Missing From the Juan Williams Debate: "The ACORN Deal"

by: John Atlas, t r u t h o u t | News Analysis

Missing From the Juan Williams Debate: "The ACORN Deal"
(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Collapse The Light, ACORN)

A raging debate has ensued around whether National Public Radio (NPR) correctly fired Juan Williams. Some say Williams undermined his credibility as a news analyst. Others accuse NPR of bungling its response and stifling free speech. What's been missing in the debate over his firing is this:

Immediately after NPR fired Williams because of his remarks about Muslims, Fox cable's Bill O'Reilly said, "This is like the ACORN deal - no more money to NPR. NPR has now devolved into a totalitarian outfit functioning as an arm of the far left."

The Republican leadership and the right-wing echo chamber followed O'Reilly's call for the federal defunding of NPR. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) announced plans to introduce legislation to strip federal funds from NPR because it fired Williams. According to DeMint, NPR received $4 billion in federal money since 2001 and will get $430 million in the 2011. Republican Minority Whip Eric Cantor and nearly every Republican running for office this year promised to seek an end to taxpayer subsidies for NPR and public television.

ACORN, the anti-poverty community group, destroyed by the Republican Party and its communications department, Fox News, has become today's symbol for the collective punishment for groups the conservatives considers America's evil wrong doers.

Republicans demonized ACORN, and see NPR as a political threat: ACORN because of its effective grassroots organizing and voter registration, NPR because of its even-handed coverage of politics, which sometimes challenges conservative orthodoxy.

The principle behind "The ACORN deal" is if an individual from a group (ACORN or NPR) makes a mistake, and the group does not adhere to a conservative philosophy of unfettered free markets and Christian fundamentalism, then the entire organization must be punished. In 2009, the US Congress defunded ACORN, after a barrage of false accusations led to its destruction. ACORN, whose members are mostly African-American, which, for four decades, was America's most effective anti-poverty group, should never have been destroyed.

Moreover, the Republican's call for defunding ACORN and NPR is hypocritical since the GOP and Fox News don't apply the same standards to the misdeeds and even crimes committed by businesses or groups that conforms to free-market and Christian fundamentalism, and enjoy government support.

For nearly 40 years, ACORN, had been mobilizing low-income Americans to fight for social justice, challenging powerful banks, corporations and government officials around such issues as wages for the working poor, predatory lending and foreclosures, welfare reform, public education, affordable housing and voting rights. And then, suddenly, in less than two years after its former ally Barack Obama got elected, in one of the most bizarre incidents in recent political history, it was destroyed by a ferocious attack by the right wing of the Republican Party, its allies, and Fox News.

Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.

Although it was exonerated of all charges of wrong doing by six independent investigations including two Congressional investigations, the Brooklyn DA and the California attorney general, ACORN had to dissolve because its name had been defamed.

Ironically, it was NPR along with The New York Times and other mainstream media that helped destroy ACORN by repeating the voter registration fraud and other accusations against the group, failing to give adequate coverage of ACORN's 40 years of good work, and by virtually ignoring the investigations that exonerated the group of any wrong doing. According to a study by Peter Dreier and Christopher Martin, during October 2008, a time when very few people ever heard of ACORN, 72.2 percent of NPR's stories had the voter fraud frame, while most of the stories gave at best a cursory background of ACORN's work of empowering the working poor.

After Congress defunded ACORN in 2009, Sen. Bernie Sanders pointed out that Congress had lavishly funded many corporations that, unlike ACORN, actually committed felonies.

For example, just two weeks before the Senate action, on September 2, drug company giant Pfizer had been hit with the biggest criminal fine in US history as part of a $2.3 billion settlement with federal prosecutors for illegally promoting medicines and for paying kickbacks to doctors. The company was paying $1 billion in civil settlements for Medicare and Medicaid fraud. According to fedspending.org, in 2007, Pfizer had more than $73 million in federal contracts. Blackwater, a company that had five of its employees facing murder charges in a massacre of Iraqi civilians in 2007, had received a $217 million contract to provide security in Iraq. A former Halliburton subsidiary, KBR, had received $80 million in contract bonuses to provide electrical wiring in Iraq, which electrocuted 16 soldiers and two contractors. Northrop Grumman had to pay a $500 million fine for getting caught nine times committing contract fraud. The Congress that defunded ACORN had also bailed out Goldman Sachs, AIG, J. P. Morgan,  and other financial services corporations that lacked transparency, committed unethical or illegal acts and engaged in practices that led to the crash of our financial system. The political attacks on ACORN revealed an obvious double standard.  How else to explain why Republicans and the right insisted on defunding ACORN for its errors, but failed to seek the same treatment for chronic corporate lawbreakers that receive billions in federal dollars?

