Despite "All Clear," Mississippi Sound Tests Positive for Oil
Sunday 29 August 2010
by: Dahr Jamail and Erika Blumenfeld, t r u t h o u t | Report

Laboratory confirmed oil-soaked sorbent pad. (Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
The State of Mississippi's Department of Marine Resources (DMR) opened all of its territorial waters to fishing on August 6. This was done in coordination with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the US Food and Drug Administration, despite concerns from commercial fishermen in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida about the presence of oil and toxic dispersants from the BP oil disaster.
On August 19, Truthout accompanied two commercial fishermen from Mississippi on a trip into the Mississippi Sound in order to test for the presence of submerged oil. Laboratory test results from samples taken on that trip show extremely high concentrations of oil in the Mississippi Sound.
James "Catfish" Miller and Mark Stewart, both lifelong fishermen, have refused to trawl for shrimp because they believe the Mississippi Sound contains submerged oil.

James "Catfish" Miller, third-generation fisherman. (Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
"I can't tell you how hard it is for me not to be shrimping right now, because I'm a trawler," Miller told Truthout as he piloted his shrimp boat out of Pass Christian Harbor, "That's what I do. I trawl."
But Miller and Stewart have been alarmed by their state's decision to reopen the waters, and have been conducting their own tests for oil in areas where they have fished for years. Their method was simple - they tied an absorbent pad to a weighted hook, dropped it overboard for a short duration of time, then pulled it up to find the results.

Miller and Mark Stewart attaching the sorbent pad to the weighted hook. (Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)

(Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)

(Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)

(Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
On each of the eight tests Truthout witnessed, the white pads were brought up covered in a brown oily substance that the fishermen identified as a mix of BP's crude oil and toxic dispersants.
The first test conducted was approximately one-quarter mile out from the harbor, and the pad pulled up was stained brown.

(Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
"They're letting people swim in this," Miller exclaimed, while holding the stained pad up to the sun.
Miller and Stewart were both in BP's Vessels Of Opportunity (VOO) program and were trained in identifying oil and dispersants.
This writer took two samples from two absorbent pads that were brought up from the water that were covered in brown residue and had them tested in a private laboratory via gas chromatography.

Miller and Dahr Jamail holding oil-soaked sorbent pad. (Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
The environmental analyst who worked with this writer did so on condition of anonymity, and performed a micro extraction that tests for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). The lower reporting limit the analyst is able to detect from a solid sample like the absorbent pad is 50 parts per million (ppm).
The first sample this writer took was from a sorbent pad dropped overboard to a depth of approximately eight feet and held there for roughly one minute. The location of this was 30 18.461 North, 089 14.171 West, taken at 9:40 AM. This sample tested positive for oil, with a hydrocarbon concentration of 479 ppm. Seawater that is free of oil would test at zero ppm of hydrocarbons.
The second sample this writer took was from a sorbent pad dropped overboard to a depth of approximately eight feet and held there for roughly one minute. The location of this was 30 18.256 North, 089 11.241 West, taken at 10:35 AM. This sample tested positive for oil, with a hydrocarbon concentration of 587 ppm.
"For the sorbent pads, I had to include the weight of the actual pad itself, so that the extraction was done as a solid," the environmental analyst explained. "Had I had enough liquid in these samples to do a liquid extraction, the numbers would have been substantially higher."
Jonathan Henderson, with the nonprofit environmental group, Gulf Restoration Network, was on board to witness the sampling.

