who have these conditions. But, they express themselves, depending on the degree of severity to which they have them, and individual life, cultural and social experiences, including traumas like the abuse and rape endured by Lisbeth in the novel reviewed by Mr. Hartmann above.

For anyone, least of all a neuro-typical(autie and other spectrum condition community term for a so-called "normal" person), especially those who've neither, at least known to themselves, that is, been around Aspies, auties, people with Tourette's Syndrome and other spectrum conditions, their families, friends, co-workers and other acquaintances or associates, or therapists, social workers and others who work with or around them, and to pronounce, as some of these posters above here do(especially Elizabeth, the last poster above me) on what they might be like, or should be like, is the height of massive, arrogant, self-satisfied ignorance and should be called just that.

I don't care what particular ideology or portion of the political spectrum on which you fall. If you pronounce on subjects with an air of self-satisfied arrogance masquerading as knowledge of a given subject, be prepared to be called on, and, at times, in an extremely impolite and downright rude manner.

Those of us on the spectrum, whether high or low functioning, their families, friends and others beside, don't need nor want such fools and their opinions, and especially their arrogance.

They serve no one, save those who utter their foolishness, if only to salve their egos.

For those who genuinely don't know about Asperger's Syndrome, autism in its varying degrees, Tourette's Syndrome, and other spectrum conditions, there's a wealth of resources on-line, and any number of books and other information sources about them you may consult if you wish.

As for those who do not, but wish to remain in their "know-it-all" ignorance on these subjects, I say, screw you, and screw Mother's Day and Christmas, too, Jasper.



I for one am glad of when

I for one am glad of when the topic of violence against women is mentioned in any medium. It has become politically correct to point out the abuse Muslim women are subjected to, while we too often forget that violence against women here in the West is an everyday affair as well. Perhaps it is just more convenient and comfortable to look elsewhere for the sins we ourselves perpetrate?



I don’t know why you

I don’t know why you assume I’ve had no experience with those with Asperger’s. I babysat a boy diagnosed with the disorder for several years and found that the assumptions most have about the condition were flat-out wrong. This child was highly intelligent, funny, creative, and sensitive to others. No, he didn’t socialize like other boys, and in many ways I found this to be a positive attribute in his case. But he did socialize, and was a trustworthy friend, although the same could not be said for the children he tried to befriend. I’ve also known adults diagnosed with Asperger’s, as well as a mother trying to deal with a child diagnosed with low-functioning autism (at 13 she does not speak or repond to others, and has an obsession with breaking windows).
 
My problem is the biological model, first, and a general obsession with “normalcy” in our culture, second.   

 
My point was that referring to Lizbeth as having Asperger’s is just one example of defining someone’s behavior as abnormal and then to refer to that abnormality as a “brain disease,” something that has no real scientific basis.  The medical response to Asperger’s is anti-depressants and atypical antipsychotics, along with social conditioning.  Society’s response is shunning on the one hand and valorizing on the other in such cases as Asperger’s and my diagnosis, bipolar I.
 
I had my first manic when I was prescribed an SSRI, and what followed was years of pain far worse than my original symptoms.  The mental hell I endured as a result of a constantly changing battery of med cocktails is beyond description, and the social effects were enormous, including losing a career, a marriage, and nearly my child. Stupidly, for ten years I continued to believe that the psychiatrists would “get it right” soon, any day, week, or year now.  It is from this experience that I have formed my opinion of psychiatrists and psychotropic medications. 
 
A year and a half ago I started to realize that those in my support groups were also being given ever-shifting med cocktails, and were also degenerating month by month.  I looked into alternative treatments and alternative ways of looking at my condition.  I took myself off the meds and have gradually gotten much better.  I do take over-the-counter meds, lithium orotate and St. Johns Wort, which keep me even and far less depressed than when on the meds, although I suspect it will take some time to get over the trauma of the decade-long med-induced pain, the cruelty routinely inflicting upon me because I was suffering, and a general fear of people finding out my diagnosis, at the cost of the career I have managed to build from the ashes—a fear that prevents me from being open to most people.  I’ve begun to explore why I began falling into deep depressions at the age of 20, and to consider that perhaps this was more an effect of living in a highly dysfunctional world. 
 
The mental illness we should be focusing on is sociopathy, which seems to be the new normal, and anyone who isn’t fine with a sociopathic system may well be susceptible to mental pain, alienation, an inability to socialize “correctly,” etc. 
 
I don’t pretend to understand the autism spectrum personally beyond knowing people diagnosed with the condition.  I can’t get into anyone else’s head.  And I don’t pretend to know to what extent any so-called mental disorder is the result of genetics, social conditioning, traumas, or the chemicals we ingest.  But I do know that my experience with psychiatry was a disaster, and that I would warn anyone away from psychiatrists.  My experiences and those of many others, as well as extensive reading on the subject, have informed my conclusion that psychiatrists don’t know what the hell they’re doing, and in more cases than most would suspect, do far more harm than good.  If this is what you consider “the height of massive, arrogant, self-satisfied ignorance,” then so be it.  I wish you well. 
 

 



1:1 louis vuitton

Woh I like your articles , saved to fav! . 1:1 louis vuitton http://www.louisvuittonreplicato.com/



burberry handbags

Dead pent topic matter, thanks for entropy. http://www.jersyesshopping.com. burberry handbags http://www.burberryoutletn.com/