The hypocrisy was striking.

So, here's the ACORN rule: no collective punishment for the rich and powerful, ideologically correct conservatives. For them, the punishment is tailored to fit the crime. They pay a fine, plead guilty to a misdemeanor or other minor offense and go on to reap millions in federal funds. For the groups who are part of the "ACORN deal" - that is, the politically incorrect - we must defund and destroy them.
 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



John Atlas is the author of the new book "Seeds of Change:The Story of ACORN, America's Most Controversial Anti-Poverty Community Group."
(Available at Amazon.com and Vanderbilt University Press.)
 


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



What will happen when the

What will happen when the right wing spin machine no longer has its favorite targets? Will they make things up? Attack strawmen to fool most of the people all of the time?

Wait. That's what they do now.

I stopped sending money to PBS years ago as I realized their fear of having federal funding yanked was coloring their commentary. Give someone like Ralph Nader air time? No way. Well, just like Chamberlain in 1939 and Obama the last 2 years, appeasement gets you nowhere.



Corporate Controlled

Corporate Controlled Infotainment companies would love to gut or kill NPR & PBS. They are just about the only news organizations we have. Without news organizations, infotainment companies can say anything they want and there will be no one left to challenge them or present actual FACTS. Our democracy is doomed. Viva plutocratic fascism!



It is not my mother's NPR

It is not my mother's NPR for sure!

I too have stopped sending contributions to NPR and for them to be NPublicR they need to stop both federal and corporate funding. My local station in NH has a ridiculous number of corporate "sponsors" and is as a result afraid to report on or be tough on them.

Yes Defund NPR and then let the public put their money where their mouth is!



Anything that any

Anything that any commentator on the Fox Propaganda Channel, should be taken with a huge grain of salt.

NPR only gets a small fraction of their funding from government sources. It's negligible. I still send my local affiliate donations, as they DO pose opposing views, unlike the umbrella organization. NPR has been giving so much air time to teabaggers, and RepubliCONs, they might as well call themselves National Petroleum Radio already, but it sure beats the Fox Propaganda network, because they do, from time to time, have an opposing viewpoint.

The amount of tax dollars that NPR gets is infinitesimal, when compared to what the Defense Department gets for propaganda. Cut the Defense budget FIRST, not these small programs, who, if cut, would be no more than a drop in the bucket when it comes to our budgetary concerns.



I cannot understand people

I cannot understand people who stop funding NPR because they feel it avoids topics that might anger some corporate support or endanger their miniscule government funding.
Instead , let your voice be heard, write the stations and request reporting on what you feel is being avoided. Work towards getting the large percentage who listen without contributing to give so that NPR is totally supported by listeners.

I do agree that I felt that NPR did not do a fair job of representing the ACORN affair. I was already aware of what ACORN had done here in NW Indiana getting some Democratic success in a heavily Republican state



Lost in the politial

Lost in the politial arguments over NPR is whether or not Juan Williams has a dirty mouth particularly with women. Years ago whenhe was a reporter for the Wasington Post the women reporters resented his ill contrived comments that always put females down or had sexual innuendosl Worse, he used blatant sexual comments in from of middle school girlon one or more occasions where the mother and friends were giving his transportation.



It's about time our tax

It's about time our tax dollars stopped supporting "National People's Radio"!



I will continue to support

I will continue to support two NPR stations because in spite of its flaws it is better than the rest of the "usual suspects." I just listen with a grain of salt, so to speak. I personally am sickened by the outrageous level of commercializaton (ads) on the airways and will go to almost any length to avoid them. And I never look at TV, having better things to do with my brain--like read books.



The NUTCASE right has long

The NUTCASE right has long had the political propaganda goal of no competition to their twisted agenda.
All weakening NPR will accomplish will be to accelerate their lie machines and make the right so dominate they can shout down any other voices as they shut down American Democracy and destroy the past 200 years while burning the American Reichstag.



"Although it was exonerated

"Although it was exonerated of all charges of wrong doing by six independent investigations including two Congressional investigations, the Brooklyn DA and the California attorney general, ACORN had to dissolve because its name had been defamed."
Amazing that in spite of the above it is now possible for the MSM to use "Acorn" as a synonym for corrupt. The Reasonable, the Truthtellers, the Thoughtful of this national audience have got to find a way of making their voices heard!