Jonathan Henderson, coastal resiliency organizer of the Gulf Restoration Network. (Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
"I can verify that the shrimp boat captain retrieved what appeared to be an oily residue," Henderson told Truthout. "My suspicion is that it was oil. It felt like oil to the touch, and it smelled like oil when you sniffed it."
On August 11, the two fishermen brought out scientist Dr. Ed Cake of Gulf Environmental Associates. (Video from the "Bridge the Gulf Project" of that trip with Miller and Stewart finding an oil and dispersant mixture on open Mississippi fishing waters.)
Dr. Cake wrote of the experience: "When the vessel was stopped for sampling, small, 0.5- to 1.0-inch-diameter bubbles would periodically rise to the surface and shortly thereafter they would pop leaving a small oil sheen. According to the fishermen, several of BP's Vessels-of-Opportunity (Carolina Skiffs with tanks of dispersants [Corexit?]) were hand spraying in Mississippi Sound off the Pass Christian Harbor in prior days/nights. It appears to this observer that the dispersants are still in the area and are continuing to react with oil in the waters off Pass Christian Harbor."
Shortly thereafter, Miller took the samples to a community meeting in nearby D'Iberville to show fishermen and families the contaminated sorbent pads. At the meeting, fishermen unanimously supported a petition calling for the firing of Dr. Bill Walker, the head of Mississippi's DMR, who is responsible for opening the fishing grounds.
On August 9, Walker, despite ongoing reports of tar balls, oil and dispersants being found in Mississippi waters, declared "there should be no new threats" and issued an order for all local coast governments to halt ongoing oil disaster work being funded by BP money that was granted to the state.
Recent weeks in Mississippi waters have found fishermen and scientists finding oil in Garden Pond on Horn Island, massive fish kills near Cat Island and Biloxi, "black water" in Mississippi Sound, oil inside Pass Christian Harbor and submerged oil in Pass Christian, in addition to what Miller and Stewart showed Truthout and others with their testing.

Stewart, third-generation fisherman. (Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
"We've sent samples to all the news media we know, here in Mississippi and in [Washington] D.C.," Stewart, a third-generation fisherman from Ocean Springs told Truthout, "We had Ray Mabus' people on this boat, and we sent them away with contaminated samples they watched us take, and we haven't heard back from any of them."
Raymond Mabus is the United States Secretary of the Navy and a former governor of Mississippi. President Obama tasked him with developing "a long-term Gulf Coast Restoration Plan as soon as possible."
Mabus has been accused by many Gulf Coast fishermen of not living up to his task.
Thus, since neither the federal nor state governments will conduct the testing they feel is necessary, Miller and Stewart decided to take matters into their own hands.
Stewart had on board another homemade method of capturing oil in the water column. He took two tomato cages and filled them with sorbent pad, layered it in plastic to hold it together, and left a hole at the bottom for the water to flow through, creating a large sorbent cone that could flow through the water.
(Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)
The method proved fruitful. After several tests in the water column, being careful to never let it touch bottom, the cone was turned a dark brown with what turned out to be a very high concentration of oil.
"Normally we have a lot of white shrimp in the Sound right now," Stewart told Truthout of the current situation in the Mississippi Sound. "You can catch 500-800 pounds a night, but right now, there are very few people shrimping, and those that are, are catching nothing or maybe 200 pounds per night. You can't even pay your expenses on 200 pounds per night."
"We think they opened shrimp season prematurely," Miller told Truthout. "How can we put our product back on the market when everybody in America knows what happened down here? I have seen so many dead animals in the last few months I can't even keep count."

Jonathan Henderson holding the oil-soaked sorbent cone. (Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
On August 19, several commercial shrimpers, including Miller and Stewart, held a press conference at the Biloxi Marina. Other fishermen there were not fishing because they feared making people sick from toxic seafood they might catch.

(Photo © Erika Blumenfeld 2010)
"I don't want people to get sick," Danny Ross, a commercial fisherman from Biloxi told Truthout. "We want the government and BP to have transparency with the Corexit dispersants."
Ross said he has watched horseshoe crabs trying to crawl out of the water and other marine life like stingrays and flounder also trying to escape the water. He believes this is because the water is hypoxic due to the toxicity of the dispersants, of which BP admits to using approximately 1.9 million gallons.
"I will not wet a net and catch shrimp until I know it's safe to do so," Ross added, "I have no way of life now. I can't shrimp and others are calling the shots. For the next 20 years, what am I supposed to do? Because that's how long it's going to take for our waters to be safe again."
David Wallis, another fisherman from Biloxi, attended the press conference. "We don't feel our seafood is safe, and we demand more testing be done," Wallis told Truthout. "I've seen crabs crawling out of the water in the middle of the day. This is going to be affecting us far into the future."
"A lot of fishermen feel as we do. Most of them I talk to don't want the season opened, for our safety as well as others," Wallis added. "Right now there's barely any shrimp out there to catch. We should be overloaded with shrimp right now. That's not normal. I won't eat any seafood that comes out of these waters, because it's not safe."
Miller told Truthout that when he worked in BP's VOO program, "I came out here and looked at the oil and they didn't let us clean it up most days. Instead, I watched them spray dispersants on it at night, and now we're seeing acid rain burn holes in our plants. I've seen them spray Corexit from Carolina Skiffs with my own eyes. For the last several weeks now they keep shoving these lies in our face. You can only turn your head so far, for so long."
The hydrocarbon tests conducted on the samples taken by this writer only represent a tiny part of the Gulf compared to the massive area of the ocean that has been affected by BP's oil catastrophe. A comprehensive sampling regime across the Gulf, taken regularly over the years ahead, is clearly required in order to implement appropriate cleanup responses and take public safety precautions.
On their own, Miller and Stewart have made at least seven sampling runs, covering many tens of miles of the Mississippi Sound, and have, in their words, "rarely pulled up a sorbent pad that did not contain oil residue."

