Listening To Conservatives Is Making Us Poor And Poorer
Friday 17 September 2010
by: Dave Johnson | Campaign for America's Future | Op-Ed
Who counts and who doesn't count? We hear so much about the "middle class" but rarely about the plight of the poor. And of course we hear again and again that the wealthy are "successful" and the "job-creators" who shouldn't be "punished" by being asked to give something back to the country that enabled their wealth. Conservative "market" thinking and Ayn Randian "the poor are losers" dehumanizing ideology* has become pervasive and dominant as we transition from one-person-one-vote democracy to one-dollar-one-vote plutocracy. In this plutocratic environment the national discussion of tax cuts for the wealthy saturates the corporate media, while the 44 million of us in poverty now are barely mentioned and count for little.
Yesterday the Census Bureau reported (NYT) that another four million people fell below the poverty line just last year, with trends showing it will probably grow. 44 million Americans -- one in seven of us -- are now trying to make it on $10,830; $22,050 for a family of four.
“We’re seeing more younger people coming in that not only don’t have any food, but nowhere to stay,” said Marla Goodwin, director of Jeremiah’s Food Pantry in East St. Louis, Ill. The pantry was open one day a month when it opened in 2008 but expanded this year to five days a month.
This chart (from the Census report) shows the trends.
On top of this, the level of "severe poverty" has hit an all-time record level. At Angry Bear, All Time Record Level of Severe Poverty,
Coverage focused on the headline poverty rate which is horrible enough. Much worse, 6.3% of people in the USA suffered severe poverty, that is lived in households with income less than half the poverty line. This is the highest severe poverty rate on record. That means that over 19 million people in the USA live in households with income less than half the poverty line (severe poverty implies income significantly less than $ 11,000 yr for a family of four) [emphasis added]
The Lifesaver Net Is Under Attack: Unemployment Benefits, Food Stamps, Welfare, Social Security
Even as poverty rises (because of conservative policies) the conservatives are attacking and weakening the safety net that keeps this disaster from getting even worse. They denigrate the idea of our government assisting citizens -- taking care of and watching out for each other -- as "spending" and "handouts." They say that unemployment and poverty assistance "undermine the work ethic." They say that helping the poor is "reaching into other people's pockets." Click through to read an example of what the Koch/Scaife/Walton (WalMart)/Tobacco/Oil/Corpation-funded Heartland Institute on "handouts". Or click through to read a sample of what the Koch/ Scaife/Tobacco/Corpation-funded Freedomworks (one of the astroturf organizations behind the Tea Party) on "handouts." Here is the Koch-founded/tobacco/oil/corporate-funded Cato Institute saying, about helping the people of New Orleans after Katrina, that government helping people is"coercion" (taxes are theft) and "it is important to remember that you can't be compassionate with other people's money."
This is dehumanizing and degrading and listening to it at all dehumanizes and degrades all of us. And the result is right in front of our faces: poverty grows, poverty becomes more extreme, wealth concentrates at the top, society becomes more cruel, the country falls further and further backwards. We have lived through a decade of conservative policies, and from the NYTimes story on the increasing poverty rate,
“This is the first time in memory that an entire decade has produced essentially no economic growth for the typical American household,” Mr. Katz said.
The Money Is Going To The Top
The Census report notes that the highest "quintile" or fifth of income-earners received 50.3 percent of all income last year, the bottom fifth receive only 3.4%..
In 2009, the share of aggregate income received by the bottom quintile was 3.4 percent; the second quintile, 8.6 percent; the third, 14.6 percent; the fourth, 23.2 percent; and the highest quintile, 50.3 percent.
Unemployment Benefits Running Out
Conservatives in the Congress are blocking emergency extensions of unemployment benefits, jobs programs and other critical parts of the safety net that helps people in emergencies such as the conservative-caused financial collapse. So another indicator of human suffering is about to get even worse. Unemployment for the "99ers" is running out, many of them older, with no jobs in sight.
Only unemployment benefits are keeping another 3.3 million from the same fate. (Chart from Center for Budget and Policy Priorities)
Health Insurance, Too
According to the Census Bureau report, the number of United States residents without health insurance climbed to 51 million in 2009, from 46 million in 2008. Additionally in 2010 millions of unemployed workers who were covered by the stimulus' COBRA subsidies are losing their coverage. There is no relief in site for years.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Expiring
The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Emergency Fund from the "stimulus" expires at the end of this month. Steve Benen at Washington Monthly writes that the TANF program, "subsidizes jobs with private companies, nonprofits, and government agencies and has single handedly put more than 240,000 unemployed people back to work."
So of course it needs to be renewed. But conservatives are blocking this. Benen writes,
The irony is, when those Americans lose their jobs, Republicans will say it was the failure of the stimulus. Their pathetic rhetoric will have it backwards -- the stimulus created those jobs, and the GOP's filibuster of an effective jobs program will throw these men and women out of work. In a sane political world, this would be a pretty big scandal...