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
And a 2 MILE by 200' slick's
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 09:00 — Vic Anderson (not verified)And a 2 MILE by 200' slick's sliding toward Grand Isle!
+1 reason the USA NEEDS
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 09:43 — Anonarcmous (not verified)+1 reason the USA NEEDS 1-payer healthcare: to coordinate environmentally healthy & sound policy which the current fragmented-for-profits-setup denies: these & this oil/chemical stuff ARE the REAL DEATH PANELS.
don't say these things the
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 10:27 — Anonymous (not verified)don't say these things the emperor won't like it
What this country needs is
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 11:52 — drosera (not verified)What this country needs is an independent environmental monitoring agency which is not funded by the whims of Congress. The EPA is made up of former political figures as well as political appointees. It should be disbanded and replaced with an outfit that is funded through taxes levied on polluters. The recommendations of the new agency would have force of law: toxic shrimp would not be harvested or sold. Time to flush out the current crop of politicians and collect the new ones in the bowl. Then flush again and again. That way, they will only get two years of feeding off the public tit.
Obama want this oil gushing
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 12:24 — Liced-christ (not verified)Obama want this oil gushing incident DISAPPEARED by the time he runs for office again. That's what this giant conspiracy is about, this "it's fine to start fishing" absurdity. Environmental experts of the Exxon Valdez spill claim that that area STILL has not recovered. Compared the with magnitude of this spill, that was like a child pissing in pond.Corporations run the Obama administration. We should not be surprised. In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech the VICIOUS LORD OBAMA declared that it will NOT be individuals that bring peace or lasting change, but institutions. Which institutions? Corporate institutions. BP is handling this mess from beginning to end and what you hear out of Obama's mouth is what BP instructed him to say. Piss on Obama.
Clearly, the sheer
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 12:30 — Deimos Pater (not verified)Clearly, the sheer overflowing of corruption in the nation, is becoming evident to all, yes America you have been sold out.Never vote for Any Rep or Dem candidate in Any election, and Trust Not what Your Government Says, They are all FRAUDS, Liars, and Murderers
Go to Jail, corporate
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 12:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Go to Jail, corporate executives. Do Not Pass Go. Do Not Collect 200.
My question would be what
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 13:16 — Anonymous (not verified)My question would be what would the cone show prior to this particular oil spill. I get pretty tired of hearing about the pristine waters of the gulf coast. Maybe 200 years ago.
"What this country needs is
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 13:30 — Gurka von S. (not verified)"What this country needs is an independent environmental monitoring agency which is not funded by the whims of Congress" writes drosera. I could not agree more! And until that happens let us call the existing agency EDA - Environmental Destruction Agency.
We MUST all write our reps,
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 13:50 — Mg (not verified)We MUST all write our reps, and appear in person at their offices to DEMAND they take up legislation for A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY. This stuff will continue to get worse until many millions of us do this, remember it.
"Let all the evils that lurk
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 13:54 — Anonymous (not verified)"Let all the evils that lurk in the mud haaatch out." ~Emperor Claudius, from "I, Claudius"
So now you see what was
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 14:07 — Anonymous (not verified)So now you see what was hidden before. You were being lied to but you still trusted. Now it is obvious that all of gov't is corrupt and in bed with the corporate liars who exchange your children's future for money, who give you cancer so that they may profit, who push drugs on you that kill you. Greed is the party, and not the Dems or the Reps. They're the same vile system.
Are you mad enough now? What will you do with a gov't too sick to repair itself? The people have the power. Will you use more love or hate?
My fingers are crossed now:
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 14:35 — Anonymous (not verified)My fingers are crossed now: You conspiracy theorists try to bad-mouth everything big corporations and its representatives in regulatory bodies (including the legislature, executive and judiciary) do to enhance the quality of our lives through cleaning our water, air and food from naturally occurring poisons. These people work so tirelessly to serve humanity day and night without regard to making money or ruling the world. Shame on us all!!! Now I uncross my fingers. Read the opposite!
Do you trust large
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 14:41 — Anonymous (not verified)Do you trust large corporations not to re-label Gulf shrimp and fish as coming from some other country? How about a beach party with all the heads and suits who say the fish and shrimp are fine, and let them see and eat what comes out of the Gulf. Let us watch the dirty creatures be caught and let us watch the suits eat them. No substitutions.
Crude Science Reporting Here
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 15:58 — Environmental Science Major (not verified)Crude Science Reporting Here -
1) Did they test for dispersants?
2) Why didn't they collect the water itself?
3) How is concentration determined from dry sample?
These are serious holes in this story. TO: get someone with a scientific background to report on this sort of thing. As for reforming Federal Agencies - get in line! The FDA, the Federal Reserve Bank, the EPA, DHS, FEMA - all rotten to the core. This is not a 'Progressive vs Conservative' issue - it is a question of corruption - the nation needs to grow a pair and pick at least one major criminal (there are so many to choose from - and they run the damned country) and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and throw their ass in jail for real. We invite more of the same by sitting passively - this is how we run what was a magnificent country into the ground, as is happening. O has been of no use and has shown no leadership or courage in this - at all - he is one of them. It is up to us - we have to make a stink and abandon the whole Left/Right thing - it is a fraud.
Did this fisherman conduct
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 16:23 — Anonymous (not verified)Did this fisherman conduct tests before the spill? Does he have a record of the water quality before the spill? Has he controlled for alternative sources of hydrocarbons in the water? There are plenty of alternate explanations.
I believe that this spill was not handled properly or transparently, but the tests conducted by the fishermen here do not seem to have followed scientific protocal. Specifically, they began with the assumption that oil was in the water, declared what they found to
be BP's oil without means to confirm, and had no control for what the water was like before the spill.
Crude Science: Do you have
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 16:29 — Anonymous (not verified)Crude Science: Do you have a clue how much this testing costs? for Oil/Hydrocarbons minimum $60 per sample, for corexit minimum $300 per sample. These people have no money! And, the scientists are being threatened or bought.
Science is a good thing, but when it is perverted, you use what you can. I thought these fisherman did a pretty smart thing...and you can see it!!!
Me PhD
Why not sample the water
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 18:24 — Environmental Consultant (not verified)Why not sample the water directly? Use a tank sampler like this one:
http://www.labsafety.com/search/tank+sampler/24530877/
It will allow you to pull a sample of water from 8 feet in depth that is more representative of the water quality than what gets caught on an absorbent. I wish I was surprised that the representative from an environmental group who witnessed this wasn't more familiar with the basics of environmental sampling but I'm not. Want to change the world? Then get smarter than the people who are working against you.
This is a serious environmental disaster. Prove the extent of the ongoing damage by getting defensible data using accepted sampling methodology.
Hey, if oil goes up the
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 18:59 — Dr. Goat (not verified)Hey, if oil goes up the Mississip we won't have to drill for it anymore!
WIN!
Have some Kool-aide, its all