Food Stamps Cut
Last month we saw this tragedy happen, Food Stamps Slashed to Pay for Teacher Jobs Bill. Conservatives forced cuts to food stamps before they would allow a bill providing $26 billion to help states cover Medicaid expenses and teacher salaries to pass.
Social Security
It has been covered here extensively that the President's "Deficit Commission" is talking about cuts to Social Security, which by law cannot borrow so it cannot contribute to the deficit, instead of looking at the tax cuts for the rich and military spending increases which caused the deficits. At the very time older Americans have had their retirement savings wiped out and many cannot find jobs and are taking early retirement, the commission is talking about reducing instead of increasing this vital program!
JOBS JOBS JOBS JOBS
This is really all about jobs and wages. The best antidote to poverty is more employment and better wages. Just yesterday 300 economists issued a statement saying so. But conservatives continue to block all efforts to provide jobs and lift wages. Isaiah Pool wrote here yesterday, in Latest Senate Jobs Bill Tests The Limits Of Right-Wing Obstruction,
Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus has introduced a bill today that is a frankly unadventurous mix of jobs initiatives and tax incentives, with a healthy dose of loophole-closings to make sure that it can be presented as revenue-neutral.
. . . Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell issued his "hell no, you can't" edict ... telling reporters that he'd lead a filibuster to make sure billionaires and millionaires paid not one dime more in earned income tax.
Such is the political environment in which Baucus drops his latest effort to move the jobs debate forward.
So every indicator of a society in terrible trouble -- unemployment, poverty, severe poverty, balance of trade, concentration of wealth, foreclosures, health insurance coverage, you name it -- is going in the wrong direction. And conservatives are proudly doing what they can to make it even worse! Why do we even listen to them at all?
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.




Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Look at that graph, people.
Wed, 09/22/2010 - 14:33 — alaskadiva (not verified)Look at that graph, people. Anyone remember families living in their cars in the 1980's? That's the last time we had poverty levels this high. Back then it was a big deal on the news. Now . ..anyone see anything on the news about the people hit the hardest? No. You don't. Instead of harping about how Obama isn't doing things fast enough and how you're all gonna stay home, stick your thumb up your nose and not vote (or vote for the biggest clown) to make your point. . .get off your ass and vote NONREPUBLICAN! Sure, they're all insiders in DC. But, this whole mess is 95% Republican strategy that has our ....in the wringer. Then call up your local news and nag them to do more reporting on the people who are suffering the most.
I should write articles for
Wed, 09/22/2010 - 17:56 — Erich von Freemason (not verified)I should write articles for this site. It's really easy... just whine about how bad the poor have it and then claim that the problem is the rich or the conservatives, without even attempting to prove a connection between the two. Let's see some real journalism: prove that some peoples' wealth causes others to be poor. Prove that conservative policies are the cause of the rise in the poverty rate. It can't be done.
Most poor people have little education, and have parents who didn't value education. Can't blame Bill Gates for that, can you? A sizable percentage of America's two most impoverished groups (blacks and latinos) ACTIVELY discourage their children from excelling in school, yet never is the blame laid on black and latino culture.
The article goes on to claim that poverty would be worse without the social safety net, again, without any proof. Compare poverty rates before all these social programs with poverty rates since, and you'll find little, if any, difference. What you will find is that Americans don't give to charity in any meaningful way any more. You will find that the cost to the taxpayer for providing charity to a poor person has gone thru the roof.
The problem is that too many people expect something for nothing (an attitude that gave us easy credit and the housing bubble), and this article just encourages that expectation. Tax issues aside, the Republicans (for once) were correct in blocking the jobs bill, as the jobs created will produce nothing of economic value, and the value of economic goods produced is the essence of what an economy is. Jobs that create nothing add nothing to the economy, despite being labeled "stimulus" jobs, and only drain the economy. Every bit of stimulus spending has been nothing more than Enron accounting used to try to hide the bursting of our economic bubble, and is just pushing the day of reckoning into the future.
The real cause of the decline in our standard of living is the fact that we are losing our competitiveness, and we've piled trillions in debt on top of it. The Chinese aren't taking our jobs; we're handing them over voluntarily. The cost, FOB, for a Chinese factory to build a 40" TV is a few hundred dollars. What would it cost in America? How can we change the way business is run in America in order to match (or beat) that cost? Those are the real questions, and nobody is asking them.
It's clear that the
Fri, 09/24/2010 - 15:23 — Anonymous (not verified)It's clear that the conservative policies of the Bush era preceded the financial collapse. Those who believe in a correlation between tax cuts for the wealthy and job creation have a great deal of explaining to do--in fact, they're talking pure voodoo economics gibberish.
Meanwhile, Dave Johnson's "plutocratic environment" is absolutely real. The rich (and their GOP pawns) seem only interested in ruthless short-term self-interest. To hell with the environment, to hell with the long-term good of the country, and to hell with the rest of us. To get this country back on track, we need to get the dirty money out of the system. Overturn the Citizens United decision and elect a government that serves the good of the people, not the special interests.