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 21:19 — Rev. Jim Jones (not verified)Have some Kool-aide, its all we have left to offer. Government Kool-aid for spoiled children with unrealistic senses of importance. Plastic bags for your five minute walk? 500 years for your 99 cent yogurt. Really, and how is that better than Palin or the rest of the whores on the right? Or can you see were just looking at our own reflections in the mirror. Don't be surprised, our harvest is coming in on schedule. Food shortages and economic collapse loom. The resource wars will be ruthless. Grab a beer, light a joint and turn on your TV brothers and sisters! I'm Jim Jones, spreading the Gospel!
Nice Article and finally
Sun, 08/29/2010 - 23:36 — Anna Nonymous (not verified)Nice Article and finally some good pictures of oil soaked handiwipes. Even the steel tri-hook weight had oil stains on it.
That boat seemed to be pretty far from shore.
Man, what a mess. I wouldn't want to snorkel in that! And I certainly wouldn't want to eat anything caught in that water.
On the brighter side, you wouldn't have to grease your frying pan. That sea-food comes pre-oiled. Just add lemon pepper. Mmm, yum-yum
The connection is cynical
Mon, 08/30/2010 - 01:15 — Underground Sanity (not verified)The connection is cynical but quite simple. Officially declare the area open for fishing and thereby undermine the validity of compensation claims by fishermen in the area. How much was the "official" paid by BP to make the declaration that the water in the area was safe? 10% of the claims defeated by the declaration would set him up with a nice pension.
You don't need to be a
Mon, 08/30/2010 - 09:05 — FR Tothus (not verified)You don't need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
To those who criticized the
Mon, 08/30/2010 - 09:57 — Anonymous (not verified)To those who criticized the scientific basis of this article: the authors never claim that it is a proper scientific test, and what they are reporting certainly seems to me to count as news.
As a scientist, I greatly appreciated the care with which the scientific content of the article is written. The authors are clearly not scientists or science journalists. To make up for that, they reported very carefully what they did: the tests, the materials (close enough -- "sorbent pads" is not very specific, but it gives the idea), and the results. There was enough information here to understand the strength of the evidence. It seems to me that they made a good case that there is cause for serious concern.
Where I would criticize the authors is not on the science reporting, but on the conventional reporting. It bothers me a great deal that Mabus's staff, NOAA staff, etc. were apparently not interviewed. They should be given a chance to comment on the findings and to explain why their own tests led them to re-open the area for fishing.
Regarding an earlier question of why the fishermen did not test before the spill... um... there's a good reason for that. They're fishermen, and there was no reason to suppose that the waters were about to be polluted by a major oil spill. However, the question is on target: what is the baseline that these observations should be compared to? That's an important question to answer, and a trained science writer would have asked it of a knowledgeable scientist. I wish these writers had asked it, since it would make it easier to evaluate the results, but it doesn't b0ther me that they didn't -- they're trying to alert the public, including other journalists and scientists, to a potentially serious problem.
Regarding the question about the methods used by the fishermen, the article clearly states that they had been trained by BP. The article implies, but doesn't explicitly state, that they are using methods like those they were trained to use. If that is the case, why should they switch?
So whos's telling the truth
Mon, 08/30/2010 - 16:48 — God Doesn't Like Ugly (not verified)So whos's telling the truth here?
Mississippi Shrimpers Refuse to Trawl, Fearing Oil, Dispersants
Dahr Jamail, Inter Press Service
Link: http://ipsnews.net:80/news.asp?idnews=52552
Quote: "*This story is part of a series of features on biodiversity by Inter Press Service...
Just because you paid to reprint it doesn't make it "your exclusive" article. A little honesty would do wonders for your reputation.
Time to stop eating fish! I
Tue, 08/31/2010 - 08:32 — Brian (not verified)Time to stop eating fish! I have no doubt oil and dispersants are still in the water, just more dispersed than before. And even if that wasn't true, any fish alive now could have ingested the chemicals earlier. Anyone with any brains at all knows this. I don't know who those agencies think they are fooling. Of course many people without brains will eat the fish, and the rates of cancer and other diseases will go up. Nobody will know for sure if this was the cause or one of the causes, but we will know the rates went up.
Even if you didn't want to be cautious, there are other good reason to stop eating fish now. It's not just that toxins are accumulating in fish all over the world, but overfishing is threatening many species of fish. Some are already in danger of extinction. Once they are gone, they are gone for good. Ocean acidity soon will also help to reduce the numbers of fish and increase extinction rates. Let's all stop eating fish now, to give them at least a small chance of making it through the period to come.
Those who criticize the
Tue, 08/31/2010 - 08:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Those who criticize the methods of these tests miss the point. Officials said the oil is gone, and they proved that is not true. It doesn't matter if it came from the BP spill or not. If there is enough oil to get the cloths visibly oily in just one minute, you do NOT want to eat fish that live and breathe that water for months and years.
Of course someone should really be testing random samples of fish as they are caught and reporting to the public the levels of oil and dispersants and other toxic chemicals found. Then people could make their own decisions. But these simple tests prove beyond any doubt that there is a significant amount of oil in the water where they were performed.
It really angers me that
Wed, 09/01/2010 - 03:40 — LEO MARQUEZ (not verified)It really angers me that Obama has nothing to say and the National Oceanic Society and the FDA is going to allow shrimp to be caught and sold to americans and the rest of the world that are caught in pollutted waters just so that BP can prtend that this contamination is finished. Mr. Obama, tell that to Sasha!!!
The real questions now are
Wed, 09/15/2010 - 14:11 — Anonymous (not verified)The real questions now are these: Are these waters safe? Is the spilled oil now almost totally recovered or is it still contaminating the gulf. Were dispersants used properly, responsibly and in a disciplined manner? Do we know about and fully understand the residual effects of this spill? Has BP been operating in a fully open and transparent manner? Have BP and government agencies colluded to obscure the truth? Has the US government properly fulfilled its obligations to protect the population from avoidable harm? Are the financial and environmental consequences of this disaster being monitored and reported. Will the problems created by this disaster be corrected? Will future spills be avoided.
ugg sales online
Fri, 10/12/2012 - 21:39 — Laggreda (not verified)ugg online outlet online wLBwyfdx http://www.ugg-boots-online.us/
gucci replica handbags
Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:36 — Mifyneew (not verified)you will like gucci replica bags and get big save jaGnzylQ http://guccireplicahandbags.legeeker.fr/
ugg usa
Sun, 10/21/2012 - 18:55 — PeemoJeD (not verified)buy best ugg usa for promotion code wdSZrxIM http://www.ugg-usa.net/
uggs outlets
Sun, 10/28/2012 - 13:40 — Drypeber (not verified)view uggs outlet at my estore cdpnVpHD http://www.uggs--outlet.org/
spyder ski jackets
Sun, 10/28/2012 - 21:04 — Whopousy (not verified)click to view spyder jackets on sale for more rKmBptNc http://www.spyder--jackets.net/
johnny knox jersey
Fri, 11/02/2012 - 23:56 — Jimmyao2gh (not verified)ctelt brandon jacobs jersey
wdjjg troy polamalu jersey
enhbs justin tuck jersey
fkmxt alex smith jersey
qvkzw london fletcher jersey
uggs outlet stores
Fri, 11/09/2012 - 19:54 — dabEmbah (not verified)cheap uggs outlet for gift CVUXNdzr http://www.uggs--outlet.org/
lyydym
Fri, 01/18/2013 - 19:42 — lyydym (not verified)tkqqey
rfalxs
Mon, 01/21/2013 - 06:48 — rfalxs (not verified)nimnatiz
izqwsyjy
Thu, 01/31/2013 - 09:00 — izqwsyjy (not verified)lciiwkmw
ovwxdqb
Thu, 01/31/2013 - 13:18 — ovwxdqb (not verified)tejywgy
christian louboutin outlet online
Mon, 02/04/2013 - 20:26 — emadeHub (not verified)click christian louboutin outlet ny MkCPwBJj [URL=http://www.christian--louboutin-outlet.net/]christian louboutin outlet online [/URL] online RsuPphzM http://www.christian--louboutin-outlet.net/
viagra
Tue, 02/05/2013 - 01:34 — viagra (not verified)leldzxj http://grmlca.com/ vbytny [url=http://mvbkwr.com/]vbytny[/url]
viagra
Thu, 02/07/2013 - 22:42 — viagra (not verified)gciwjfi http://upbsam.com/ lwpxlqs [url=http://unzjdi.com/]lwpxlqs[/url]
viagra
Thu, 02/07/2013 - 23:07 — viagra (not verified)stbmgzjw http://svnsde.com/ bxughhs [url=http://iugquo.com/]bxughhs[/url]
viagra
Fri, 02/08/2013 - 01:12 — viagra (not verified)hnbunn http://ybtdej.com/ auawmij [url=http://ublsye.com/]auawmij[/url]
viagra
Fri, 02/08/2013 - 02:00 — viagra (not verified)fjwrbn http://evyrwz.com/ dhhofcwg [url=http://geoiyn.com/]dhhofcwg[/url]
viagra
Fri, 02/08/2013 - 18:05 — viagra (not verified)mtjdbvj yhqdvij
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 01:20 — viagra (not verified)ojkcgcdk icwuhlc
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 01:22 — viagra (not verified)hcfxpr qlcruk
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 01:34 — viagra (not verified)jqhnbk htanuhj
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 01:37 — viagra (not verified)tujfub erwyxn
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 03:54 — viagra (not verified)bjugnc [url=http://gufdlo.com/]bftkmqe[/url]
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 08:21 — viagra (not verified)ychyndl [url=http://cgyhmo.com/]jzxpgirv[/url]
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 08:22 — viagra (not verified)fnpeawh [url=http://eljoqz.com/]ysqvfmdy[/url]
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 08:30 — viagra (not verified)nzrtmhi [url=http://fuuxny.com/]iwjoxjr[/url]
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 08:33 — viagra (not verified)jbbfwwvc [url=http://sorric.com/]iskejljx[/url]
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 10:14 — viagra (not verified)bvdtkrib http://btcnjp.com/
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 14:09 — viagra (not verified)wevizwty http://kdklof.com/
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 14:10 — viagra (not verified)vgkkdl http://cesdbw.com/
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 14:21 — viagra (not verified)mrdwvf http://zbmhcu.com/
viagra
Sat, 02/09/2013 - 14:23 — viagra (not verified)wjctbsxy http://txkycf.com/
viagra
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 22:57 — viagra (not verified)shfuhfgo
fast payday loan
Fri, 02/15/2013 - 19:52 — fast payday loan (not verified)nhkmrfh
quick payday loans
Wed, 02/20/2013 - 13:19 — quick payday loans (not verified)fplsxvrs
personal loans
Wed, 02/20/2013 - 14:34 — personal loans (not verified)otjhblb
no fax payday loans
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 13:45 — no fax payday loans (not verified)bvrmxgj
quickquid
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 14:57 — quickquid (not verified)xkkxjf
pay day loan
Mon, 02/25/2013 - 16:49 — pay day loan (not verified)tfvyshwu
payday loans
Mon, 03/04/2013 - 09:33 — payday loans (not verified)hyidppg
payday loan
Tue, 03/05/2013 - 09:02 — payday loan (not verified)wyrgfmv
payday loans
Tue, 03/05/2013 - 12:47 — payday loans (not verified)ztqsni
payday loans online
Wed, 03/06/2013 - 15:59 — payday loans online (not verified)vtaasdxq
viagra online
Thu, 03/07/2013 - 10:01 — viagra online (not verified)udpabn
payday advance
Tue, 03/12/2013 - 07:28 — payday advance (not verified)edupuppb
order viagra
Wed, 03/27/2013 - 08:27 — order viagra (not verified)axzynygb
cash advance
Wed, 03/27/2013 - 08:41 — cash advance (not verified)lzdnrpuk
fast cash advance
Fri, 03/29/2013 - 10:22 — fast cash advance (not verified)rhefygyk
generic viagra
Mon, 04/01/2013 - 09:34 — generic viagra (not verified)yxymics
payday loans australia
Mon, 04/01/2013 - 10:40 — payday loans australia (not verified)kywrky
generic viagra
Mon, 04/01/2013 - 11:56 — generic viagra (not verified)xugaajwd
buy cheap viagra online
Wed, 04/03/2013 - 23:39 — buy cheap viagra online (not verified)hwjqbz
payday loans
Thu, 04/04/2013 - 06:40 — payday loans (not verified)kmppxov
viagra order uk
Fri, 04/05/2013 - 12:05 — viagra order uk (not verified)txwitcp
viagra online
Sun, 04/07/2013 - 18:44 — viagra online (not verified)rumixtek
cheap viagra
Tue, 04/09/2013 - 12:20 — cheap viagra (not verified)eniunzok
payday loans
Tue, 04/09/2013 - 12:25 — payday loans (not verified)nwsbvett
payday loans online
Tue, 04/09/2013 - 13:45 — payday loans online (not verified)tgyobbka
cheap viagra
Tue, 04/09/2013 - 13:56 — cheap viagra (not verified)kjeigf
how to order viagra
Thu, 04/11/2013 - 19:05 — how to order viagra (not verified)svwocczc
no prescription order viagra online
Fri, 04/12/2013 - 00:25 — no prescription order viagra online (not verified)wnrpkvx
generic viagra
Fri, 04/12/2013 - 21:47 — generic viagra (not verified)jqmuevy
generic viagra
Sat, 04/13/2013 - 03:05 — generic viagra (not verified)slxltstt
paydayuk
Tue, 04/16/2013 - 05:26 — paydayuk (not verified)qkfrhwy
payday loans australia
Wed, 04/17/2013 - 05:59 — payday loans australia (not verified)cueqbfoh
quickquid
Sat, 04/27/2013 - 20:04 — quickquid (not verified)lakwld
pounds till payday
Sat, 05/04/2013 - 13:35 — pounds till payday (not verified)sthnrdiz
personal loans
Fri, 05/17/2013 - 10:10 — personal loans (not verified)zhyhylbx